ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02112370REBTUpdated Aug 4, 2017Results posted

Efficacy of Ropivacaine (With Epinephrine) in BABA Endoscopic and Robotic Thyroidectomy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ropivacaine with epinephrine injection and Placebo in Thyroid Neoplasm and Goiter, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-04.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
148
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the pain relief and the hemodynamic stability of ropivacaine with epinephrine in BABA endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy.

Read the detailed description

Diluted ropivacaine with epinephrine is injected into the subcutaneous space to relieve pain and reduce bleeding during procedures. The synergistic effect of ropivacaine with epinephrine can contribute to patients' welfare, such as relieving pain and structuring the hemodynamic stability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thyroid Neoplasm
  • Goiter

Keywords

  • Ropivacaine
  • Epinephrine
  • Endoscopy
  • Robotics
  • Thyroidectomy
03

In context

Thyroid Neoplasms

819 studies on the registry are indexed under Thyroid Neoplasms; 216 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 148 is above the median of 50 across 518 interventional studies indexed under Thyroid Neoplasms.

Browse Thyroid Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,897 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of thyroid neoplasm or benign goiter
  • Scheduled for BABA endoscopic or robotic thyroidectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Completion thyroidectomy
  • Modified radical neck dissection
  • Allergy history
  • Stroke history
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Coagulopathy
  • Severe cardiovascular disease
  • Severe pulmonary disease
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
148 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    100cc normal saline is injected into the subcutaneous layer for the initial flap dissection.

    Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Ropivacaine with epinephrine injection

    1 mg/mL 1cc epinephrine is diluted in 100cc normal saline and then 7.5 mg/mL 30cc ropivacaine is diluted in the same normal saline. The mixture is injected into the subcutaneous layer for the initial flap dissection.

    Drug: Ropivacaine with epinephrine injection

Interventions

  • DrugRopivacaine with epinephrine injection

    Drug pages: Ropivacaine · Epinephrine

    1 mg/mL 1cc epinephrine is diluted in 100cc normal saline and then 7.5 mg/mL 30cc ropivacaine is diluted in the same normal saline. The mixture is injected into the subcutaneous layer for the initial flap dissection for the experiment group.

    Also known as: Hanlim ropiva injection 7.5 mg/mL (20cc), Insurance code: A37804211, Jeil epinephrine injection 1 mg/mL (1cc), Insurance code: A04900341

  • OtherPlacebo

    100cc normal saline is injected into the subcutaneous layer for the initial flap dissection for the placebo group.

    Also known as: CJ 0.9% Normal Saline injection 100cc, Insurance code: A11601752

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NRS Pain Scores for the First 12 Hours

    The numerical rating scale is utilized to assess the postoperative pain change for the first 12 hours according to location. Range: 0(minimal pain, better outcome) \~ 10(maximum pain, worse outcome) Unlike the general NRS pain score as reported in the "post-operative 48 hour" result which deals with post-operative discomfort in general, this outcome measures the pain score of the specific location in which flap dissection had taken place.

    Time frame: Postoperative 12 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum of Measured Systolic Blood Pressures

    The maximal systolic blood pressure is monitored during surgery.

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours

  2. Maximum of Measured Diastolic Blood Pressures

    The maximal diastolic blood pressure is monitored during surgery.

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours

  3. Maximum of Measured Heart Rates

    The maximal heart rate is monitored during surgery.

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours

  4. Blood Loss Amount

    The blood loss amount is estimated at the end of surgery.

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours

  5. Operation Time

    The amount of time taken from start to the end of surgery

    Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours

  6. NRS Change

    Change in NRS score a with time The numerical rating scale is utilized to assess the postoperative pain change for the first 12 hours according to location. Range: 0(minimal pain, better outcome) \~ 10(maximum pain, worse outcome)

    Time frame: 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 hours post operation

  7. Pain Killer Dose

    Change in pain killer usage with time

    Time frame: 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 hours post operation

07

Results

Posted Aug 4, 2017
Limitations and caveats
1. Single-institution study 2. We did not directly examine the vasoconstrictive properties of epinephrine in helping reduce bleeding. 3. Issue regarding importance of statistical vs. clinical significance of the pain score remains to be addressed

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
Started7474
Completed7474
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNRS Pain Scores for the First 12 Hours

The numerical rating scale is utilized to assess the postoperative pain change for the first 12 hours according to location. Range: 0(minimal pain, better outcome) \~ 10(maximum pain, worse outcome) Unlike the general NRS pain score as reported in the "post-operative 48 hour" result which deals with post-operative discomfort in general, this outcome measures the pain score of the specific location in which flap dissection had taken place.

Time frame:
Postoperative 12 hours
Reported as:
Mean · points
NRS Pain Scores for the First 12 Hours
pointsNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
Swallowing difficulty4.93 ± 1.794.12 ± 1.87
Anterior neck pain4.50 ± 2.103.69 ± 1.94
Right chest pain3.99 ± 2.273.16 ± 1.96
Left chest pain3.74 ± 1.944.51 ± 2.45
Back pain0.65 ± 1.500.28 ± 1.05
Posterior neck pain1.47 ± 2.071.65 ± 2.40
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Saline Injection vs Ropivacaine With Epinephrine Injection · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.008 (threshold p value for significance \< 0.05)
  • Normal Saline Injection vs Ropivacaine With Epinephrine Injection · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.016 (threshold p value for significance \< 0.05)
  • Normal Saline Injection vs Ropivacaine With Epinephrine Injection · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.019 (threshold p value for significance \< 0.05)
  • Normal Saline Injection vs Ropivacaine With Epinephrine Injection · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.035 (threshold p value for significance \< 0.05)
  • Normal Saline Injection vs Ropivacaine With Epinephrine Injection · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.089 (threshold p value for significance \< 0.05)
  • Normal Saline Injection vs Ropivacaine With Epinephrine Injection · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.634 (threshold p value for significance \< 0.05)
SecondaryMaximum of Measured Systolic Blood Pressures

The maximal systolic blood pressure is monitored during surgery.

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Maximum of Measured Systolic Blood Pressures
mmHgNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
Maximum of Measured Systolic Blood Pressures142 ± 16.5145 ± 18.9
SecondaryMaximum of Measured Diastolic Blood Pressures

The maximal diastolic blood pressure is monitored during surgery.

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Maximum of Measured Diastolic Blood Pressures
mmHgNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
Maximum of Measured Diastolic Blood Pressures91 ± 14.986 ± 19.2
SecondaryMaximum of Measured Heart Rates

The maximal heart rate is monitored during surgery.

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Maximum of Measured Heart Rates
beats per minuteNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
Maximum of Measured Heart Rates88 ± 16.199 ± 13.3
SecondaryBlood Loss Amount

The blood loss amount is estimated at the end of surgery.

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · ml
Blood Loss Amount
mlNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
Blood Loss Amount30 ± 58.218 ± 40.5
SecondaryOperation Time

The amount of time taken from start to the end of surgery

Time frame:
participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of approximately 2.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Operation Time
minutesNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
Operation Time163.6 ± 54.1155.3 ± 46.8
SecondaryNRS Change

Change in NRS score a with time The numerical rating scale is utilized to assess the postoperative pain change for the first 12 hours according to location. Range: 0(minimal pain, better outcome) \~ 10(maximum pain, worse outcome)

Time frame:
0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 hours post operation
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
NRS Change
scores on a scaleNormal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
0 hour5.73 ± 2.025.68 ± 2.13
1 hour5.05 ± 1.954.7 ± 1.59
2 hour4.55 ± 1.804.11 ± 1.56
4 hour3.55 ± 1.273.34 ± 1.19
6 hour3.39 ± 1.293.28 ± 1.22
9 hour3.28 ± 1.343.14 ± 1.38
12 hour3.19 ± 1.373.18 ± 1.23
24 hour2.93 ± 1.092.95 ± 1.05
48 hour2.27 ± 0.942.08 ± 0.90
SecondaryPain Killer Dose

Change in pain killer usage with time

Time frame:
0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 hours post operation
Reported as:
Mean · vials (15mg ketorolac per vial)
Pain Killer Dose
vials (15mg ketorolac per vial)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine Injection
0 hour1 ± 0.720.84 ± 0.60
1 hour0.35 ± 0.510.31 ± 0.47
2 hour0.31 ± 0.490.26 ± 0.44
4 hour0.07 ± 0.250.11 ± 0.31
6 hour0.18 ± 0.380.15 ± 0.36
9 hour0.14 ± 0.340.12 ± 0.33
12 hour0.18 ± 0.420.19 ± 0.43
24 hour0.20 ± 0.440.16 ± 0.41
48 hour0.01 ± 0.110.07 ± 0.15

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Normal Saline Injection—0/74 (0%)0/74 (0%)
Ropivacaine With Epinephrine Injection—0/74 (0%)0/74 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All patients referred for BABA robotic or endoscopic thyroidectomy at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine InjectionTotal
Mean38.0 ± 9.335.5 ± 8.836.1 ± 9.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine InjectionTotal
Female6966135
Male5813
Preoperative thyroid function test (T3, ng/dL)
Preoperative thyroid function test (T3, ng/dL)(ng/dL)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine InjectionTotal
Mean121.8 ± 15.0123.3 ± 25.1122.5 ± 20.6
Preoperative thyroid function test (free T4, ng/dL)
Preoperative thyroid function test (free T4, ng/dL)(ng/dL)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine InjectionTotal
Mean1.2 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.4
Preoperative thyroid function test (TSH, uIU/mL)
Preoperative thyroid function test (TSH, uIU/mL)(uIU/mL)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine InjectionTotal
Mean1.8 ± 1.02.2 ± 1.72.0 ± 1.4
Method of operation (robotic/endoscopic)
Method of operation (robotic/endoscopic)(participants)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine InjectionTotal
Robotic5355108
Endoscopic211940
Extent of operation (Right/Left/Total)
Extent of operation (Right/Left/Total)(participants)Normal Saline InjectionRopivacaine With Epinephrine InjectionTotal
Right262955
Left282452
Total202141
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 463-707, South Korea
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hristovska AM, Kristensen BB, Rasmussen MA, Rasmussen YH, Elving LB, Nielsen CV, Kehlet H. Effect of systematic local infiltration analgesia on postoperative pain in vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Mar;93(3):233-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12319. PubMed 24576202 ↗
  • Miratashi SA, Behdad S, Ayatollahi V, Ahmadi A. Hemodynamic effects of intraocular epinephrine during cataract surgery: a double blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical trial. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul-Dec;4(2):288-94. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v4i2.6546. PubMed 22864036 ↗
  • Kim SJ, Lee KE, Myong JP, Koo do H, Lee J, Youn YK. Prospective study of sensation in anterior chest areas before and after a bilateral axillo-breast approach for endoscopic/robotic thyroid surgery. World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):1147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1934-8. PubMed 23397168 ↗
  • Lee KE, Choi JY, Youn YK. Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug;21(4):230-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822d0455. PubMed 21857470 ↗
  • Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, Oh SK, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):601-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0481-y. PubMed 17308853 ↗
  • Choi JY, Lee KE, Chung KW, Kim SW, Choe JH, Koo do H, Kim SJ, Lee J, Chung YS, Oh SK, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy via bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA): review of 512 cases in a single institute. Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):948-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1973-x. Epub 2011 Nov 4. PubMed 22052422 ↗
  • Kwon H, Koo do H, Choi JY, Kim E, Lee KE, Youn YK. Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy for Graves' disease: an initial experience in a single institute. World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1576-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2027-4. PubMed 23558759 ↗
  • Lee KE, Kim E, Koo do H, Choi JY, Kim KH, Youn YK. Robotic thyroidectomy by bilateral axillo-breast approach: review of 1,026 cases and surgical completeness. Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2955-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2863-1. Epub 2013 Feb 23. PubMed 23436099 ↗
  • Lee KE, Koo do H, Im HJ, Park SK, Choi JY, Paeng JC, Chung JK, Oh SK, Youn YK. Surgical completeness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy after propensity score matching. Surgery. 2011 Dec;150(6):1266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.015. PubMed 22136850 ↗
  • Lee KE, Rao J, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Jun;19(3):e71-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a4ccae. PubMed 19542833 ↗
  • Lee JH, Suh YJ, Song RY, Yi JW, Yu HW, Kwon H, Choi JY, Lee KE. Preoperative flap-site injection with ropivacaine and epinephrine in BABA robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy safely reduces postoperative pain: A CONSORT-compliant double-blinded randomized controlled study (PAIN-BREKOR trial). Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(22):e6896. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006896. PubMed 28562541 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2014, a primary completion of May 2016 and a completion of Jun 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Aug 2017, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 7, 2014
First posted
Apr 11, 2014
Start
May 2014
Primary completionActual
May 2016
CompletionActual
Jun 2016
Results first posted
Aug 4, 2017
Last update
Aug 4, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02112370
Responsible party
Kyu Eun Lee (Associate Professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 11, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
Jun 2016
Results posted
Aug 4, 2017
Last update
Aug 4, 2017

Study contacts

Kyu Eun Lee, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Seoul National University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ropivacaine · Epinephrine

Start the discussion