ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02033759Updated Jul 13, 2020Results posted

Patient Anxiety Associated With Lymphedema Surveillance Method

An interventional study of Bio-Impedance Testing and Anxiety Questionnaire in Anxiety, sponsored by Mercy Research. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-13.

Primary conditionLymphedemaRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Lymphedema
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's title name Lymphedema.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Mercy Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 168 studies in Lymphedema with a site in United States — 38 open to participants now, 45 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Lymphedema · United States.

Enrollment
68th of 122
43 · median 50
Started
2014
with 4 others
No phase
86 of 168
15 open now
Registered
61st of 168
by date

Among the 168 studies in Lymphedema with a site in United States, this one is the 68th largest by enrollment of the 122 interventional ones, is one of 5 that started in 2014, is one of 86 with no phase, and was the 61st registered.

By phase

168 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study86 · 15 open
Observational44 · 15 open
Phase 219 · 4 open
Phase 18 · 2 open
Phase 34 · 1 open
Phase 44 · 1 open
Phase 1/23 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2014.

Size and results

Median enrollment 50 across the 122 interventional studies, 148 across the 44 observational. Of the 114 that completed or were terminated, 39 (34%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 168 studies in Lymphedema with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

We propose to study the impact of BIA screening on anxiety and primary prevention strategies for lymphedema development among patients with recent surgery for breast cancer. Currently, professional societies recommend scheduled follow-up visits to screen for lymphedema after recovery from breast cancer (e.g., 6-week, 3-month, 6-month visits with a certified lymphedema therapist). Screening involves a discussion of lymphedema symptoms and risk reduction strategies, measurement of the affected limb with a tape measure, and physical inspection for physical changes consistent with lymphedema. In the proposed study, patients will be randomly assigned to the addition of BIA screening vs. usual care. At each screening visit, all patients will be assessed for their current lymphedema risk behaviors, as outlined by the National Lymphedema Network (7). To evaluate anxiety levels, all patients will be asked to fill out the Beck Anxiety Inventory, a validated screening tool used in prior studies of patients with breast cancer (8,9). This questionnaire will be administered at each follow-up lymphedema screening visit, and the baseline will be administered at the preoperative visit. For patients randomly assigned to BIA screening, this involves the placement of adhesive electrodes on the each wrist and an ankle, followed by connection of the electrodes to the BIA machine, which then uses a painless electrical impulse to measure impedance of flow and thus asymmetry in the extracellular lymphedema volume between the 2 upper limbs (6,10). Statistical analysis will involve comparison of lymphedema risk behaviors and anxiety levels between those patients with vs. without BIA screening.

03

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lymphedema
04

In context

Lymphedema Reclassified

529 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphedema; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 50 across 369 interventional studies indexed under Lymphedema.

Browse Lymphedema studies →

Lead sponsor

Mercy Research is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Lymphedema, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women recently diagnosed with breast cancer Age 18 and older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those women with a pacemaker
06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Traditional circumferential measurements

    Traditional screening with volumetric analysis Patient Anxiety Questionnaire

    Other: Anxiety Questionnaire · Other: Traditional Circumferential Measurements

  • Experimental
    Bio-Impedance Testing

    Traditional Screening with Volumetric Analysis and Bio-Impedance Analysis Patient Anxiety Questionnaire

    Device: Bio-Impedance Testing · Other: Anxiety Questionnaire · Other: Traditional Circumferential Measurements

Interventions

  • DeviceBio-Impedance Testing

    Participants in the BIA Arm will also undergo bio-impedance testing with this device.

    Also known as: LTU-400 by Impedimed

  • OtherAnxiety Questionnaire

    21 item questionnaire

    Also known as: Beck Anxiety Inventory will be administered.

  • OtherTraditional Circumferential Measurements
07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety

    The Beck Anxiety Score is a measurement on a scale from 0 to 63 obtained by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory tool to assess symptoms of anxiety. A higher score correlates to increased anxiety whereas a lower score expresses a lower amount of anxiety.

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-op

  2. Anxiety

    The Beck Anxiety Score is a measurement on a scale from 0 to 63 obtained by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory tool to assess symptoms of anxiety. A higher score correlates to increased anxiety whereas a lower score expresses a lower amount of anxiety.

    Time frame: 3 months post-op

  3. Anxiety

    The Beck Anxiety Score is a measurement on a scale from 0 to 63 obtained by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory tool to assess symptoms of anxiety. A higher score correlates to increased anxiety whereas a lower score expresses a lower amount of anxiety.

    Time frame: 6 months post-op

08

Results

Posted May 27, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Our study used the Beck Anxiety Inventory, with its greater focus on physical symptoms of anxiety, and this approach may not have been as sensitive for identifying emotional distress when compared with other psychological tools.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTraditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance Testing
Started2221
Completed1919
Not completed32
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject21
Withdrew: Protocol violation11

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnxiety

The Beck Anxiety Score is a measurement on a scale from 0 to 63 obtained by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory tool to assess symptoms of anxiety. A higher score correlates to increased anxiety whereas a lower score expresses a lower amount of anxiety.

Time frame:
6 weeks post-op
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Anxiety
units on a scaleTraditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance Testing
Anxiety7.1 (0 to 23)8.8 (0 to 31)
PrimaryAnxiety

The Beck Anxiety Score is a measurement on a scale from 0 to 63 obtained by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory tool to assess symptoms of anxiety. A higher score correlates to increased anxiety whereas a lower score expresses a lower amount of anxiety.

Time frame:
3 months post-op
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Anxiety
units on a scaleTraditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance Testing
Anxiety7.8 (0 to 26)10.1 (0 to 39)
PrimaryAnxiety

The Beck Anxiety Score is a measurement on a scale from 0 to 63 obtained by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory tool to assess symptoms of anxiety. A higher score correlates to increased anxiety whereas a lower score expresses a lower amount of anxiety.

Time frame:
6 months post-op
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Anxiety
units on a scaleTraditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance Testing
Anxiety5.1 (0 to 15)6.6 (0 to 20)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Traditional Circumferential Measurements—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Bio-Impedance Testing—0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Traditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance TestingTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years131124
>=65 years6814
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Traditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance TestingTotal
Female191837
Male011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Traditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance TestingTotal
United States191938
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(BMI (kg/m^2) Average)Traditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance TestingTotal
Mean30 (24 to 40)29 (21 to 42)30 (21 to 42)
Anxiety
Anxiety(units on a scale)Traditional Circumferential MeasurementsBio-Impedance TestingTotal
Mean7.2 (0 to 25)12.2 (0 to 34)9.6 (0 to 34)
09

Study locations

1 site
  • Mercy Clarkson/Clayton
    Creve Coeur, Missouri 63141, United States
10

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — POSTER PRESENTATION AT ACRM CONFERENCE CHICAGO NOV 2016

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

11

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2014, a primary completion of Sep 2016 and a completion of Mar 2019. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2020, 3 years 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 7, 2014
First posted
Jan 13, 2014
Start
Jun 2014
Primary completionActual
Sep 2016
CompletionActual
Mar 19, 2019
Results first posted
May 27, 2020
Last update
Jul 13, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 13, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
12

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02033759
Lead sponsor
Mercy Research
Responsible party
Sarah Stolker (Physical Therapist, Mercy Integrative Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 13, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Mar 19, 2019
Results posted
May 27, 2020
Last update
Jul 13, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion