ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02090413ASSUREUpdated Dec 28, 2016Results posted

Phase 4 Study of Effect of Aspirin on Flushing in Dimethyl Fumarate-Treated Participants With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 4 interventional study of dimethyl fumarate and acetylsalicylic acid in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Biogen. Completed at 21 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-28.

Sponsored by Biogen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
241
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether 150 mg enteric-coated aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) taken twice a day (BID) with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) administration or 75 mg enteric-coated ASA taken once daily in the morning (QAM) with DMF administration reduces the incidence and/or severity of flushing events in subjects with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) compared with ASA-placebo administered with DMF in the clinical practice setting.

Secondary objectives of this study are: to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DMF administered with and without enteric-coated ASA in the clinical practice setting; to evaluate the impact of DMF administration on quality of life as measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36®) and European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires.

02

Conditions studied

  • Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • multiple sclerosis
  • flushing
  • aspirin
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

618 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; 82 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 241 is above the median of 66 across 437 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting studies →

Lead sponsor

Biogen is the lead sponsor of 511 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Of its 100 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 50 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Naïve to fumaric acid esters (e.g. DMF, Fumaderm, compounded fumarates)
  • Diagnosed with RRMS and satisfies the approved therapeutic indication for DMF
  • Participants of must practice effective and be willing and able to continue contraception throughout the study
  • Ability to complete the tolerability scales accurately using the electronic diary (eDiary) and ability to complete the paper Flushing Diaries

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with study requirements or, at the discretion of the Investigator, is deemed unsuitable for study participation
  • One or more major comorbidities that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may affect the outcome of the study or otherwise makes the subject an unsuitable candidate for study participation. The prevailing product labels for both DMF and ASA should be used as guides
  • Known active (subjects with cutaneous basal cell carcinoma that has been completely excised prior to study entry remain eligible)
  • Chronic use (≥7 consecutive days) of ASA- or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-containing products within the month prior to enrollment in the study
  • A known intolerance to ASA
  • Active peptic ulceration or a history of peptic ulceration, hemophilia or other clotting disorders, or gout
  • Known reactions (e.g., bronchospasm, rhinitis, urticaria) in response to ASA or NSAID administration
  • Impaired hepatic or renal function, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Female subject is pregnant, lactating, or will be attempting to become pregnant during the Double-Blind Period (first 12 weeks) of the study
  • Currently participating in another interventional clinical trial

NOTE: Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
241 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DMF + ASA 150 mg BID

    DMF 120 mg taken BID for the first 7 days and 240 mg BID from Week 2 through Week 48. ASA 150 mg is taken BID from Day 1 through Week 4. (Between Weeks 5 and 8, ASA is prohibited; between Weeks 9 and 48, ASA is allowed as needed.)

    Drug: dimethyl fumarate · Drug: acetylsalicylic acid

  • Experimental
    DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM

    DMF 120 mg taken BID for the first 7 days and 240 mg BID from Week 2 through Week 48. ASA 75 mg is taken in the morning (QAM) and ASA-Placebo is taken in the evening (QPM) from Day 1 through Week 4. (Between Weeks 5 and 8, ASA is prohibited; between Weeks 9 and 48, ASA is allowed as needed.)

    Drug: dimethyl fumarate · Drug: acetylsalicylic acid · Drug: ASA-Placebo

  • Experimental
    DMF + ASA-Placebo BID

    DMF 120 mg taken BID for the first 7 days and 240 mg BID from Week 2 through Week 48. ASA-Placebo is taken BID from Day 1 through Week 4. (Between Weeks 5 and 8, ASA is prohibited; between Weeks 9 and 48, ASA is allowed as needed.)

    Drug: dimethyl fumarate · Drug: ASA-Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by the Modified Global Flushing Severity Scale (MGFSS)

    Participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks treatment, recorded on the hand-held participant reporting device (eDiary) as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects). Day 1 data are not included in the analysis because MGFSS question refers to last 24 hours flushing score.

    Time frame: Day 2 to Week 4

  2. Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by the Modified Flushing Severity Scale (MFSS)

    Participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks of treatment recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 4

  3. Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by MGFSS

    Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks of treatment recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects). Day 1 data are not included in the analysis because MGFSS question refers to last 24 hours flushing score.

    Time frame: Day 2 to Week 4

  4. Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by MFSS

    Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks of treatment recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin.This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of Treatment, as Assessed by MGFSS

    Participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of Treatment, as Assessed by MFSS

    Participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 12

  3. Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MGFSS

    Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 12

  4. Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MFSS

    Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 12

  5. Duration of Flushing Episodes During Weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MGFSS

    Duration of participant-reported flushing events during weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12

  6. Duration of Flushing Episodes During Weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MFSS

    Duration of participant-reported flushing events during weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects). For participants with more than 1 flushing event during a visit interval, the average duration for the visit interval was used.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12

  7. Number of Participants With Self-Reported Flushing Events During Weeks 13 to 48

    Participant-reported flushing events (which include redness, warmth, tingling, and/or itching of the skin) during Weeks 13 to 48 of treatment were recorded in the CRF.

    Time frame: Week 13 to Week 48

  8. Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs in the First 12 Weeks

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or; results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An SAE may also be any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed above. A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12

  9. Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs, SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs in Weeks 13 to 48

    AE: any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or; results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An SAE may also be any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed above. A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug.

    Time frame: Week 13 to Week 48

  10. Number of Participants Discontinuing Treatment and Discontinuing the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Flushing AEs in the First 12 Weeks

    A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug. Flushing AEs include redness, warmth, tingling, and/or itching of the skin.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12

  11. Number of Participants Discontinuing Treatment and Discontinuing the Study Due to Treatment-Emergent Flushing AEs in Weeks 13 to 48

    A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug. Flushing AEs include redness, warmth, tingling, and/or itching of the skin.

    Time frame: Week 13 to Week 48

  12. Change From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Physical Component Summary (PCS)

    SF-36 is a self-administered, generic health status questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure 8 health concepts: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. The score for a domain is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0 (worst health-related quality of life) to 100 (best health-related quality of life). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0 (lowest level of physical functioning) to 100 (highest level of physical functioning).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or early termination (ET)

  13. Change From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Mental Component Summary (MCS)

    SF-36 is a self-administered, generic health status questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure 8 health concepts: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. The score for a domain is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0 (worst health-related quality of life) to 100 (best health-related quality of life). Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0 (lowest level of physical functioning) to 100 (highest level of physical functioning).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire: Mobility

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Self-Care

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET

  16. Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Usual Activities

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Pain/Discomfort

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET

  18. Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Anxiety/Depression

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET

  19. Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-VAS

    For the EQ-VAS, the participant was instructed to draw a line on a 20-cm vertical scale at the point that best describes his or her own health, where 0 represents the "worst imaginable health state" and 100 represents the "best imaginable health state."

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET

07

Results

Posted Dec 28, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Started818080
Completed626057
Not completed192023
Withdrew: Adverse event111520
Withdrew: Flushing event201
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject222
Withdrew: Investigator decision110
Withdrew: Other210
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up110

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by the Modified Global Flushing Severity Scale (MGFSS)

Participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks treatment, recorded on the hand-held participant reporting device (eDiary) as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects). Day 1 data are not included in the analysis because MGFSS question refers to last 24 hours flushing score.

Time frame:
Day 2 to Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by the Modified Global Flushing Severity Scale (MGFSS)
percentage of participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Weeks 1-4 combined; n=80, 79, 8090.092.488.8
Week 1; n=80, 77, 8083.885.783.8
Week 2; n=77, 76, 7976.661.869.6
Week 3; n=74, 74, 7673.055.453.9
Week 4; n=72, 71, 7159.754.954.9
Statistical analysis
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 2.4 · 95% CI -6.4 to 11.2Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: -1.3 · 95% CI -10.8 to 8.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 2.0 · 95% CI -9.3 to 13.2Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 0.0 · 95% CI -11.4 to 11.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -14.8 · 95% CI -29.2 to -0.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: -7.0 · 95% CI -20.9 to 6.9Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -17.6 · 95% CI -32.8 to -2.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: -19.0 · 95% CI -34.1 to -3.9Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -4.8 · 95% CI -21.0 to 11.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: -4.8 · 95% CI -21.0 to 11.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by the Modified Flushing Severity Scale (MFSS)

Participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks of treatment recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by the Modified Flushing Severity Scale (MFSS)
percentage of participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Overall flushing events91.396.296.3
Overall redness events90.088.588.8
Overall warmth events92.597.497.5
Overall tingling events81.387.286.3
Overall itching events87.579.576.3
Statistical analysis
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 4.9 · 95% CI -2.6 to 12.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 5.0 · 95% CI -2.5 to 12.5Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -1.5 · 95% CI -11.2 to 8.1Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: -1.3 · 95% CI -10.8 to 8.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 4.9 · 95% CI -1.8 to 11.7Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 5.0 · 95% CI -1.7 to 11.7Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 5.9 · 95% CI -5.4 to 17.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 5.0 · 95% CI -6.4 to 16.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -8.0 · 95% CI -19.5 to 3.5Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: -11.3 · 95% CI -23.1 to 0.6Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
PrimaryWorst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by MGFSS

Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks of treatment recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects). Day 1 data are not included in the analysis because MGFSS question refers to last 24 hours flushing score.

Time frame:
Day 2 to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by MGFSS
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by MGFSS4.36 ± 2.663.99 ± 2.633.93 ± 2.47
PrimaryWorst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by MFSS

Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during the first 4 weeks of treatment recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin.This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During the First 4 Weeks of Treatment, as Assessed by MFSS
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Overall flushing4.84 ± 2.774.73 ± 2.434.78 ± 2.53
Redness4.83 ± 2.694.65 ± 2.734.34 ± 2.67
Warmth5.03 ± 2.544.88 ± 2.384.9 ± 2.46
Tingling3.31 ± 2.383.62 ± 2.533.3 ± 2.30
Itching3.7 ± 2.553.64 ± 2.763.23 ± 2.66
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of Treatment, as Assessed by MGFSS

Participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of Treatment, as Assessed by MGFSS
percentage of participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 71, 7074.673.280.0
Weeks 9-12 combined; n=67, 62, 6561.267.776.9
Statistical analysis
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -1.4 · 95% CI -15.8 to 13.0Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 5.4 · 95% CI -8.4 to 19.1Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 6.5 · 95% CI -9.9 to 23.0Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 15.7 · 95% CI 0.2 to 31.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of Treatment, as Assessed by MFSS

Participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting Overall Flushing Events During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of Treatment, as Assessed by MFSS
percentage of participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Overall Flushing, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 7080.382.984.3
Overall Flushing, Weeks 9-12 combined;n=68, 65, 6566.269.278.5
Redness, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 7077.575.781.4
Redness, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 6570.661.573.8
Warmth, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 7080.380.082.9
Warmth, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 6570.670.875.4
Tingling, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 7057.755.771.4
Tingling, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 6554.449.261.5
Itching, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 7054.964.364.3
Itching, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 6548.552.356.9
Statistical analysis
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 2.6 · 95% CI -10.2 to 15.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 4.0 · 95% CI -8.6 to 16.6Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 3.1 · 95% CI -12.8 to 18.9Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 12.3 · 95% CI -2.8 to 27.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -1.8 · 95% CI -15.7 to 12.2Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 4.0 · 95% CI -9.4 to 17.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -9.0 · 95% CI -25.1 to 7.0Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 3.3 · 95% CI -12.0 to 18.5Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -0.3 · 95% CI -13.5 to 12.9Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 2.6 · 95% CI -10.2 to 15.4Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 0.2 · 95% CI -15.3 to 15.7Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 4.8 · 95% CI -10.3 to 19.9Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -2.0 · 95% CI -18.4 to 14.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 13.7 · 95% CI -1.9 to 29.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: -5.2 · 95% CI -22.1 to 11.8Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 7.1 · 95% CI -9.6 to 23.9Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 9.4 · 95% CI -6.8 to 25.5Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 9.4 · 95% CI -6.8 to 25.5Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Difference in percentage: 3.8 · 95% CI -13.2 to 20.8Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Difference in percentage: 8.4 · 95% CI -8.5 to 25.3Two sided 95% CI of difference in proportions was constructed based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
SecondaryWorst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MGFSS

Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MGFSS
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 71, 703.00 ± 2.612.83 ± 2.43.47 ± 2.64
Weeks 9 to 12 combined; n=67, 62, 652.43 ± 2.722.81 ± 2.762.95 ± 2.5
SecondaryWorst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MFSS

Worst severity of participant-reported flushing events during Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Worst Severity Scores of Overall Flushing During Weeks 5-8 and Weeks 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MFSS
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Overall Flushing, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 703.37 ± 2.83.24 ± 2.573.57 ± 2.45
Overall Flushing, Weeks 9-12 combined;n=68, 65, 652.5 ± 2.653.15 ± 2.983.45 ± 2.74
Redness, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 703.27 ± 2.92.83 ± 2.543.51 ± 2.58
Redness, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 652.57 ± 2.552.75 ± 3.133.4 ± 2.93
Warmth, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 703.3 ± 2.713.11 ± 2.453.49 ± 2.54
Warmth, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 652.66 ± 2.523.06 ± 2.973.45 ± 2.85
Tingling, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 702.03 ± 2.412.07 ± 2.52.79 ± 2.56
Tingling, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 651.71 ± 2.171.78 ± 2.432.54 ± 2.69
Itching, Weeks 5-8 combined; n=71, 70, 701.92 ± 2.352.17 ± 2.322.64 ± 2.59
Itching, Weeks 9-12 combined; n=68, 65, 651.51 ± 2.041.69 ± 2.152.17 ± 2.52
SecondaryDuration of Flushing Episodes During Weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MGFSS

Duration of participant-reported flushing events during weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MGFSS. The MGFSS measures the side effects related to flushing during the past 24 hours. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects).

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDuration of Flushing Episodes During Weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MFSS

Duration of participant-reported flushing events during weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the study recorded on the eDiary as assessed by MFSS. MFSS questionnaire measures the side effects related to flushing following drug administration. Flushing means redness, warmth, tingling or itching of the skin. This questionnaire relates only to the period of time since the investigational drug was administered and was to be completed within 10 hours of taking the study drug (2 times/day). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no flushing side effects) to 10 (extreme flushing side effects). For participants with more than 1 flushing event during a visit interval, the average duration for the visit interval was used.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Duration of Flushing Episodes During Weeks 1-4, 5-8 and 9-12 of the Study, as Assessed by MFSS
hoursDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Weeks 1-4 combined; n=73, 75, 770.69 ± 0.440.8 ± 0.591.11 ± 1.16
Weeks 5-8 combined; n=57, 58, 591.06 ± 2.120.73 ± 0.521.08 ± 1.18
Weeks 9-12 combined; n=45, 45, 510.66 ± 0.520.69 ± 0.590.79 ± 0.94
Statistical analysis
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Mean difference (final values): -0.145 · 95% CI -0.414 to 0.125Analysis of variance model (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Mean difference (final values): -0.392 · 95% CI -0.656 to -0.128ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Mean difference (final values): -0.247 · 95% CI -0.507 to 0.012ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Mean difference (final values): 0.376 · 95% CI -0.193 to 0.945ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Mean difference (final values): 0.069 · 95% CI -0.498 to 0.635ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Mean difference (final values): -0.308 · 95% CI -0.867 to 0.251ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM · Mean difference (final values): 0.024 · 95% CI -0.308 to 0.355ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA-Placebo BID vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Mean difference (final values): -0.06 · 95% CI -0.374 to 0.254ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
  • DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM vs DMF + ASA 150 mg BID · Mean difference (final values): -0.084 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.232ANCOVA model was used with treatment, center as effects and baseline characteristics as covariates.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Self-Reported Flushing Events During Weeks 13 to 48

Participant-reported flushing events (which include redness, warmth, tingling, and/or itching of the skin) during Weeks 13 to 48 of treatment were recorded in the CRF.

Time frame:
Week 13 to Week 48
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Self-Reported Flushing Events During Weeks 13 to 48
participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Number of Participants With Self-Reported Flushing Events During Weeks 13 to 48363542
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs in the First 12 Weeks

AE: any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or; results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An SAE may also be any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed above. A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to AEs in the First 12 Weeks
participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Any event666863
Moderate or severe event243826
Severe event358
Related event353840
Serious event112
Discontinued treatment due to event5912
Discontinued study due to event5913
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs, SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs in Weeks 13 to 48

AE: any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or; results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An SAE may also be any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed above. A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug.

Time frame:
Week 13 to Week 48
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs, SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs in Weeks 13 to 48
participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Any event666866
Moderate or severe event405051
Severe event51212
Related event454249
Serious event373
Discontinued treatment due to event9610
Discontinued study due to event9610
SecondaryNumber of Participants Discontinuing Treatment and Discontinuing the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Flushing AEs in the First 12 Weeks

A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug. Flushing AEs include redness, warmth, tingling, and/or itching of the skin.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Discontinuing Treatment and Discontinuing the Study Due to Treatment-emergent Flushing AEs in the First 12 Weeks
participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Discontinuing treatment002
Discontinuing study002
SecondaryNumber of Participants Discontinuing Treatment and Discontinuing the Study Due to Treatment-Emergent Flushing AEs in Weeks 13 to 48

A treatment-emergent AE is defined as any AE that occurs after the first administration of DMF or ASA/Placebo drug. Flushing AEs include redness, warmth, tingling, and/or itching of the skin.

Time frame:
Week 13 to Week 48
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Discontinuing Treatment and Discontinuing the Study Due to Treatment-Emergent Flushing AEs in Weeks 13 to 48
participantsDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Discontinuing treatment200
Discontinuing study200
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Physical Component Summary (PCS)

SF-36 is a self-administered, generic health status questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure 8 health concepts: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. The score for a domain is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0 (worst health-related quality of life) to 100 (best health-related quality of life). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0 (lowest level of physical functioning) to 100 (highest level of physical functioning).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or early termination (ET)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Physical Component Summary (PCS)
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=81, 80, 8044.627 ± 10.82241.99 ± 10.96643.16 ± 11.438
Change at Week 24; n=68, 63, 61-0.014 ± 9.1540.551 ± 8.473-1.471 ± 7.754
Change at Week 48/ET; n=68, 65, 64-1.008 ± 10.31-1.449 ± 10.964-2.989 ± 14.22
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Mental Component Summary (MCS)

SF-36 is a self-administered, generic health status questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure 8 health concepts: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. The score for a domain is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0 (worst health-related quality of life) to 100 (best health-related quality of life). Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0 (lowest level of physical functioning) to 100 (highest level of physical functioning).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline at Weeks 24 and 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Mental Component Summary (MCS)
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=81, 80, 8047.413 ± 8.77245.048 ± 10.53146.496 ± 10.812
Change at Week 24; n=68, 63, 61-0.139 ± 11.66-0.893 ± 10.059-0.312 ± 12.251
Change at Week 48/ET; n=68, 65, 64-0.976 ± 13.759-2.081 ± 13.733-2.82 ± 15.465
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire: Mobility

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire: Mobility
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=81, 79, 801.877 ± 0.9671.785 ± 0.8871.888 ± 0.928
Change at Week 24; n=67, 63, 60-0.104 ± 0.6060.095 ± 1.214-0.05 ± 0.467
Change at Week 48/ET; n=67, 63, 630.03 ± 0.6270.079 ± 1.0210.095 ± 0.56
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Self-Care

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Self-Care
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=81, 79, 801.321 ± 0.6681.38 ± 0.7221.363 ± 0.621
Change at Week 24; n=67, 63, 60-0.045 ± 0.442-0.079 ± 1.1820.017 ± 0.567
Change at Week 48/ET; n=67, 64, 63-0.045 ± 0.367-0.109 ± 1.1430.079 ± 0.604
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Usual Activities

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Usual Activities
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=81, 79, 801.827 ± 0.8911.975 ± 0.9472.025 ± 0.993
Change at Week 24; n=67, 63, 60-0.06 ± 0.6940 ± 1.244-0.017 ± 0.725
Change at Week 48/ET; n=67, 64, 630.149 ± 0.783-0.016 ± 1.1050.063 ± 0.896
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Pain/Discomfort

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Pain/Discomfort
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=81, 79, 802 ± 0.882.038 ± 0.8691.975 ± 0.941
Change at Week 24; n=67, 63, 60-0.104 ± 0.6990 ± 1.0320.1 ± 0.573
Change at Week 48/ET; n=67, 64, 63-0.09 ± 0.7120.078 ± 1.117-0.127 ± 0.707
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Anxiety/Depression

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), or "severe problems" (3). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire: Anxiety/Depression
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=81, 79, 801.642 ± 0.7631.848 ± 0.8931.763 ± 0.917
Change at Week 24; n=67, 63, 60-0.06 ± 0.903-0.19 ± 1.2930 ± 0.803
Change at Week 48/ET; n=67, 63, 630.03 ± 0.953-0.127 ± 1.184-0.032 ± 0.842
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-VAS

For the EQ-VAS, the participant was instructed to draw a line on a 20-cm vertical scale at the point that best describes his or her own health, where 0 represents the "worst imaginable health state" and 100 represents the "best imaginable health state."

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 or ET
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 and Week 48 in Quality of Life Measurements as Assessed by the EQ-VAS
units on a scaleDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Baseline; n=80, 80, 8078.288 ± 16.44269.6 ± 19.53573.438 ± 16.38
Change at Week 24; n=66, 63, 60-2.318 ± 12.579-0.587 ± 17.24-2.95 ± 16.326
Change at Week 48/ET; n=66, 64, 63-3.061 ± 18.053-0.438 ± 17.834-1.476 ± 13.201

Adverse events

Collected over Screening through Week 48. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DMF + ASA-Placebo BID—4/81 (4.9%)77/81 (95.1%)
DMF + ASA 75 mg QAM—8/80 (10%)76/80 (95%)
DMF + ASA 150 mg BID—5/80 (6.3%)76/80 (95%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/812/801/80
Multiple sclerosis relapseNervous system disorders0/812/800/80
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/811/800/80
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/811/800/80
PeritonitisInfections and infestations0/811/800/80
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/810/801/80
Drug intoleranceGeneral disorders0/810/801/80
PainGeneral disorders0/811/800/80
Gastrointestinal disorderGastrointestinal disorders0/810/801/80
AbasiaGeneral disorders0/811/800/80
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 266
Most frequent other events
EventDMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BID
FlushingVascular disorders42/8136/8045/80
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders12/8116/8023/80
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders17/8121/8019/80
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations20/8115/8016/80
HeadacheNervous system disorders16/8114/8018/80
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders14/8114/8014/80
Multiple sclerosis relapseNervous system disorders5/8112/805/80
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders5/8111/804/80
FatigueGeneral disorders9/8111/807/80
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders8/815/8010/80

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BIDTotal
Mean40.17 ± 10.6339.48 ± 8.4840.16 ± 8.2339.94 ± 9.15
Gender
Gender(Participants)DMF + ASA-Placebo BIDDMF + ASA 75 mg QAMDMF + ASA 150 mg BIDTotal
Female596260181
Male22182060
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • Research Site
    Cork, Ireland
  • Research Site
    Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
  • Research Site
    Dublin, Dublin 7, Ireland
  • Research Site
    Dublin, Dublin 9, Ireland
  • Research Site
    Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Cardiff, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Edinburgh, EHA 2XU, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Exeter, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Glasgow, G51 4TH, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Leicester, LE5 4PW, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Liverpool, L9 7LJ, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    London, SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Plymouth, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Swansea, SA6 6NL, United Kingdom
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 28, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02090413
Lead sponsor
Biogen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 18, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Results posted
Dec 28, 2016
Last update
Dec 28, 2016

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Biogen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Aspirin

Start the discussion