ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02056834Updated Mar 3, 2025Results posted

chronOS Inject in Proximal Tibial Fractures

An observational study in Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture Schatzker I - VI, Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture AO-OTA 41 and Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture AO-OTA 42, sponsored by Synthes GmbH. Completed at 2 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.

Sponsored by Synthes GmbH (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to observe the safety, the radiological and clinical outcomes of chronOS Inject after having been used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study was to observe the safety, the radiological and clinical outcomes of chronOS Inject after having been used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures. Secondary objectives were to assess the surgeon's satisfaction in using chronOS Inject and patient satisfaction post surgery.

The study was planned to be a multi-center, prospective, observational study. Patients with proximal tibial fractures of type Schatzker I - VI, AO-Müller-Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect were assessed for eligibility to enter the study. Patients eligible for the study were followed over time to twelve months after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture Schatzker I - VI
  • Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture AO-OTA 41
  • Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture AO-OTA 42

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tibial Fractures

135 studies on the registry are indexed under Tibial Fractures; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 70 across 37 observational studies indexed under Tibial Fractures.

Browse Tibial Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Synthes GmbH is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted after Synthes GmbH became part of Johnson & Johnson.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with proximal tibial fractures of type Schatzter I - VI, AO-OTA 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect are assessed for eligibility to enter the study. A computerized tomography is performed if necessary to confirm the fracture type and the amount of bone defect. Patients eligible for the study are followed over time to 12 months after surgery.

A total of 30 patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria are enrolled in the study, which is conducted at Kyungpook National University Hospital and Hanyang University Guri Hospital in the Republic of Korea.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with closed proximal tibial fractures defined by : Tibia plateau, Schatzker I - VI, AO-OTA 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect
  • Skeletally mature adult 18 years or older, with close of growth plate at the time of surgery
  • Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to scheduled visits, treatment plan, completing forms, and other study procedures
  • Personally signed and dated document prior to any study-related procedures indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fractures with severe soft tissue damage
  • Proximal tibial fractures with tumor or osteomyelitis
  • Any tibial anatomy or disease process that would interfere with deployment or performance of the device as defined by the surgeon
  • Osteopenia or Osteoporosis: if dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is required, exclusion will be defined as a DEXA bone density measured T score \<=-1.0
  • Known history of Paget's disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease
  • Morbid obesity defined as a >40 kg/m2 or weight more than 50 kg over ideal body weight
  • Active . A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless treated with curative intent and there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy >5 years
  • Known or documented history of communicable disease, including AIDS and
  • Active Hepatitis (receiving medical treatment within two years)
  • Active systemic or local infection
  • Active rheumatoid arthritis, non-controlled diabetes mellitus, or any other medical condition(s) that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing
  • Current or recent history (within last 2 years) of substance abuse (e.g., recreational drugs, narcotics, or alcohol)
  • Immunologically suppressed, or has received systemic , excluding nasal steroids, at any dose daily for >1 month within last 12 months
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study period
  • Involved in study of another product that may affect outcome
  • History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales
  • Patients who are incarcerated
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • chronOS Inject

    Closed proximal tibial fractures of type Schatzker I - VI, AO-OTA 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect

    Device: chronOS Inject

Interventions

  • DevicechronOS Inject

    chronOS Inject is used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fracture Union

    Fracture union (complete bone healing) was assessed by the investigators based on anteroposterior and lateral X-rays

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Articular Subsidence

    Evidence of articular subsidence (collapse of surface pertaining to the joint) of ≥2 mm was assessed by the investigators

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Mean Time to Union

    Mean time to union was calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivorship function

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absorption Rate of Calcium Phosphate Cement

    Absorption of calcium phosphate cement over time was calculated from X-rays with the INFINITT program.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Patients Who Reached Full Weight Bearing

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Total Range of Motion

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Anatomical Gradings Assessed Radiographically

    The following was assessed: * depression of knee joint: presence or absence * condylar widening (enlargement of the knee joint): presence or absence * angulation; valgus/varus (abnormal outward/inward turning of the knee): presence or absence

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Patient's Satisfaction

    Satisfaction with treatment was assessed by the subjects, where subjects indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated no satisfaction, while a score of 100 indicated completely satisfied.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Surgeon's Satisfaction With the Product

    Satisfaction with product was assessed by the surgeon post-operatively, where surgeons indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated absolutely unacceptable, while a score of 100 indicated very satisfying.

    Time frame: Post-surgery

  7. Extension Ability and Stability

    The following was assessed: * extension ability of the knee * stability of the knee in extension

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Peri-operative Complications

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Physical Composite Score (PCS)

    The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and all follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Mental Composite Score (MCS)

    The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and at follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. VAS Leg Pain Intensity

    The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain intensity was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all, and 100 represented the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. VAS Leg Pain Frequency

    The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain frequency was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all and 100 represented pain always.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Lysholm Knee Scale

    The Lysholm knee scale is a condition-specific outcome measure that was originally designed to assess ligament injuries of the knee. The survey was administered to subject at follow-up visits and comprises 8 subscales related to limp, support, stair climbing, squatting, walking, running and jumping as well as a question related to the atrophy of the thigh. The responses to these 8 questions are graded to provide a maximum result of 100 points.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 25, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonechronOS Inject
Started36
6 weeks34
6 months31
Completed29
Not completed7
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7

Outcome measures

PrimaryFracture Union

Fracture union (complete bone healing) was assessed by the investigators based on anteroposterior and lateral X-rays

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Fracture Union
participantschronOS Inject
Union27
Non-union2
PrimaryArticular Subsidence

Evidence of articular subsidence (collapse of surface pertaining to the joint) of ≥2 mm was assessed by the investigators

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Articular Subsidence
participantschronOS Inject
Absent28
Present1
SecondaryAbsorption Rate of Calcium Phosphate Cement

Absorption of calcium phosphate cement over time was calculated from X-rays with the INFINITT program.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of absorption at 12 months
Absorption Rate of Calcium Phosphate Cement
percentage of absorption at 12 monthschronOS Inject
Absorption Rate of Calcium Phosphate Cement0.64 ± 0.115
SecondaryPatients Who Reached Full Weight Bearing
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patients Who Reached Full Weight Bearing
participantschronOS Inject
Patients Who Reached Full Weight Bearing29
SecondaryTotal Range of Motion
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Total Range of Motion
participantschronOS Inject
At least 140 degree17
At least 120 degree11
At least 90 degree1
At least 60 degree0
At least 30 degree0
SecondaryAnatomical Gradings Assessed Radiographically

The following was assessed: * depression of knee joint: presence or absence * condylar widening (enlargement of the knee joint): presence or absence * angulation; valgus/varus (abnormal outward/inward turning of the knee): presence or absence

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Anatomical Gradings Assessed Radiographically
participantschronOS Inject
Absence of depression28
Absence of condylar widening28
Absence of angulation29
SecondaryPatient's Satisfaction

Satisfaction with treatment was assessed by the subjects, where subjects indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated no satisfaction, while a score of 100 indicated completely satisfied.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient's Satisfaction
units on a scalechronOS Inject
Patient's Satisfaction80.52 ± 16.02
SecondarySurgeon's Satisfaction With the Product

Satisfaction with product was assessed by the surgeon post-operatively, where surgeons indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated absolutely unacceptable, while a score of 100 indicated very satisfying.

Time frame:
Post-surgery
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Surgeon's Satisfaction With the Product
units on a scalechronOS Inject
Mixing ability87.3 ± 6.16
Injecting ability87 ± 6.31
Application time87 ± 6.31
Moldability81.7 ± 9.59
Setting time77.1 ± 13.54
Rate of chronOS over bone graft68.6 ± 28.39
SecondaryExtension Ability and Stability

The following was assessed: * extension ability of the knee * stability of the knee in extension

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Extension Ability and Stability
participantschronOS Inject
Normal extension ability26
0-10 degree extension ability3
Normal extension stability28
Abnormal extension stability1
SecondaryPeri-operative Complications
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Peri-operative Complications
participantschronOS Inject
Microscopic or radiologic cement leakage during OP0
Breakage of fixing device post-OP0
Re-OP during hospital stay0
Suffer from surgical wound complication post-OP0
SecondarySF-12 Short Form Health Survey Physical Composite Score (PCS)

The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and all follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Physical Composite Score (PCS)
units on a scalechronOS Inject
Score at baseline37.02 ± 9.616
Score at 12 months42.43 ± 4.589
Statistical analysis
  • chronOS Inject · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0166
SecondarySF-12 Short Form Health Survey Mental Composite Score (MCS)

The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and at follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Mental Composite Score (MCS)
units on a scalechronOS Inject
Score at baseline46.3 ± 9.707
Score at 12 months46.45 ± 7.145
Statistical analysis
  • chronOS Inject · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.3785
SecondaryVAS Leg Pain Intensity

The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain intensity was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all, and 100 represented the worst possible pain.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
VAS Leg Pain Intensity
units on a scalechronOS Inject
Score at baseline61.19 ± 32.714
Score at 12 months17 ± 18.592
Statistical analysis
  • chronOS Inject · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.0001
SecondaryVAS Leg Pain Frequency

The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain frequency was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all and 100 represented pain always.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
VAS Leg Pain Frequency
units on a scalechronOS Inject
Score at baseline57.28 ± 33.505
Score at 12 months20.52 ± 20.051
Statistical analysis
  • chronOS Inject · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.0001
SecondaryLysholm Knee Scale

The Lysholm knee scale is a condition-specific outcome measure that was originally designed to assess ligament injuries of the knee. The survey was administered to subject at follow-up visits and comprises 8 subscales related to limp, support, stair climbing, squatting, walking, running and jumping as well as a question related to the atrophy of the thigh. The responses to these 8 questions are graded to provide a maximum result of 100 points.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Lysholm Knee Scale
participantschronOS Inject
Excellent (95-100)14
Good (84-94)11
Fair (65-83)3
Poor (<65)1
PrimaryMean Time to Union

Mean time to union was calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivorship function

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · months
Mean Time to Union
monthschronOS Inject
Mean Time to Union7.5 ± 0.441

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were recorded from treatment (implantation of the device) through the end of the follow-up period at 12 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
chronOS Inject—1/36 (2.8%)9/36 (25%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventchronOS Inject
Non-union of lateral tibial condyleMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/36
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventchronOS Inject
K-wire irritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/36
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/36
Volar mass on finger (MP joint)Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/36
Articular subsidence, loss of reduction and depression of lateral condyle of the tibiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/36
PainGeneral disorders1/36
Cartilage damage at the initial injuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/36
Posterior neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/36
Non-union of lateral tibial condyleMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/36

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)chronOS Inject
Mean55.4 ± 14.6
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)chronOS Inject
Age group <=58 years19
Age group >58 years17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)chronOS Inject
Female15
Male21
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)chronOS Inject
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian36
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)chronOS Inject
Korea, Republic of36
Smoking status
Smoking status(participants)chronOS Inject
Never23
Former4
Current9
Height
Height(cm)chronOS Inject
Mean163.4 ± 8.99
Weight
Weight(kg)chronOS Inject
Mean62.6 ± 12.15

8 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Kyungpook National University Hospital
    Daegu, 700-721, Korea, Republic of
  • Hanyang University Guri Hospital
    Guri, 471-701, Korea, Republic of
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2010 to primary completion in Sep 2012, 30 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2014, 1 year 8 months after primary completion.

Of 17 observational studies under Tibial Fractures, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 62. This study's 30 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 31, 2014
First posted
Feb 6, 2014
StartActual
Mar 1, 2010
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2012
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2012
Results first posted
Jun 25, 2014
Last update
Mar 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02056834
Lead sponsor
Synthes GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 6, 2014
Start date
Mar 1, 2010
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2012
Completion
Sep 30, 2012
Results posted
Jun 25, 2014
Last update
Mar 3, 2025

Study contacts

Chang-Wug Oh, MD
principal investigator · Kyungpook National University Hospital
Kichul Park, MD
principal investigator · Hanyang University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion