ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02108145Updated Aug 1, 2019

Percutaneous Bilateral Versus Unilateral Metal Stent for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of bilateral metal stent insertion and unilateral metal stent insertion in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma, sponsored by Air Force Military Medical University, China. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-01.

Sponsored by Air Force Military Medical University, China · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common biliary malignancy and the second most common hepatic malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A majority of the CCA (50-70%) was presented in the area of the biliary duct bifurcation. Recent retrospective study included heterogeneous group of malignant diseases demonstrate that draining more than 50% of was associated with a longer median survival.

However, in recent European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) biliary stenting clinical guideline and Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), whether we should deployment bilateral or unilateral metal stent for patients with HCCA was not clearly recommended due to the absence of randomized controlled trials.

Read the detailed description

Patients with advanced hilar obstruction (Bismuth III and IV), PTBS had a higher success rate of cholestasis palliation and a low rate of post cholangitis when compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). The advantage of percutaneous approach is the precise lobar selection for drainage and this approach should yield a lower rate of cholangitis.

Guideline recommendation European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) biliary stenting clinical guideline and Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations the goal of palliative stenting of HCCA is drainage of adequate liver volume (50% or more), irrespective of unilateral, bilateral, or multi-segmental stenting was based on heterogeneous group of malignancy by ERCP in retrospective study.There are no randomized clinical trials compared with these two internal biliary drainage methods in HCCA using metal stent.

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect and safety of bilateral versus unilateral stenting in patients with HCCA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Keywords

  • cholangiocarcinoma
  • jaundice
  • metal stent
  • PTBS
03

In context

Klatskin Tumor

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Klatskin Tumor; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 55 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Klatskin Tumor.

Browse Klatskin Tumor studies →

Lead sponsor

Air Force Military Medical University, China is the lead sponsor of 178 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Written informed consent; Jaundice duo to biliary obstruction; The diagnosis is based on typical features on MRI and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or histologic and cytologic confirmation is established by percutaneous biopsy (X ray-guided) or exploratory laparotomy; Bismuth type Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳobstruction; Performance status (eastern cooperative oncology group, ECOG) 0-2; All patients were considered unsuitable or refuse for resection on the basis of general medical condition and/or tumor extent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Refuse to participate and provide informed consent; Bismuth Ⅰtype obstruction; Performance status (eastern cooperative oncology group, ECOG) 3-4. Portal Vein involvement; Prior history of stent; Concomitant renal insufficiency; Severe cardiopulmonary diseases; Uncontrolled systemic infection or sepsis; Accompany other malignancy or serious medical illness which may reduce the life expectancy.

Contraindications for PTBS.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    unilateral metal stent insertion

    unilateral metal stent insertion was performed either left or right hepatic lobe as can be drainage more liver volume

    Procedure: unilateral metal stent insertion

  • Experimental
    bilateral metal stent insertion

    percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage plus bilateral metal stent.The bare stents were used for PTBS

    Procedure: bilateral metal stent insertion

Interventions

  • Procedurebilateral metal stent insertion
  • Procedureunilateral metal stent insertion
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failure to control jaundice or failure to prevent stent occlusion or re-jaundice within three month after stent implantation

    Time frame: From stent insertion to three months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median survival

    Time frame: up to 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Stent patency

    Stent patency is a secondary endpoint of this study. Cumulative stent patency rate is compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: up to 1year

  2. Early major complications

    Early major complications is a secondary endpoint of this study.Early major complications rate is compared between the two groups

    Time frame: 30 days within treatment

  3. 30-day mortality

    30-day mortality is a secondary endpoint of this study. 30-day mortality rate is compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: 30 days within treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Han Guo Hong
    Xi’an, Shanxi 710032, China
    • guohong han, M.D. · Contact · hangh2009@gmail.com · +86-29-84771537
    • mingwu Li, M.D. · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02108145
Responsible party
Guohong Han (Head of Department of Digestive Interventional Radiology, Air Force Military Medical University, China) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2014
Start date
Jul 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 1, 2019

Study contacts

Guohong Han, MD,Ph.D
Contact
hangh@fmmu.edu.cn
86-29-84771528
MingWu Li, MD
Contact
lmw_jack@china.com.cn
Guohong Han, MD,Ph.D
principal investigator · Air Force Military Medical University, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion