An interventional study of LIS302DL accelerometer in Urinary Disorders, sponsored by AdministrateurCIC. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-11.
Sponsored by AdministrateurCIC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
The purpose of this study is to determine if it is possible to identify activities in the daily accelerometer measures of a person with urinary disorders.
AdministrateurCIC is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Recording for 24 hours accelerations related to daily physical activity of the patient.
Number of patients with urinary disorders for which it is possible to identify automatically activities among all the daily accelerometer data.
Intrinsic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, ROC curve) of the test for detecting in automated way the activities among all the daily accelerometer data
Time frame: 6 months
Score of satisfaction with the use of the medical device, assessed by the patients
Score between 0 and 10, takes into account the feasibility of the proposed approach and the patient felt the importance of this feasibility.
Time frame: 6 months
The record gives a start of Feb 2012, a primary completion of Jul 2013 and a completion of Jul 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
AdministrateurCIC