CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02132975PROSBOT-ApolloUpdated Oct 18, 2016

Motorised Probe Holder Assisting Prostate Biopsies

An interventional study of Biopsies using Apollo and UroStation® and Biopsies using UroStation® (image fusion) in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by AdministrateurCIC. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-18.

Sponsored by AdministrateurCIC · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Study, for the first time in clinical conditions, the potential contribution, in terms of accuracy, of the motorised probe holder during prostate biopsies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • prostate
  • cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • of-age patient
  • patient for whom a prostate biopsies session is planned
  • patient affiliated to the social security or equivalent
  • patient having a target identified on MRI
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication
  • patient wearing a mechatronic device
  • patient concerned by the L1121-6 à 8 of the health public code
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    With motorised probe handler

    The surgeon use the motorised probe handler to do the biopsy

    Device: Biopsies using Apollo and UroStation® · Procedure: Biopsies using UroStation® (image fusion)

  • Experimental
    Without motorised probe handler

    The surgeon do the biopsy as he usually do.

    Procedure: Biopsies using UroStation® (image fusion)

Interventions

  • DeviceBiopsies using Apollo and UroStation®

    Apollo : Motorised probe handler for prostate biopsies

  • ProcedureBiopsies using UroStation® (image fusion)
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Distance between virtual and effective biopsy, in the two arms

    Time frame: 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Success rate in locking/releasing the probe combined with success rate in performing a full exploration of the prostate

    Time frame: 8 months

  2. Probe holder positions error between virtual and effective biopsy

    Time frame: 8 months

  3. User satisfaction

    * biopsies session duration * device manageability * device unwiediness * contribution of the lock of the probe * set up, cleaning * global satisfaction

    Time frame: 2 hours

  4. Safety Evaluation

    * number of time the device couldn't be started * number of times the emergency button was pushed * number of time the biopsy couldn't entirely be done using the device * number of time the device protections had to be repositioned

    Time frame: 2 hours

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Urology, AP-HP Pitié Salpêtrière
    Paris, Ile de France 75561, France
07

References and documents

Related links

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02132975
Lead sponsor
AdministrateurCIC
Collaborators
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Institute for Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Clinical Investigation Centre for Innovative Technology Network
Responsible party
AdministrateurCIC (Coordinating investigator, University Hospital, Grenoble) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 7, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Last update
Oct 18, 2016

Study contacts

Pierre Mozer, MD, PhD
principal investigator · AP-HP Pitié Sapêtrière

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion