An interventional study of PET-MR 18f-FACBC and histology (gold standard) in Prostatic Neoplasms, sponsored by St. Olavs Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-05.
Sponsored by St. Olavs Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in Norwegian men. For optimal treatment, accurate staging of the disease at the time point of diagnosis is important. The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a combined PET/MR examination for risk assessment and detection of lymph node metastases. The overall aim of the project is to improve the investigators ability to provide individually tailored treatment to prostate cancer patients.
The study will include 32 men with high-risk prostate cancer, who are eligible for radical prostatectomy. Informed consent is a requirement for inclusion in the study.
6,484 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,415 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 58 across 4,908 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.
Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →St. Olavs Hospital is the lead sponsor of 171 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: PET-MR 18f-FACBC · Procedure: histology (gold standard)
histopathological classification of co-located dissected lymph nodes
Positive and negative predictive value of 18FACBC PET/MR for detection of lymph node metastases
Findings on 18FACBC PET/MR images will be compared to histopathology, which is considered the gold standard for evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastases
Time frame: 7 days
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.