ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06765785Updated Jan 10, 2025

Cardiovascular Screening in Asymptomatic South Asians

An interventional study of CTCA in Cardiovascular Diseases, Asymptomatic Condition and South Asian, sponsored by Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-10.

Sponsored by Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs in the United Kingdom. Ethnic minorities like South Asians (SA) have a 3-5 times higher incidence of CVD as predicted by various risk scores despite similar or fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) is able to outline the coronary anatomy determining the site, severity and type of atherosclerotic plaque location in the heart arteries. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommends CTCA as the first line investigation for stable chest pain considered to be coming from the heart (angina).

However there is no pathway for the patients who are asymptomatic but at high risk of CVD, such as the SA cohort. Current practice involves using risk scores to guide management of asymptomatic adults. One recommended and commonly used score is the Q-risk score (the QRISK ® 3-2018 risk calculatorhttps://qrisk.org > three). This score incorporates ethnicity amongst other risk factors and patients with a risk ≥10% of having a heart attack or stroke in the next 10 years are offered primary prevention treatment with low dose statin therapy. For example, an average (height 164cm weight 70kg) 40 year old male of SA descent, without symptoms who is a non-smoker but with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) on tablet treatment scores 5.8% - this risk is not high enough to warrant treatment with a statin unless he also has abnormally raised cholesterol levels. But this patient is still high risk of CVD due to his ethnicity and DM. There is no current evidence to tailor treatment in such asymptomatic, high risk ethnic minorities.

Similar to screening programs for cancer, screening CTCA, compared to risk stratification with the QRISK ® 3 score, may help in risk stratification of a higher proportion of SA patients. 50 asymptomatic SA patients from 2 sites (25 patients each site) with one CV risk factor will be randomised to either Q-risk 3 score or to screening CTCA.

Read the detailed description

This is a pilot study- 50 patients, randomised 1:1 to each arm (25 patients per arm). This is 10% of the original sample size of 500. As this is a 2 centre study, each centre will recruit 25 patients and the financial requirement will be the responsibility of the individual centre.

Potential participants will be recruited from specialist non-Cardiology clinics in Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals (SWBH) NHS Trust and the Barts London hospital. Participants will be approached by members of the clinical care team when they attend the specialist non-Cardiology clinic. This study will be discussed with the participants and the patient information sheet handed over to them. Assent will be taken for further review in clinic by a member of the research team. Following this and written informed consent, they will be randomised to either CTCA or Q-risk 3 score.

Non-English-speaking patients will have a Trust translator (either language line or in-person).

Randomisation: Block randomisation with sealed envelope technique after written informed consent. Randomisation will be performed by members of the research team. Patients will randomised 1:1 to the interventional arm (CTCA) or Q-risk 3 score.

Blood tests: After consent, a routine blood sample of 20 millilitres (ml) - will be collected. The blood sample will be analysed at sites local lab and the following results will be collected: full blood count, urea and electrolytes, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile and lipoprotein a (Lp (a) ).

Follow up: At one year from recruitment, patients will have a telephonic follow up to obtain information regarding occurrence of any events and/or hospitalisation.

Data collection, management and analysis:

  • Electronic case record file (eCRF) and online database to collect demographic, medical history, CTCA report and Q risk score information.
  • Blood samples in both groups
  • Comparison of demographics, bloods, proportion started on primary prevention treatment between the CTCA and Q-risk 3 group.
  • Categorical variables will be presented as percentage and compared with the chi square or Fisher's test.
  • Continuous variables will be presented as mean (+/- standard deviation) and tested for normalcy by
  • Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normal variables will be compared by student's t-test or in the case or non-normal variables by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
  • Proportion of patients in the CTCA arm who receive primary prevention treatment versus proportion in the Q-risk arm who receive primary prevention treatment will be compared, as will the composite of event rates and hospital admissions at one year.
  • In addition, the association of Q-risk 3 score with plaque on CTCA will be analysed by ROC curve.

Confidentiality: No identifiable data will be leaving the Trust. The respective sites (SWBH and Barts hospitals) will individually perform the CTCA and Q-risk 3 score on their cohort of patients and report it individually Authorised members of the Sponsor organisation will monitor the research at appropriate timelines and therefore have access to patients' identifiable information. Patients recruited will be allocated a participant ID.

Pseudonymised data will be collected on electronic case report forms (CRFs). Following completion of the study, anonymised data will be analysed. NHS indemnity will apply to this study. Study data will be stored for a maximum of 5 years after closure.

Ethics: All required ethical approval(s) for the trial will be sought using the Integrated Research Application System. The trial will be conducted in accordance with all relevant regulations.

Before enrolling patients into the trial, each trial site must ensure that the local conduct of the trial has the agreement of the relevant NHS Trust Research \& Development (R\&D) department. Sites will not be permitted to enrol patients into the trial until written confirmation of Capacity and Capability (CC\&C) is received. All patients will be consented prior to inclusion in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Asymptomatic Condition
  • South Asian

Keywords

  • South Asian
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,368 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 939 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 3,084 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Asymptomatic South Asian patients of age

    • men≥30 years ≤60 years
    • Women >50 years ≤60 years

Plus at least one of the following risk factors:

  • hypertension (HTN)
  • diabetes mellitus (DM)
  • hyperlipidaemia
  • family history of premature coronary artery disease (male \<45 years, female \<55 years)
  • smoking (current or ex-smoker in the last 3 months)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded

    • Patients unable to give written
    • History of previous coronary events/CABG/ coronary stenting or CTCA in the last 4 years
    • Patients with pre-existing cardiac symptoms
    • Patients who could or are pregnant
    • Allergy to iodine contrast
    • Active ongoing and treatment for the same
    • ≤30ml/min/1.72m2
    • Participation in any other interventional research trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Q risk 3 score

    Q risk 3 score will be calculated and if the 10 year risk of cardiovascular events is \>/=10%, patients in this arm will receive primary prevention treatment

  • Experimental
    screening CTCA

    Patients randomised to the CTCA arm will receive primary prevention treatment if plaque is present on the CTCA

    Diagnostic Test: CTCA

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCTCA

    Screening CTCA will be performed in the experimental arm after 1:1 randomisation using sealed envelope technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients treated by primary prevention

    To compare the proportion of patients treated by primary prevention therapy with screening CTCA versus Q-risk 3 score

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association of Q risk 3 score with plaque seen on CTCA

    To assess the association of Q-risk 3 score with plaque on CTCA by receiver operating curve

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Predictors of plaque on CTCA

    To assess the predictors of plaque on CTCA by Cox proportional hazard analysis

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lim MC, Wong TW, Yaneza LO, De Larrazabal C, Lau JK, Boey HK. Non-invasive detection of significant coronary artery disease with multi-section computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Clin Radiol. 2006 Feb;61(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.09.006. PubMed 16439223 ↗
  • Hughes DM, Coronado JIC, Schofield P, Yiu ZZN, Zhao SS. The predictive accuracy of cardiovascular disease risk prediction tools in inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis: an observational validation study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Dec 1;63(12):3432-3441. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead610. PubMed 37966910 ↗
  • Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Brindle P. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2017 May 23;357:j2099. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2099. PubMed 28536104 ↗
  • Harding S. Mortality of migrants from the Indian subcontinent to England and Wales: effect of duration of residence. Epidemiology. 2003 May;14(3):287-92. PubMed 12859028 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is a pilot study which will help to conduct larger studies which will confirm or refute the pilot study findings

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2024; primary completion for Dec 2026, 24 months later.

Of 1,077 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cardiovascular Diseases, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 24 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,216 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 49.

Cardiovascular Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 19, 2024
First posted
Jan 9, 2025
StartEst.
Dec 31, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
Last update
Jan 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06765785
Lead sponsor
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Vinoda Sharma (Consultant Cardiologist, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2025
Start date
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 10, 2025

Study contacts

Vinoda Dr Sharma, FRCP FESC
Contact
vinodasharma@nhs.net
+441215075841
Vinoda Sharma, FRCP FESC
study chair · Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion