CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02061319Updated Aug 13, 2026Results posted

Randomized Trial of Nordic Walking vs. Standard Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Heart Failure

An interventional study of Nordic Walking in Heart Failure, sponsored by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main purpose of our project is to see if a 12-week program of Nordic walking is better than standard exercise therapy for increasing exercise capacity (measured by how far people can walk in 6 minutes) and increasing quality of life (measured by having people fill out two questionnaires). We will also see if Nordic walking: improves heart performance (measured by heart ultrasound); improves how active people are (measured by an activity monitor); increases aerobic fitness (measured by a treadmill test); improves body composition (measured by waist size); and reduces hormone levels in the blood.

Read the detailed description

A single-site, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial will be conducted (Appendix C) at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI). Patients with stable HF referred to cardiac rehabilitation will undergo baseline assessment and then be randomly assigned (1:1) to either standard exercise therapy (consisting of regular walking and a resistance exercise program) or Nordic walking. Follow-up measures will be taken at the end of intervention (12 weeks) and after a 14-week no-intervention observation period (26 weeks). After initial randomization to treatment group, participants will be stratified by treatment group and randomly assigned to one of three follow-up measurement conditions at 12 weeks: echocardiograph and cardiopulmonary test (N=80); cardiopulmonary test only (N=60); or no follow-up echocardiograph or cardiopulmonary test (N=76). The primary outcomes will be: a) changes in exercise capacity measured by 6MWT; and b) changes in disease-specific HRQL measured by the MLHFQ. Additional measures will examine the effects of the exercise interventions on: cardiac performance; leisure time activity; cardio-respiratory fitness; body composition; neurohormonal activation; and generic HRQL

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is close to the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation is the lead sponsor of 179 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of HF based on a HF admission and/or a clear diagnosis of HF and/or reduced ejection fraction (≤45% measured by echocardiography within the last six months);
  • Patient is referred to cardiac rehabilitation program;
  • Patient is willing to attend an onsite cardiac rehabilitation program twice weekly for 12 weeks;
  • In the opinion of the referring physician, the patient is medically stable, and able to participate in an exercise program
  • Patient is able, in the opinion of the qualified investigator, to comprehend and participate in the exercise intervention;
  • Patient is 18 years of age or older;
  • Patient is willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is unable to read and understand English or French
  • Patient intends to begin cardiac rehabilitation within the next 6 weeks
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to return for follow-up visits at 12 and 26 weeks;
  • Patient is currently using Nordic Walking poles.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nordic Walking Group

    Participants in the Nordic walking group will be provided with walking poles (GymstickTM Nordic Walking Poles, Gymstick International OY, Lahti, Finland) for the duration of the study. They will attend on-site exercise classes twice weekly for 12 weeks. The on-site exercise training classes will be one hour in length and include the following components: a 15 minute chair warm-up that excludes resistance exercises; 10-15 minutes of walking with Nordic walking poles for the first 3 weeks, progressing to 30 minutes of continuous walking with poles for the remaining 9 weeks; and 15 minutes of cool down exercises. Participants will be instructed to take the walking poles home and perform 200-400 minutes of Nordic walking per week for 12 weeks

    Behavioral: Nordic Walking

  • No intervention
    Standard Exercise Therapy

    Individuals assigned to standard exercise therapy will attend on-site exercise classes twice weekly for 12 weeks. Each on-site class will be one hour in duration and consist of: a 15-minute chair-based warm-up that includes 6-8 upper and lower body resistance training exercises using either hand-held weights or therabands at an intensity of 50-60% of 1- RM with the patient completing one set of 10-12 repetitions progressing to 15 repetitions before increasing the intensity by 5-10%; 10-15 minutes of walking for the first 3 weeks, progressing to 30 minutes of continuous walking for the remaining 9 weeks; and 15 minutes of cool down exercises. A strength training program will be provided to participants and they will be encouraged to do one additional strength training session at home. Participants will also be instructed to complete additional walking sessions at home so that they can accumulate a total of 200-400 minutes of exercise per week.

Interventions

  • BehavioralNordic Walking

    Participants in the Nordic walking group will be provided with walking poles (GymstickTM Nordic Walking Poles, Gymstick International OY, Lahti, Finland) for the duration of the study. They will attend on-site exercise classes twice weekly for 12 weeks. The on-site exercise training classes will be one hour in length and include the following components: a 15 minute chair warm-up that excludes resistance exercises; 10-15 minutes of walking with Nordic walking poles for the first 3 weeks, progressing to 30 minutes of continuous walking with poles for the remaining 9 weeks; and 15 minutes of cool down exercises. Participants will be instructed to take the walking poles home and perform 200-400 minutes of Nordic walking per week for 12 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Exercise Capacity Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test

    The 6 minute walk test was selected as a primary outcome because this sub-maximal test is a good indicator of the capacity to undertake day-to-day activities in patients with Heart Failure

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks.

  2. Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)

    The MLHFQ is a 21-item scale that measures the effects of HF-related symptoms, functional limitations, and psychological distress on an individual's quality of life. Participants are asked to indicate using a 6-point, zero to five, Likert scale how much each of 21 factors prevent them from living as they desire. Each item is scored 0-5, and the total scores is the summed score of all items, totaling 0 - 105. Higher scores represent lower quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health Related Quality of Live Using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)

    Total scale is split into 2 subscales: physical component summary (PCS) and mental composition summary (MCS). Each subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher scores represent better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  2. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Split into 2 subscales: anxiety and depression. Each subscale has 7 items, scored from 0-3, with the total score of each subscale being 0-21 each. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety or depression. 0-7 indicates a normal range.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  3. Physical Activity

    Physical activity includes any type of exercise. For example, walking, swimming, biking etc. Identification of "light", "moderate" or "vigourous" activity is determined by the participant based on perceived effort. Results are collected from exercise journals.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  4. Left Ventricular Filling Pressures

    The left ventricular filling pressure is the pressure inside the left ventricle of the heart during the resting phase of the heart beat when the chamber fills with blood. It is assessed by echocardiography and calculate as an E/e' ratio, where E = the peak velocity of early diastolic blood flow across the mitral valve, and e' = the peak velocity of mitral valve annulus during early diastole, which is a measure of how fast the heart muscle relaxes. Valus \<8 are considered normal, 8-14 indicates potentially normal, but is baseline and requires further evaluation and \>/= 15 suggests elevated pressures and presence of diastolic dysfunction or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  5. Cardiopulmonary Fitness by VO2 Peak

    assessed using CPET

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  6. Body Mass Index

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  7. Calf Circumference

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  8. Waist Circumference

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  9. Blood Levels of N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 13, 2026
Limitations and caveats
\- unblinded assessors could have introduced measurement bias

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNordic Walking GroupStandard Exercise Therapy
Started3838
Completed2626
Not completed1212

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in Exercise Capacity Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test

The 6 minute walk test was selected as a primary outcome because this sub-maximal test is a good indicator of the capacity to undertake day-to-day activities in patients with Heart Failure

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · meters walked
Changes in Exercise Capacity Measured by 6 Minute Walk Test
meters walkedNordic Walking GroupStandard Exercise Therapy
Baseline443.1 ± 17.2437 ± 17.0
12 Weeks511.2 ± 21.0490.4 ± 20.7
SecondaryHealth Related Quality of Live Using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)

Total scale is split into 2 subscales: physical component summary (PCS) and mental composition summary (MCS). Each subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher scores represent better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on subscales
Health Related Quality of Live Using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36)
Scores on subscalesStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline PCS subscale43.1 ± 1.341.9 ± 1.3
Baseline MCS subscale50.6 ± 1.647.6 ± 1.6
12 Weeks PCS subscale47.5 ± 1.446.7 ± 1.5
12 Weeks MCS subscale52.2 ± 1.455.0 ± 1.5
PrimaryMinnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)

The MLHFQ is a 21-item scale that measures the effects of HF-related symptoms, functional limitations, and psychological distress on an individual's quality of life. Participants are asked to indicate using a 6-point, zero to five, Likert scale how much each of 21 factors prevent them from living as they desire. Each item is scored 0-5, and the total scores is the summed score of all items, totaling 0 - 105. Higher scores represent lower quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale (total)
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
Score on a scale (total)Standard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline33.5 ± 3.533.9 ± 3.5
12 weeks20.8 ± 3.019.6 ± 3.2
SecondaryHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Split into 2 subscales: anxiety and depression. Each subscale has 7 items, scored from 0-3, with the total score of each subscale being 0-21 each. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety or depression. 0-7 indicates a normal range.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a subscale
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Score on a subscaleStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline HADS anxiety subscale4.8 ± 0.75.2 ± 0.7
Baseline HADS depression subscale4.0 ± 0.54.3 ± 0.4
12 Weeks HADS anxiety subscale4.1 ± 0.64.2 ± 0.6
12 Weeks HADS depression subscale3.2 ± 0.42.7 ± 0.4
SecondaryPhysical Activity

Physical activity includes any type of exercise. For example, walking, swimming, biking etc. Identification of "light", "moderate" or "vigourous" activity is determined by the participant based on perceived effort. Results are collected from exercise journals.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · minutes per day
Physical Activity
minutes per dayStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline - Light Physical Activity261.4 ± 15.9253.0 ± 14.9
Baseline - Moderate Physical Activity22.1 ± 3.218.0 ± 3.0
Baseline - Vigorous Physical Activity1.4 ± 0.81.0 ± 0.8
Baseline Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (Unbouted)23.5 ± 3.419.0 ± 3.2
Baseline Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (bouted)11.7 ± 2.37.2 ± 2.2
12 Weeks - Light Physical Activity268.5 ± 14.9254.9 ± 14.9
12 Weeks - Moderate Physical Activity24.1 ± 4.122.2 ± 4.3
12 Weeks - Vigorous Physical Activity2.1 ± 0.70.4 ± 0.8
12 Weeks - Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (Unbouted)23.5 ± 3.419.0 ± 3.2
12 Weeks - Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (bouted)14.6 ± 3.512.1 ± 3.7
SecondaryLeft Ventricular Filling Pressures

The left ventricular filling pressure is the pressure inside the left ventricle of the heart during the resting phase of the heart beat when the chamber fills with blood. It is assessed by echocardiography and calculate as an E/e' ratio, where E = the peak velocity of early diastolic blood flow across the mitral valve, and e' = the peak velocity of mitral valve annulus during early diastole, which is a measure of how fast the heart muscle relaxes. Valus \<8 are considered normal, 8-14 indicates potentially normal, but is baseline and requires further evaluation and \>/= 15 suggests elevated pressures and presence of diastolic dysfunction or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · E/e' ratio
Left Ventricular Filling Pressures
E/e' ratioStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline16.1 ± 2.510.4 ± 1.8
12 Weeks14.9 ± 2.08.5 ± 1.3
SecondaryCardiopulmonary Fitness by VO2 Peak

assessed using CPET

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ml/kg/min
Cardiopulmonary Fitness by VO2 Peak
ml/kg/minStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline15.2 ± 1.317.8 ± 1.1
12 Weeks13.0 ± 1.717.7 ± 1.2
SecondaryBody Mass Index
Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2
Body Mass Index
kg/m^2Standard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline30.5 ± 1.130.5 ± 1.1
12 Weeks31.1 ± 1.130.7 ± 1.1
SecondaryCalf Circumference
Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters
Calf Circumference
centimetersStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline38.1 ± 0.738.3 ± 0.7
12 Weeks37.9 ± 0.738.4 ± 0.7
SecondaryWaist Circumference
Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters
Waist Circumference
centimetersStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline106.1 ± 2.8108.9 ± 2.8
12 Weeks107.9 ± 2.9109.9 ± 2.9
SecondaryBlood Levels of N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)
Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Blood Levels of N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)
pg/mLStandard Exercise TherapyNordic Walking Group
Baseline2212.7 ± 797.73022.5 ± 816.2
12 Weeks1450.3 ± 471.21679.8 ± 482.3

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline to 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nordic Walking Group0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)3/26 (11.5%)
Standard Exercise Therapy0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)1/26 (3.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventNordic Walking GroupStandard Exercise Therapy
Event unrelated to interventionGeneral disorders3/261/26

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Nordic Walking GroupStandard Exercise TherapyTotal
Mean64.0 ± 9.862.9 ± 11.263.5 ± 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Nordic Walking GroupStandard Exercise TherapyTotal
Female81018
Male302858
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Nordic Walking GroupStandard Exercise TherapyTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4W7, Canada
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02061319
Lead sponsor
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2014
Start date
Mar 2014
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2016
Completion
Aug 31, 2017
Results posted
Aug 13, 2026
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Robert Reid, Dr.
principal investigator · Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion