ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02043548TIMUpdated Oct 30, 2020Results posted

Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Refractory Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis

A Phase 2 interventional study of tocilizumab and placebo in Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis, sponsored by Chester Oddis. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-30.

Sponsored by Chester Oddis · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this multi-center pilot study is to determine if the drug tocilizumab (Actemra) is effective in the treatment of patients with refractory adult polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM).

Read the detailed description

Although there are several studies supporting the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, it's use in other autoimmune disorders has also been propose. A consensus statement on blocking the effects of IL-6 in RA and other autoimmune conditions has been recently published. IL-6 is involved in the growth and differentiation of many inflammatory cells. In addition to its initial role in triggering B-cell stimulating factor, it also induces T cell growth and differentiation and plays a critical role in both adaptive and innate immune responses. IL-6, produced by many cells including T cells, B cells, monocytes and endothelial cells, binds to its receptor (IL-6R) and subsequently triggers several intracellular pathways leading to the release of inflammatory mediators and stimulation of the immune system. Inhibition of IL-6 has been studied in phase II and III clinical trials of RA. It has led to a decrease in acute phase reactants and other indicators of chronic inflammation. IL-6 is also a potential therapeutic target in systemic sclerosis, and since IL-6 induces differentiation of B cells into antibody forming cells and contributes to T cells transforming into effector cells, its use in Systemic Lupus erythematosus (SLE) has also been suggested.

The use of TCZ in myositis proposed in this protocol is supported by the aforementioned rationale and its efficacy in other rheumatologic disorders. Patients with refractory polymyositis (PM) were treated with tocilizumab and responded favorably. In dermatomyositis, tissue inflammation implicates soluble cytokine networks contributing to disease pathogenesis. Work on a mouse model of myositis noted IL-6 as a mediator of muscle inflammation. Other investigators studying peripheral blood samples and clinical data on both adult and juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) noted that serum levels of IL-6 were significantly correlated with disease activity. In this same study, correlations between serum IL-6 levels and both the type I interferon gene and chemokine signatures were also identified in DM. These authors suggest that the coordinated dysregulation of IL-6 production and Type I interferon signaling implicates these pathways as contributing to disease pathogenesis in DM.

In a mouse model of PM, C protein-induced myositis (CIM), the pathology reportedly mimics that seen in human PM. Mice were treated with anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies or control antibodies and muscle tissue was histologically and immunohistochemically analyzed. CIM was ameliorated in this mouse model implicating IL-6 in the development of myositis. These results not only identified this model as useful to understanding PM but they suggest that IL-6 blockade be considered as a new therapeutic approach in the treatment of myositis.

Thus, the collective findings described above provide evidence for the involvement of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of both adult PM and DM as well as supporting its role from animal models and human studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatomyositis
  • Polymyositis

Keywords

  • dermatomyositis
  • polymyositis
  • tocilizumab
  • Actemra
03

In context

Dermatomyositis

184 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatomyositis; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is close to the median of 35 across 130 interventional studies indexed under Dermatomyositis.

Browse Dermatomyositis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Chester Oddis as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients will be included in the trial based on the following criteria:

  1. Definite or probable polymyositis (PM )or dermatomyositis (DM) by the criteria of Bohan and Peter (as modified by IMACS) in adults over the age of 18. We will also allow enrollment of juvenile dermatomyositis(JDM) patients (considered to have DM) over the age of 18 who otherwise meet the inclusion criteria stipulated below.
  2. Subjects must either have the classic rash(es) of DM (heliotrope, Gottron sign or Gottron papules), possess one of the myositis-associated autoantibodies (e.g. anti-synthetase, anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP), anti-Mi-2, anti-PM-Scl, transcription intermediary factor 1-γ (anti TIF1-γ etc.), or have the diagnosis of PM agreed upon by a 3-member Adjudication Committee consisting of a rheumatologist, neurologist and neuromuscular pathologist.
  3. myositis patients are defined (see Section 3.1.1) as having failed (or considered intolerant to) an adequate course of or having failed glucocorticoids and at least one other (IS) or immunomodulatory agent (e.g. methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, and rituximab).
  4. Subjects with an Manual muscle score (MMT-8) score ≤ 66 (see Appendix B) must also have at least 2 other core set measures meeting the criteria listed below.
  5. Subjects with an MMT-8 score > 66 must have at least 3 other core set measures meeting the criteria listed below and a global extramuscular visual analog score (VAS) score on the Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool ( MDAAT) ≥ 5cm on a 10cm scale.
  6. Criteria for core set measures for study entry:

    1. Patient global VAS with a minimum value of 2.0cm on a 10cm scale.
    2. MD global VAS with a minimum value of 2.0cm on a 10cm scale.
    3. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index with a minimum value of 0.25
    4. Elevation of at least one of the muscle enzymes (Creatine kinase (CK), (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), aldolase, Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at a minimum level of 1.3x the (ULN).
    5. Global extramuscular disease activity score with a minimum value of 1.0cm on a 10cm VAS scale on the Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT).
  7. If on prednisone, the dose must be stable for 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. Tapering of the prednisone dose will only be allowed after the subject meets the Definition of Improvement (DOI) or if safety/toxicity issues supervene.

    1. Prednisone Tapering: Prednisone should be held constant without tapering or escalation (unless there is a serious adverse event or disease flare) until the subject has achieved the DOI. Then, tapering of prednisone may commence using a schedule approximating a 20-25% taper of the existing dose every 4 weeks based on the clinical judgment of the clinical site investigator. Prednisone tapering using the aforementioned guidelines can be commenced at any time if: (a) the patient achieves the DOI or (b) there are complications or circumstances that, in the clinical site investigator's opinion, necessitate the tapering of corticosteroids.
    2. Prednisone at Entry: It is also recommended that patients be on less than 1mg/kg/day of prednisone at study entry.
    3. Prednisone Dosing During Flare: If in the clinical site investigator's opinion there are complications or worsening of disease that necessitate an increase in the prednisone dose then the smallest reasonable increase should be considered.
  8. If an immunosuppressive (IS) agent was discontinued prior to the screening visit there may be a as stipulated below or individualized according to the patients treating physician:

    1. 4 week washout for methotrexate
    2. 8 week washout for any other IS agent (e.g. azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil)
    3. 3 month washout for leflunomide, IVIg or cyclophosphamide
    4. 6 month washout for rituximab
    5. 8 week washout for infliximab or adalimumab
    6. 2 week washout for etanercept
    7. 1 week washout for anakinra
  9. If an IS agent is continued, the dose must remain stable for 4 weeks prior to enrollment and at least until the DOI is met or if safety/toxicity issues supervene. Concomitant IS medications permitted include methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. IVIg will also be allowed as an immunomodulatory agent. Careful patient safety monitoring along with American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines for monitoring these medications will be employed if those toxicity monitoring laboratory studies are not already being assessed as part of this trial. No concomitant biologic agents are allowed (rituximab, anti-TNFs, abatacept) as well as cyclophosphamide or tofacitinib as concomitant immunosuppressive agents. Investigators will be certain to assess and classify adverse events as being secondary to either study drug as well as any concomitant immunosuppressive agent(s). That is, there should be attribution of the adverse event (AE) to the appropriate agent.
  10. Normal organ function, except if abnormal due to the disease under investigation
  11. Men and women of must agree to use an acceptable method of during treatment and for twelve months after completion of treatment.
  12. Subject has provided written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A patient will be excluded if any of the following criteria are met:

  1. Subjects under the age of 18.
  2. Severe muscle damage defined as a global muscle damage score >5 on a 10cm VAS scale on the Muscle Damage Index (MDI).
  3. Evidence of active malignant disease, diagnosed within the previous 5 years (including hematological malignancies and solid tumors, except basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri that has been excised and cured), or breast cancer diagnosed within the previous 10 years unless related to primary disease under investigation.
  4. Known active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial or other infections (including but not limited to tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial disease, and C, and herpes zoster, but excluding fungal infections of nail beds).
  5. Any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 4 weeks of screening or oral antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to screening.
  6. Active tuberculosis (TB) requiring treatment within the previous 3 years. Patients should be screened for latent TB and, if positive, treated following local practice guidelines prior to initiating TCZ. Patients treated for tuberculosis with no recurrence in 3 years are permitted.
  7. Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active) unless related to primary disease under investigation.
  8. Pregnant women or nursing (breast feeding) mothers.
  9. Patients with not willing to use an effective method of .
  10. History of alcohol, drug or chemical abuse within 1 year prior to screening or any medical condition or physical or psychological state that the PI feels would not allow the subject to safely complete the study.
  11. Initiation of an exercise program for muscle strengthening within 4 weeks of the screening visit or initiation of a muscle strengthening exercise program during the study.
  12. Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following randomization.
  13. Treatment with any agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of screening.
  14. Previous treatment with the following cell-depleting therapies, including investigational agents or approved therapies: CAMPATH, cluster of differentiation 4 (anti-CD4), cluster of differentiation antigen 5 (anti-CD5), and anti¬CD3.
  15. Immunization with a live/attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to baseline.
  16. Previous treatment with tocilizumab (TCZ).
  17. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies.
  18. Evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant cardiovascular, nervous system, pulmonary (including obstructive pulmonary disease), renal, hepatic, endocrine (include uncontrolled diabetes mellitus) or gastrointestinal disease (including complicated diverticulitis, ulcerative colitis, or Crohn's disease.)
  19. Patients with lack of peripheral venous access.
  20. Body weight of > 150 kg.
  21. Abnormal laboratory values noted below:

    1. Serum creatinine > 1.6 mg/dL in female patients and > 1.9 mg/dL in male patients. Patients with serum creatinine values exceeding limits may be eligible for the study if their estimated (GFR) are >30.
    2. count \< (100,000/mm3); \< 8.5 g/dl and white blood cell count (WBC) \< 3000/mm3; \< 2.0 x 109/L (2000/mm3); Absolute Lymphocyte Count \< 0.5 x 109/L (500/mm3)
  22. Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or antibody
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: Tocilizumab

    Tocilizumab will be given at a dose of 8mg/kg by IV infusion every 4 weeks at 6 time points (Visits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6).

    Drug: tocilizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Group B: Placebo

    Placebo arm - no active drug

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • given at a dose of 8mg/kg by IV infusion every 4 weeks at 6 time points (Visits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6).

    Also known as: Actemra

  • Drugplacebo

    given by IV infusion every 4 weeks at 6 time points (Visits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the Average Total Improvement Scores at Visits 2 Through 7 During the 6-month Treatment Period Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms

    The total improvement score was calculated by adding the improvement scores of all six core set measures based on 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism(EULAR) myositis response criteria. The minimum and maximum values of the average Total Improvement Scores are 0 and 100; The minimum and maximum values of the average Total Improvement Scores of our included patients are 5.0 and 67.1; The higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the Time to First Definition of Improvement (DOI) Between the 2 Arms

    Time to achieve the first DOI between the treatment and placebo arms.The total improvement score (TIS) is the sum of all 6 improvement scores associated with the change in each core set measure. A TIS \>= 20 represents minimal improvement, a score of \>=40 represents moderate improvement, and a score of \>=60 represents major improvement.

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  2. Count of the Adverse Events Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms.

    We compared the count of the adverse events between the treatment and placebo arms statistically.

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  3. Comparison of the Steroid-sparing Effect (Calculated Using Prednisone Dose Equivalents) Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms

    Mean change of steroid dose prednisone equivalent from last visit to baseline visit was compared between the two treatment arms

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  4. Comparison of Individual Average Core Set Measure in Subjects Over Time Between the 2 Arms (Repeated Measures Analysis)

    The core set measure tested was manual muscle testing, and we compared the mean manual muscle test measures in subjects over time. The minimum and maximum values of the manual muscle testing are 0 and 150; The minimum and maximum values of the manual muscle testing of our included patients are 97.0 and 150.0; The higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  5. Magnitude of the Effect Size Between the Both Treatment Arms

    Compared the number of subjects meeting total improvement scores \>=20 (minimal) and \>=40 (moderate) and \>=60 (major) based on 2016 ACR EULAR myositis response criteria for treatment group and placebo group. The highest TIS score achieved from week 4 through week 24 was used to determine the effect size between both treatment arms.

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

07

Results

Posted Oct 30, 2020

Participant flow

Adult refractory dermatomyositis and polymyositis

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Started1818
Completed1717
Not completed11
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy10
Withdrew: Adverse event01

Outcome measures

PrimaryCompare the Average Total Improvement Scores at Visits 2 Through 7 During the 6-month Treatment Period Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms

The total improvement score was calculated by adding the improvement scores of all six core set measures based on 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism(EULAR) myositis response criteria. The minimum and maximum values of the average Total Improvement Scores are 0 and 100; The minimum and maximum values of the average Total Improvement Scores of our included patients are 5.0 and 67.1; The higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Compare the Average Total Improvement Scores at Visits 2 Through 7 During the 6-month Treatment Period Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms
score on a scaleGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Compare the Average Total Improvement Scores at Visits 2 Through 7 During the 6-month Treatment Period Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms26.4 ± 16.829.3 ± 16.8
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Tocilizumab vs Group B: Placebo · GEE · p = 0.86
SecondaryComparison of the Time to First Definition of Improvement (DOI) Between the 2 Arms

Time to achieve the first DOI between the treatment and placebo arms.The total improvement score (TIS) is the sum of all 6 improvement scores associated with the change in each core set measure. A TIS \>= 20 represents minimal improvement, a score of \>=40 represents moderate improvement, and a score of \>=60 represents major improvement.

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Reported as:
Median · days
Comparison of the Time to First Definition of Improvement (DOI) Between the 2 Arms
daysGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Comparison of the Time to First Definition of Improvement (DOI) Between the 2 Arms42.4 (27.5 to 90.4)55.5 (29.4 to 114.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Tocilizumab vs Group B: Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.77
SecondaryCount of the Adverse Events Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms.

We compared the count of the adverse events between the treatment and placebo arms statistically.

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Reported as:
Number · events
Count of the Adverse Events Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms.
eventsGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Count of the Adverse Events Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms.149
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Tocilizumab vs Group B: Placebo · binomial test · p = 0.40
SecondaryComparison of the Steroid-sparing Effect (Calculated Using Prednisone Dose Equivalents) Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms

Mean change of steroid dose prednisone equivalent from last visit to baseline visit was compared between the two treatment arms

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Reported as:
Median · mg
Comparison of the Steroid-sparing Effect (Calculated Using Prednisone Dose Equivalents) Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms
mgGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Comparison of the Steroid-sparing Effect (Calculated Using Prednisone Dose Equivalents) Between the Treatment and Placebo Arms0.0 (0 to 0)0.0 (0 to 5)
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Tocilizumab vs Group B: Placebo · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.40
SecondaryComparison of Individual Average Core Set Measure in Subjects Over Time Between the 2 Arms (Repeated Measures Analysis)

The core set measure tested was manual muscle testing, and we compared the mean manual muscle test measures in subjects over time. The minimum and maximum values of the manual muscle testing are 0 and 150; The minimum and maximum values of the manual muscle testing of our included patients are 97.0 and 150.0; The higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Comparison of Individual Average Core Set Measure in Subjects Over Time Between the 2 Arms (Repeated Measures Analysis)
score on a scaleGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Comparison of Individual Average Core Set Measure in Subjects Over Time Between the 2 Arms (Repeated Measures Analysis)130.7 ± 16.94137.3 ± 11.83
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Tocilizumab vs Group B: Placebo · GEE · p = 0.78
  • Group A: Tocilizumab vs Group B: Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.19
SecondaryMagnitude of the Effect Size Between the Both Treatment Arms

Compared the number of subjects meeting total improvement scores \>=20 (minimal) and \>=40 (moderate) and \>=60 (major) based on 2016 ACR EULAR myositis response criteria for treatment group and placebo group. The highest TIS score achieved from week 4 through week 24 was used to determine the effect size between both treatment arms.

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Reported as:
Number · participants
Magnitude of the Effect Size Between the Both Treatment Arms
participantsGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Minimal Improvement37
Moderate Improvement46
Major Improvement32

Adverse events

Collected over Time frame period beginning with any amount of exposure to Tocilizumab through the protocol-defined follow-up period. Total duration 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group A: Tocilizumab0/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)11/18 (61.1%)
Group B: Placebo0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)8/18 (44.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
Bilateral sub-massive pulmonary embolismCardiac disorders1/180/18
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGroup A: TocilizumabGroup B: Placebo
SinusitisInfections and infestations4/183/18
Upper Respiratory InfectionInfections and infestations3/181/18
Herpes ZosterInfections and infestations0/182/18
General disorders and administration site conditionsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/180/18
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/180/18
pruritisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/180/18
HypertensionVascular disorders1/180/18
Muscle CrampsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/181/18
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/181/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group A: TocilizumabGroup B: PlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years151631
>=65 years325
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group A: TocilizumabGroup B: PlaceboTotal
Mean52.3 (31.3 to 83.4)50.4 (21.5 to 70.7)52.3 (21.5 to 83.4)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group A: TocilizumabGroup B: PlaceboTotal
Female151328
Male358
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group A: TocilizumabGroup B: PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino123
Not Hispanic or Latino171633
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Group A: TocilizumabGroup B: PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Black or African American336
White121426
Unknown or Not Reported202
Dermatomyositis vs. polymyositis per treatment group
Dermatomyositis vs. polymyositis per treatment group(Participants)Group A: TocilizumabGroup B: PlaceboTotal
Dermatomyositis101323
Polymyositis8513
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • North Shore Long Island Jewish Center
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States
  • Vanderbilt University
    Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Oddis CV, Reed AM, Aggarwal R, Rider LG, Ascherman DP, Levesque MC, Barohn RJ, Feldman BM, Harris-Love MO, Koontz DC, Fertig N, Kelley SS, Pryber SL, Miller FW, Rockette HE; RIM Study Group. Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: a randomized, placebo-phase trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Feb;65(2):314-24. doi: 10.1002/art.37754. PubMed 23124935 ↗
  • Rider LG, Giannini EH, Brunner HI, Ruperto N, James-Newton L, Reed AM, Lachenbruch PA, Miller FW; International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group. International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jul;50(7):2281-90. doi: 10.1002/art.20349. PubMed 15248228 ↗
  • Kaly L, Rosner I. Tocilizumab - a novel therapy for non-organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;26(1):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2012.01.001. PubMed 22424201 ↗
  • Schoels MM, van der Heijde D, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Gabay C, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Jones G, Kvien TK, Murakami M, Nishimoto N, Smolen JS. Blocking the effects of interleukin-6 in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory rheumatic diseases: systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing a consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Apr;72(4):583-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202470. Epub 2012 Nov 10. Erratum In: Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):1110. Murikama, Miho M [corrected to Murakami, Miho]. PubMed 23144446 ↗
  • Smolen JS, Schoels MM, Nishimoto N, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Gabay C, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Jones G, Kvien TK, Murakami M, Betteridge N, Bingham CO 3rd, Bykerk V, Choy EH, Combe B, Cutolo M, Graninger W, Lanas A, Martin-Mola E, Montecucco C, Ostergaard M, Pavelka K, Rubbert-Roth A, Sattar N, Scholte-Voshaar M, Tanaka Y, Trauner M, Valentini G, Winthrop KL, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Consensus statement on blocking the effects of interleukin-6 and in particular by interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Apr;72(4):482-92. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202469. Epub 2012 Nov 21. PubMed 23172750 ↗
  • Muangchan C, Pope JE. Interleukin 6 in systemic sclerosis and potential implications for targeted therapy. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jun;39(6):1120-4. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111423. Epub 2012 Apr 15. PubMed 22505699 ↗
  • Shirota Y, Yarboro C, Fischer R, Pham TH, Lipsky P, Illei GG. Impact of anti-interleukin-6 receptor blockade on circulating T and B cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jan;72(1):118-28. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201310. Epub 2012 Aug 2. PubMed 22858586 ↗
  • Narazaki M, Hagihara K, Shima Y, Ogata A, Kishimoto T, Tanaka T. Therapeutic effect of tocilizumab on two patients with polymyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul;50(7):1344-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker152. Epub 2011 Apr 22. No abstract available. PubMed 21515628 ↗
  • Scuderi F, Mannella F, Marino M, Provenzano C, Bartoccioni E. IL-6-deficient mice show impaired inflammatory response in a model of myosin-induced experimental myositis. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Jul;176(1-2):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.03.026. Epub 2006 May 24. PubMed 16725212 ↗
  • Bilgic H, Ytterberg SR, Amin S, McNallan KT, Wilson JC, Koeuth T, Ellingson S, Newman B, Bauer JW, Peterson EJ, Baechler EC, Reed AM. Interleukin-6 and type I interferon-regulated genes and chemokines mark disease activity in dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Nov;60(11):3436-46. doi: 10.1002/art.24936. PubMed 19877033 ↗
  • Sugihara T, Sekine C, Nakae T, Kohyama K, Harigai M, Iwakura Y, Matsumoto Y, Miyasaka N, Kohsaka H. A new murine model to define the critical pathologic and therapeutic mediators of polymyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr;56(4):1304-14. doi: 10.1002/art.22521. PubMed 17394136 ↗
  • Okiyama N, Sugihara T, Iwakura Y, Yokozeki H, Miyasaka N, Kohsaka H. Therapeutic effects of interleukin-6 blockade in a murine model of polymyositis that does not require interleukin-17A. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Aug;60(8):2505-12. doi: 10.1002/art.24689. PubMed 19644888 ↗
  • Oddis CV, Rider LG, Reed AM, Ruperto N, Brunner HI, Koneru B, Feldman BM, Giannini EH, Miller FW; International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group. International consensus guidelines for trials of therapies in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Sep;52(9):2607-15. doi: 10.1002/art.21291. No abstract available. PubMed 16142757 ↗
  • Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, Brown SG, Camargo CA Jr, Cydulka R, Galli SJ, Gidudu J, Gruchalla RS, Harlor AD Jr, Hepner DL, Lewis LM, Lieberman PL, Metcalfe DD, O'Connor R, Muraro A, Rudman A, Schmitt C, Scherrer D, Simons FE, Thomas S, Wood JP, Decker WW. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb;117(2):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1303. PubMed 16461139 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2014 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 57 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2020, 1 year 3 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jul 2020.

Of 19 phase 2 interventional studies under Dermatomyositis, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 52. This study's 57 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2014
First posted
Jan 23, 2014
StartActual
Oct 1, 2014
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 31, 2019
Results delay requested
Jul 30, 2020
Results first posted
Oct 30, 2020
Last update
Oct 30, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02043548
Lead sponsor
Chester Oddis
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc.
Responsible party
Chester Oddis (Chester Oddis, MD, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 23, 2014
Start date
Oct 1, 2014
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2019
Completion
Jul 31, 2019
Results posted
Oct 30, 2020
Last update
Oct 30, 2020

Study contacts

Chester V. Oddis, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tocilizumab

Start the discussion