A Phase 2 interventional study of crizotinib and pemetrexed disodium in Adenocarcinoma of the Lung, Large Cell Lung Cancer and Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by SWOG Cancer Research Network. Terminated at 167 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-20.
Sponsored by SWOG Cancer Research Network · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This randomized phase II trial studies how well pemetrexed disodium with or without crizotinib works in treating patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer that has progressed after crizotinib. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as pemetrexed disodium, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Crizotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether giving pemetrexed disodium is more effective with or without crizotinib in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer that has progressed after crizotinib.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of crizotinib and pemetrexed (pemetrexed disodium) compared to pemetrexed monotherapy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+ non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who achieved clinical benefit with crizotinib monotherapy and subsequently progressed systemically.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the response rate (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial responses) in patients randomized to receive pemetrexed monotherapy to historical data.
II. To assess overall survival in both arms. III. To evaluate the patterns of failure (central nervous system [CNS], extra-CNS) of the combination of crizotinib and pemetrexed and of pemetrexed monotherapy in ALK+ non-squamous NSCLC after progression on crizotinib.
IV. To evaluate the frequency and severity of toxicities resulting from the administration of crizotinib and pemetrexed compared to pemetrexed monotherapy.
V. To evaluate PFS and the response rate in patients treated with crizotinib following progression on the pemetrexed monotherapy arm.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) and response rates (RR) between ALK dominant and ALK non-dominant patients in the entire study population and within each treatment arm.
II. To evaluate if the magnitude of difference in these outcomes between ALK dominant and ALK non-dominant patients varies by treatment arm.
III. To assess blood biomarkers of sensitivity and resistance to crizotinib and pemetrexed in an exploratory manner. The blood biomarkers include cell free circulating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), micro ribonucleic acid (microRNA) before treatment, during treatment (after 2 cycles) and at treatment progression.
IV. To assess pharmacogenomic factors in peripheral blood that might affect the drug level and treatment outcomes in an exploratory manner.
V. To assess proteomic/immunologic parameters that might affect the treatment outcomes in an exploratory manner.
VI. To evaluate the frequency of individual mechanisms of resistance (copy number gain [CNG], mutation, alternate oncogene).
VII. To identify alternative driver mechanisms in ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization positive (FISH+) otherwise unknown.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive crizotinib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-21 and pemetrexed disodium intravenously (IV) over 10 minutes on day 1.
ARM II: Patients receive pemetrexed disodium IV over 10 minutes on day 1. Upon disease progression or symptomatic deterioration, patients may crossover to Arm I.
In both arms, courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 3 years.
7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →SWOG Cancer Research Network is the lead sponsor of 328 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.
Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients receive crizotinib PO BID on days 1-21 and pemetrexed disodium IV over 10 minutes on day 1.
Drug: crizotinib · Drug: pemetrexed disodium · Other: laboratory biomarker analysis · Other: pharmacological study
ARM II: Patients receive pemetrexed disodium IV over 10 minutes on day 1. Upon disease progression or symptomatic deterioration, patients may crossover to Arm I.
Drug: pemetrexed disodium · Other: laboratory biomarker analysis · Other: pharmacological study
Given PO
Also known as: c-met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor PF-02341066, c-met/HGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor PF-02341066, MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PF-02341066, PF-02341066
Given IV
Also known as: ALIMTA, LY231514, MTA
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Also known as: pharmacological studies
PFS Between Patients Randomized to Receive Pemetrexed Disodium Monotherapy Versus Crizotinib and Pemetrexed Disodium Combination Therapy
A stratified log-rank test at the 0.10 level will be used to test the primary hypothesis comparing the two treatment arms.
Time frame: From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Incidence of Adverse Events of Crizotinib in Combination With Pemetrexed Disodium, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
Comparisons of toxicities rates will be done using a Fisher's exact or chi-squared test of independence, when appropriate using 10% as the significance threshold. Within each treatment arm, any toxicity with at least 5% prevalence has at least a 95% chance of being observed.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Response Rate (Confirmed and Unconfirmed) With Pemetrexed Disodium Monotherapy
Comparisons of response rates will be done using a chi-square test of independence using 10% as the significance threshold. Within each treatment arm, response rates can be estimated to within 13% (with 95% confidence).
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Response Rates (Confirmed and Unconfirmed) of Crizotinib With Pemetrexed Disodium
Comparisons of response rates will be done using a chi-square test of independence using 10% as the significance threshold. Within each treatment arm, response rates can be estimated to within 13% (with 95% confidence).
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Patterns of Failure
Defined as CNS-only, extra-CNS, and both CNS and extra-CNS progression between the treatment arms. Evaluated within each treatment arm using cumulative incidence curves.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
Overall Survival
Differences in OS by treatment arm will be evaluated using a 1-sided log-rank test with significant level of 10%.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
| Milestone | Arm I (Crizotinib, Pemetrexed Disodium) | Arm II (Pemetrexed Disodium) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 0 | 0 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
A stratified log-rank test at the 0.10 level will be used to test the primary hypothesis comparing the two treatment arms.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Comparisons of toxicities rates will be done using a Fisher's exact or chi-squared test of independence, when appropriate using 10% as the significance threshold. Within each treatment arm, any toxicity with at least 5% prevalence has at least a 95% chance of being observed.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Comparisons of response rates will be done using a chi-square test of independence using 10% as the significance threshold. Within each treatment arm, response rates can be estimated to within 13% (with 95% confidence).
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Comparisons of response rates will be done using a chi-square test of independence using 10% as the significance threshold. Within each treatment arm, response rates can be estimated to within 13% (with 95% confidence).
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Defined as CNS-only, extra-CNS, and both CNS and extra-CNS progression between the treatment arms. Evaluated within each treatment arm using cumulative incidence curves.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Differences in OS by treatment arm will be evaluated using a 1-sided log-rank test with significant level of 10%.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Collected over Up to 3 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Crizotinib, Pemetrexed Disodium) | — | — | — |
| Arm II (Pemetrexed Disodium) | — | — | — |
The one patient that enrolled immediately withdrew consent \[enrolled the day before the study closed\]. No manuscript will be forthcoming.
| Age, Categorical | Arm I (Crizotinib, Pemetrexed Disodium) | Arm II (Pemetrexed Disodium) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | — | — | — |
| Between 18 and 65 years | — | — | — |
| >=65 years | — | — | — |
| Age, Continuous | Arm I (Crizotinib, Pemetrexed Disodium) | Arm II (Pemetrexed Disodium) | Total |
|---|
| Sex: Female, Male | Arm I (Crizotinib, Pemetrexed Disodium) | Arm II (Pemetrexed Disodium) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | — | — | — |
| Male | — | — | — |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Arm I (Crizotinib, Pemetrexed Disodium) | Arm II (Pemetrexed Disodium) | Total |
|---|
Showing the first 100 of 167 sites.
This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
SWOG Cancer Research Network