ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02069353Updated Oct 8, 2019Results posted

Augmented Multimodal Neurologic Monitoring in High Risk Survivors of Cardiac Arrest

An interventional study of QFlow 500™ Perfusion Probe (Hemedex, Cambridge, MA) and Spencer Probe Depth Electrode (Ad-Tech Medical, Racine, WI) in Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Jonathan Elmer. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-08.

Sponsored by Jonathan Elmer · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Low enrollment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiac arrest is the most common cause of death in the United States and as many as 590,000 Americans suffering a cardiac arrest each year. Despite advances in care, as many as 50 to 89% of patients who are resuscitated after a cardiac arrest die in the hospital. Brain injury is the most common cause of death and disability after cardiac arrest. The investigators use advanced brain monitoring in patients who are at high risk of death after cardiac arrest, with the goal of preventing ongoing brain injury. The most common problem the investigators have observed is low oxygen levels in the brain, which is often very difficult to treat.

In this study, the investigators plan to use two additional brain monitors in the care of these high risk patients: a monitor for seizures and a monitor of the amount of blood flow in the brain. The investigators will use these to detect and treat potential causes of low brain oxygen levels. The main hypotheses are that electrical events in the brain such as seizures and "spreading depolarizations" will occur during times of low brain tissue oxygen level, and that treating these events and low blood flow will reduce the rate of low brain oxygen levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Neurological injury
  • Seizures
  • Spreading depolarizations
  • Cerebral hypoperfusion
  • Brain tissue hypoxia
03

In context

Heart Arrest

984 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4 is below the median of 100 across 563 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jonathan Elmer as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • High risk survivors of cardiac arrest
  • Decision by potential subject's clinical team to use our institutional standard invasive, multimodal neurologic monitoring for post-arrest care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cardiac arrest

    Survivors of cardiac arrest at high risk of neurological deterioration. Participants will undergo placement of a Spencer Probe Depth Electrode and QFlow 500™ Perfusion Probe in addition to the institutional standard multimodal neurological monitoring.

    Device: QFlow 500™ Perfusion Probe (Hemedex, Cambridge, MA) · Device: Spencer Probe Depth Electrode (Ad-Tech Medical, Racine, WI)

Interventions

  • DeviceQFlow 500™ Perfusion Probe (Hemedex, Cambridge, MA)
  • DeviceSpencer Probe Depth Electrode (Ad-Tech Medical, Racine, WI)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Spreading Depolarizations

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days

  2. Occult Seizures

    Seizures detected by intracortical EEG but not surface EEG

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days

  3. Cerebral Hypoperfusion

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinically Significant Bleeding

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the initial hospitalization, an expected average of 2 weeks

  2. Monitor-associated Infection

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the initial hospitalization, an expected average of 2 weeks

  3. Device Malfunction

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days

07

Results

Posted Oct 8, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCardiac Arrest
Started4
Completed4
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimarySpreading Depolarizations
Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Spreading Depolarizations
ParticipantsCardiac Arrest
Spreading Depolarizations0
PrimaryOccult Seizures

Seizures detected by intracortical EEG but not surface EEG

Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occult Seizures
ParticipantsCardiac Arrest
Occult Seizures0
PrimaryCerebral Hypoperfusion
Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cerebral Hypoperfusion
ParticipantsCardiac Arrest
Cerebral Hypoperfusion4
SecondaryClinically Significant Bleeding
Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of the initial hospitalization, an expected average of 2 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinically Significant Bleeding
ParticipantsCardiac Arrest
Clinically Significant Bleeding0
SecondaryMonitor-associated Infection
Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of the initial hospitalization, an expected average of 2 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Monitor-associated Infection
ParticipantsCardiac Arrest
Monitor-associated Infection0
SecondaryDevice Malfunction
Time frame:
Participants will be followed for the duration of invasive monitoring, an expected average of 5 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Device Malfunction
ParticipantsCardiac Arrest
Device Malfunction0

Adverse events

Collected over Duration of index hospitalization, a median of 3 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cardiac Arrest3/4 (75%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cardiac Arrest
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years3
>=65 years1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cardiac Arrest
Female3
Male1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cardiac Arrest
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White3
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cardiac Arrest
United States4
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 30, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2015, a primary completion of Oct 2018 and a completion of Oct 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Oct 2019, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 17, 2014
First posted
Feb 24, 2014
Start
Jul 2015
Primary completionActual
Oct 19, 2018
CompletionActual
Oct 19, 2018
Results first posted
Oct 8, 2019
Last update
Oct 8, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02069353
Lead sponsor
Jonathan Elmer
Collaborators
Laerdal Foundation
Responsible party
Jonathan Elmer (Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2014
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
Oct 19, 2018
Completion
Oct 19, 2018
Results posted
Oct 8, 2019
Last update
Oct 8, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion