ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02125877Updated Jul 25, 2017Results posted

Phase II Study to Investigate the Benefits of an Improved Deferasirox Formulation (Film-coated Tablet)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Deferasirox dispersible tablet and Defearisox film-coated tablet in Chronic Iron Overload Due to Transfusion-dependant Anemias, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 51 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 10 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-25.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
173
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assessed the new film-coated tablet formulation to the currently approved dispersible tablet formulation with regards to overall safety, Gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability, palatability, satisfaction and compliance

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Iron Overload Due to Transfusion-dependant Anemias

Keywords

  • Iron overload
  • Chelation
  • Thalassemia
  • Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)
  • Transfusional hemisiderosis
  • Deferasirox
  • ICL670
  • Dispersible tablet
  • Film-coated tablet
03

In context

Iron Overload

168 studies on the registry are indexed under Iron Overload; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 173 is above the median of 60 across 108 interventional studies indexed under Iron Overload.

Browse Iron Overload studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,711 studies on the registry; 218 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 435 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients aged ≥ 10 years
  • Patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia and iron overload, requiring deferasirox DT at doses of ≥ 30 mg/kg/day as per the investigator's decision OR Patients with very low, low or intermediate (int) risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and iron overload, requiring deferasirox DT at doses of ≥ 20 mg/kg/day as per the investigator's decision.
  • History of transfusion of at least 20 PRBC units and anticipated to be transfused with at least 8 units of PRBCs annually during the study
  • Serum ferritin > 1000 ng/mL, measured at screening Visit 1 and screening Visit 2 (the mean value will be used for eligibility criteria).

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Creatinine clearance below the contraindication limit in the locally approved prescribing information. Creatinine clearance will be estimated from serum creatinine at screening Visit 1 and screening Visit 2 and the mean value will be used for eligibility criteria.
  • Serum creatinine > 1.5 xULN at screening measured at screening Visit 1 and screening Visit 2 (the mean value will be used for eligibility criteria).
  • ALT (SGPT) > 5xULN, unless LIC confirmed as >10 mg Fe/dw within 6 months prior to screening visit 1.
  • Significant proteinuria as indicated by a urinary protein/creatinine ratio > 0.5 mg/mg in a non-first void urine sample at screening Visit 1 or screening Visit 2.
  • Patients with significant impaired gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of oral deferasirox (e.g. ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, or small bowel resection).
  • Liver disease with severity of Child-Pugh Class B or C
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
173 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Deferasirox dispersible tablet (DFX-DT)

    Iron chelation naïve participants received DFX-DT 20 mg/kg/day once daily orally from weeks 1 - 4. After week 4, the dose could be adjusted by +/- 5 to 10 mg/kg/day, with a maximum dose of 40 mg/kg/day. Iron chelation pre-treated participants were supposed to start on a dose that was equivalent to their pre-washout dose.

    Drug: Deferasirox dispersible tablet

  • Experimental
    Deferasirox film-coated tablet (DFX-FCT)

    Participants received DFX-FCT 14 mg/kg/day once daily orally from weeks 1 - 4. After week 4, the dose could be adjusted by +/- 3.5 to 7 mg/kg/day, with a maximum dose of 28 mg/kg/day. Iron chelation pre-treated participants were supposed to start on a dose that was equivalent to their pre-washout dose

    Drug: Defearisox film-coated tablet

Interventions

  • DrugDeferasirox dispersible tablet

    Deferasirox DT was provided as 125 mg, 250 mg and 500 mg dispersible tablets for oral use.

    Also known as: ICL670, DT (dispersible tablet)

  • DrugDefearisox film-coated tablet

    Deferasirox FCT was provided as 90 mg, 180 mg and 360 mg film-coated tablets for oral use.

    Also known as: ICL670, FCT (film-coated tablet)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Safety as Measured by Frequency of Adverse Events

    The percentage of participants with adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths was assessed.

    Time frame: 28 weeks

  2. Overall Safety as Measured by Changes in Laboratory Values From Baseline

    The percentage of participants with post-baseline laboratory values meeting specified criteria for notable/extended range was assessed. The following laboratory parameters were measured: platelet count, absolute neutrophils, serum creatinine , creatinine clearance, urinary protein/urinary creatinine ratio, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Note that within data categories, creat = creatinine, cons = consecutive, ULN = upper limit of normal and urin = urinary.

    Time frame: baseline (BL), 30 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Selected Gastro-intestinal (GI) Adverse Events

    The percentage of participants with any GI adverse event, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain was assessed.

    Time frame: 28 weeks

  2. Mean Domain Scores of the Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation Therapy (Modified SICT)

    The modified SICT consisted of 13 items that represent 3 domains: adherence, satisfaction and concerns. The adherence domain consisted of 7 items, 6 which were measured using a 5-point response scale and was calculated by summing the 6 items. The score range from 6 to 30 and higher scores indicated worse adherence. The satisfaction domain consisted of 3 items, 2 which were measured using a 5-point response scale and was calculated by summing the 2 items. The score range from 2 to 10 and higher scores indicated worse satisfaction. The concerns domain consisted of 3 items to address any concerns or worries with his/her medication. All 3 items were measured on a 5-point response scale and were calculated by summing the 3 items. The score range from 3 to 15 and higher scores indicated fewer concerns. For all three domains, the meaningful difference between two treatment arms was determined to be 1 point.

    Time frame: weeks 2, 3, 13 and 24 (end of treatment or within 7 days of last dose)

  3. Palatability Questionnaire Score

    The palatability questionnaire consisted of 4 items. The first item measured the taste and aftertaste of the medication and were scored a on a 5-point response scale. The second item offered an additional response option of "no aftertaste". The last 2 items referred to whether the medication was taken, i.e. swallowed or vomited, and how the participant perceived the amount of medication to be taken. The palatability summary score was calculated using a scoring matrix from items 1, 3 and 4 scores and the score ranges from 0 - 11. Higher scores indicated the best palatability. A meaningful difference between two treatment arms was determined to be 1 point.

    Time frame: weeks 2, 3, 13 and 24 (end of treatment or within 7 days of last dose)

  4. Weekly Average of Daily Scores of the Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptom Diary

    The GI symptom diary consisted of 6 items, five which were scored using a 0 - 10 rating scale with item appropriate anchors to rate the symptom, for example, Pain in your belly: 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain. The GI diary summary score was created using the 10 point response scale for the 5 items. The GI symptom daily diary had a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 50. The weekly average score for the 7 days was calculated for each individual item and the GI summary score was created from these weekly averages. Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A meaningful difference between two treatment arms was determined to be 0.3 point.

    Time frame: weeks -1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  5. Number of Participants With Weekly Average Compliance of Medication Consumption

    A compliance questionnaire assessed whether the medication was taken. Weekly average compliance was calculated when there were at least four non-missing daily responses.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24

  6. Weekly Dose Violation Rate

    The dose violation is defined as a dose either missed completely or not taken in accordance with the timing instruction (no later than 12:00 pm. The rate was calculated as \[number of dose violations/drug exposure (days)\] x 100.

    Time frame: weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  7. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)

    Blood samples were collected to assess AUClast.

    Time frame: week 1, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose; week 3, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose

  8. Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax)

    Blood samples were collected to assess Cmax.

    Time frame: week 1, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose; week 3, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose

  9. Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)

    Blood samples were collected to assess Tmax.

    Time frame: week 1, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose; week 3, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose

  10. Dererasirox Plasma Concentration

    Blood samples were collected to assess deferasirox concentration. Dose-adjusted calculations are presented: (concentration/actual dose)\*20 for participants on DFX-DT and (concentration/actual dose)\*14 for participants on DFX-FCT.

    Time frame: Week 3, day 1, pre-dose (0 hour (h)) and 2 h post-dose; week 13, day 1, pre-dose (0 hour (h)) and 2 h post-dose; and week 21, day 1, pre-dose (0 hour (h)) and 2 h post-dose

07

Results

Posted Oct 18, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
Started8687
Pharmacokinetic analysis set8383
Pharmacokinetic subset a1615
Safety set8687
Completed7377
Not completed1310
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Administrative problems01
Withdrew: Participant/guardian decision02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject21
Withdrew: Protocol deviation41
Withdrew: Adverse event64

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Safety as Measured by Frequency of Adverse Events

The percentage of participants with adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths was assessed.

Time frame:
28 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Safety as Measured by Frequency of Adverse Events
Percentage of participantsDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
Adverse events89.589.7
SAEs15.118.4
Deaths01.1
PrimaryOverall Safety as Measured by Changes in Laboratory Values From Baseline

The percentage of participants with post-baseline laboratory values meeting specified criteria for notable/extended range was assessed. The following laboratory parameters were measured: platelet count, absolute neutrophils, serum creatinine , creatinine clearance, urinary protein/urinary creatinine ratio, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Note that within data categories, creat = creatinine, cons = consecutive, ULN = upper limit of normal and urin = urinary.

Time frame:
baseline (BL), 30 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Safety as Measured by Changes in Laboratory Values From Baseline
Percentage of participantsDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
platelet count, notable range: <100 x 10^9/L9.38.0
platelet count, extended range: <50 x 10^9/L3.55.7
absolute neutrophils, notable range: <1.5 x 10^9/L8.113.8
absolute neut., extended range: <0.5 x 10^9/L4.70
serum creat, 2 cons >33% incr. from BL and >ULN4.73.4
creat clearance, notable range: 2 cons <60mL/min7.02.3
creat clearance, extended range: 2 cons <40mL/min2.32.3
urin protein/urin creat ratio, 2 cons >1.0 mg/mg2.30
ALT, notable range: >5 x ULN and >2 x BL1.21.1
ALT, extended range: >10 x ULN and >2 x BL1.20
AST, notable range: >5 x ULN and >2 x BL01.1
AST, extended range: >10 x ULN and >2 x BL1.20
SecondaryFrequency of Selected Gastro-intestinal (GI) Adverse Events

The percentage of participants with any GI adverse event, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain was assessed.

Time frame:
28 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Frequency of Selected Gastro-intestinal (GI) Adverse Events
Percentage of participantsDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
Any GI adverse event61.658.6
Abdominal pain26.726.4
Constipation15.18.0
Diarrhea34.933.3
Nausea26.727.6
Vomiting22.117.2
SecondaryMean Domain Scores of the Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation Therapy (Modified SICT)

The modified SICT consisted of 13 items that represent 3 domains: adherence, satisfaction and concerns. The adherence domain consisted of 7 items, 6 which were measured using a 5-point response scale and was calculated by summing the 6 items. The score range from 6 to 30 and higher scores indicated worse adherence. The satisfaction domain consisted of 3 items, 2 which were measured using a 5-point response scale and was calculated by summing the 2 items. The score range from 2 to 10 and higher scores indicated worse satisfaction. The concerns domain consisted of 3 items to address any concerns or worries with his/her medication. All 3 items were measured on a 5-point response scale and were calculated by summing the 3 items. The score range from 3 to 15 and higher scores indicated fewer concerns. For all three domains, the meaningful difference between two treatment arms was determined to be 1 point.

Time frame:
weeks 2, 3, 13 and 24 (end of treatment or within 7 days of last dose)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Domain Scores of the Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation Therapy (Modified SICT)
score on a scaleDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week 2, adherence (n=70,70)10.3 ± 3.807.6 ± 2.14
week 2, satisfaction/preference (n=70,70)5.2 ± 2.242.8 ± 1.37
week 2, concerns (n=70,70)12.9 ± 2.9413.8 ± 2.02
week 3, adherence (n=58,51)10.9 ± 4.097.7 ± 2.06
week 3, satisfaction/preference (n=58,51)5.4 ± 2.222.6 ± 1.05
week 3, concerns (n=58,51)12.4 ± 2.7314.0 ± 1.49
week 13, adherence (n=59,64)11.2 ± 3.567.8 ± 2.05
week 13, satisfaction/preference (n=59,64)5.4 ± 2.142.9 ± 1.54
week 13, concerns (n=59,64)12.7 ± 2.5013.6 ± 1.87
week 24, adherence (n=63,60)12.5 ± 5.327.5 ± 2.41
week 24, satisfaction/preference (n=63,60)5.8 ± 2.282.9 ± 1.58
week 24, concerns (n=63,60)11.8 ± 3.0713.7 ± 1.84
SecondaryPalatability Questionnaire Score

The palatability questionnaire consisted of 4 items. The first item measured the taste and aftertaste of the medication and were scored a on a 5-point response scale. The second item offered an additional response option of "no aftertaste". The last 2 items referred to whether the medication was taken, i.e. swallowed or vomited, and how the participant perceived the amount of medication to be taken. The palatability summary score was calculated using a scoring matrix from items 1, 3 and 4 scores and the score ranges from 0 - 11. Higher scores indicated the best palatability. A meaningful difference between two treatment arms was determined to be 1 point.

Time frame:
weeks 2, 3, 13 and 24 (end of treatment or within 7 days of last dose)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Palatability Questionnaire Score
score on a scaleDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week 2 (n=69,70)9.0 ± 3.0110.8 ± 0.50
week 3 (n=57,51)8.8 ± 3.0110.8 ± 0.45
week 13 (n=59,62)9.3 ± 2.8410.8 ± 1.16
week 24 (n=63,60)8.8 ± 3.1010.9 ± 0.34
SecondaryWeekly Average of Daily Scores of the Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptom Diary

The GI symptom diary consisted of 6 items, five which were scored using a 0 - 10 rating scale with item appropriate anchors to rate the symptom, for example, Pain in your belly: 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain. The GI diary summary score was created using the 10 point response scale for the 5 items. The GI symptom daily diary had a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 50. The weekly average score for the 7 days was calculated for each individual item and the GI summary score was created from these weekly averages. Higher scores indicated worse symptoms. A meaningful difference between two treatment arms was determined to be 0.3 point.

Time frame:
weeks -1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Weekly Average of Daily Scores of the Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptom Diary
score on a scaleDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week -1 (n=69,65)1.4 ± 2.101.9 ± 3.69
week 4 (n=60,64)1.8 ± 3.491.1 ± 2.15
week 8 (n=59,51)1.4 ± 2.451.1 ± 2.16
week 12 (n=51,45)1.7 ± 3.161.0 ± 1.78
week 16 (n=48,41)1.9 ± 3.750.9 ± 1.92
week 20 (n40,39)1.5 ± 3.270.9 ± 1.44
week 24 (n32,26)1.5 ± 3.291.2 ± 1.89
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Weekly Average Compliance of Medication Consumption

A compliance questionnaire assessed whether the medication was taken. Weekly average compliance was calculated when there were at least four non-missing daily responses.

Time frame:
Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Weekly Average Compliance of Medication Consumption
ParticipantsDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week 15653
week 26464
week 36256
week 45858
week 55658
week 66251
week 75548
week 85646
week 95345
week 105246
week 115042
week 125041
week 134947
week 145142
week 154842
week 164840
week 174339
week 184338
week 194037
week 204036
week 213936
week 223834
week 233633
week 243024
SecondaryWeekly Dose Violation Rate

The dose violation is defined as a dose either missed completely or not taken in accordance with the timing instruction (no later than 12:00 pm. The rate was calculated as \[number of dose violations/drug exposure (days)\] x 100.

Time frame:
weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Reported as:
Mean · percent dose violation
Weekly Dose Violation Rate
percent dose violationDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week 1 (n=56,53)17.7 ± 31.0415.8 ± 29.42
week 4 (n=58,58)15.8 ± 32.516.7 ± 15.45
week 8 (n=56,46)18.0 ± 35.388.4 ± 22.17
week 12 (n=50,41)15.7 ± 34.2210.7 ± 22.63
week 16 (n=48,40)13.5 ± 31.0810.0 ± 24.5
week 20 (n=40,36)22.6 ± 38.3811.3 ± 26.67
week 24 (n=30,24)17.1 ± 34.2610.1 ± 25.47
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)

Blood samples were collected to assess AUClast.

Time frame:
week 1, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose; week 3, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose
Reported as:
Mean · umol/L*h
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)
umol/L*hDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week1 (n=14,15)1110 ± 4951040 ± 405
week 3 (n=13,15)1590 ± 5402110 ± 987
SecondaryObserved Maximum Plasma Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax)

Blood samples were collected to assess Cmax.

Time frame:
week 1, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose; week 3, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose
Reported as:
Mean · umol/L
Observed Maximum Plasma Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax)
umol/LDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week 1 (n=14,15)74.6 ± 30.779.3 ± 23.5
week 3 (n=14,15)118 ± 82.3139 ± 57.2
SecondaryTime to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)

Blood samples were collected to assess Tmax.

Time frame:
week 1, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose; week 3, day 1: pre-dose (0 hour) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 hours post dose
Reported as:
Median · hour
Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)
hourDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week 1 (n=14,15)3.57 (1.15 to 7.89)2.00 (1.15 to 15.6)
week 3 (n=14,15)2.85 (1.40 to 8.39)2.02 (1.07 to 5.06)
SecondaryDererasirox Plasma Concentration

Blood samples were collected to assess deferasirox concentration. Dose-adjusted calculations are presented: (concentration/actual dose)\*20 for participants on DFX-DT and (concentration/actual dose)\*14 for participants on DFX-FCT.

Time frame:
Week 3, day 1, pre-dose (0 hour (h)) and 2 h post-dose; week 13, day 1, pre-dose (0 hour (h)) and 2 h post-dose; and week 21, day 1, pre-dose (0 hour (h)) and 2 h post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · umol/L
Dererasirox Plasma Concentration
umol/LDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
week 3, pre-dose (n=63,70)39.6 ± 48.427.3 ± 20.4
week 3, 2 hours post-dose (n=67,76)80.8 ± 52.295.5 ± 53.0
week 13, pre-dose (n=69.56)37.1 ± 37.831.3 ± 22.9
week 13, 2 hours post-dose (n=74,59)78.7 ± 39.592.5 ± 39.1
week 21, pre-dose (n=54,59)46.6 ± 46.443.1 ± 36.8
week 21, 2 hours post-dose (n=59,64)89.8 ± 59.3105 ± 51.2

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Deferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)—13/86 (15.1%)69/86 (80.2%)
Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)—16/87 (18.4%)72/87 (82.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 49
Most frequent serious events
EventDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/862/87
SepsisInfections and infestations0/862/87
Accidental overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/862/87
Autoimmune haemolytic anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/860/87
HaemolysisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/860/87
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/860/87
Cardiac failure acuteCardiac disorders1/860/87
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders1/860/87
Anal fissureGastrointestinal disorders1/860/87
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders1/860/87
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventDeferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders30/8627/87
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders23/8624/87
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders23/8623/87
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders18/8615/87
Urine protein/creatinine ratio increasedInvestigations11/8617/87
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders13/867/87
HeadacheNervous system disorders12/865/87
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders6/8610/87
AstheniaGeneral disorders8/864/87
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations7/868/87

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Deferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)Total
Mean35.1 ± 18.6034.6 ± 19.9734.9 ± 19.25
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Deferasirox Dispersible Tablet (DFX-DT)Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet (DFX-FCT)Total
Female474188
Male394685
08

Study locations

51 sites
  • Children's Hospital of Orange County Onc Dept
    Orange, California 92868-3874, United States
  • Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Onc Dept
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Children's Hospital Boston Department of Hematology
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College-Cornell University Onc Dept
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Onc. Dept
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4399, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, C1221ADC, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Linz, A-4010, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vienna, 1140, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lille, 59020, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75010, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg 68305, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Goslar, 38642, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hanover, 30170, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Potsdam, 14467, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Athens, GR GR-115 27, Greece
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Patra - RIO, GR 265 04, Greece
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Thessaloniki, GR 546 42, Greece
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brindisi, BR 72100, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Catania, CT 95125, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cona, FE 44100, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Genova, GE 16128, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Genova, GE 16132, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cagliari, ITA 09121, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lecce, LE 73100, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Milan, MI 20122, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Milan, MI 20162, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Palermo, PA 90127, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Palermo, PA 90146, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Reggio Calabria, RC 89100, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Verona, VR 37126, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Naples, 80138, Italy
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hazmiyeh, Beirut PO Box 213, Lebanon
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kuala Lumpur, 50589, Malaysia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pulau Pinang, 10990, Malaysia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mexico City, Mexico City 06726, Mexico
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Moscow, Russia 117198, Russia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dammam, 15215, Saudi Arabia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dammam, 40145, Saudi Arabia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Madrid, 28033, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Al Ain - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, United Arab Emirates
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dubai, 9115, United Arab Emirates
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, N19 5NF, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    London, NW1 2PJ, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Taher AT, Origa R, Perrotta S, Kouraklis A, Ruffo GB, Kattamis A, Goh AS, Huang V, Zia A, Herranz RM, Porter JB. Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized phase II study of the deferasirox film-coated tablet in patients with transfusion-dependent anemias. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Nov 19;16(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1041-5. PubMed 30453981 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2014 to primary completion in Feb 2016, 19 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2016, 7 months after primary completion.

Of 14 phase 2 interventional studies under Iron Overload, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 45. This study's 19 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 26, 2014
First posted
Apr 29, 2014
StartActual
Jul 8, 2014
Primary completionActual
Feb 24, 2016
CompletionActual
Feb 24, 2016
Results first posted
Oct 18, 2016
Last update
Jul 25, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 25, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02125877
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2014
Start date
Jul 8, 2014
Primary completion
Feb 24, 2016
Completion
Feb 24, 2016
Results posted
Oct 18, 2016
Last update
Jul 25, 2017

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion