CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02143583Updated Jun 24, 2015Results posted

Follow-up of Study AN004T to Assess the Persistence of AllerT Efficacy During the 2nd to 4th Season After Treatment

An observational study in Birch Pollen Allergy, sponsored by Anergis. Completed at 22 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-24.

Sponsored by Anergis · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
196
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study aiming to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-month pre-seasonal treatment with an AllerT 50 µg or 100 µg maintenance dose administered in previous study AN004T in reducing symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis during the 2nd following birch pollen season.

Read the detailed description

Multicenter, international, parallel-group follow-up study of subjects randomized and treated in Study AN004T (AllerT 100 µg, AllerT 50 µg, placebo) and followed over the 2nd, and if appropriate, the 3rd and 4th birch pollen seasons in this study (still double-blind during the 1st year, open-label in the 2nd and 3rd years).

02

Conditions studied

  • Birch Pollen Allergy

Keywords

  • rhinoconjunctivitis
  • birch pollen
  • desensitization
  • allergen immunotherapy
03

In context

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

392 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 196 is above the median of 96 across 30 observational studies indexed under Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal.

Browse Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal studies →

Lead sponsor

Anergis is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Subjects with moderate to severe allergic rhiniconjunctivitis to birch pollen

Inclusion criteria

  1. Any subject having been randomized in the AN004T trial and had received at least one injection
  2. Any subject having been informed and provided signed consent for participating in the trial and willing to follow all planned trial assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any subject having received specific immunotherapy against birch pollen or a tree pollen mix including birch pollen at any time since AN004T and before Visit 1
  2. Any subject intending to travel during the birch pollen season outside of the birch pollination area for more than 7 consecutive days
  3. Any subject unable or unwilling to record allergy symptoms and medications daily during the following birch pollen season using an electronic diary device
  4. Any subject not covered by medical insurance
  5. Any subject having received immunosuppressive medication within 4 weeks prior to inclusion, or planned to be used during the trial period
  6. Any subject having received systemic or local antihistamines, oral or inhaled corticosteroids or under anti depressant medication with antihistamine effect within 2 weeks prior to inclusion
  7. Any subject having used any investigational or non-registered drug, vaccine, or medical device within 4 weeks prior to inclusion, or planned to use such treatments during the trial period
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
196 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • AllerT 100 μg

    patients having received AllerT at a first dose of 50 μg and 4 maintenance doses of 100 μg in study AN004T

  • AllerT 50 μg

    patients having received AllerT at a first dose of 25 μg and 4 maintenance doses of 50 μg in study AN004T

  • Placebo

    Patients having received Placebo (i.e., adjuvant alone) delivered in the same manner as AllerT in study AN004T

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average of the Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (RSMS) Obtained Daily During the Birch Pollen Season

    The scale range is from 0 to 3. Lower is the the RSMS value, better is the efficacy as this implies that lower is the symptoms and concomitant medication intake by the patient The RSMS includes 2 subscales : the Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (RSS) with a range of values from 0 to 3 and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score Score (RMS) with also a range of values from 0 to 3 The RSMS is the sum of the RSS and RMS divided by 2 The Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (RSS) comprises 6 different symptoms from the nose and eyes. The sum of the 6 symptom scores divided by 6 will be used as the RSS (scale of 0 to 3). The daily Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score (RMS) will be determined by assigning daily scores as follows: 0 = no medication 1. = subject took topical antihistamine 2. = subject took oral antihistamine 3. = subject took oral corticosteroids

    Time frame: from the first of 3 consecutive days with a regional pollen count > 10 grains/m3 to the earliest between the 42nd day after the start of the season and the last day in the last occurrence of 3 consecutive days with a regional pollen count ≥ 10 grains/m3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average of the Total Score of the Validated Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-life Questionnaire© (Mini RQLQ) Obtained Weekly During the Birch Pollen Season

    The Mini-RQLQ will be used. This evaluation tool includes 14 questions assessing 5 domains (activity limitation, practical problems, nose symptoms, eye symptoms, and non-nose/eye symptoms). For each question the answer is quoted from 0: "no troubled" to 6: "extremely troubled"; then the average of the score for the 14 questions is calculated resulting in a scale from 0 to 6, 0 being the best case and 6 the worst case

    Time frame: between the 42nd day after the start of the season and the last day in the last occurrence of 3 consecutive days with a regional pollen count ≥ 10 grains/m3

07

Results

Posted Jun 24, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAllerT 100 μgAllerT 50 μgPlacebo
Started626668
Completed616666
Not completed102
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject101
Withdrew: Husband illness001

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage of the Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (RSMS) Obtained Daily During the Birch Pollen Season

The scale range is from 0 to 3. Lower is the the RSMS value, better is the efficacy as this implies that lower is the symptoms and concomitant medication intake by the patient The RSMS includes 2 subscales : the Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (RSS) with a range of values from 0 to 3 and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score Score (RMS) with also a range of values from 0 to 3 The RSMS is the sum of the RSS and RMS divided by 2 The Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (RSS) comprises 6 different symptoms from the nose and eyes. The sum of the 6 symptom scores divided by 6 will be used as the RSS (scale of 0 to 3). The daily Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score (RMS) will be determined by assigning daily scores as follows: 0 = no medication 1. = subject took topical antihistamine 2. = subject took oral antihistamine 3. = subject took oral corticosteroids

Time frame:
from the first of 3 consecutive days with a regional pollen count > 10 grains/m3 to the earliest between the 42nd day after the start of the season and the last day in the last occurrence of 3 consecutive days with a regional pollen count ≥ 10 grains/m3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Average of the Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (RSMS) Obtained Daily During the Birch Pollen Season
units on a scaleAllerT 100 μgAllerT 50 μgPlacebo
Average of the Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score (RSMS) Obtained Daily During the Birch Pollen Season0.853 ± 0.5240.795 ± 0.4210.959 ± 0.487
SecondaryAverage of the Total Score of the Validated Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-life Questionnaire© (Mini RQLQ) Obtained Weekly During the Birch Pollen Season

The Mini-RQLQ will be used. This evaluation tool includes 14 questions assessing 5 domains (activity limitation, practical problems, nose symptoms, eye symptoms, and non-nose/eye symptoms). For each question the answer is quoted from 0: "no troubled" to 6: "extremely troubled"; then the average of the score for the 14 questions is calculated resulting in a scale from 0 to 6, 0 being the best case and 6 the worst case

Time frame:
between the 42nd day after the start of the season and the last day in the last occurrence of 3 consecutive days with a regional pollen count ≥ 10 grains/m3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Average of the Total Score of the Validated Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-life Questionnaire© (Mini RQLQ) Obtained Weekly During the Birch Pollen Season
units on a scaleAllerT 100 μgAllerT 50 μgPlacebo
Average of the Total Score of the Validated Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-life Questionnaire© (Mini RQLQ) Obtained Weekly During the Birch Pollen Season1.486 ± 1.0171.479 ± 0.8791.767 ± 1.054

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AllerT 100 μg—0/62 (0%)2/62 (3.2%)
AllerT 50 μg—2/66 (3%)1/66 (1.5%)
Placebo—0/68 (0%)4/68 (5.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAllerT 100 μgAllerT 50 μgPlacebo
AngioedemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/621/660/68
Rash generalisedSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/621/660/68
Threatened laborPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/621/660/68
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAllerT 100 μgAllerT 50 μgPlacebo
NasopharyngitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/621/664/68

Baseline characteristics

Safety set : subjects having received at least one injection of AllerT or placebo in AN004T and successfully screened in AN005T

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AllerT 100 μgAllerT 50 μgPlaceboTotal
Mean39.0 ± 9.037.9 ± 9.435.5 ± 9.337.4 ± 9.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AllerT 100 μgAllerT 50 μgPlaceboTotal
Female303734101
Male32293495
08

Study locations

22 sites
  • Allergiklinikken
    Hellerup, Copenhagen 2900, Denmark
  • Lungemedicinsk Forskningsafdeling
    Arhus, 8000, Denmark
  • Klinisk Institute
    Odense, 5000, Denmark
  • Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, 67000, France
  • Viktorija Vevere private practice of Allergology
    Rezekne, 4601, Latvia
  • Center of examination and treatment of allergic diseases
    Riga, 1003, Latvia
  • Kaunas Clinics University Hospital
    Kaunas, 50009, Lithuania
  • Allergy Clinic JSC Perspektyvos
    Vilnius, 08431, Lithuania
  • Vilnius University Hospital
    Vilnius, 08661, Lithuania
  • Antakalnio affiliation of the Vilnius City Allergy Center
    Vilnius, 10200, Lithuania
  • SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny - Allergology
    Lodz, 90153, Poland
  • Alergologii Centrum
    Lodz, 90553, Poland
  • Alergotest
    Lublin, 20095, Poland
  • Alergo-Med
    Tarnow, 33100, Poland
  • Centrum Alergologii IRMED
    Warszawa, 01157, Poland
  • Silesian Piasts University of Medicine in Wrocław
    Wroclaw, 50-368, Poland
  • Aler-med
    Wroclaw, 54203, Poland
  • NZOZ Przychodnia Lekarska Hipokrates
    Zabrze, 41800, Poland
  • University hospital Skane
    Lund, 22185, Sweden
  • Orebro University Hospital
    Orebro, 70185, Sweden
  • Lungavdelningen, Vastmanlands
    Vasteras, 72189, Sweden
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
    Lausanne, VD 1005, Switzerland
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02143583
Lead sponsor
Anergis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Jul 2014
Results posted
Jun 24, 2015
Last update
Jun 24, 2015

Study contacts

Framçois SPERTINI, MD
principal investigator · University of Lausanne Hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion