CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02096185Updated Oct 21, 2016

Is Any Additional Information Gained Regarding Margins Using 3D Tomosynthesis Vs 2D Conventional Digital Imaging When Imaging Operative Breast Specimens?

An interventional study of 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging and 2 dimensional digital imaging in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 30 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-21.

Sponsored by Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2015), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
30 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Patients who are diagnosed with breast cancer will have surgery to remove the tumour. Where this is a local excision not mastectomy, the tissue removed is sent for x-ray imaging to assess that the abnormality has been removed and give an estimation of the distance from lesion to specimen edge. This allows the surgeon to decide whether to remove more tissue or not at the time. This study is designed to compare whether more accurate information about lesion to margin measurement can be obtained using 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging compared to 2 dimensional conventional digital imaging which is the type of imaging currently used. This has the potential to prevent some patients requiring a second operation to remove more tissue if the margins of the specimen are still involved with tumour.

The study involves x-raying the specimen under both conditions when it arrives from theatre. Only the 2D image will be reviewed at the time as is current practice. The 3D image will be reviewed later and the measurements for lesion to specimen margin compared. The lesion to margin measurement as recorded by the pathologist will be taken as the 'gold standard' and the imaging measurements will also be compared to that.

In theory, the use of 3D tomosynthesis should allow more accurate lesion to margin measurement because 3D can provide better visualisation of the lesion edges by removing the effect of superimposed tissue.

The hypothesis states that the use of 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging should provide better lesion visualisation compared to 2 dimensional conventional digital imaging thus allowing more accurate lesion to margin measurement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Surgery
  • Specimen imaging
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 72 across 9,302 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient requires surgery to remove breast cancer and operative specimen needs to be x-rayed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with breast cancer who need mastectomy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging

    Breast specimen to be x-rayed using both conditions 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging 2 dimensional conventional digital imaging

    Radiation: 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging

  • Experimental
    2 dimensional digital imaging

    Breast specimens to be x-rayed under both conditions 3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging 2 dimensional digital imaging

    Radiation: 2 dimensional digital imaging

Interventions

  • Radiation3 dimensional tomosynthesis imaging

    Each operative specimen will be imaged twice using each condition

  • Radiation2 dimensional digital imaging
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Shortest distance in mm from visible lesion to specimen margin

    2D conventional digital imaging - measured at time of surgery and info relayed to surgeon in theatre 3D tomosynthesis imaging - measured later with operator blinded to the 2D measurement Pathological measurement - final measurement used as the 'gold standard'

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
    Birmingham, West Midlands B18 7QH, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 21, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02096185
Lead sponsor
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Jennifer Waldron (Consultant Radiographer, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 26, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2017 (estimated)
Completion
May 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2016

Study contacts

Jennifer Waldron
principal investigator · Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion