An interventional study of Anti-epileptic drugs and No anti-epileptic drugs in Cardiac Arrest, Anoxic Encephalopathy and Status Epilepticus, sponsored by University of Twente. Completed at 11 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-21.
Sponsored by University of Twente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect of medical treatment of electro-encephalographic status epilepticus on neurological outcome of patients with postanoxic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest.
Rationale: Electroencephalographic status epilepticus is described in 9-35% of patients with postanoxic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest and is associated with case fatality rates of 90-100%. It is unclear whether (some) electroencephalographic seizure patterns in these patients represent a condition which can be treated with antiepileptic drugs to improve outcome, or have to be regarded as an expression of severe ischemic damage, in which treatment with antiepileptic would be futile. Therefore, both treatment with and treatment without antiepileptic drugs are considered standard modalities in these patients. We aim to compare these standard strategies and hypothesize that aggressive and early treatment of electro-encephalographic status epilepticus with antiepileptic drugs improves outcome as compared to treatment without these drugs.
Objective: To estimate the effect of medical treatment of electro-encephalographic status epilepticus on neurological outcome of patients with postanoxic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest
Study design: We will perform a multicenter clinical trial with randomized treatment allocation, open label treatment and blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE design). The intervention contrast will be aggressive medical treatment vs. no treatment of electroencephalographic status epilepticus, in addition to standard best medical management of comatose patients after cardiac arrest, including mild therapeutic hypothermia.
Study population: The study population will consist of adult patients with postanoxic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest, admitted to the intensive care unit, with electroencephalographic status epilepticus on continuous EEG, who are eligile for inclusion in this trial.
Intervention: Treatment of electroencephalographic status epilepticus will be based on guidelines for treatment of overt status epilepticus. The objective of this treatment will be to suppress all epileptiform activity in the EEG. If the electroencephalographic status epilepticus will return after tapering sedative treatment at 24 hours, the procedure will be repeated. If the status will return after 2 x 24 hours, it will be considered refractory.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome measure will be neurological outcome defined as the score on the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at 3 months dichotomized as good (CPC 1-2 = no or moderate neurological disability) and poor (CPC 3-5 = severe disability, coma, or death).
Sample size: With a presumed reduction of poor outcome of 7%, from 99% - 92%, alpha of 5%, power of 80%, one tailed testing, and one interim analysis by an independent data safety and monitoring board, the objected number of inclusions is 172. With an estimation of an incidence of electroencephalographic status epilepticus of 20% in patients with postanoxic coma, the total number of patients to be monitored will be 860.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation: Medical treatment of electroencephalographic status epilepticus may modify the high risk of death. Otherwise, this treatment of electroencephalographic status epilepticus may lead to prolonged hospitalization of several days of comatose patients that otherwise would have died. The risk of an increase of morbidity or mortality on the longer term is considered negligible.
926 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 226 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 172 is above the median of 100 across 518 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.
Browse Heart Arrest studies →University of Twente is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Step 1: Phenytoin (loading dose 15-20 mg/kg iv, maintenance doses 150 mg iv twice per day) PLUS one of the following benzodiazepines (bolus + continuous infusion): lorazepam or midazolam. Benzodiazepine dosing regimes should be based on national and local protocols for status epilepticus treatment Step 2: Propofol infusion (with a maximum rate of 8 mg/kg/hour) PLUS a second anti-epileptic drug in addition to fenytoin: Option 1: levetiracetam bolus 1500 mg, followed by 1000 mg 2 dd 1 intravenously or Option 2: valproic acid bolus 10-20 mg/kg in 30 min, followed by15 mg/kg/day in 2 dosages intravenously. Step 3: Thiopental, initial dosage 12,5 mg/kg/hr for the first 6 hours followed by 5 mg/kg/hr for 6 hours. After these loading dosages, treatment should be guided by the EEG pattern.
Drug: Anti-epileptic drugs
The non-intervention group will be treated conform standard guidelines of treatment of comatose patients after cardiac arrest, but without anti-epileptic drugs or EEG based deep sedation. Treatment to suppress clinical myoclonia or seizures with low dose propofol is left to the discretion of the treating physician. Decisions regarding limitation or withdrawal of treatment will be done in accordance with the Dutch guideline "postanoxic coma" in both treatment arms. Reasons for withdrawal of treatment will be documented.
Other: No anti-epileptic drugs
Recommendations for the treatment of status epilepticus are based on recent international guidelines for treatment of overt status epilepticus. The objective of treatment with AED is to suppress all epileptiform activity. There is no clear proof that induction of a burst-suppression pattern is of additional value and induction of burst suppression is therefore not obligate. If the electroencephalographic status epilepticus returns after tapering sedative treatment at 24 hours, the procedure will be repeated. If the status returns after 2 x 24 hours, it will be considered refractory. Decisions regarding limitation or withdrawal of treatment will be done in accordance with the Dutch guideline "postanoxic coma". Reasons for withdrawal of treatment will be documented.
Also known as: Lorazepam, Midazolam, Fenytoin, Propofol, Levetiracetam, Valproate, Thiopental
The non-intervention group will be treated conform standard guidelines of treatment of comatose patients after cardiac arrest, but without anti-epileptic drugs or EEG based deep sedation. Treatment to suppress clinical myoclonia or seizures with low dose propofol is left to the discretion of the treating physician. Decisions regarding limitation or withdrawal of treatment will be done in accordance with the Dutch guideline "postanoxic coma". Reasons for withdrawal of treatment will be documented.
Neurological outcome
The primary outcome measure will be neurological outcome defined as the score on the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at 3 months dichotomized as good (CPC 1-2 = no or moderate neurological disability) and poor (CPC 3-5 = severe disability, coma, or death).
Time frame: three months
Long term outcome
Secondary outcome measures will include i) mortality; ii) the CPC score at 6 and 12 months; iii) length of stay on the ICU; iv) duration of mechanical ventilation; v) seizure recurrence within one year; vi) quality of life as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey (SF36), depression as measured by the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) , and cognitive functioning as measured by detailed neuropsychological examination after 12 months. Secondary outcome measures in survivors will be collected to thoroughly assess outcome and quality of life of survivors. These outcome measures will not be collected to test between-group differences, since the estimated number of survivors is small. Furthermore, a limited amount of data on the use of resources will be collected for analysis of cost-effectiveness, including place of residence at one year and admission in hospitals, rehabilitations centers, and nursing homes within the first year.
Time frame: 12 months
Plan to share: No
The record gives a start of Apr 2014, a primary completion of Apr 2021 and a completion of Jan 2022. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Lorazepam
University of Twente