CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01720251Updated Apr 13, 2015Results posted

Efficacy Study of a Preseasonal Treatment With AllerT in Subjects With Birch Pollen Allergy

A Phase 2 interventional study of placebo and AllerT low dose in Allergic Rhinitis and Rhinoconjunctivitis, sponsored by Anergis. Completed at 24 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-13.

Sponsored by Anergis · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of the trial is to demonstrate the efficacy of a two months pre-seasonal treatment with AllerT 100 µg maintenance dose in reducing symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis during the following birch pollen season

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergic Rhinitis
  • Rhinoconjunctivitis

Keywords

  • allergic rhinitis
  • birch pollen
  • immunotherapy
03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 240 is above the median of 89 across 906 interventional studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Anergis is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • moderate to severe allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to birch pollen:

    1. Score of symptoms of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (RSS) ≥ 12 during the two preceding birch pollen seasons
    2. Previous use of anti-allergy medications during the two preceding birch pollen seasons
    3. Positive SPT to birch pollen extract
    4. Positive specific IgE CAP test for Bet v 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled asthma, FEV1 \< 80% of predicted
  • previous SIT (specific immunotherapy) to birch pollen or any other SIT within 5 years
  • clinical symptoms due to allergens other than birch pollen during the whole trial period
  • history of anaphylaxis
  • positive skin prick test to AllerT
  • any other treatment or conditions which may increase the risk of the study for the subject or affect the efficacy assessments during the birch pollen season
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
240 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    SC injections of placebo

    Drug: placebo

  • Experimental
    AllerT low dose

    SC injections of AllerT 25 or 50 micrograms

    Drug: AllerT low dose

  • Experimental
    AllerT full dose

    SC injections of AllerT 50-100 micrograms

    Drug: AllerT full dose

Interventions

  • Drugplacebo

    SC injections of placebo on days 1, 7, 14, 28 and 56

  • DrugAllerT low dose

    SC injections of AllerT 25-50 micrograms on days 1, 7, 14, 28 and 56

    Also known as: AllerT 25-50 micrograms

  • DrugAllerT full dose

    SC injections of AllerT 50-100 micrograms on days 1, 7, 14, 28 and 56

    Also known as: AllerT 50-100 micrograms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score

    The efficacy analysis will be performed on the symptom and medication data collected from the first day of the birch pollen season as defined by pollen counts in the air in each site region (from March to May 2013 depending on site region), to 42 days later or to the end of the pollen season, whichever comes first. The scale range is from 0 to 3. Lower is the the RSMS value, better is the efficacy as this implies that lower is the symptoms and concomitant medication intake by the patient The RSMS includes 2 subscales : the Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (RSS) with a range of values from 0 to 3 and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score Score (RMS) with also a range of values from 0 to 3 The RSMS is the sum of the RSS and RMS divided by 2

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks during the birch pollen season 2013

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life

    mini-RQLQ questionnaires

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks during the birch pollen season 2013

  2. Safety and Tolerability

    Adverse events will be collected throughout the trial period and will be reported as Treatment emergent adverse events occurring between start of treatment and 28 days after completion of treatment for each subject

    Time frame: from start of treatment to 28 days after completion of treatment, i.e. for approximately 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Immunological Markers: Specific IgE and IgG4

    blood samples will be drawn at the above time points to measure immunological markers: specific IgE and IgG4

    Time frame: before treatment, 4 weeks after the last injection and 2 weeks before, at the peak time and within 2 weeks after the end of the expected birch pollen season 2013

07

Results

Posted Apr 13, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboAllerT Low DoseAllerT Full Dose
Started797982
Completed787782
Not completed120

Outcome measures

PrimaryCombined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score

The efficacy analysis will be performed on the symptom and medication data collected from the first day of the birch pollen season as defined by pollen counts in the air in each site region (from March to May 2013 depending on site region), to 42 days later or to the end of the pollen season, whichever comes first. The scale range is from 0 to 3. Lower is the the RSMS value, better is the efficacy as this implies that lower is the symptoms and concomitant medication intake by the patient The RSMS includes 2 subscales : the Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom Score (RSS) with a range of values from 0 to 3 and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score Score (RMS) with also a range of values from 0 to 3 The RSMS is the sum of the RSS and RMS divided by 2

Time frame:
up to 6 weeks during the birch pollen season 2013
Reported as:
Mean · score (maximum=3)
Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score
score (maximum=3)PlaceboAllerT Low DoseAllerT Full Dose
Combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom and Medication Score0.86 ± 0.6030.64 ± 0.5300.72 ± 0.573
SecondaryQuality of Life

mini-RQLQ questionnaires

Time frame:
up to 6 weeks during the birch pollen season 2013

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondarySafety and Tolerability

Adverse events will be collected throughout the trial period and will be reported as Treatment emergent adverse events occurring between start of treatment and 28 days after completion of treatment for each subject

Time frame:
from start of treatment to 28 days after completion of treatment, i.e. for approximately 12 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedImmunological Markers: Specific IgE and IgG4

blood samples will be drawn at the above time points to measure immunological markers: specific IgE and IgG4

Time frame:
before treatment, 4 weeks after the last injection and 2 weeks before, at the peak time and within 2 weeks after the end of the expected birch pollen season 2013

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—0/79 (0%)59/79 (74.7%)
Allert 50 µg—1/78 (1.3%)70/78 (89.7%)
AllerT 100 µg—2/82 (2.4%)70/82 (85.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboAllert 50 µgAllerT 100 µg
conjunctivitisEye disorders0/791/780/82
Oropharyngeal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders0/791/780/82
Tongue oedemaGastrointestinal disorders0/791/780/82
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/791/780/82
HypersensitivityGeneral disorders0/790/781/82
Skull fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/790/781/82
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboAllert 50 µgAllerT 100 µg
Injection site painSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders26/7920/7816/82
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/7912/7826/82
RhinitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/7922/7825/82
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/7917/7825/82
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/7920/7811/82
Injection site reactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10/7919/7815/82
Injection site erythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders18/797/7811/82
NasopharyngitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders14/7913/7816/82
Injection site oedemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/798/7813/82
ConjunctivitisEye disorders5/7911/7812/82

Baseline characteristics

In AllerT low dose group, one patient has been randomized but not treated explaining the difference beween baseline participants number and participant flow

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboAllerT Low DoseAllerT Full DoseTotal
Mean34.1 ± 9.0836.2 ± 9.9236.4 ± 9.3635.6 ± 9.45
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboAllerT Low DoseAllerT Full DoseTotal
Female384343124
Male413539115
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • Allergiklinikken
    Hellerup, Copenhagen 2900, Denmark
  • Lungemedicinsk Forskningsafdeling
    Arhus, 8000, Denmark
  • Klinisk Institute
    Odense, 5000, Denmark
  • CHU de Reims
    Reims, 51092, France
  • Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, 67000, France
  • Viktorija Vevere private practice of Allergology
    Rezekne, 4601, Latvia
  • Paul Stradins Clinical University Hospital - Pulmonology Allergology
    Riga, 1002, Latvia
  • Center of examination and treatment of allergic diseases
    Riga, 1003, Latvia
  • Kaunas Clinics University Hospital
    Kaunas, 50009, Lithuania
  • Allergy Clinic JSC Perspektyvos
    Vilnius, 08431, Lithuania
  • Vilnius University Hospital
    Vilnius, 08661, Lithuania
  • Antakalnio affiliation of the Vilnius City Allergy Center
    Vilnius, 10200, Lithuania
  • SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny - Allergology
    Lodz, 90153, Poland
  • Alergologii Centrum
    Lodz, 90553, Poland
  • Alergotest
    Lublin, 20095, Poland
  • Alergo-Med
    Tarnow, 33100, Poland
  • Centrum Alergologii IRMED
    Warszawa, 01157, Poland
  • Silesian Piasts University of Medicine in Wrocław
    Wroclaw, 50-368, Poland
  • Aler-med
    Wroclaw, 54203, Poland
  • NZOZ Przychodnia Lekarska Hipokrates
    Zabrze, 41800, Poland
  • University hospital Skane
    Lund, 22185, Sweden
  • Orebro University Hospital
    Orebro, 70185, Sweden
  • Lungavdelningen, Vastmanlands
    Vasteras, 72189, Sweden
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
    Lausanne, VD 1005, Switzerland
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01720251
Lead sponsor
Anergis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Sep 2013
Results posted
Apr 13, 2015
Last update
Apr 13, 2015

Study contacts

Francois Spertini, MD
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion