ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02104687Flow-pressUpdated Sep 8, 2016

Intraoperative Haemodynamic Optimization Comparing Flow and Pressure Parameters

An interventional study of Flow group and Press group in Major Abdominal Surgery, Duodenohemipancreatectomy and Rectal Resection, sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava. Completed at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-08.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to confirm the hypothesis that flow treatment algorithm based on cardiac index trending by transesophageal Dopplerometry would result in reduced complications and reduced length of hospital stay in major abdominal surgery patients, when compared to patients treated with press treatment algorithm.

Read the detailed description

Despite standardisation of intraoperative care provided for risk surgery patients, the preoperative mortality remains higher than expected. The aim of the goal-directed heamodynamic therapy (GDT) is to improve the altered cardiovascular function and to reach the desired intraoperative values of oxygen supply (DO2) and cardiac index (CI). Standard haemodynamic measurements, such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) remain relatively unchanged despite reduced blood flow. However, GTD is able to detect early hypo perfusion abnormalities. The aim of goal-directed heamodynamic therapy, based on the titration of fluids and vasoactive drugs to physiological flow-related end points is to reduce perioperative complications, perioperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesise, that following this treatment regimen results in reduced postoperative complications (primary endpoint) and reduced length of hospital stay (secondary endpoint).

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Abdominal Surgery
  • Duodenohemipancreatectomy
  • Rectal Resection
  • Extensive Bowel Surgery

Keywords

  • GTD, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy
  • CI, cardiac index
  • MAP, mean arterial pressure
  • CVP, central venous pressure
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ostrava is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 21 years of age and above
  • anticipated duration of surgery more than 120 minutes
  • estimated blood loss exceeding more than 15% of blood volume
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification 2 or 3
  • indication for an arterial line and central venous catheter

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or lactating women
  • age below 21 years of age
  • emergency surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification 1
  • sepsis and septic shock
  • severe cardiac arrhythmias
  • patients with pathology or intervention on oesophagus
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Flow

    The Flow therapeutic algorithm will be responsible for adjustment of intraoperative interventions - volumotherapy and administration of vasoactive drugs, with the aim to maintain the CI value \>2.5 l/m/m2 (FTc - flow time \<330 ms was chosen as variable defining preload; PV, peak velocity \<70 ms-1 will be used as a variable defining contractility; SVR, total systemic vascular resistance between 1000-1800 cdyn.s/cm5m2 will be used as variable defining after load). After the desired values of CI have been obtained, no further increase of therapeutic intervention (fluids, vasoactive drugs) will be performed.

    Procedure: Press group

  • Active comparator
    Press

    The Press therapeutic algorithm will be responsible for adjustment of intraoperative interventions based upon standard pressure parameters and will include volumotherapy and administration of vasoactive drugs, with the aim to maintain the desired values of MAP of 65-105 mmHg and CVP 8-12 mmHg. After the desired values of MAP and CVP have been obtained, no further increase of therapeutic intervention (fluids, vasoactive drugs) will be performed.

    Procedure: Flow group

Interventions

  • ProcedureFlow group

    After induction, each patient will obtain Transesophageal Dopplerometry probe (CardioQ) in order to monitor the parameters of CI, FTc, PV and SVR.

  • ProcedurePress group

    After induction, the parameters of MAP and CVP will be monitored in each of the patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pre-defined postoperative complications for up to 28 days after surgery

    The followed postoperative complications include infectious, respiratory, cardiovascular, abdominal, renal complications, massive postoperative bleeding and preoperative death.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The length of hospitalization

    Length of hospital stay will be obtained from the patient record.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport responses in survivors and nonsurvivors of high-risk surgery. Crit Care Med. 1993 Jul;21(7):977-90. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199307000-00010. PubMed 8319478 ↗
  • Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1392-402. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5. Epub 2010 Oct 21. PubMed 20966436 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2014, a primary completion of Jun 2016 and a completion of Aug 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 1, 2014
First posted
Apr 4, 2014
Start
Apr 2014
Primary completionActual
Jun 2016
CompletionActual
Aug 2016
Last update
Sep 8, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02104687
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 4, 2014
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Last update
Sep 8, 2016

Study contacts

Pavel Szturz, MD, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University Hospital Ostrava

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion