CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02097797IMPACT-CrohnUpdated Feb 5, 2018

Impact of the Fecal Flora Transplantation on Crohn's Disease

An interventional study of Fecal Transplantation and Sham Transplantation in Crohn's Disease, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-05.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Crohn's disease is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory bowel disease. Many data show that the intestinal flora is involved in the disease and it has been show that patients with Crohn's disease exhibit an abnormal fecal flora that might play a role in inflammation. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the fecal flora transplantation on Crohn's disease.

Read the detailed description

Introduction : Crohn's disease (CD) is an relapsing inflammatory bowel disease relatively frequent. Its prevalence is about 1 for 700 in France, affecting predominantly young adults. Its treatment is based on immunosuppressants that might be associated with potentially severe complications such as infection and cancers. Moreover, these treatments are expensive. The gut microbiota being involved in the disease pathogenesis, it can be considered as a potential therapeutic target.

CD pathogenesis remains poorly understood but involves an inappropriate immune response toward an unbalanced gut microbiota (called dysbiosis) in predisposed hosts. The complete replacement of a dysbiotic microbiota by a "healthy" one is thus an attractive strategy. Fecal transplantation (FT) has been used with success for a long time in the context of Clostridium difficile.

Hypothesis : Fecal transplantation allow the replacement of a dysbiotic microbiota by a " healthy " one with favorable impact on CD evolution.

Primary endpoint : In CD patient with colonic or ileo-colonic involvement put in remission with corticosteroids, Evaluate if FT can modify a dysbiotic fecal microbiota to be closer of the one of a healthy donor.

Methodology

For the Receiver :

Once corticoid-induced remission will be achieved, the patient will be included and randomised to receive either FT or sham transplantation during a colonoscopy. The patient will be evaluated at week 2, 6, 10, 14, 18 and 24. At week 6, a colonoscopy will be performed.

For the Donor :

Donors will be recruited by poster advertising. When a receiver will be included, 3 donors will be contacted to attend an inclusion visit including physical examination as well as blood and stool screening for pathogen. The 3 donors will then come the day of the FT to donate their stool.

02

Conditions studied

  • Crohn's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Crohn's disease
  • microbiota
  • fecal transplantation
03

In context

Crohn Disease

1,880 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 66 across 1,188 interventional studies indexed under Crohn Disease.

Browse Crohn Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Receiver

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years and \< 70 years
  • Crohn's disease with colonic or ileo-colonic involvement
  • Active disease at screening defined by a Harvey Bradshaw Index >4
  • Clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index \<5) in the 3 weeks following corticosteroid onset
  • Patient with health insurance
  • Written consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fistulizing disease
  • Anoperineal or abdominal abscess
  • Complication requiring surgical treatment
  • Treatment with anti-TNFa (ongoing or stopped in the 1 month preceding randomization)
  • Immunosuppressant treatment started or stopped in the 3 months preceding randomization
  • Non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) intake in the 4 weeks preceding randomization
  • Antibiotics or antifungic treatment in the 4 weeks preceding colonoscopy
  • Probiotics intake in the 4 weeks preceding colonoscopy
  • Clostridium difficile infection in the 10 days preceding randomization
  • contraindication to colonoscopy or anesthesia
  • Pregnancy

Donor

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 20 years and \< 50 years
  • 27kg/m² > BMI > 17 kg/m²
  • Regular bowel movement with usually one bowel movement in the morning
  • Subject with health insurance
  • Written consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection risk:

    • Known infection by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Human T Leukemia Virus (HTLV), Hepatitis B or C virus.
    • At risk behavior: Travel (in the preceding 3 months, excepting in Euro area, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Croatia, Hungary, Republic Tcheque, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Swiss, USA or Canada), at risk sexual activity (intercourse without protection with a new partner) in the preceding 6 months, blood transfusion, piercing or tattoo in the preceding 6 months residence of several years in intertropical area, abroad hospitalization more than 24 hours in the last 12 months (including patient and his immediate family).
    • Positive result at one of the screening tests for infectious disease. : HIV, HCV, HBV, HTLV, syphilis, Enteric viruses (Rotavirus, HEV, Adenovirus, Norovirus, Enterovirus, HAV, Poliovirus, Astrovirus, Aichi virus, Sapovirus), parasites in stool (Cyclospora, Isospora, Cryptosporidium, Microsporidium, Strongyloides stercoralis, Entamoeba histolitica, Giardia intestinalis, Dientamoeba fragilis), and in blood (Strongyloides stercoralis, Trichinella spiralis, Amoebiasis), pathogenic bacteria in stool (Clostridium difficile, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio cholerae/parahemolyticus, verotoxin-producing E. coli)
    • Anal lesions suggesting viral infection or positive test for HSV anal and/or multi-drug resistant bacteria (Enterobacteria producing extended spectrum betalactamase, Actinobacter baumanii, Vancomycin resistant enterococci and carbapenemase producing bacteria).
    • Positive test for multidrug resistant bacteria
    • If receiver is EBV negative, EBV positive donor will be excluded
    • If receiver is CMV negative, CMV positive donor will be excluded.
    • If receiver is negative for Toxoplasma gondii, positive donor for Toxoplasma gondii will be excluded
    • Known transmissible infectious disease
    • Infection (or possible infection) in the 7 days preceding screening
    • Risk factors for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
    • Personal history of Typhoid fever
  • Gastrointestinal comorbidity

    • Personal history or first degree relative :

      • Inflammatory bowel disease
      • Coeliac disease
    • Personal history of irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea
    • Personal history of gastrointestinal neoplasia or polyposis
    • First degree relative with gastrointestinal neoplasia or polyposis before 60 years old
    • Gastrointestinal infection in the 3 preceding months (defined by the occurrence of an acute diarrhea that last less than a week)
  • Factors possibly affecting the composition of the microbiota:

    • Antibiotics or antifungic intake in the 3 preceding months before FT
    • Non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) intake in the 4 weeks preceding FT
    • Specific diet (exclusion diet, vegetarian diet)
    • Pregnancy
    • Immunosuppressant intake (corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, biologics, etc)
    • Anti neoplastic chemotherapy
    • Hemorrhoid disease
    • Personal history or first degree relative with inflammatory or autoimmune disease
  • Other Factors :

    • Known chronic disease
    • Abnormality at initial biological check up: blood cells count, fasting, glycaemia, kidney function, liver tests, haemostasis, calprotectin
    • Long term curative therapy
    • Recent intake of food allergens related of receiver's known allergy
  • between screening and FT :

    • At risk behavior (Travel, at risk sexual activity, blood transfusion, piercing tattoo, accidental blood exposure)
    • Anal lesions suggestive of viral infection or positivity for HSV in anal area
    • Infection or possible infection
    • Occurrence of gastro-intestinal symptoms
    • Medicine intake in the 48 hours preceding FT (except contraceptive)
    • In case of woman: menstruation in the 48 hours preceding FT
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fecal Transplantation

    patients receiving the fecal transplant (fecal microbiota from a healthy donor)

    Other: Fecal Transplantation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Transplantation

    patients receiving the vehicle (Physiological serum)

    Other: Sham Transplantation

Interventions

  • OtherFecal Transplantation

    Fecal microbiota (50-100g of stool from donor resuspended in 250-350ml of physiological serum and filtered) given by infusion in coecum during colonoscopy

  • OtherSham Transplantation

    250-350ml of physiological serum given by infusion in coecum during colonoscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. FT success defined by : Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs donor] > Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs receiver before FT]) with Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs donor] ≥ 0.6.

    In other words, FT success is reached if the fecal microbiota of the receiver 6 weeks after FT is closer of the fecal microbiota of the donor that of the receiver before FT. Fecal microbiota composition will be assessed by 454 pyrosequencing (16S RNA) and microbiota comparison will be done using Sorensen's index.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

Secondary outcomes

  1. FT feasibility

    evaluate the feasibility of the FT procedure (frequency of evaluable patients in each group)

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  2. Clinical relapse rate in the 24 weeks following FT procedure

    Clinical relapse defined by a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) \> 220 points, or by a CDAI between 150 and 220 with an increase \>70 compared with baseline, or by the need of surgery or to start a medical treatment for CD.

    Time frame: 24 weeks following FT

  3. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on CRP

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on CRP level.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  4. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on Leukocytes level

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: Leukocytes level

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  5. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on fecal calprotectin

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: fecal calprotectin

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  6. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  7. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on fecal microbiota composition

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: fecal microbiota composition

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  8. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on lymphocytes population in blood

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: lymphocytes population in blood

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  9. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on lymphocytes population in colon

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: lymphocytes population in colon.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

  10. Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on colon transcriptomics

    Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: colon transcriptomics.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after FT

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gastroenterology department, Saint Antoine Hospital
    Paris, 75571, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sokol H, Landman C, Seksik P, Berard L, Montil M, Nion-Larmurier I, Bourrier A, Le Gall G, Lalande V, De Rougemont A, Kirchgesner J, Daguenel A, Cachanado M, Rousseau A, Drouet E, Rosenzwajg M, Hagege H, Dray X, Klatzman D, Marteau P; Saint-Antoine IBD Network; Beaugerie L, Simon T. Fecal microbiota transplantation to maintain remission in Crohn's disease: a pilot randomized controlled study. Microbiome. 2020 Feb 3;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-0792-5. PubMed 32014035 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02097797
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Apr 25, 2017
Completion
Aug 30, 2017
Last update
Feb 5, 2018

Study contacts

Harry Sokol, MD, PhD
study director · Assistance Publique

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion