ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02141243Updated Jun 12, 2019

Prospective Evaluation of Lingual Frenotomy in Newborns With Simultaneous Lip Tie for the Relief of Breastfeeding Pain.

An interventional study of Lingual Frenotomy and Labial Frenotomy in Ankyloglossia, Breast Feeding and Enlarged Labial Frenum, sponsored by University of South Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 2 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-12.

Sponsored by University of South Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 2 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We are proposing to conduct a randomized, controlled trial of newborns in the maternal infant care areas at Tampa General Hospital. Participants who are determined eligible for the study (classified to have ankyloglossia via the HATLFF and either a Class III or IV maxillary labial frenum) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A or Group B. Group A will receive a sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #2. Group B will receive a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy, and breastfeeding will be monitored afterwards.

Read the detailed description

The study is a randomized control studies which aims to contribute data to a previous study on the effects of ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) on breastfeeding, and to also provide new information on the effects of maxillary lip-tie on breastfeeding. Participants who are determined eligible for the study (classified to have ankyloglossia via the HATLFF and either a Class III or IV maxillary labial frenum) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A or Group B. Group A will receive a sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #2. Group B will receive a lingual frenotomy procedure for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy, and breastfeeding will be monitored afterwards. These results will be analyzed to determine when lingual frenotomies, labial frenotomies, or both are necessary to improve breastfeeding pain and LATCH scores.

The study aims to prove that the simple and low risk frenotomy procedure should be considered as treatment for both ankyloglossia and maxillary lip-tie, preventing breastfeeding complications as well as many other future problems such as with speech and self esteem. It is hypothesized that the use of frenotomies as treatment for ankyloglossia and maxillary lip-tie will improve breastfeeding success for breastfeeding couplets with newborns with both ankyloglossia and maxillary lip-tie. It is expected to see an increase in LATCH score to >7 for breastfeeding sessions and a significant decrease in scoring on the pain scale after frenotomy intervention, while it is expected to see little change in LATCH and pain scale assessment scores after sham procedures. Overall data is not expected to vary significantly between Group A and Group B. It is also hypothesized that a lingual frenotomy alone will be sufficient to improve breastfeeding success without the need to also conduct a labial frenotomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankyloglossia
  • Breast Feeding
  • Enlarged Labial Frenum
03

In context

Ankyloglossia

32 studies on the registry are indexed under Ankyloglossia; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 105 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Ankyloglossia.

Browse Ankyloglossia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of South Florida is the lead sponsor of 340 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (24%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 2 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Newborn is full term (at least 37 weeks) and otherwise in good health.
  2. Newborn exhibits having ankyloglossia (score of less than 11 with failing lactation management or an appearance score lower than 8, based on HATLFF) and a Class III or Class IV maxillary lip-tie, simultaneously.
  3. Mother of newborn noted to have nipple pain or difficulty with breastfeeding (LATCH score of \<7).
  4. Mother of newborn has intention to exclusively breastfeed newborn.
  5. Mother of newborn signs a written for treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Premature newborns.
  2. Newborns older than 2 weeks.
  3. Newborns with craniofacial anomalies (i.e. cleft lip or palate).
  4. Newborns who are neurologically compromised.
  5. Mother has condition that could affect the milk supply (i.e diabetes).
  6. Mother of newborn is not English speaking and not able to read at least at a 6th grade level.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A

    All participants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group A infants will receive lingual frenotomy for intervention #1 and a sham procedure for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and a laser, (iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm) or scissors, will be used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.

    Procedure: Lingual Frenotomy · Procedure: Labial Frenotomy · Procedure: Sham Procedure

  • Experimental
    Group B

    All participating infants will receive both the lingual frenotomy and sham procedure. Group B infants will receive the sham procedure for intervention #1 and a lingual frenotomy for intervention #2. Newborns that continue to have difficulty with breastfeeding after both interventions will undergo intervention #3, a labial frenotomy. Sham/placebo procedure: infant brought into a procedure room and kept there for as long as the average experimental procedure would take (\~5 minutes). Lingual frenotomy: tongue will be elevated, expose frenulum with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators, and then incise frenulum tissue with a straight scissor. Maxillary labial frenotomy: 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area, upper lip lifted, frenum stretched, and an iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm laser used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.

    Procedure: Lingual Frenotomy · Procedure: Labial Frenotomy · Procedure: Sham Procedure

Interventions

  • ProcedureLingual Frenotomy

    For newborns receiving the ankyloglossia frenotomy, the tongue will be elevated and the frenulum exposed with a grooved director or 2 cotton tipped applicators. The frenulum tissue will then be incised with a straight scissor. If thick, it will be crushed with a straight clamp to provide anesthesia and decrease bleeding, and the exposed and previously clamped tongue frenulum will be incised with a straight scissor.

  • ProcedureLabial Frenotomy

    For newborns receiving the maxillary labial frenotomy, 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area. The upper lip will be lifted and the frenum stretched. Then an iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm laser will be used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.

  • ProcedureSham Procedure

    For newborns receiving the maxillary labial frenotomy, 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine will be injected into the area. The upper lip will be lifted and the frenum stretched. Then an iLaseTM 940 ± 15 nm laser will be used to release its attachment to the level of the periosteum.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale

    This visual pain analog scale is used to measure breastfeeding pain experienced by the mother.

    Time frame: after breastfeeding before intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #2, and during 1 week follow-up (also after intervention #3 if applicable)

  2. Change in LATCH score

    Latch, Audible swallowing, Type of nipple, Comfort, and Hold (LATCH) Breastfeeding Quality Assessment

    Time frame: after breastfeeding before intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #1, after breastfeeding after intervention #2, and during 1 week follow-up (also after intervention #3 if applicable)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dollberg S, Botzer E, Grunis E, Mimouni FB. Immediate nipple pain relief after frenotomy in breast-fed infants with ankyloglossia: a randomized, prospective study. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Sep;41(9):1598-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.024. PubMed 16952598 ↗
  • Kotlow L. Diagnosis and treatment of ankyloglossia and tied maxillary fraenum in infants using Er:YAG and 1064 diode lasers. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011 Apr;12(2):106-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03262789. PubMed 21473843 ↗
  • Segal LM, Stephenson R, Dawes M, Feldman P. Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of ankyloglossia: methodologic review. Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jun;53(6):1027-33. PubMed 17872781 ↗
  • Buryk M, Bloom D, Shope T. Efficacy of neonatal release of ankyloglossia: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug;128(2):280-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0077. Epub 2011 Jul 18. PubMed 21768318 ↗
  • Edmunds J, Miles SC, Fulbrook P. Tongue-tie and breastfeeding: a review of the literature. Breastfeed Rev. 2011 Mar;19(1):19-26. PubMed 21608523 ↗
  • Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O'Hare D, Schanler RJ, Eidelman AI; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):496-506. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2491. PubMed 15687461 ↗
  • Masaitis NS, Kaempf JW. Developing a frenotomy policy at one medical center: a case study approach. J Hum Lact. 1996 Sep;12(3):229-32. doi: 10.1177/089033449601200321. PubMed 9025430 ↗
  • Wiessinger D, Miller M. Breastfeeding difficulties as a result of tight lingual and labial frena: a case report. J Hum Lact. 1995 Dec;11(4):313-6. doi: 10.1177/089033449501100419. PubMed 8634108 ↗
  • Kotlow LA. The influence of the maxillary frenum on the development and pattern of dental caries on anterior teeth in breastfeeding infants: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. J Hum Lact. 2010 Aug;26(3):304-8. doi: 10.1177/0890334410362520. Epub 2010 Mar 22. PubMed 20308621 ↗
  • Bagga S, Bhat KM, Bhat GS, Thomas BS. Esthetic management of the upper labial frenum: a novel frenectomy technique. Quintessence Int. 2006 Nov-Dec;37(10):819-23. PubMed 17078281 ↗
  • Kotlow LA. Diagnosing and understanding the maxillary lip-tie (superior labial, the maxillary labial frenum) as it relates to breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 2013 Nov;29(4):458-64. doi: 10.1177/0890334413491325. Epub 2013 Jul 2. PubMed 23821655 ↗
  • Amir LH, James JP, Donath SM. Reliability of the hazelbaker assessment tool for lingual frenulum function. Int Breastfeed J. 2006 Mar 9;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-1-3. PubMed 16722609 ↗
  • Jensen D, Wallace S, Kelsay P. LATCH: a breastfeeding charting system and documentation tool. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1994 Jan;23(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1994.tb01847.x. PubMed 8176525 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02141243
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2014
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Apr 2018
Completion
May 2018
Last update
Jun 12, 2019

Study contacts

Pat Ricalde, MD
principal investigator · University of South Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion