CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02078427AHEADUpdated Jun 17, 2024

ADVATE/ ADYNOVI Hemophilia A Outcome Database (AHEAD)

An observational study in Hemophilia A, sponsored by Baxalta now part of Shire. Completed at 110 sites in 22 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-17.

Sponsored by Baxalta now part of Shire · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
951
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to document the natural history of hemophilia A disease and long-term outcomes in terms of effectiveness, safety and quality of life in participants receiving Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) or Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG) in routine clinical practice

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 951 is above the median of 80 across 314 observational studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Baxalta now part of Shire is the lead sponsor of 110 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will include male and female participants of any race and age who have a diagnosis of hemophilia A (Factor VIII (FVIII) =5%). Participants must have been prescribed rAHF-PFM or rAHF-PEG for the management of hemophilia A by the treating physician prior to the decision to enroll in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant has hemophilia A {FVIII lesser than or equal to (\<=)5%}
  • Participant is prescribed Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) or Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG) by the treating physician
  • Participant or participant's legally authorized representative provides informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has known hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients
  • Participant has known allergic reaction to mouse or hamster proteins
  • Participant has participated in another clinical study involving an investigational product (IP) or device within 30 days prior to study enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving another FVIII concentrate or device during the course of this study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
951 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • rAHF-PFM

    Participants treated with rAHF-PFM alone

    Biological: ADVATE

  • rAHF-PEG

    Participants treated with rAHF-PEG alone

    Biological: ADYNOVI

  • rAHF-PFM then rAHF-PEG

    Participants treated with rAHF-PFM and subsequently switched to rAHF-PEG

    Biological: ADVATE · Biological: ADYNOVI

Interventions

  • BiologicalADVATE

    Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method

    Also known as: octocog alfa, rAHF-PFM

  • BiologicalADYNOVI

    Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) Pegylated

    Also known as: rurioctocog alfa pegol, rAHF-PEG

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Joint Health Outcomes - Assessed by Physical Exam Using Only the Pain, Bleeding, and Physical Exam Parameters of the Gilbert Scale

    The World Federation of Hemophilia developed a musculoskeletal evaluation system, commonly referred to as the Gilbert test, to measure hemophilia joint health status.The Gilbert test needs to be performed in the absence of acute bleed, acute pain, and acute inflammation into the evaluated joint. Four parameters are used in each Gilbert test: pain (score: 0-3), bleeding (score: 0-3), physical exam (score: 0-12), and X-ray evaluation (score: 0-13) Scores of 0, represent no pain, no bleeding, no physical exam issues, and/or no x-ray issues. Higher scores for each of these categories represents worsening conditions.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Annualized Bleed Rate, All Joints

    The annualized bleed rate for all joints will be calculated per participant and summarized over the set of available participants with a minimum observation period of 90 days per treatment regimen.

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  2. Annualized Bleed Rate, All Bleeds

    The annualized bleed rate for all bleeds will be calculated per participant and summarized over the set of available participants.with a minimum observation period of 90 days per treatment regimen.

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  3. Annualized bleed rate, pre-existing target joints at baseline

    The annualized bleed rate for pre-existing target joints at baseline will be calculated per participant and summarized over the set of available participants with a minimum observation period of 90 days per treatment regimen.

    Time frame: Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  4. Incidence of New Target Joints

    The incidence of new target joints will be calculated as the total number of new target joints in all participants divided by the total number of observation days.

    Time frame: Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  5. Status of joint health by X-ray by Pettersson scale

    The status of joint health by X-ray by Pettersson score will be summarized for each observational year.

    Time frame: Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit.

  6. Status of Joint Health by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scoring System- Using The Lund Scoring System (LSS)

    LSS score format= A(e:s:h). Sum of values for Subchondral Cyst (score: 1-6), irregularity/erosion of Subchondral Cortex (score: 1-4), and Chondral Destruction (score: 1-6) gives value for the A component of score. e, s, h components represent effusion/hemarthrosis, hypertrophic synovial, \& hemosiderin deposition (score: 0-4 for each). Max. score is 16(4:4:4). Subchondral Cyst: * ≥1 bone * ≥2 bones * \>3 cysts in ≥1 bone * \>3 cysts ≥2 bones * Largest size \>4 mm: ≥1 bone * Largest size \>4 mm: ≥2 bones Subchondral Cortex * ≥1 bone * ≥2 bones * Involve \> half joint surface: ≥1 bone * Involve \> half of joint surface: ≥2 bones Chondral Destruction * ≥1 bone * ≥2 bones * Full thickness defect (FTD): ≥1 bone * FTD: ≥2 bones * FTD involves \>1/3 of joint surface: ≥1 bone * FTD involves \>1/3 of joint surface: ≥2 bones Effusion/hemarthrosis (e): Hypertrophic synovial (s): Hemosiderin (h): (0-4 for each): * 0 absent * 1 equivocal * 2 small * 3 moderate * 4 large

    Time frame: Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  7. Status of joint health using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)

    The International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) developed a scoring system for musculoskeletal evaluation, the HJHS, optimized for use in children with no or minimal joint disease. The HJHS includes the following parameters: swelling, duration of swelling, muscle atrophy, joint pain, crepitus on motion, flexion loss, extension loss, strength and global gait.

    Time frame: Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  8. Overall effectiveness assessment for prophylaxis therapy

    * Excellent: Same or lower breakthrough bleed rate (BBR) within last 12 months (M) compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prior prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other Factor VIII (FVIII), same or better than expected outcome according to investigator's expectation * Good: Minor increase in BBR within last 12M compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other FVIII, slightly less than expected outcome according to investigator's expectation * Fair: Moderate increase in BBR in last 12M compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other FVIII, somewhat less than expected outcome according to investigator's expectation * Poor: Significant increase in BBR in the 12M compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other FVIII, little to no benefit according to investigator's expectation

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone;- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years;- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  9. Compliance with the dosing prescribed and its relationship with effectiveness

    Evaluation of patients´ compliance to prescribed prophylactic treatment will be performed by the treating physician. Compliance will be categorized according to a 4-point table (Highly compliant, Fairly compliant, Moderately compliant, Poorly compliant)

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone;- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years;- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  10. Overall effectiveness assessment for on-demand treatment

    * Excellent: Bleed episodes typically respond to same or fewer number of infusion and same or lower dose as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation * Good: Most bleed episodes typically respond to same number of infusion and dose but some require more infusions or higher dose as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation * Fair: Bleed episodes typically require more infusions and/or higher dose than expected as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation * Poor: Bleed episodes routinely fail to respond to same number of infusion and dose and require additional or different factor concentrate for hemostatic control as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  11. Global effectiveness assessment for on-demand treatment

    * Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of bleeding as evidenced by objective signs (e.g., swelling, tenderness, irritability, inconsolability, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal hemorrhage) within approximately 8 hours of a single infusion. No additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusions to maintain hemostasis would not affect this scoring. * Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after the infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. * Fair: Probable or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after the infusion. Requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. * Poor: No improvement or condition worsens.

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  12. Number of rAHF-PFM or rAHF-PEG units required for bleed cessation

    Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG)

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  13. Number of rAHF-PFM or rAHF-PEG infusions required for bleed cessation

    Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG)

    Time frame: Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  14. Incidence of target joint intervention, including surgery, radiosynovectomy, and chemosynovectomy

    Time frame: Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit

  15. Incidence of pseudo tumor development

    Time frame: Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  16. Quality of Life: HAL questionnaire - for adult patients

    The the lHAL measures activities involving the upper extremities, basic activities involving ower extremities and complex activities involving the lower extremities as well as an overall physical activity score for adults.

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  17. Quality of Life: SF-12v2 questionnaire - for adult patients

    The SF-12v2 measures generic health-related quality of life for adults.

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  18. Quality of Life: EQ-5D questionnaire - for adult patients

    The EQ-5D measures health utility in adult participants.

    Time frame: Enrollment visit;Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  19. Quality of Life: PedHAL questionnaire - for pediatric patients

    The PedHAL measures activities involving the upper extremities, basic activities involving the lower extremities and complex activities involving the lower extremities as well as an overall physical activity score for children. For participants 4-13 years of age: - PedHAL (parent version) For participants 14-17 years of age: - PedHAL (child version)

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  20. Quality of Life: SF-10 questionnaire - for pediatric patients

    The SF-10 measures generic health-related quality of life for children and is parent-completed.

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  21. Quality of Life: EQ-5D (14 and up) questionnaire - for pediatric patients

    The EQ-5D measures health utility in subjects aged 14 and up.

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  22. Chronic pain associated with hemophilia, as measured over a period of 4 weeks on an annual basis, using the visual analog scale (VAS)

    The VAS assesses the pain using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). During screening visit and on an annual basis, the investigators shall ask participants to rate the average level of chronic pain associated with hemophilia over the period of 4 weeks prior to visit date using the VAS.

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  23. Acute pain associated with hemophilia, as measured with individual bleeding episodes, using the visual analog scale (VAS)

    The VAS assesses the pain using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Participants will be asked to provide ratings on level of acute pain associated with each bleeding episode using the VAS. The VAS scores will be recorded in the participant diary.

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  24. Number of days lost from school or work due to bleeding episodes

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  25. Modalities of switching from a standard FVIII product to rAHF-PEG - 1

    Difference in number of weekly prophylactic infusions between previous regimen and rAHF-PEG

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  26. Modalities of switching from a standard FVIII product to rAHF-PEG - 2

    Difference in number of weekly doses between previous regimen and rAHFPEG

    Time frame: Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit

  27. Incidence of Inhibitors in Previously Treated Patients (PTPs) with Factor VIII (FVIII) Levels Lesser than (<)1%, Lesser Than or Equal to (<=) 2%, and <= 5% without history of inhibitor

    Time frame: Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)

  28. Incidence of Inhibitors in Previously Treated Patients (PTPs) with Factor VIII (FVIII) Levels <1%, <=2%, and <= 5% with history of inhibitor

    Time frame: Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)

  29. Incidence of Inhibitors in Previously Untreated Patient (PUPs) and Minimally Treated Patients (MTPs) with Factor VIII (FVIII) Levels <1%, <=2%, and <= 5%

    Time frame: Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)

  30. Incidence of therapy-related serious adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)

  31. Incidence of therapy-related non-serious adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)

  32. Incidence of inhibitors after switching to rAHF-PEG

    Incidence of inhibitors after switching to rAHF-PEG in the same subgroups of patients

    Time frame: Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)

07

Study locations

110 sites
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • South Metropolitan Health Service trading as Fiona Stanley Hospital
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6050, Australia
  • Landes Frauen und Kinderklinik Linz (LFKK Linz)
    Linz, 4017, Austria
  • Kepler Universitätsklinikum Klinik für Kinder-und Jugendheilkunde
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Medizinische Universitaet Wien
    Wien, 1090, Austria
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
    Bruxelles, B-1200, Belgium
  • Hemoce - Ce
    Fortaleza, Ceará 60431086, Brazil
  • Hemocentro do Espírito Santo
    Vitória, Espírito Santo 29040-090, Brazil
  • Hemepar - Pr
    Curitiba, Paraná 80045-145, Brazil
  • Hemorgs - Rs
    Porto Alegre, Parthenon 90650-000, Brazil
  • Fundação HEMOPA
    Belém, Pará 66033-000, Brazil
  • Hemocentro da UNICAMP
    Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil
  • Hemocentro Ribeirão Preto - SP
    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14051140, Brazil
  • Hemorio - Rj
    Rio de Janeiro, 20211030, Brazil
  • Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
    São Paulo, 5403000, Brazil
  • Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada
  • The Moncton City Hospital
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 6Z8, Canada
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada
  • St-Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
  • Sick Kids Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
  • Royal University Hospital
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada
  • Shenzhen Children's Hospital
    Shenzhen, Futian, China
  • Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Nanfang Medical University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Institute of Hematology, Blood Disease Hospital, PUMC&CAMS
    Tianjin, Heping, China
  • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology
    Wuhan, Hubei, China
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
    Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China
  • The Blood Center of Shandong Province
    Jinan, Shandong, China
  • Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital University of Medical Sciences
    Beijing, 100045, China
  • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
    Nanjing, China
  • Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
    Shenzhen, 518037, China
  • IPS FUSA SAS Centro Integral de Coagulacion
    Atlantico, Colombia
  • Integral Solutions SD SAS
    Bogotá, Colombia
  • Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL
    Floridablanca, 681004, Colombia
  • Fakultní nemocnice Brno
    Brno, 613 00, Czechia
  • Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava, Oddělení dětské hematologie a hematoonkologie
    Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
  • Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava
    Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
  • Fakultní nemocnice v Motole
    Praha 5, 150 06, Czechia
  • Rigshospitalet
    Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
  • "Hôpital Morvan CHRU de Brest"
    Brest, 29200, France
  • CHU Côte de Nacre - CRTH
    CAEN Cedex, 14033, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Générale - CTH
    Chambery Cedex, 73011, France
  • CTRH - CHU Bocage
    Dijon Cedex, 21079, France
  • Hôpital André Mignot
    Le Chesnay Cedex, 78157, France
  • Hôpital de la Mère et de l'Enfant - CHU de LIMOGES
    LIMOGES cedex, 87043, France
  • CHRU Hôtel Dieu - CRTH
    Nantes Cedex, 44093, France
  • Hôpital Cochin
    Paris, 75014, France
  • CHU de Reims Hôpital Maison Blanche - CRTH
    Reims Cedex, 51092, France
  • Centre Régional de Traitement de l'Hémophilie et des Maladies hémorragiques. CHU de Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
    RENNES Cedex 09, 35033, France
  • CHRU Charles Nicolle
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • CIC
    Saint Priest en Jarez, 42270, France
  • CHRU Purpan CRTH - Pavillon Sénac
    Toulouse Cedex 9, 31059, France
  • Aghia Sofia Children's Hospital
    Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece
  • Laikon General Hospital
    Goudi, Athens 11527, Greece
  • General Hospital of Thessaloniki "Ippokratio"
    Thessaloniki, 546 42, Greece
  • Heim Pál Gyermekkórház
    Budapest, H-1089, Hungary
  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont
    Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
  • Mohács City Hospital
    Mohács, H-7700, Hungary
  • Jósa András County Hospital
    Nyíregyháza, H-4400, Hungary
  • Markusovszky Hospital
    Szombathely, H-9700, Hungary
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Consorziale Di Bari
    Bari, 70124, Italy
  • Policlinico S Orsola Malpighi
    Bologna, 40138, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Vittorio Emanuele, Ferrarotto, S. Bambino
    Catania, 95120, Italy
  • Ospedale Pugliese -Ciaccio
    Catanzaro, 88100, Italy
  • Az. Osp. Univ. Careggi
    Firenze, 50134, Italy
  • Ospedale di Macerata
    Macerata, 62100, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milano, 20122, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova Clinica Medica II
    Padova, 35100, Italy
  • AOUP P. Giaccone
    Palermo, 90133, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli
    Reggio Calabria, 89123, Italy
  • Università degli studi di Roma "La Sapienza"
    Roma, 00161, Italy
  • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
    Roma, 00165, Italy
  • Policlinico Universitario Gemelli
    Roma, 00168, Italy
  • Centro Emofilia e Coagulopatie Rare
    Scorrano, 73025, Italy
  • Ospedale Molinette
    Torino, 10126, Italy
  • Rikshospitalet
    Oslo, N-0027, Norway
  • Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, N-0424, Norway
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. dr Andrzeja Jurasza
    Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1
    Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Dzieciecy Szpital Kliniczny
    Warszawa, 02-091, Poland
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny we Wrocławiu
    Wroclaw, 50-556, Poland
  • Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo
    Ponta Delgada, Açores 9500-370, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar e Universitade de Coimbra
    Coimbra, 3000-602, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte Hospital de Sta. Maria
    Lisboa, 1649-035, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar de São João, E.P.E.
    Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
  • SBHI Chelyabinsk Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
    Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
  • Federal State Budget Institution "Hematology Research Center" of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
    Moscow, 125167, Russian Federation
  • SBHI of the Republic of Kareliya Republican Hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov
    Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation
  • State Budget Healthcare Institution of Saint-Petersburg "City polyclinic #37"
    Saint Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation
  • Clinics of FSBEI High Education Samara SMU of MoH of Russia
    Samara, 443079, Russian Federation
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, SI-1000, Slovenia
  • Hospital Teresa Herrera-Materno Infantil
    A Coruña, 15006, Spain
  • Hospital Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH)
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases
    Palma de Mallorca, 07120, Spain
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden
  • Kliniska studier i Sverige - Forum Söder
    Malmö, SE-205 02, Sweden
  • Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna
    Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
  • Universitätsspital Basel
    Basel, CH-4031, Switzerland
  • Inselspital Bern
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland

Showing the first 100 of 110 sites across 22 countries.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02078427
Lead sponsor
Baxalta now part of Shire
Collaborators
Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now part of Shire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2014
Start date
Jun 28, 2011
Primary completion
Jan 16, 2024
Completion
Jan 16, 2024
Last update
Jun 17, 2024

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion