A Phase 1 interventional study of Azacitidine and Decitabine in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, de Novo Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Essential Thrombocythemia, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-30.
Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
This phase I/Ib trial studies the side effects and best dose of azacitidine and sonidegib or decitabine and so see how well they work in treating patients with myeloid malignancies. The hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway plays an important role in cellular growth, differentiation and repair. Inappropriate activation of Hh pathway signaling and uncontrolled cellular proliferation may be associated with mutations in the Hh-ligand cell surface receptor Smo. Sonidegib binds to the Hh cell surface receptor Smo, which may result in the suppression of the Hh signaling pathway and the inhibition of cancer cells. Azacitidine and decitabine may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving azacitidine together with sonidegib or decitabine may be a safe and successful treatment for patients with myeloid malignancies.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of LDE225 (sonidegib) (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine (overall); LDE225 (days 1-7) in combination with azacitidine (overall); and LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with decitabine (overall). (Phase I) II. To estimate the efficacy of LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine in the following subgroups: untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap; relapsed/refractory AML/CMML/MDS/MPN overlap; and myelofibrosis (MF) only. (Phase Ib)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the duration of response, time to progression, overall survival, and time to AML or death (for MDS subjects) of LDE225 (days 1-28) in combination with azacitidine (overall and by cohort). (Phase I/1b)
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To conduct correlative studies to measure HH pathway activation and inhibition and explore biomarkers of response.
II. To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported symptoms using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-Core (C)30 in subjects treated with LDE225 in combination with azacitidine or decitabine.
OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of erismodegib.
Patients receive azacitidine subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) on days 1-7, sonidegib orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28 or 1-7* or decitabine IV on days 1-5. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
*NOTE: Sonidegib PO QD is given on days 1-7 if in combination with azacitidine or on days 1-28 is given if in combination with decitabine.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months until progressive disease and then every 6 months for 2 years.
5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 637 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 63 is above the median of 38 across 4,248 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.
Browse Leukemia studies →Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.
Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with one of the following diagnoses:
MDS and CMML patients relapsed/refractory to hypomethylating agents as evidenced by one of the following:
Progressed after treatment with hypomethylating agents had been discontinued
Exclusion Criteria:
Any of the following prior therapies:
Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant heart disease, including any one of the following:
Any of the following:
NOTE: adequate contraception is defined as either:
Use a combination of the following:
Barrier method of contraception: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/vaginal suppository
Patients receive azacitidine SC or IV on days 1-7, sonidegib PO QD on days 1-28 or 1-7\* or decitabine IV on days 1-5. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NOTE: Sonidegib PO QD is given on days 1-7 if in combination with azacitidine or on days 1-28 is given if in combination with decitabine.
Drug: Azacitidine · Drug: Decitabine · Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis · Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment · Drug: Sonidegib
Given SC or IV
Also known as: 5 AZC, 5-AC, 5-Azacytidine, 5-AZC, Azacytidine, Azacytidine, 5-, Ladakamycin, Mylosar, U-18496, Vidaza
Given IV
Also known as: 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine, Dacogen, Decitabine for Injection, Deoxyazacytidine, Dezocitidine
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment
Given PO
Also known as: ERISMODEGIB, LDE-225, LDE225, Odomzo, Smoothened Antagonist LDE225
Best overall response (complete response [CR] or complete response with incomplete recovery [CRi]) in untreated AML, CMML, MDS, or MDS/MPN Overlap patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Best overall response (CR or CRi) in myelofibrosis patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Best overall response (CR or CRi) in relapsed/refractory AML, CMML, MDS, or MDS/MPN Overlap patients (Phase IB [Dose Expansion])
The proportion of CR/CRi responses will be estimated (by cohort) by the number of CR/CRi responses divided by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% exact binomial confidence intervals will be computed. The frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories will also be computed. Best overall response over all cycles of study treatment will also be described using frequency and relative frequency of individual response categories.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
MTD defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients) (Phase I)
Graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0.
Time frame: 42 days
Duration of response
The distribution of duration of response will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Date at which the patient's earliest best objective status is first noted to be a CR/CRi response to the earliest date progression is documented, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Incidence of adverse events graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (Phase IB [dose expansion])
The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns (by cohort and overall). Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. The rate of grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events, and the rate of grade 4 or higher adverse event (hematologic and non-hematologic) will be computed each with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Overall survival
The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to AML
The distribution of time to AML will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to leukemic transformation due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to death
The distribution of time to death will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Time to progression
The distribution of time to progression will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Time frame: Time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 30 days post-treatment
Biomarker levels
Statistical analysis of each biomarker will be primarily descriptive. Continuous biomarker levels will be explored in a graphical manner including mean plots and plots of change and percent change from baseline and other summary measures. Any potential relationships between the baseline level or change in the level of each biomarker and clinical outcome such as overall response, 6-month progression and survival, and adverse event incidence will be further analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or logistic regression methods, as appropriate.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
Patient-reported outcomes (quality of life and symptoms) as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and MPN-SAF Total Symptom Score (TSS)
Scale score trajectories over time will be examined using stream plots and mean plots with standard deviation error bars overall. Changes from baseline at each cycle will be statistically tested using paired t-tests, and standardized response means (mean of the change from baseline scores at a given cycle, divided by the standard deviation of the change scores) will be interpreted (after applying Middel's adjustment) using Cohen's cut-offs.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-treatment
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mayo Clinic