ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02058147LixiLan-OUpdated May 9, 2017Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine/ Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Compared to Insulin Glargine Alone and Lixisenatide Alone on Top of Metformin in Patients With T2DM

A Phase 3 interventional study of Insulin glargine/lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination and Insulin glargine (HOE901) in Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by Sanofi. Completed at 273 sites in 23 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-09.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,170
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

To compare the insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination to lixisenatide alone and to insulin glargine alone (on top of metformin treatment) in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 30.

Secondary Objective:

To compare the overall efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination (FRC) to insulin glargine alone and to lixisenatide alone (on top of metformin treatment) over a 30 week treatment period in participants with type 2 diabetes.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 37 weeks including up to 6 weeks of screening, 30-week treatment period, and a 3 days follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,589 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,332 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,170 is above the median of 81 across 7,713 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,547 studies on the registry; 88 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 122 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosed for at least 1 year before the screening visit, treated for at least 3 months prior to visit 1 with metformin alone or metformin and a second oral anti-diabetic treatment that could be a sulfonylurea, a glinide, a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor or a di-peptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and who were not adequately controlled with this treatment.
  • Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • HbA1c at screening visit:

    • less than 7.5% or more than 10% for participants previously treated with metformin alone,
    • less than 7.0% or more than 9% for participants previously treated with metformin and a second oral anti-diabetic treatment.
  • Pregnancy or lactation, women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method.
  • Use of oral glucose-lowering agents other than those stated in the inclusion criteria or any injectable glucose-lowering agents during the 3 months before screening.
  • Previous Treatment with insulin (except for short-term treatment due to intercurrent illness including gestational diabetes, at the discretion of the trial physician).
  • History of discontinuation of a previous treatment with a glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) due to safety/tolerability issue or lack of efficacy.
  • Participant who previously participated in any clinical trial with lixisenatide or the insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed ratio combination or had previously received lixisenatide.
  • Any contraindication to metformin use, according to local labeling.
  • Use of weight loss drugs within 3 months prior to screening visit.
  • Within the last 6 months prior to screening visit: history of stroke, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or heart failure requiring hospitalization. Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation procedures to be performed during the study period.
  • History of pancreatitis (unless pancreatitis was related to gallstones and cholecystectomy was already performed), chronic pancreatitis, pancreatitis during a previous treatment with incretin therapies, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery.
  • Personal or immediate family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic conditions that predispose to MTC (e.g, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes).
  • Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure above 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure above 95 mmHg) at screening visit.
  • At screening visit, Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal to 20 or above 40 kg/m\^2.
  • At screening visit amylase and/or lipase more than 3 times the upper limit of the normal (ULN) laboratory range.
  • At screening visit alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or alkaline phosphatase (AST) more than 3 ULN.
  • At screening visit calcitonin above or equal to 20 pg/mL (5.9 pmol/L).

Exclusion Criteria for randomization at the end of the screening period:

  • HbA1c less than 7% or above 10%;
  • Fasting Plasma glucose above 250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L);
  • Metformin maximal tolerated dose less than 1500 mg/day;
  • Amylase and/or lipase more than 3 ULN.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,170 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)

    FRC once daily (QD) for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

    Drug: Insulin glargine/lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination · Drug: Metformin

  • Active comparator
    Insulin Glargine

    Insulin glargine QD for 30 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.

    Drug: Insulin glargine (HOE901) · Drug: Metformin

  • Active comparator
    Lixisenatide

    Lixisenatide 10 mcg QD for 2 weeks, then 20 mcg QD (maintenance dose).

    Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010) · Drug: Metformin

Interventions

  • DrugInsulin glargine/lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination

    Insulin glargine/Lixisenatide FRC was self-administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection in the morning within one hour before breakfast using one of the 2 prefilled disposable SoloStar® pen-injectors: Pen A containing 100 U/mL insulin glargine (Lantus, 100 U/mL) and 50 mcg/mL lixisenatide in a ratio of 2 U:1 mcg, used for administration of doses from 10 U to 40 U (10 U/5mcg to 40 U/20mcg). Pen B containing 100 U/mL insulin glargine (Lantus, 100 U/mL) and 33 mcg/mL lixisenatide in a ratio of 3 U:1 mcg, used to administer doses from 41 U to 60 U (41 U/13 mcg to 60 U/20 mcg). The starting dose was 10 U/5 mcg. Dose was then adjusted individually to reach and maintain fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) of 80 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL (4.4 mmol/L to 5.6 mmol/L) while avoiding hypoglycemia.

    Also known as: (HOE901/AVE0010)

  • Insulin glargine (100 U/mL) was self-administered by SC injection at approximately the same time every day. Dose was adjusted individually to reach and maintain fasting SMPG of 80 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL (4.4 mmol/L to 5.6 mmol/L) while avoiding hypoglycemia.

    Also known as: Lantus

  • Lixisenatide was self-administered by SC injection within 0 to 60 minutes before breakfast or evening meal. If the maintenance dose of 20 mcg was not tolerated, dose could be reduced to 10 mcg.

    Also known as: Lyxumia

  • Pharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral administration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30

    Primary outcome was to test superiority of FRC versus Lixisenatide and non-inferiority versus Insulin glargine. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% or ≤6.5% at Week 30

    Participants without Week 30 value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders.

    Time frame: Week 30

  2. Change in Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 30

    Plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 30

  3. Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30

    Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 30

  4. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 30

    Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 30

  5. Mean Change in 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile From Baseline to Week 30

    Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime two times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 30 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week before a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. The analysis included all scheduled measurements obtained during the study. The missing data was handled by mixed effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 30

  6. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30

    Time frame: Week 30

  7. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30 and No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 30

  8. Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 30

    The analysis included scheduled measurements obtained up to the date of last injection of the IMP, including those obtained after introduction of rescue therapy.

    Time frame: Week 30

  9. Change in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 30

    The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 30

  10. Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30 With No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). The analysis included all HbA1c measurements at Week 30, including those obtained after the IMP discontinuation or the introduction of rescue medication.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 30

  11. Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 30-Week Treatment Period

    Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) was performed. Threshold values - from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG \>240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 30: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>8%.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 30

  12. Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Subject-Year

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

    Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)

  13. Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

    Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)

  14. Percentage of Participants With Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

    Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Plasma glucose measurements might not have been available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal was considered sufficient evidence that the event had been induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia included all episodes in which neurological impairment was severe enough to prevent self-treatment, and which were thus thought to place participants at risk of injury to themselves or others.

    Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2017

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 240 centers in 23 countries. A total of 2457 participants were screened between February 12, 2014 and September 16, 2014. 978 participants were not eligible for run-in mainly due to glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value at screening visit being out of the protocol defined range.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)Insulin GlargineLixisenatide
Started469467234
Treated469467233
Completed440440205
Not completed292729
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated001
Withdrew: Adverse event12921
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy103
Withdrew: Poor compliance to protocol894
Withdrew: Other than specified890

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30

Primary outcome was to test superiority of FRC versus Lixisenatide and non-inferiority versus Insulin glargine. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 30
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of hemoglobin
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30
percentage of hemoglobinInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30-1.63 ± 0.038-1.34 ± 0.039-0.85 ± 0.052
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Lixisenatide · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤0.05.) · Least square (ls) mean difference: -0.78 · 95% CI -0.898 to -0.665Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Mixed Models Analysis · Ls mean difference: -0.29 · 95% CI -0.384 to -0.194Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Ls mean difference: -0.29 · 95% CI -0.384 to -0.194Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% or ≤6.5% at Week 30

Participants without Week 30 value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders.

Time frame:
Week 30
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% or ≤6.5% at Week 30
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
HbA1c <7.0%73.759.433
HbA1c ≤6.5%55.839.519.3
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Lixisenatide · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤0.05.) · Difference in percentage: 40.61 · 95% CI 33.63 to 47.59HbA1c \<7.0%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide.
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Lixisenatide · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Difference in percentage: 36.38 · 95% CI 29.81 to 42.95HbA1c ≤6.5%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide.
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Difference in percentage: 14.31 · 95% CI 8.37 to 20.25HbA1c \<7.0%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine.
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Difference in percentage: 16.35 · 95% CI 10.13 to 22.58HbA1c ≤6.5%: Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine.
SecondaryChange in Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 30

Plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 30
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 30
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Change in Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 30-2.31 ± 0.154-0.18 ± 0.157-3.23 ± 0.216
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤0.05. The hierarchical testing continued only when primary hypotheses (superiority: FRC to lixisenatide; non-inferiority: FRC to insulin glargine for HbA1c) was statistically significant.) · Ls mean difference: -2.13 · 95% CI -2.498 to -1.77Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine.
SecondaryChange in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30

Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 30
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kg
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30
kgInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30-0.29 ± 0.1821.11 ± 0.183-2.3 ± 0.256
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Ls mean difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -1.891 to -0.91Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 30
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 30
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 30-3.46 ± 0.09-3.27 ± 0.091-1.5 ± 0.124
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Lixisenatide · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Ls mean difference: -1.96 · 95% CI -2.246 to -1.682Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide
SecondaryMean Change in 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile From Baseline to Week 30

Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime two times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 30 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week before a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. The analysis included all scheduled measurements obtained during the study. The missing data was handled by mixed effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 30
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Mean Change in 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile From Baseline to Week 30
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Mean Change in 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile From Baseline to Week 30-3.35 ± 0.081-2.66 ± 0.084-1.95 ± 0.111
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Lixisenatide · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Ls mean difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -1.645 to -1.158Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Lixisenatide
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Ls mean difference: -0.69 · 95% CI -0.892 to -0.495Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin Glargine
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30
Time frame:
Week 30
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 3043.225.127.9
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Difference in percentage: 18.08 · 95% CI 12.15 to 24.01Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin glargine
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30 and No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 30
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30 and No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% With No Body Weight Gain at Week 30 and No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period31.818.926.2
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Difference in percentage: 12.98 · 95% CI 7.5 to 18.45Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin Glargine
SecondaryAverage Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 30

The analysis included scheduled measurements obtained up to the date of last injection of the IMP, including those obtained after introduction of rescue therapy.

Time frame:
Week 30
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units (U)
Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 30
Units (U)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin Glargine
Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 3039.77 ± 0.69940.46 ± 0.701
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination vs Insulin Glargine · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4857 (Threshold for significance ≤ 0.05.) · Ls mean difference: -0.69 · 95% CI -2.632 to 1.252Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide FRC vs Insulin Glargine
SecondaryChange in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 30

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 30 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 30
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mmol/L
Change in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 30
mmol/LInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Change in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 30-5.68 ± 0.176-3.31 ± 0.178-4.58 ± 0.245
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30 With No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). The analysis included all HbA1c measurements at Week 30, including those obtained after the IMP discontinuation or the introduction of rescue medication.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 30
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30 With No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30 With No Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG ≤ 70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) During 30-Week Treatment Period53.644.430.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 30-Week Treatment Period

Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) was performed. Threshold values - from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG \>240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 30: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>8%.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 30
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 30-Week Treatment Period
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 30-Week Treatment Period3.63.412.4
SecondaryNumber of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Subject-Year

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

Time frame:
First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)
Reported as:
Number · Events per subject-year
Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Subject-Year
Events per subject-yearInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Subject-Year1.441.220.34
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤ 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).

Time frame:
First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia25.623.66.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Plasma glucose measurements might not have been available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal was considered sufficient evidence that the event had been induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia included all episodes in which neurological impairment was severe enough to prevent self-treatment, and which were thus thought to place participants at risk of injury to themselves or others.

Time frame:
First dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose administration (median treatment exposure: 211 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
percentage of participantsInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
Percentage of Participants With Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia00.20

Adverse events

Collected over All Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Day 213) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination—18/469 (3.8%)138/469 (29.4%)
Insulin Glargine—19/467 (4.1%)85/467 (18.2%)
Lixisenatide—9/233 (3.9%)98/233 (42.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 56
Most frequent serious events
EventInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
ErysipelasInfections and infestations1/4690/4671/233
Meningitis staphylococcalInfections and infestations0/4690/4671/233
Lung neoplasm malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/4690/4671/233
Metastases to liverNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/4690/4671/233
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders0/4690/4671/233
Diabetes mellitus inadequate controlMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/4690/4671/233
Metabolic acidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/4690/4671/233
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders1/4690/4671/233
RadiculopathyNervous system disorders0/4690/4671/233
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/4690/4671/233
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInsulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatide
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders45/46917/46756/233
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders42/46920/46721/233
HeadacheNervous system disorders24/46915/46718/233
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations33/46923/46712/233
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations26/46925/46715/233
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders15/4697/46715/233

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Mean58.2 ± 9.558.3 ± 9.458.7 ± 8.758.4 ± 9.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Female247230101578
Male222237133592
Race
Race(Participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Caucasian4174212161054
Black33331278
Asian/Oriental87318
Other116320
Ethnicity
Ethnicity(Participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Hispanic858751223
Not Hispanic384380183947
Second Oral Anti-diabetic Drug (OAD) Use
Second Oral Anti-diabetic Drug (OAD) Use(Participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Yes274270133677
No195197101493
Second OAD Use at Screening by Class
Second OAD Use at Screening by Class(Participants)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Sulfonylurea259249123631
Glinide310518
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor2204
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor1211528
None193195101489
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Mean31.64 ± 4.431.66 ± 4.5131.99 ± 4.3931.72 ± 4.44
Duration of Diabetes
Duration of Diabetes(years)Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio CombinationInsulin GlargineLixisenatideTotal
Mean8.89 ± 5.518.66 ± 5.598.89 ± 6.268.80 ± 5.69

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

273 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 840027
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840122
    Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840062
    Tempe, Arizona 85282, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840023
    Tempe, Arizona, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840084
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840100
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840065
    Bell Gardens, California 90201, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840090
    Chino, California 91710, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840002
    Chula Vista, California 91911, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840013
    Concord, California 94520, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840053
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840017
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840070
    Lancaster, California 93534, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840121
    Long Beach, California 90806, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840126
    Los Angeles, California 90017, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840044
    Los Angeles, California 90057, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840101
    Mission Hills, California 91345, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840086
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840120
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840005
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840034
    Palm Springs, California 92262, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840074
    Port Hueneme, California 93041, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840068
    San Ramon, California 94583, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840067
    Santa Ana, California 92704, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840029
    Tarzana, California 91356, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840006
    Temecula, California 92591, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840078
    West Hills, California 91345, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840059
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840038
    Denver, Colorado 80246, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840104
    Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840098
    Miami, Florida 33156-7563, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840014
    New Port Richey, Florida 34652, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840047
    Ocoee, Florida 34761, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840056
    Palm Harbor, Florida 34684, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840089
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840054
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840119
    Woodstock, Georgia 30189, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840108
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840075
    Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840080
    Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840026
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840116
    Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840050
    Springfield, Illinois 62704, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840008
    Avon, Indiana 46123, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840015
    Avon, Indiana 46123, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840076
    Avon, Indiana 46123, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840082
    Evansville, Indiana 47713, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840031
    Evansville, Indiana 47714, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840060
    Evansville, Indiana 47714, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840048
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840085
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840012
    Valparaiso, Indiana, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840025
    Waterloo, Iowa 50702, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840022
    Lexington, Kentucky 40504, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840007
    Louisville, Kentucky 40213, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840081
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840097
    Auburn, Maine 04210, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840063
    Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840028
    Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840071
    Chesterfield, Michigan 48047, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840001
    Dearborn, Michigan 48124, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840091
    Kalamazoo, Michigan 49048, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840009
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840024
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840057
    Butte, Montana 59701, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840042
    Omaha, Nebraska 68131, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840109
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840052
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840069
    Nashua, New Hampshire 03063, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840123
    Morganville, New Jersey 07751, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840011
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840030
    New Hyde Park, New York 11042, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840096
    Syracuse, New York 13214-2016, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840039
    Asheville, North Carolina 28803, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840021
    Hickory, North Carolina 28601, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840046
    Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840072
    Morganton, North Carolina 28655, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840110
    Salisbury, North Carolina 28144, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840095
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840099
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840004
    Columbus, Ohio 43213, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840016
    Maumee, Ohio 43537, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840103
    Eugene, Oregon 97404, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840113
    Portland, Oregon 97201-3098, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840036
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15473, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840043
    Tipton, Pennsylvania 16684, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840058
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840127
    Charleston, South Carolina 29407, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840049
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840114
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840112
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840094
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37912, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840051
    Austin, Texas 78758, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840066
    Corpus Christi, Texas 78404, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840111
    Dallas, Texas 75208, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840020
    Dallas, Texas 75216, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840064
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840003
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840088
    Edinburg, Texas 78539, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 840118
    Fort Worth, Texas 76132, United States

Showing the first 100 of 273 sites across 23 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rosenstock J, Aronson R, Grunberger G, Hanefeld M, Piatti P, Serusclat P, Cheng X, Zhou T, Niemoeller E, Souhami E, Davies M; LixiLan-O Trial Investigators. Benefits of LixiLan, a Titratable Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine Plus Lixisenatide, Versus Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide Monocomponents in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Oral Agents: The LixiLan-O Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39(11):2026-2035. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0917. Epub 2016 Aug 15. PubMed 27527848 ↗
  • Shao H, Kianmehr H, Guo J, Li P, Fonseca V, Shi L. Efficacy of iGlarLixi on 5-year risk of diabetes-related complications: A simulation study. J Diabetes Complications. 2022 Mar;36(3):108132. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108132. Epub 2022 Jan 25. PubMed 35101326 ↗
  • Davies MJ, Russell-Jones D, Barber TM, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Galstyan GR, Zhu D, Baxter M, Dessapt-Baradez C, McCrimmon RJ. Glycaemic benefit of iGlarLixi in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients with high HbA1c or those with inadequate glycaemic control on two oral antihyperglycaemic drugs in the LixiLan-O randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Aug;21(8):1967-1972. doi: 10.1111/dom.13791. Epub 2019 Jun 18. PubMed 31124299 ↗
  • Dailey G, Bajaj HS, Dex T, Groleau M, Stager W, Vinik A. Post hoc efficacy and safety analysis of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed- ratio combination in North American patients compared with the rest of world. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Mar 21;7(1):e000581. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000581. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31114694 ↗
  • Schmider W, Belder R, Lee M, Niemoeller E, Souhami E, Frias JP. Impact of dose capping in insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination trials in patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Jun;35(6):1081-1089. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1558852. Epub 2019 Jan 11. PubMed 30550345 ↗
  • Rosenstock J, Handelsman Y, Vidal J, Ampudia Blasco FJ, Giorgino F, Liu M, Perfetti R, Meier JJ. Propensity-score-matched comparative analyses of simultaneously administered fixed-ratio insulin glargine 100 U and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs sequential administration of insulin glargine and lixisenatide in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2821-2829. doi: 10.1111/dom.13462. Epub 2018 Aug 13. PubMed 29974618 ↗
  • Trujillo JM, Roberts M, Dex T, Chao J, White J, LaSalle J. Low incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events over time with a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide versus lixisenatide alone. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Nov;20(11):2690-2694. doi: 10.1111/dom.13444. Epub 2018 Aug 21. PubMed 29923298 ↗
  • Davies MJ, Leiter LA, Guerci B, Grunberger G, Ampudia-Blasco FJ, Yu C, Stager W, Niemoeller E, Souhami E, Rosenstock J. Impact of baseline glycated haemoglobin, diabetes duration and body mass index on clinical outcomes in the LixiLan-O trial testing a titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs insulin glargine and lixisenatide monocomponents. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Dec;19(12):1798-1804. doi: 10.1111/dom.12980. Epub 2017 Jul 7. PubMed 28432746 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02058147
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 7, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Results posted
Feb 10, 2017
Last update
May 9, 2017

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion