ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02045394Updated Dec 3, 2015

Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Haemoptysis: a Multicenter Study

An observational study in Lung Cancer, Tuberculosis and Bronchiectasis, sponsored by University of Milan. Completed at 6 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-03.

Sponsored by University of Milan · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
610
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Haemoptysis is the coughing up of blood originating from the respiratory tract. It is a common and worrying clinical symptom which can be due to different aetiologies including lung cancer, tuberculosis, COPD, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, acute bronchitis or unknown origin (cryptogenic haemoptysis). Epidemiology and optimal diagnostic approach are largely unclear. Aims of this study are to define current epidemiology and to provide the best diagnostic approach by providing a diagnostic algorithm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Tuberculosis
  • Bronchiectasis
  • Pneumonia
  • Acute Bronchitis
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Cryptogenic Haemoptysis

Keywords

  • haemoptysis
  • hemoptysis
  • airway bleeding
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 610 is above the median of 200 across 1,434 observational studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Milan is the lead sponsor of 183 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Inpatients and outpatients with haemoptysis requiring a diagnosis referred for medical consultation to italian university and clinical hospitals.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • haemoptysis requiring a diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of known bleeding lesions in the upper or lower airways
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
610 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
18 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients presenting with haemoptysis

    Other: Chest X-ray · Other: computed tomography of the chest · Procedure: Bronchoscopy

Interventions

  • OtherChest X-ray
  • Othercomputed tomography of the chest

    Also known as: chest CT scan

  • ProcedureBronchoscopy

    In patients with haemoptysis bronchoscopy will be performed with flexible bronchoscope. A systemic research of bleeding site and causes will be done. Microbiological or pathological sampling will be executed if clinically required. In selected patients, bronchoscopy might be performed with the rigid instrument or the flexible bronchoscope in intubated patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients presenting with haemoptysis affected by lung cancer, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, acute bronchitis, cryptogenic haemoptysis or other causes.

    To define the prevalence of diseases presenting with haemoptysis by measuring percentage of patients presenting with haemoptysis affected by lung cancer, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, acute bronchitis, cryptogenic haemoptysis or other causes. Epidemiology will be analysed related to the severity of the symptom (mild haemoptysis: drops of blood or bloody sputum; moderate haemoptysis: \<500 ml/24 h, severe haemoptysis: 1-2 cups, as defined by Hirshberg et al. CHEST 1997).

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of chest X-ray, chest CT scan and bronchoscopy alone and in combination in the diagnosis of different causes of haemoptysis.

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of of chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan and bronchoscopy executed alone versus the combination of the exams in the diagnosis of different causes of haemoptysis (lung cancer, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, pneumonia, acute bronchitis, cryptogenic haemoptysis and other causes).

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Percentage and severity of recurrence of haemoptysis in the follow-up period.

    Every patient will be followed with scheduled visits and phone calls for 18 months since the first episode of haemoptysis. The percentage of patient with recurrence of haemoptysis, the severity of recurrence, will be measured and analysed by descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Sensitivity and specificity of bronchoscopy in localizing the bleeding side and lobe in relation to the timing of the haemoptysis.

    Accuracy of bronchoscopy in localizing the side and the lobe source of the bleeding in relation to the timing of haemoptysis. The bronchoscopic findings will be analysed in relation to the timing of the bleeding (within 24 hours, between 24 and 48, 49 and 96 or over 96 hours after the occurrence of the symptom).

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Patient survival in the follow-up period.

    Every patient will be followed with scheduled visits and phone calls for 18 months since the first episode of haemoptysis. Patient survival will be measured and analysed by descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 18 months

Other outcomes

  1. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with haemoptysis by using spirometry with the threshold of FEV1/FVC <70

    Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with haemoptysis will be assessed performing spirometry as described by European Respiratory Society Guidelines (European Respiratory Journal, 2005). COPD will be diagnosed in patient with a compatible clinical history (smoking history and frequent exacerbations) and the presence of a ventilatory obstructive defect as defined by a ratio of the forced expiratory volume in the first second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) \<70.

    Time frame: 1 month or at clinical stability

  2. Distribution of main causes of haemoptysis in the subgroup of patients undergoing medical therapies that increase the risk of bleeding.

    To define the prevalence of diseases in patients presenting with haemoptysis in relation to the use of drugs such as antiaggregants or anticoagulants.

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Pneumologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria
    Ancona, Italy
  • USC Pneumologia, Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi
    Lodi, Italy
  • U.O. di Pnuemologia, Azienda Ospedaliera, Carlo Poma
    Mantova, Italy
  • Respiratory Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano.
    Milan, 20142, Italy
  • A.O.U. Maggiore della Carità - S.C.D.O. Pneumologia
    Novara, Italy
  • Clinica Pneumotisiologica, AOU Sassari
    Sassari, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mondoni M, Carlucci P, Cipolla G, Pagani M, Tursi F, Fois A, Pirina P, Canu S, Gasparini S, Bonifazi M, Marani S, Comel A, Saderi L, De Pascalis S, Alfano F, Centanni S, Sotgiu G. Long-term prognostic outcomes in patients with haemoptysis. Respir Res. 2021 Aug 4;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01809-6. PubMed 34348724 ↗
  • Mondoni M, Carlucci P, Cipolla G, Fois A, Gasparini S, Marani S, Centanni S, Sotgiu G. Bronchoscopy to assess patients with hemoptysis: which is the optimal timing? BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0795-9. PubMed 30744616 ↗
  • Mondoni M, Carlucci P, Job S, Parazzini EM, Cipolla G, Pagani M, Tursi F, Negri L, Fois A, Canu S, Arcadu A, Pirina P, Bonifazi M, Gasparini S, Marani S, Comel AC, Ravenna F, Dore S, Alfano F, Sferrazza Papa GF, Di Marco F, Centanni S, Sotgiu G. Observational, multicentre study on the epidemiology of haemoptysis. Eur Respir J. 2018 Jan 4;51(1):1701813. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01813-2017. Print 2018 Jan. No abstract available. PubMed 29301924 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02045394
Responsible party
Fabiano Di Marco (M.D., Ph.D., University of Milan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2014
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2015
Last update
Dec 3, 2015

Study contacts

Michele Mondoni, MD
principal investigator · Respiratory Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Carlucci, MD
study chair · Respiratory Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Stefano Centanni, MD, PhD
study director · Respiratory Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion