An interventional study of Abatacept and Placebo in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Chronic Hepatitis B, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-16.
Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the combination of abatacept along with entecavir (the study drugs) is safe and effective in treating symptoms related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Abatacept, given in an intravenous (IV - injected into a vein) as well as subcutaneous form, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of RA. In this research, abatacept will be given by injection. A subcutaneous injection is an injection given under the skin.
Entecavir, to be taken by mouth, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of hepatitis B.
The study is divided into the following time periods:
Screening Phase: Up to 4 weeks Randomized Double-blind Phase: 24 weeks Open-label Extension Phase: 24 weeksFollow-up Phase: a phone call after Week 48
Each phase contains one or more study visits.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disorder affecting 1% of the world's population. If not adequately controlled, it may lead to disability in up to 30% of patients within the first three years of disease onset [1] and can be associated with premature death. Recent research has suggested that the first event in the pathogenesis of RA is an antigen dependent activation of T-cells in an immunogenetically susceptible host. T-cells require two signals for activation, one involving the trimolecular complex (class II Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), antigen, T-cell receptor), and the other being co-stimulation of the CD28 (Cluster of Differentiation 28) molecule on T-cells by the B7 molecules (CD80 and CD86) on antigen presenting cells.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can cause chronic disease in 5% of immunocompetent adults and has a prevalence of over 350 million worldwide. It is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer and accounts for one million deaths annually. In patients with chronic hepatitis B and RA, treatment options are limited. Traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are associated with hepatotoxicity and are contraindicated in chronic hepatitis. A recent retrospective analysis suggests that successful use of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) agents may be possible in these patients but the authors do warn that these patients should be closely monitored and that fatal reactivation of hepatitis B is possible. Treatment with rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against B-cell protein CD20, is another option; however, the use of this medication in RA patients with chronic hepatitis B may also cause reactivation.
When RA patients with chronic hepatitis B were started on a Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitor or methotrexate (MTX), 2 of 5 HBsAg+ patients reactivated their hepatitis B, indicating a possible high rate of activation in these patients when not on hepatitis B treatment. Reactivation in this and another study occurred after 9-19 months of antirheumatic therapy. In RA patients with chronic Hepatitis B, entecavir appears to be effective at preventing reactivation.
There are no studies on the safety of abatacept in patients with RA and HBV. Adequate T-cell function is important to help cure or contain HBV infection. Our site has conducted a retrospective study that shows preliminary safety of abatacept in patients with RA and chronic Hepatitis B on antiviral therapy. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept in RA patients with chronic Hepatitis B in a pilot study in a randomized, controlled fashion.
2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.
Browse Hepatitis A studies →University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.
Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Target Disease Exceptions
a) Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA; fibromyalgia or keratoconjunctivitis/xerostomia are allowed, as long as these will not confound the CLINICAL EFFICACY OUTCOMES.
Medical History and Concurrent Diseases
h) Subjects who currently abuse drugs or alcohol. i) Subjects with evidence of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment, including HIV.
j) Subjects with herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) that resolved less than 2 months before the informed consent document was signed.
k) Subjects who have received any live vaccines within 3 months of the anticipated first dose of study medication.
l) Subjects with any serious bacterial infection within the last 3 months, unless treated and resolved with antibiotics, or any chronic bacterial infection.
m) Subjects at risk for tuberculosis (TB) or not treated for latent TB is tested positive.
n) Subjects who are positive for hepatitis C antibody if the presence of hepatitis C virus was also shown with polymerase chain reaction or recombinant immunoblot assay.
o) Subjects who have abnormal laboratory values
Prohibited Treatments and/or Therapies
This arm of study subjects will receive 125 mg subcutaneous abatacept during the 24 week double blind period.
Drug: Abatacept
This arm of study patients will receive matching placebo injections during the 24 week double blind period.
Drug: Placebo
Abatacept Injection, 125 mg/Syringe (125 mg/mL), is a sterile solution for SC administration, which contains approximately 126 mg abatacept.
Also known as: Orencia
Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events
Adverse events will be assessed at timepoints specified in the protocol.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks from Week 4 to Week 48
Number of Subjects with Hepatitis B Reactivation
Blood test for Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA will be used.
Time frame: Every 4 Weeks from Week 4 to Week 48
DAS28-ESR-4 Unit
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48
CDAI Unit
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
TJC Count
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
SJC Count
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Patient Global (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
MD Global (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Pain (measured on a 5 point Likert scale)
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Global Assessment of Disease Activity (as measured on a 5 point Likert scale)
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
HAQ-DI Units
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Fatigue (as assessed by FACIT-Fatigue Unit)
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Sleep as assessed by Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Instrument Unit
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
ACR 20/50/70 Percentage
Time frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of California, Los Angeles