CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02054923Updated Aug 5, 2015

The Effect of Routine Video-recording on Colonoscopy Quality Indicators.

An interventional study of Implementation of routine videorecording and No routine videorecording in Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-05.

Sponsored by Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,200
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Routine video recording of the colonoscopy examination has been proposed as a simple and easy to implement method that could improve the quality of colonoscopy. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether implementation of routine video recording of screening colonoscopy withdrawal is effective as a means of supporting quality performance of colonoscopy. The study will be performed in 8 screening centers within the framework of a national colonoscopy screening program in Poland (the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Platform; PCSP). Individuals aged 55-64 years are eligible to participate in the PCSP. In the run-in period colonoscopy quality measures will be monitored through a dedicated joint database. Then eligible screening centres will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the video recording group or the control group. Screening centres assigned to the video recording group will receive videorecorders and DVDs and will be asked to video record all screening colonoscopies (only withdrawal). Control group will be allowed to record colonoscopies on demand only. Then , the colonoscopy quality measures will again be monitored through a dedicated joint database. All the recorded DVDs will be reviewed to verify ceacal intubation and withdrawal time by the PCSP team.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • colonoscopy
  • videorecording
  • quality indicators
  • screening
  • colorectal cancer
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,600 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5,200 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Screening centres participating in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Platform (PCSP) between 2012 and 2013, in which no routine video recording of screening colonoscopies is performed
  • Screening centres which will sign informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
5,200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Routine video recording group

    Intervention: Procedure: Implementation of routine videorecording of colonoscopy withdrawal

    Procedure: Implementation of routine videorecording

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Intervention: Behavioral: No routine videorecording (on demand videorecording possible)

    Behavioral: No routine videorecording

Interventions

  • ProcedureImplementation of routine videorecording

    All screening centres (clusters) assigned to the routine video recording group will receive an appropriate number of video recorders and DVDs for each colonoscopy room. Screening centre coordinators will be responsible for the implementation of routine video recording of all screening colonoscopies (only withdrawal) in the centres. Every three months screening centre coordinators will be asked to send back all recorded DVDs. All the recorded DVDs will be reviewed to verify ceacal intubation and withdrawal time by the PCSP team and then stored.

  • BehavioralNo routine videorecording

    Screening centres (clusters) assigned to the control group will not receive video recorders and DVDs but will be allowed to record colonoscopies on demand.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in screening centre adenoma detection rate before and after intervention

    Proportion of patients with at least one adenoma identified (measured in screening program database).

    Time frame: From the time of randomization up to 10 months (the end of screening program annual edition)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reported and audited ceacal intubation rates

    Proportion of complete colonoscopies (measured in screening program database; audited ceacal intubation rates will be assessed through videorecording review)

    Time frame: From the time of randomization up to 10 months (the end of screening program annual edition)

  2. Rates of painful colonoscopy

    Severe or moderate pain on a four point verbal rating scale (measured in screening program database)

    Time frame: From the time of randomization up to 10 months (the end of screening program annual edition)

  3. Rates of proximal (to the splenic flexure) serrated polyps ≥10mm in size

    Measured in screening program database.

    Time frame: From the time of randomization up to 10 months (the end of screening program annual edition)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Institute of Oncology
    Warsaw, Poland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02054923
Lead sponsor
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Collaborators
Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Foundation for Polish Science, European Union
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 4, 2014
Start date
Mar 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
Aug 5, 2015

Study contacts

Michal F. Kaminski, MD, PhD
principal investigator · The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology
Jaroslaw Regula, MD, PhD
study chair · The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
Maria Rupińska
study director · The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion