ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02096354ROCKETUpdated Oct 15, 2024Results posted

A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of RRx-001 and Regorafenib in Colorectal Neoplasms, sponsored by EpicentRx, Inc.. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by EpicentRx, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study.

Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. If patients qualify to participate in this study, they will be randomly assigned to the 'interventional arm' where patients will receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib.

On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study and receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab.

Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.

Read the detailed description

Purpose This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study.

Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. Qualifying patients will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to the 'interventional arm' and receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients will have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib.

On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab.

Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.

Background Oxygen is vital to life, we need it to breathe, for example, but at the same time it gives rise to byproducts that are toxic called free radicals. Free radicals are defined as "oxidants". Similarly, substances that interact with and neutralize free radicals, thus preventing them from causing damage, are called "antioxidants". Examples of recognizable antioxidants are Vitamin E, Vitamin C and beta-carotene. Antioxidants are also known as "free radical scavengers." When free radicals are present in excess of antioxidants damage may occur.

A free radical is an unstable molecule with an unpaired electron, an electrically charged particle, which seeks out another electron to return to a state of balance. An example of a free radical is hydrogen peroxide, recognizable as the household product that "bubbles" when it's poured on wounds. These bubbles come from oxygen free radicals, which are toxic to bacteria and all living cells, including cancer. The fact that these free radicals are toxic has to do with how reactive they are-imagine free radicals as high-speed ball bearings that smash into other molecules in order to "steal" back an electron and end their radical state, which sets off a chain reaction that transforms once stable compounds into a string of reactive radicals.

As new free radicals are created in this chain reaction, they randomly slam into whatever molecules they are closest to and steal their electrons, corroding them, like a biological form of rust. This process is repeated over and over, picking up speed, until an antioxidant can "neutralize" the free radicals and put a stop to the snowball effect. In the same way that this free radical bombardment can damage not only bacteria but also healthy tissues in the body, it is also capable of destroying cancer cells.

The current consensus is that compared to normal tissue tumor cells may accumulate elevated levels of free radicals, which contribute to the development of cancer. This is potentially a fatal weakness, a form of biological "Kryptonite", which can be used to advantage since the addition of even a small amount of free radicals may push the tumor over the edge, past the tipping point, above tolerable thresholds, breaking the camel's back. Similar to the expression "live by the sword, die by the sword", free radicals may lead to the development of cancer but they also are capable of harming it when present in excess.

RRx-001 is a completely new type of drug that comes from the U.S. aerospace or rocket science industry. It is activated to deliver free radicals to tissues that have low levels of oxygen. Compared to normal tissues, which have higher levels of oxygen, most, if not all, tumors exist in a low-oxygen environment, perhaps to prevent oxidation. In this way the free radicals delivered by RRx-001 to cancer cells under low oxygen conditions are able, in theory, to cause their targeted destruction without harming normal cells.

In general, colorectal tumors have low levels of antioxidants and, without this antioxidant protection, these tumors are more likely to be harmed by free radicals, so a treatment like RRx-001, which is able to increase the free radicals in the tumor, may benefit patients with colorectal cancer; this is a reason for studying RRx-001 in colorectal cancer. So far, in a Phase 1 study, 25 men and women with advanced, incurable cancer have received RRx-001 for different lengths of time and at doses that ranged from 10 mg/m2 to 83 mg/m2 once a week.

Regorafenib is a drug approved by the FDA to treat colon cancer after previous chemotherapy is no longer effective. It belongs to a class of targeted drugs known as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Tyrosine kinases, which play a key role in many cell functions including cell growth and division, are commonly mutated or changed in cancer cells, becoming super-active and producing cells that have uncontrolled growth, and, therefore, blocking them with drugs like regorafenib may keep the cancer cells from growing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,738 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,481 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is below the median of 77 across 4,222 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

EpicentRx, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histological or cytological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum;
  • Subject must have received at least oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens with bevacizumab and with, cetuximab or panitumumab if KRAS wildtype and are refractory to irinotecan;
  • Subject has measurable disease by radiographic techniques (computerized tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]);
  • Subjects with a history of brain metastasis are eligible for the study as long as they meet all the following criteria: their brain metastases have been treated, they have no evidence of progression or hemorrhage after treatment, have been off dexamethasone for 4 weeks prior to first study drug administration, and have no ongoing requirement for dexamethasone or anti-epileptic drugs;
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  • Subject's Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status is 0 or 1;
  • Adequate organ function
  • Fertile subjects must use effective contraception during the course of the study and for 30 days following withdrawal from the study;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
  • Unresolved toxicity higher attributed to any prior therapy/procedure excluding alopecia, hypothyroidism and oxaliplatin- induced neurotoxicity ≤ Grade 2 for at least 14 days;
  • Evidence or history of tendency or predisposition to active bleeding. Any hemorrhage or bleeding event of Grade 3 or higher within 4 weeks of start of study medication;
  • Symptoms or signs of active brain metastases;
  • History of an allergic reaction or intolerance to irinotecan
  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Cholangitis that required treatment or intervention within 4 weeks of study enrollment
  • Concurrent anticancer therapy or any cytotoxic therapy within 1 month prior to Day 1. Corticosteroid therapy is not allowed except on dosing days;
  • Subject has previously received regorafenib;
  • Clear contraindication for systemic corticosteroids (diabetes mellitus is not per se a clear contraindication);
  • Severe hypoalbuminemia (albumin \< 3.0 g/dL);
  • Subjects who are pregnant or lactating or who are planning to become pregnant during the course of the study are excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RRx-001 followed by irinotecan

    Once-weekly intravenous RRx-001 at a dose of 4 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab)

    Drug: RRx-001 · Drug: Irinotecan

  • Active comparator
    Regorafenib followed by irinotecan

    Regorafenib daily on Days 1- 21 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab)

    Drug: Regorafenib · Drug: Irinotecan

Interventions

  • Also known as: Stivarga

  • To be dosed after RRx-001 or regorafenib

    Also known as: With or without bevacizumab

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 47 months

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or censorship.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival

    Progression-free survival (PFS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 77 months

    Time frame: Baseline, every 6-8 weeks while on study.

  2. Number of Adverse Events

    Incidence of related Adverse Events (AEs). SAEs and all other non-serious AEs are located in the Reported Adverse Event Module. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 is used to grade adverse events.

    Time frame: Baseline through end of treatment (28 days after last dose of study drug). Approximately 24 weeks.

  3. Objective Response Rate

    Percentage of participants with ORR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target disease. PR applied only to participants with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30 % decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  4. Clinical Benefit Rate

    The period from study entry through Disease Control. Disease Control Rate (DCR) also correlates to Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or SD relative to the total number of treated subjects

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

07

Results

Posted Oct 15, 2024

Participant flow

Participants were recruited based on physician referral at four academic medical centers between May 2014 and October 2019. The first participant first visit was May 22, 2014 and the last patient last visit was October 8, 2020.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNot Randomized
Started381311
Completed2430
Not completed141011
Withdrew: Physician decision450
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject310
Withdrew: Adverse event740
Withdrew: Ineligible0011

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival

From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 47 months

Time frame:
From date of enrollment until death or censorship.
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
Overall Survival8.6 (4.8 to NA)4.7 (2.2 to NA)
SecondaryProgression Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 77 months

Time frame:
Baseline, every 6-8 weeks while on study.
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression Free Survival
monthsRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
Progression Free Survival6.1 (3.7 to NA)1.7 (0.7 to NA)
SecondaryNumber of Adverse Events

Incidence of related Adverse Events (AEs). SAEs and all other non-serious AEs are located in the Reported Adverse Event Module. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 is used to grade adverse events.

Time frame:
Baseline through end of treatment (28 days after last dose of study drug). Approximately 24 weeks.
Reported as:
Number · Number of total adverse events
Number of Adverse Events
Number of total adverse eventsRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
CTCAE Grade 118487
CTCAE Grade 27648
CTCAE Grade 31515
CTCAE Grade 400
CTCAE Grade 500
SecondaryObjective Response Rate

Percentage of participants with ORR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target disease. PR applied only to participants with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30 % decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Objective Response Rate
ParticipantsRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
Partial Response50
Stable Disease124
Progressive Disease66
Non-Evaluable10
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate

The period from study entry through Disease Control. Disease Control Rate (DCR) also correlates to Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or SD relative to the total number of treated subjects

Time frame:
Up to 2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Benefit Rate
ParticipantsRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
Clinical Benefit Rate174

Adverse events

Collected over Serious Adverse Events and **Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events** were collected beginning at baseline through end of treatment (28 days after last dose of study drug). All-Cause Mortality was assessed up to 47 months". Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
RRx-001 Followed by Irinotecan3/38 (7.9%)14/38 (36.8%)19/38 (50%)
Regorafenib Followed by Irinotecan1/13 (7.7%)7/13 (53.8%)10/13 (76.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 41
Most frequent serious events
EventRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
Disease progressionGeneral disorders3/380/13
AV MalformationsCongenital, familial and genetic disorders0/381/13
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/381/13
Abdominal Pain lowerGastrointestinal disorders0/381/13
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/381/13
Lower Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/381/13
Flank painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/381/13
Mental status changesPsychiatric disorders1/381/13
HydronephrosisRenal and urinary disorders0/381/13
HaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/381/13
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 45
Most frequent other events
EventRRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by Irinotecan
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/389/13
Pain in ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/388/13
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/388/13
FatigueGeneral disorders16/387/13
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/387/13
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders9/386/13
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/386/13
Infusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications13/380/13
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders12/381/13
HyperbilirubinaemiaHepatobiliary disorders0/384/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNot RandomizedTotal
Mean53.7 ± 10.4161.2 ± 11.6558.1 ± 10.2556.4 ± 9.33
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNot RandomizedTotal
Female219636
Male174526
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNot RandomizedTotal
White21111042
Black or African American5005
Unknown1012
Asian111012
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib Followed by IrinotecanNot RandomizedTotal
United States24101145
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • UCSD Moores Cancer Center
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Kaiser Permanete
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96819, United States
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20889, United States
  • Aquilino Cancer Center, Maryland Oncology and Hematology PA
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Oronsky B, Scribner C, Aggarwal R, Cabrales P. RRx-001 protects normal tissues but not tumors via Nrf2 induction and Bcl-2 inhibition. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug;145(8):2045-2050. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02958-4. Epub 2019 Jun 27. PubMed 31250159 ↗
  • Scicinski J, Fisher G, Carter C, Cho-Phan C, Kunz P, Ning S, Knox S, Oronsky B, Caroen S, Parker C, Fanger G, Reid T. The Development Of RRx-001, A Novel Nitric-Oxide-Mediated Epigenetically Active Anticancer Agent. Redox Biol. 2015 Aug;5:422. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Dec 30. PubMed 28162292 ↗
  • Reid TR, Abrouk N, Caroen S, Oronsky B, Stirn M, Larson C, Beale K, Knox SJ, Fisher G. ROCKET: Phase II Randomized, Active-controlled, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of RRx-001 + Irinotecan vs. Single-agent Regorafenib in Third/Fourth Line Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2023 Mar;22(1):92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 2. PubMed 36529613 ↗
  • Reid T, Dad S, Korn R, Oronsky B, Knox S, Scicinski J. Two Case Reports of Resensitization to Previous Chemotherapy with the Novel Hypoxia-Activated Hypomethylating Anticancer Agent RRx-001 in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. Case Rep Oncol. 2014 Jan 24;7(1):79-85. doi: 10.1159/000358382. eCollection 2014 Jan. PubMed 24575021 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 9, 2016
  • Informed consent form · Feb 25, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02096354
Lead sponsor
EpicentRx, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Apr 13, 2018
Completion
Oct 8, 2020
Results posted
Oct 15, 2024
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Study contacts

Bryan Oronsky, MD
study director · EpicentRx, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: RRx-001

Start the discussion