CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02053610Updated Sep 14, 2018Results posted

CLL11: A Study of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759 [GA101]) With Chlorambucil in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (Stage 2)

A Phase 3 interventional study of obinutuzumab and rituximab in Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 262 sites in 26 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-14.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2009, registered Nov 2013).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
787
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This open-label, randomized, 3-arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of (obinutuzumab) RO5072759 in combination with chlorambucil as compared to rituximab plus chlorambucil or chlorambucil alone in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients will be randomized 2:2:1 to receive a maximum of six 28-day cycles of either RO5072759 (1000 mg intravenous (iv) infusion, on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6) plus chlorambucil (0.5 mg/kg orally, days 1 and 15 of cycles 1-6), or rituximab (iv infusion day 1, 375 mg/m\^2 cycle 1, 500 mg/m\^2 cycles 2-6) plus chlorambucil, or chlorambucil alone. Anticipated time on study treatment is >6 months and follow-up for disease-progression and safety will be at least 5 years. In the US, this trial is sponsored/managed by Genentech.

Read the detailed description

Protocol BO21004 is divided into 3 separate Unique Protocol IDs for reporting results on clinicaltrials.gov because there are 3 separate primary analyses conducted at different time-points.

  • BO21004 (Stage 1a) [NCT01010061] includes the analysis of 2 of the 3 arms obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Glb) compared to chlorambucil (Clb) reported separately.
  • BO21004 (Stage 1b) [NCT01998880] includes the analysis of 2 of the 3 arms rituximab plus chlorambucil (RClb) compared to chlorambucil (Clb) reported separately.
  • BO21004 (Stage 2) includes the analysis of 2 of the 3 arms obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (Glb) compared to rituximab plus chlorambucil (RClb) reported here.
02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Leukemia

5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 787 is above the median of 38 across 4,247 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults >/=18 years
  • Documented Cluster of Differentiation Antigen 20 (CD20) + B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Lymphoma (B-CLL)
  • Previously untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) requiring treatment according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) criteria
  • Total Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) > 6 and/or creatinine clearance \< 70 ml/min.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior CLL therapy
  • Transformation of CLL to aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Richter's transformation)
  • History of other malignancy unless the malignancy has been in remission without treatment for >/=2 years prior to enrolment, and except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, surgically treated low-grade prostate cancer, or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast treated with lumpectomy alone
  • Positive hepatitis serology (HBV, HCV) or positive HIV or Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus (HTLV) testing
  • Patients with active infection requiring systemic treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
787 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    obinutuzumab + chlorambucil (GClb)

    Participants received 1000 mg obinutuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion, on Days 1 \[first infusion split 100 mg on Day 1 and 900 mg on Day 2 as per protocol amendment\], 8 and 15 in Cycle 1 and Day 1 in Cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles) plus chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally on Day 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (6 Cycles).

    Drug: obinutuzumab · Drug: chlorambucil

  • Active comparator
    rituximab + chlorambucil (RClb)

    Participants received 375 mg/m\^2 rituximab IV infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 then 500 mg/m\^2 IV infusions on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles) plus chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally on Day 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (6 cycles).

    Drug: rituximab · Drug: chlorambucil

  • Active comparator
    Chlorambucil (Clb)

    Participants received chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally on Day 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (6 Cycles). Participants with Progressive Disease or within 6 months of follow-up were allowed to cross over to receive obinutuzumab + chlorambucil.

    Drug: chlorambucil

Interventions

  • Drugobinutuzumab

    1000 mg obinutuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion, on Days 1 \[first infusion split 100 mg on Day 1 and 900 mg on Day 2 as per protocol amendment\], 8 and 15 in Cycle 1 and Day 1 in Cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles).

    Also known as: RO5072759, GA101, GAZYVA®, Gazyvaro

  • Drugrituximab

    375 mg/m\^2 rituximab intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle duration is 28 days) then 500 mg/m\^2 IV infusions on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6.

    Also known as: Rituxan®, MabThera®

  • Drugchlorambucil

    Chlorambucil 0.5 mg/kg orally on Day 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by the investigator. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events

    Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death.

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data

    Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by an Independent Review Committee.

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)

  3. Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)

    EOTR was the first response assessment 56 days from the last dose according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (IWCLL) guidelines. Complete Response (CR) required: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. Partial Response (PR) required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response

    Best overall response according to IWCLL guidelines was defined as the percentage of patients with CR, CRi, PR or nodular Partial Response (nPR). CR required all of the following: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. PR required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  5. Event Free Survival

    Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time between date of randomization and the date of disease progression/relapse, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy. Progressive disease as per IWCLL criteria required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  6. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  7. Duration of Response

    Duration of Response was defined as the date the response \[either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)\] was first recorded until the date of Disease Progression or death due to any cause. Response was assessed according IWCLL guidelines.

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  8. Percentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of Treatment

    Molecular remission was defined as a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative result at the end of treatment (assessment that occurred between 56 days and 6 months of last treatment). Molecular remission was assessed for all patients using a blood sample. Additionally, a bone marrow sample was obtained from patients whom the investigator assumed to have a complete response, consistent with the IWCLL guidelines. A combined analysis of blood and bone marrow results was conducted. A patient was considered MRD negative if result was less than 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell in 10000 leukocytes (MRD value \< 0.0001) based on the method of allele specific polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR).

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  9. Time to Re-Treatment/New Anti-leukemic Therapy

    Time to re-treatment/new anti-leukemic therapy was defined as time between the date of randomization and the date of first intake of re-treatment or new anti-leukemic therapy.

    Time frame: Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)

  10. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire

    The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) was used to assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and symptom burden. The QLQ-C30 contains 30 items including the functional scales of physical functioning (5 items), role functioning (2 items), emotional functioning (4 items), cognitive functioning (2 items), social functioning (2 items) and symptom scales including fatigue (3 items), nausea and vomiting (2 items), and pain (4 items) and six single item scales on dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)

  11. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire

    EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CLL16) module was used to assess patient-reported outcomes and symptom burden. The QLQ-CLL16 module includes three multi-item scales assessing fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects and disease symptoms (8 items), infection (4 items) and two single item scales on social activities and future health worries. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)

07

Results

Posted Oct 10, 2014

Participant flow

787 patients were enrolled in the study. Following a 6 patient safety run-in prior to randomization, 781 patients were randomized.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Started330333
Received study drug326331
Completed288266
Not completed4267
Withdrew: Adverse event/intercurrent illness2543
Withdrew: Withdrew consent29
Withdrew: Death55
Withdrew: Administrative/other11
Withdrew: Disease progression23
Withdrew: Refused treatment/did not cooperate13
Withdrew: Did not receive treatment42
Withdrew: Insufficient therapeutic response11
Withdrew: Violation of selection criteria10

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by the investigator. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)15.7 (14.3 to 17.2)28.9 (26.1 to 32.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Log Rank, Stratified · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.49 · 95% CI 0.41 to 0.58Stratified by Binet stage at Baseline.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events

Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death.

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events
percentage of participantsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events88.573.3
SecondaryProgression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data
monthsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data14.9 (14.2 to 17.2)26.7 (23.2 to 31.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Log Rank, Stratified · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.42 · 95% CI 0.33 to 0.54Stratified by Binet stage at Baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data

Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by an Independent Review Committee.

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data
percentage of participantsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Data55.530.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)

EOTR was the first response assessment 56 days from the last dose according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (IWCLL) guidelines. Complete Response (CR) required: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. Partial Response (PR) required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)
percentage of participantsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Complete Response (CR)4.8 (2.8 to 7.8)15.6 (11.9 to 20)
Complete Response incomplete (CRi)1.5 (0.5 to 3.5)3.6 (1.9 to 6.2)
Partial Response (PR)53.9 (48.4 to 59.4)52.0 (46.4 to 57.4)
Nodular Partial Response (nPR)5.2 (3.0 to 8.1)7.5 (4.9 to 10.9)
Stable Disease15.2 (11.5 to 19.5)4.5 (2.5 to 7.3)
Progressive Disease11.2 (8.0 to 15.1)4.5 (2.5 to 7.3)
No Response Assessment8.2 (NA to NA)12.3 (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Chi-squared · p = 0.0001 · Difference in response rates: 13.22 · 95% CI 6.3 to 20.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response

Best overall response according to IWCLL guidelines was defined as the percentage of patients with CR, CRi, PR or nodular Partial Response (nPR). CR required all of the following: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. PR required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response
percentage of participantsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Complete Response (CR)7.0 (4.5 to 10.3)23.7 (19.3 to 28.7)
Complete Response incomplete (CRi)1.2 (0.3 to 3.1)1.8 (0.7 to 3.9)
Partial Response (PR)55.5 (49.9 to 60.9)50.8 (45.2 to 56.2)
Nodular Partial Response (nPR)2.7 (1.3 to 5.1)3.0 (1.4 to 5.5)
Stable Disease14.5 (10.9 to 18.8)3.9 (2.1 to 6.6)
Progressive Disease11.5 (8.3 to 15.5)4.5 (2.5 to 7.3)
No Response Assessment7.6 (NA to NA)12.3 (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Chi-squared · p = 0.0002 · Difference in response rates: 12.92 · 95% CI 6.1 to 19.8
SecondaryEvent Free Survival

Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time between date of randomization and the date of disease progression/relapse, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy. Progressive disease as per IWCLL criteria required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Event Free Survival
monthsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Event Free Survival15 (14.2 to 17.1)26.5 (24.8 to 30.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Log Rank, Stratified · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.51 · 95% CI 0.43 to 0.61Stratified by Binet stage at Baseline.
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Overall Survival73.1 (60.8 to NA)NA (74.6 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Log Rank, Stratified · p = 0.0245 · Hazard ratio (stratified): 0.76 · 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97Stratified by Binet stage at Baseline.
SecondaryDuration of Response

Duration of Response was defined as the date the response \[either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)\] was first recorded until the date of Disease Progression or death due to any cause. Response was assessed according IWCLL guidelines.

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response
monthsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Duration of Response11.8 (9.5 to 12.6)23.8 (19.1 to 30.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Log Rank, Stratified · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.50 · 95% CI 0.41 to 0.61Stratified by Binet stage at Baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of Treatment

Molecular remission was defined as a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative result at the end of treatment (assessment that occurred between 56 days and 6 months of last treatment). Molecular remission was assessed for all patients using a blood sample. Additionally, a bone marrow sample was obtained from patients whom the investigator assumed to have a complete response, consistent with the IWCLL guidelines. A combined analysis of blood and bone marrow results was conducted. A patient was considered MRD negative if result was less than 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell in 10000 leukocytes (MRD value \< 0.0001) based on the method of allele specific polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR).

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of Treatment
percentage of participantsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Percentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of Treatment2 (0.9 to 5.2)24 (18.8 to 30.0)
SecondaryTime to Re-Treatment/New Anti-leukemic Therapy

Time to re-treatment/new anti-leukemic therapy was defined as time between the date of randomization and the date of first intake of re-treatment or new anti-leukemic therapy.

Time frame:
Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Re-Treatment/New Anti-leukemic Therapy
monthsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Time to Re-Treatment/New Anti-leukemic Therapy34.9 (29.1 to 41.6)56.4 (48.3 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb) · Log Rank, Stratified · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (stratified): 0.58 · 95% CI 0.46 to 0.73Stratified by Binet stage at Baseline.
SecondaryEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire

The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) was used to assess patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and symptom burden. The QLQ-C30 contains 30 items including the functional scales of physical functioning (5 items), role functioning (2 items), emotional functioning (4 items), cognitive functioning (2 items), social functioning (2 items) and symptom scales including fatigue (3 items), nausea and vomiting (2 items), and pain (4 items) and six single item scales on dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)
Reported as:
Mean · unit on a scale
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Questionnaire
unit on a scaleRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Appetite Loss Scale: Baseline (n=314, 312)15.4 ± 26.0219 ± 29.37
Appetite Loss Scale: Cy4D1 (n=277, 258)12 ± 23.2210.9 ± 21.47
Cognitive Functioning Scale: Baseline(n=312, 315)83.0 ± 20.0280.4 ± 22.52
Cognitive Functioning Scale: Cy4D1 (n=277, 259)83.6 ± 17.2683.9 ± 20.25
Constipation Scale: Baseline (n=311, 312)15.2 ± 24.6214.9 ± 23.54
Constipation Scale: Cy4D1 (n=276,257)14.3 ± 23.0515.3 ± 25.16
Diarrhoea Scale: Baseline (n=311,313)8.4 ± 18.789.5 ± 19.58
Diarrhoea Scale: Cy4D1 (n=276,257)8.8 ± 19.669.2 ± 20.32
Dyspnoea Scale: Baseline (n=312,312)27.5 ± 28.6227.8 ± 29.97
Dyspnoea: Cy4D1 (n=277,257)20.8 ± 26.6916.5 ± 23.75
Emotional Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=312,314)77.1 ± 21.3273.9 ± 23.14
Emotional Functioning Scale: Cy4D1 (n=277,259)82.7 ± 18.2982.5 ± 19.18
Fatigue Scale: Baseline (n=313,312)36.9 ± 25.8638.5 ± 26.05
Fatigue Scale: Cy4D1 (n=278,258)30.4 ± 22.3229.8 ± 21.43
Financial Difficulties Scale: Baseline (n=309,312)10.5 ± 21.5310.5 ± 22.14
Financial Difficulties Scale: Cy4D1(n=273,258)9.6 ± 20.028.4 ± 19.35
Nausea, Vomiting Scale: Baseline (n=313,315)4.5 ± 12.665.3 ± 12.9
Nausea, Vomiting Scale: Cy4D1 (n=278,258)4.1 ± 10.185.2 ± 10.96
Pain scale: Baseline (n=313,316)22.5 ± 27.5922.9 ± 27.73
Pain scale: Cy4D1 (n=278,259)15.6 ± 22.4818.1 ± 24.60
Physical Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=313,316)75.8 ± 19.3473.3 ± 20.77
Physical Functioning Scale: Cy4D1 (n=278,258)77.8 ± 18.578.5 ± 18.90
Global Health Status Scale: Baseline (n=310,313)58.1 ± 22.7458.0 ± 23.81
Global Health Status Scale: Cy4D1 (n=275,256)65.8 ± 20.2266.7 ± 20.27
Role Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=313,315)76.4 ± 28.6874.3 ± 27.62
Role Functioning Scale: Cy4D1 (n=277,258)79.9 ± 25.478.7 ± 24.56
Social Functioning Scale: Baseline (n=312,314)82.9 ± 23.8183.7 ± 24.96
Social Functioning Scale: Cy4D1(n=276,259)85.4 ± 2186.6 ± 20.71
Insomnia: Baseline (n=312,316)25.6 ± 30.9129.9 ± 31.18
Insomnia: Cy4D1(n=276,258)20.9 ± 26.7121.6 ± 27.97
SecondaryEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire

EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CLL16) module was used to assess patient-reported outcomes and symptom burden. The QLQ-CLL16 module includes three multi-item scales assessing fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects and disease symptoms (8 items), infection (4 items) and two single item scales on social activities and future health worries. Final scores are transformed such that they range from 0 - 100, whereby higher scores indicate greater functioning, greater quality of life, or a greater degree of symptoms, with changes of 5 - 10 points considered to be of minimally important difference to participants. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and Cycle 4 Day 1 (Cy4D1)
Reported as:
Mean · unit on a scale
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CLL16 Questionnaire
unit on a scaleRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Disease Effects Scale: Baseline (n=276,284)22.8 ± 17.9422.7 ± 18.49
Disease Effects Scale: Cy4D1 (n=243, 233)15.4 ± 1514.7 ± 15.34
Fatigue Scale: Baseline (n=276, 284)27.7 ± 23.4831.1 ± 25.32
Fatigue Scale: Cy4D1 (n=243, 233)21 ± 20.5220.6 ± 20.82
Future Health: Baseline (n=275, 280)47.5 ± 32.1749.8 ± 32.79
Future Health: Cy4D1 (n=240, 231)33.9 ± 29.7230.3 ± 31.17
Infection Scale: Baseline (n=275, 284)11.8 ± 15.8312.7 ± 16.67
Infection Scale: Cy4D1 (n=243, 233)9.4 ± 13.949 ± 12.2
Social Problems: Baseline (n=271, 281)25.2 ± 32.4523.6 ± 31.12
Social Problems: Cy4D1 (n=242, 232)19.3 ± 26.0319.5 ± 27.94
Treatment Side Effects Scale: Baseline(n=276, 284)17.9 ± 15.6919.9 ± 17.59
Treatment Side Effect Scale: Cy4D1(n=243, 233)14.2 ± 13.5714.6 ± 14.89

Adverse events

Collected over 5.5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)—124/321 (38.6%)279/321 (86.9%)
Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)—150/336 (44.6%)299/336 (89%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 223
Most frequent serious events
EventRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Infusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/32134/336
PneumoniaInfections and infestations19/32114/336
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)4/3218/336
Squamous cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)7/3214/336
Squamous cell carcinoma of skinNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)6/3216/336
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/3216/336
Tumour lysis syndromeMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/3215/336
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/3214/336
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/3214/336
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders2/3214/336
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Infusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications118/321197/336
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders104/321128/336
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders20/32146/336
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders42/32140/336
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders34/32133/336
FatigueGeneral disorders30/32126/336
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders24/32131/336
PyrexiaGeneral disorders22/32128/336
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders16/32127/336
AstheniaGeneral disorders25/32123/336

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)Total
Mean71.5 ± 8.8271.9 ± 8.6871.7 ± 8.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)Total
Female126130256
Male204203407
08

Study locations

262 sites
  • San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Baltimore, Maryland 21215, United States
  • Green Bay, Wisconsin 54311, United States
  • Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188, United States
  • Buenos Aires, 1406, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, 1425, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, C1114AAN, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, C1180AAX, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, C1221ADC, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, C1431FWO, Argentina
  • Rosario, 2000, Argentina
  • Adelaide, New South Wales 5011, Australia
  • Gosford, New South Wales 2250, Australia
  • Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, Australia
  • Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia
  • St. Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia
  • Sydney, New South Wales 2139, Australia
  • Greenslopes, Queensland 4120, Australia
  • Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia
  • Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Kurralta Park, South Australia 5037, Australia
  • Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia
  • Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Wien, 1090, Austria
  • Wien, 1160, Austria
  • Goiania, GO 74140-050, Brazil
  • Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
  • Porto Alegre, RS 90880-480, Brazil
  • Santo Andre, SP 09060-650, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil
  • Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
  • Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria
  • Sofia, 1756, Bulgaria
  • Varna, 9010, Bulgaria
  • Vratsa, 3000, Bulgaria
  • Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
  • Winnipeg, Manitoba R0C 2Z0, Canada
  • Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2Y9, Canada
  • Barrie, Ontario L4M 6M2, Canada
  • Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada
  • Rimouski, Quebec G5L 5T1, Canada
  • Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Brno, 625 00, Czechia
  • Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czechia
  • Praha 2, 128 08, Czechia
  • Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
  • København, 2100, Denmark
  • Odense, 5000, Denmark
  • Vejle, 7100, Denmark
  • Århus, 8000, Denmark
  • Cairo, 11796, Egypt
  • Tallinn, 13419, Estonia
  • Tartu, 51014, Estonia
  • Angers, 49933, France
  • Bobigny, 93009, France
  • Caen, 14076, France
  • Clermont Ferrand, 63003, France
  • Creteil, 94010, France
  • Le Mans, 72015, France
  • Lille, 59037, France
  • Lyon, 69373, France
  • Marseille, 13273, France
  • Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Nantes, 44093, France
  • Paris, 75475, France
  • Paris, 75651, France
  • Pessac, 33604, France
  • Pierre Benite, 69495, France
  • Poitiers, 86021, France
  • Reims, 51092, France
  • Rennes, 35033, France
  • Rouen, 76038, France
  • Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Tours, 37044, France
  • Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, 54511, France
  • Ahaus, 48683, Germany
  • Amberg, 92224, Germany
  • Ansbach, 91522, Germany
  • Bamberg, 96049, Germany
  • Berlin, 12200, Germany
  • Bonn, 53113, Germany
  • Bremen, 28177, Germany
  • Bremen, 28209, Germany
  • Bremen, 28239, Germany
  • Delitzsch, 04509, Germany
  • Detmold, 32756, Germany
  • Dresden, 01127, Germany
  • Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Duisburg, 47051, Germany
  • Erlangen, 91052, Germany
  • Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Eschweiler, 52249, Germany
  • Essen, 45122, Germany
  • Essen, 45239, Germany
  • Esslingen, 73730, Germany

Showing the first 100 of 262 sites across 26 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dimier N, Delmar P, Ward C, Morariu-Zamfir R, Fingerle-Rowson G, Bahlo J, Fischer K, Eichhorst B, Goede V, van Dongen JJM, Ritgen M, Bottcher S, Langerak AW, Kneba M, Hallek M. A model for predicting effect of treatment on progression-free survival using MRD as a surrogate end point in CLL. Blood. 2018 Mar 1;131(9):955-962. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-792333. Epub 2017 Dec 18. PubMed 29255066 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02053610
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Collaborators
German CLL Study Group, Genentech, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2014
Start date
Dec 31, 2009
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2013
Completion
Aug 23, 2017
Results posted
Oct 10, 2014
Last update
Sep 14, 2018

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion