A Phase 2 interventional study of PET with 18F-FDOPA in Metastatic Melanoma, sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-14.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention
Melanoma incidence is increasing in most developed countries. At the metastatic stage, the prognosis is usually poor. Major advances have been obtained over the last 3 years with the development of therapies targeting the MAP kinases pathway.
Vemurafenib (zelboraf®) is approved in France since 2012 as first treatment of metastatic melanoma carrying a B-RAF mutation.
For growth, the tumor needs an adequate supply of nutrients to allow the synthesis of macromolecules and a contribution in carbon elements to ensure the production of energy. The nutrition demand is met through greater availability of nutrients via tumor angiogenesis and through increased intracellular penetration of nutrients via specific upregulation of transport systems and metabolic pathways.
Scanner is the imaging method most commonly used for the evaluation of therapeutic response. Such a method gives a morphological indication but does not evaluate the metabolic response.
With the development of functional imaging techniques and the advent of positron emission tomography (PET), it is now possible to obtain an assessment of the metabolic activity of tumors. The use of 18F-FDG to assess therapeutic responses to targeted therapies is fairly recent. The advantage of this approach is well documented for GIST and non-small cell lung cancer. In melanoma, the metabolic response to 18F-FDG is much faster than the response to TAP scanner.
18F-FDG tracer that targets glucose metabolism, is the most sensitive functional imaging in melanoma, which has hindered the development of other tracers such as 18F-FDOPA and 18F-FLT. The 18F-FDG TEP can thus be used in the initial staging and follow-up of the disease, a situation in which it can replace the TAP scanner, additional brain imaging remaining necessary.
The use of metabolic imaging to study the response to targeted therapies in melanoma has been the subject of only one publications. There was a trend toward improved progression-free survival in patients with high metabolic response at day J15.
For melanoma, the diagnostic sensitivity of PET 18F-FDOPA is lower than that of 18F-FDG (64% versus 95%). In contrast, the 18F-FDOPA tracer has the advantage of allowing a brain assessment, which is critical in melanoma that gives frequent metastases in the central nervous system. There has never been any evaluation of the metabolic response to targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors PET with 18F-FDOPA.
The investigators propose to conduct a monocentric prospective preliminary study to explore the potential usefulness of the metabolic PET imaging with 18F-FDOPA in the evaluation of metabolic response of B-RAF mutated metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib.
3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 5 is below the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.
Browse Melanoma studies →Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: PET with 18F-FDOPA
brain metastases metabolic profile obtained with PET 18F-FDOPA
The profiles of metabolic changes in volume (expressed in%) obtained with each of the two tracers in conjunction with morphological volume changes observed on CT scan for non-brain metastases and brain metastases, respectively, will determine in first approach
Time frame: 24 MONTHS
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille