An interventional study of Phacoemulsification and Endoscopic Cycloplasty (ECPL) in Glaucoma, sponsored by Credit Valley EyeCare. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-30.
Sponsored by Credit Valley EyeCare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the mechanical angle opening in patients with angle closure due to a plateau iris configuration (elevated iris) using phacoemulsification combined with endoscopic cycloplasty versus treatment with phacoemulsification alone.
1,844 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 233 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 65 across 1,296 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.
Browse Glaucoma studies →Credit Valley EyeCare is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Cataract extraction alone
Procedure: Phacoemulsification
Cataract extraction combined with endoscopic cycloplasty
Procedure: Phacoemulsification · Procedure: Endoscopic Cycloplasty (ECPL)
Anterior Chamber Angle Depth (nasal angle)
Anterior chamber angle depth (nasal angle) measured using the Shaffer grading system and via anterior segment imaging
Time frame: Twelve months
Number of glaucoma medications
The number of glaucoma medications will be recorded and compared to pre-operative number of glaucoma medications.
Time frame: Twelve months post-op
Intraocular pressure (IOP)
IOP will be recorded and compared to pre-operative IOP.
Time frame: Twelve months post-op
Intra- and post-operative complications
Analyzing any unexpected complications from the surgery such as prolonged hypotony, intraocular pressure spike, prolonged corneal inflammation etc. This will be done during the clinic visit and analyzed under slit lamp examination.
Time frame: Up to one year after surgery
The record gives a start of Nov 2010, a primary completion of Nov 2013 and a completion of Nov 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Credit Valley EyeCare