ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02049931Updated Aug 7, 2018Results posted

Comparison of Treatments of Osteoporotic Compression Fracture Using Rigid Brace, Soft Brace, and no Brace

An interventional study of No brace treatment and Rigid brace in Compression Fracture, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-07.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The treatment outcomes in the treatment without brace would be non-inferior to those in use of rigid or soft brace.

Read the detailed description

Bracing has been considered as a landmark step in conservative management for osteoporotic compression fractures. However, no prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trials are available to document for the efficacy of wearing of the rigid or soft brace for the management of osteoporotic compression fracture. Therefore, the current trial was therefore designed to compare the outcome for improvement of disability and pain in patients with osteoporotic compression fracture using rigid, soft, or no brace.

02

Conditions studied

  • Compression Fracture

Keywords

  • osteoporosis, compression fracture, brace
03

In context

Fractures, Compression

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Compression; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 73 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Compression.

Browse Fractures, Compression studies →

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,900 studies on the registry; 274 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • the presence of acute back pain caused by a single level vertebral fracture within 3 days of minor trauma such as fall from height,
  • compression fracture between T 7 and L3 including injuries of only anterior compartment of vertebral body without neurologic deficit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the presence of more than two recent vertebral fractures,
  • pathologic malignant compression fractures,
  • neurologic complications,
  • a history of previous injury or surgery to the fractured level,
  • inability to complete the questionnaires about pain and disability.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    No brace group

    Patients in the no brace treatment group were allowed to ambulate without any braces as long as it would be tolerable.

    Device: No brace treatment

  • Active comparator
    Rigid brace group

    Patients in the rigid brace immobilization group were strictly maintained on bed rest until fitted a thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis. Brace is required to be worn at all times except when lying. All patients were instructed to wear the rigid brace for a total of 8 weeks.

    Device: Rigid brace

  • Active comparator
    Soft brace group

    Because soft back brace was a custom-made, it began to be worn when enrollment for the study. Brace is required to be worn at all times except when lying. All patients were instructed to wear the soft brace for a total of 8 weeks.

    Device: Soft brace

Interventions

  • DeviceNo brace treatment

    Patients in the no brace group were allowed to ambulate without any braces as long as it would be tolerable.

  • DeviceRigid brace

    In rigid brace group, brace is required to be worn at all times except when lying. All patients were instructed to wear the rigid brace for a total of 8 weeks.

  • DeviceSoft brace

    In soft brace group, brace is required to be worn at all times except when lying. All patients were instructed to wear the soft brace for a total of 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 Weeks

    The primary outcome was the score for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 weeks after compression fracture. The ODI is a self-reported questionnaire measuring back-specific function including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, and traveling. The questionnaire consists of 10 items each with 6 response levels. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total score is converted to a 0 to 100 scale (zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible).

    Time frame: 12 weeks after injury

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) for Back Pain

    The VAS for back pain comprised a 10-cm line with "none" (0) on one end and "disabled pain" (10) on the other. Participants were asked to place a mark on the 10-cm line, which represented his or her perceived level of back pain, and the measured distance (cm) from the mark to the zero point was considered the score.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks after injury

  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    The ODI is a self-reported questionnaire measuring back-specific function including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, and traveling. The questionnaire consists of 10 items each with 6 response levels. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total score is converted to a 0 to 100 scale (zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible).

    Time frame: at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after compression fracture.

  3. General Health Status

    The general health status was assessed with use of the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) at the initial enrollment and 12 weeks after compression fracture.The raw scores for the eight subscales and the two summaries of the SF-36 (Physical Function,Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role Emotion, and Mental Health, as well as the Physical Component Summary \[PCS\] and the Mental Component Summary \[MCS\]) were transformed into norm-based 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability, and the higher the score the less disability. A score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

    Time frame: at the initial enrollment and 12 weeks after compression fracture

  4. the Progression of Body Compression Ratio Over All Follow-up Assessments

    The anterior body compression ratio was assessed by calculating the ratio between the vertical height of the most compressed anterior section of the injured vertebral body and the posterior vertebral body height at that level

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after compression fracture

07

Results

Posted May 25, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNo Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace Group
Started202020
Completed171517
Not completed353

Outcome measures

PrimaryOswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 Weeks

The primary outcome was the score for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 weeks after compression fracture. The ODI is a self-reported questionnaire measuring back-specific function including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, and traveling. The questionnaire consists of 10 items each with 6 response levels. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total score is converted to a 0 to 100 scale (zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible).

Time frame:
12 weeks after injury
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 Weeks
units on a scaleNo Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace Group
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 Weeks35.95 (25.42 to 46.47)33.54 (23.79 to 43.29)37.83 (26.77 to 48.90)
SecondaryVisual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) for Back Pain

The VAS for back pain comprised a 10-cm line with "none" (0) on one end and "disabled pain" (10) on the other. Participants were asked to place a mark on the 10-cm line, which represented his or her perceived level of back pain, and the measured distance (cm) from the mark to the zero point was considered the score.

Time frame:
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks after injury
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) for Back Pain
units on a scaleNo Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace Group
2 weeks after injury5.9 ± 1.95.5 ± 1.86.8 ± 1.7
6 weeks after injury4.6 ± 2.05.2 ± 1.86.3 ± 2.0
12 weeks after injury4.9 ± 2.03.4 ± 2.14.2 ± 1.9
SecondaryOswestry Disability Index (ODI)

The ODI is a self-reported questionnaire measuring back-specific function including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, and traveling. The questionnaire consists of 10 items each with 6 response levels. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total score is converted to a 0 to 100 scale (zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible).

Time frame:
at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after compression fracture.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
units on a scaleNo Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace Group
2 weeks after injury56.84 ± 17.0653.32 ± 13.5664.19 ± 16.12
6 weeks after injury47.05 ± 16.2252.53 ± 14.5257.62 ± 16.53
12 weeks after injury42.12 ± 16.1238.73 ± 13.7844.25 ± 17.12
SecondaryGeneral Health Status

The general health status was assessed with use of the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) at the initial enrollment and 12 weeks after compression fracture.The raw scores for the eight subscales and the two summaries of the SF-36 (Physical Function,Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role Emotion, and Mental Health, as well as the Physical Component Summary \[PCS\] and the Mental Component Summary \[MCS\]) were transformed into norm-based 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability, and the higher the score the less disability. A score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

Time frame:
at the initial enrollment and 12 weeks after compression fracture
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
General Health Status
units on a scaleNo Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace Group
SF-36 PCS at the initial enrollment29.70 ± 13.5534.18 ± 14.5829.87 ± 11.87
SF-36 PCS at 12 weeks after injury31.15 ± 12.4532.75 ± 14.2333.53 ± 11.52
SF-36 MCS at the initial enrollment41.79 ± 10.3148.29 ± 14.9342.21 ± 11.75
SF-36 MCS at 12 weeks after injury36.53 ± 11.6437.85 ± 14.6234.63 ± 12.43
Secondarythe Progression of Body Compression Ratio Over All Follow-up Assessments

The anterior body compression ratio was assessed by calculating the ratio between the vertical height of the most compressed anterior section of the injured vertebral body and the posterior vertebral body height at that level

Time frame:
2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after compression fracture
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
the Progression of Body Compression Ratio Over All Follow-up Assessments
ratioNo Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace Group
2 weeks after injury0.62 ± 0.050.67 ± 0.030.70 ± 0.05
6 weeks after injury0.58 ± 0.040.66 ± 0.040.65 ± 0.03
12 weeks after injury0.57 ± 0.050.63 ± 0.030.64 ± 0.03

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
No Brace Group—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Rigid Brace Group—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Soft Brace Group—1/20 (5%)0/20 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNo Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace Group
DeathCardiac disorders0/200/201/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)No Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace GroupTotal
Mean72.25 ± 10.4066.75 ± 11.0071.75 ± 7.9670.25 ± 10.26
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)No Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace GroupTotal
Female13141441
Male76619
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)No Brace GroupRigid Brace GroupSoft Brace GroupTotal
Korea, Republic of20202060
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim HJ, Yi JM, Cho HG, Chang BS, Lee CK, Kim JH, Yeom JS. Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):1959-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00187. PubMed 25471910 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Dec 2012, a primary completion of Oct 2013 and a completion of Jan 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2015, 1 year 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 28, 2014
First posted
Jan 30, 2014
Start
Dec 2012
Primary completionActual
Oct 2013
CompletionActual
Jan 2014
Results first posted
May 25, 2015
Last update
Aug 7, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02049931
Responsible party
Jin S. Yeom (professor, Seoul National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2014
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Jan 2014
Results posted
May 25, 2015
Last update
Aug 7, 2018

Study contacts

Ho-Joong Kim, MD
principal investigator · Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion