An interventional study of Fecal Transplantation and Sham Transplantation in Crohn's Disease, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-05.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Crohn's disease is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory bowel disease. Many data show that the intestinal flora is involved in the disease and it has been show that patients with Crohn's disease exhibit an abnormal fecal flora that might play a role in inflammation. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the fecal flora transplantation on Crohn's disease.
Introduction : Crohn's disease (CD) is an relapsing inflammatory bowel disease relatively frequent. Its prevalence is about 1 for 700 in France, affecting predominantly young adults. Its treatment is based on immunosuppressants that might be associated with potentially severe complications such as infection and cancers. Moreover, these treatments are expensive. The gut microbiota being involved in the disease pathogenesis, it can be considered as a potential therapeutic target.
CD pathogenesis remains poorly understood but involves an inappropriate immune response toward an unbalanced gut microbiota (called dysbiosis) in predisposed hosts. The complete replacement of a dysbiotic microbiota by a "healthy" one is thus an attractive strategy. Fecal transplantation (FT) has been used with success for a long time in the context of Clostridium difficile.
Hypothesis : Fecal transplantation allow the replacement of a dysbiotic microbiota by a " healthy " one with favorable impact on CD evolution.
Primary endpoint : In CD patient with colonic or ileo-colonic involvement put in remission with corticosteroids, Evaluate if FT can modify a dysbiotic fecal microbiota to be closer of the one of a healthy donor.
Methodology
For the Receiver :
Once corticoid-induced remission will be achieved, the patient will be included and randomised to receive either FT or sham transplantation during a colonoscopy. The patient will be evaluated at week 2, 6, 10, 14, 18 and 24. At week 6, a colonoscopy will be performed.
For the Donor :
Donors will be recruited by poster advertising. When a receiver will be included, 3 donors will be contacted to attend an inclusion visit including physical examination as well as blood and stool screening for pathogen. The 3 donors will then come the day of the FT to donate their stool.
1,880 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 462 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 66 across 1,188 interventional studies indexed under Crohn Disease.
Browse Crohn Disease studies →Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Receiver
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Donor
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Infection risk:
Gastrointestinal comorbidity
Personal history or first degree relative :
Factors possibly affecting the composition of the microbiota:
Other Factors :
between screening and FT :
patients receiving the fecal transplant (fecal microbiota from a healthy donor)
Other: Fecal Transplantation
patients receiving the vehicle (Physiological serum)
Other: Sham Transplantation
Fecal microbiota (50-100g of stool from donor resuspended in 250-350ml of physiological serum and filtered) given by infusion in coecum during colonoscopy
250-350ml of physiological serum given by infusion in coecum during colonoscopy
FT success defined by : Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs donor] > Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs receiver before FT]) with Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs donor] ≥ 0.6.
In other words, FT success is reached if the fecal microbiota of the receiver 6 weeks after FT is closer of the fecal microbiota of the donor that of the receiver before FT. Fecal microbiota composition will be assessed by 454 pyrosequencing (16S RNA) and microbiota comparison will be done using Sorensen's index.
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
FT feasibility
evaluate the feasibility of the FT procedure (frequency of evaluable patients in each group)
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Clinical relapse rate in the 24 weeks following FT procedure
Clinical relapse defined by a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) \> 220 points, or by a CDAI between 150 and 220 with an increase \>70 compared with baseline, or by the need of surgery or to start a medical treatment for CD.
Time frame: 24 weeks following FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on CRP
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on CRP level.
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on Leukocytes level
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: Leukocytes level
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on fecal calprotectin
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: fecal calprotectin
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on fecal microbiota composition
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: fecal microbiota composition
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on lymphocytes population in blood
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: lymphocytes population in blood
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on lymphocytes population in colon
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: lymphocytes population in colon.
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on colon transcriptomics
Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: colon transcriptomics.
Time frame: 6 weeks after FT
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris