ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02024477Updated Feb 15, 2019Results posted

Effect of Saxagliptin on EPCs as a Cellular Biomarker for Evaluating Endothelial Dysfunction in Early T2DM Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Saxagliptin and Placebo in Type 2 Diabetes, sponsored by George Washington University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-15.

Sponsored by George Washington University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Type 2 diabetes is a national epidemic. Diabetes has undesirable effects on blood vessels which may contribute to heart disease. Endothelial Progenitor Cells(EPCs) are found in the blood . Research has shown that improving the survival of these special blood cells may decrease the harmful effects of diabetes on blood vessels and reduce or reverse heart disease. Saxagliptin is an FDA(Food and Drug Administration) approved prescription medicine used along with diet and exercise to lower blood sugar in people with Type 2 diabetes. It is in a class of diabetes medication called DPP-4 inhibitors. DPP-4 inhibitors have been shown to increase EPCs in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Hypothesis: We believe poor viability and function of EPCs in early diabetes ultimately affects the repair and regeneration of the endothelium and that prompt intervention using saxagliptin with another oral hypoglycemic agent, Metformin, may reduce or reverse cardiovascular risk by improving EPC survival and function above and beyond adequate glucose metabolism control.

Read the detailed description

Type 2 diabetes is a national epidemic 1,2 with significant macro and microvascular complications. Insulin resistance in prediabetes and early and late diabetes are associated with endothelial dysfunction.

A few studies indicate that EPCs can act as a suitable bio-marker for monitoring cardiovascular morbidity. In this proposal we suggest that EPCs or CD34 positive cells can act as a suitable cellular biomarker for estimating and following endothelial dysfunction in early type 2 diabetes patients.

EPCs have been used as a regenerative tool in ischemic myocardium and diabetic wound healing. Endothelial dysfunction with associated inflammation may be a consequence of excess super-oxide presence in a setting of diabetes which is a pro-oxidative stress condition causing EPC dysfunction and senescence. Therefore monitoring EPC number, function and gene expression may serve as a very useful cellular bio-marker for cardiovascular complications in early type 2 diabetes.

Though lifestyle modification has been proposed as a main stay for prevention and treatment of early type 2 diabetes, several new therapies for diabetes have been developed in recent years. Incretins and incretin mimetics appear to hold promise. Oral DPP-4 inhibitors have been shown to increase EPCs in patients with type 2 diabetes reportedly via SDF-1 alpha up-regulation. Interestingly, up-regulation of SDF-1 alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), both chemotactic factors increase mobilization and recruitment of EPCs in the face of acute ischemic injury for repair and regeneration.

Several studies have shown positive effect of incretins (Glucagon like peptide, GLP-1) and incretin receptor agonists (GLP-1 receptor agonists) on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes patients and even in patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction who do not have diabetes.

DPP-4 Inhibitors may have cardio-protective effects of their own, as they increase bio-availability of endogenous GLP-1. They improve blood flow and nitric oxide production in endothelium. These are unique properties not demonstrated by other oral diabetes medications. The mechanism underlying these effects may be mediated by increased nitric oxide bioavailability but is not completely known. It is possible that Saxagliptin, a member of DPP-4 inhibitor group of drugs may be able to improve number and function of CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells by up-regulating chemotactic agent SDF1 alpha (DPP-4 degrades SDF-1) and its receptor CXCR47, 20, 21, 30, 31.

Poor viability and function of EPCs in early diabetes may ultimately affect the repair and regeneration of the endothelium and prompt intervention may reduce or reverse cardiovascular risk by improving EPC survival and function above and beyond adequate glucose metabolism control.

Therefore we would like to explore the effect of saxagliptin in addition to lifestyle intervention, on number and function and gene expression of EPC and impact on endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

  • endothelial cells
  • cellular biomarker
  • endothelial dysfunction
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,589 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,332 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 81 across 7,713 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

George Washington University is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (85%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults aged 40-70 years.
  2. Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes within the previous 8 years using criteria of the American Diabetes Association
  3. Currently treated with no hypoglycemic agents other than a stable dose (>3 months) of metformin (≥1.0 to ≤2 grams daily).
  4. HbA1C between 6 to 9% (both inclusive)
  5. BMI 25 to 39.9 kg/m2 (both inclusive)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications for moderate exercise
  2. Implanted devices (e.g., pacemakers) that may interact with Tanita scale
  3. Previous coronary or cerebrovascular event within 6 months of screening or active or clinically significant coronary and/or peripheral vascular disease.
  4. Low hematocrit \<28 Units
  5. Pre-existing liver disease and/or ALT and AST >2.5X's UNL
  6. Kidney disease (serum creatinine levels ≥1.5 mg/dL for men, ≥1.4 mg/dL for women,Creatinine Clearance ≤50 mL/min)
  7. History of pancreatitis, or cancer (except basal cell carcinoma)
  8. Statin use started (or dose change) in the last 3 months.
  9. Use of oral or injectable anti-diabetic medication other than Metformin
  10. Use of any form of consistent-long term steroid medication (oral, inhaled injected or nasal) within the last 3 months
  11. Systolic BP> 140 mmHg and diastolic BP> 90 mmHg
  12. Active wounds or recent surgery within 3 months.
  13. Inflammatory disease, or current use of anti-inflammatory drugs
  14. triglycerides >400 mg/dL
  15. untreated hyper/hypothyroidism Additionally, patients who are active smokers, patients who are pregnant, nursing women, and post menopausal women who are on hormone replacement therapy will be excluded.

Patients on low dose oral contraceptives will be allowed to participate as these formulations contain lesser amount of estrogens.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Matching placebo 1 pill daily for 12 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    saxagliptin

    Saxagliptin 5mg once daily for 12 weeks

    Drug: Saxagliptin

Interventions

  • 5 mg tablet once daily for 12 weeks

    Also known as: Onglyza

  • DrugPlacebo

    1 tablet daily for 12 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CD34+ Endothelial Progenitor Cells Number

    We will use patient's peripheral blood derived CD34+ cells looking at number of CD34+ Endothelial Progenitor Cell as % of the total Mononuclear cell population. Post saxagliptin will be compared to pre saxagliptin measurement

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks post saxagliptin

  2. CD 34+ Cell Function

    function of EPC cell as migration of CD34+ cells in response to SDF-1a ( 100 ng/mL). Results are expressed in fluorescence ratio between cells exposed to the chemotactic factor and cells exposed to chemo attractant-free media ( control) followed by lysis in presence of CyQuant GR dye.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks post saxagliptin Up to 12 weeks post saxagliptin: Visit 1 at Baseline, Visit 2 at 6 weeks, and Visit 3 at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serum Endothelial Inflammatory Marker hsCRP

    Time frame: Baseline 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin

  2. Fasting Lipid Profile LDL/HDL

    ratio of LDL over HDL

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin

  3. Glycemic Control

    measuring HbA1c levels

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin

  4. Adiposity

    measured using a Tanita Body Composition Fat Analyzer scale, measured as percentage body fat

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin

  5. Arterial Stiffness

    Arterial stiffness assessed using Vascular Flow and wave measurement equipment, SphygmoCor CP system from ATCOR. Reported as Augmentation Index adjusted for a heart rate of 75. Augmentation index (AIx) is a measure of systemic arterial stiffness derived from the ascending aortic pressure waveform. Lower the value, better correlated outcome as positive augmentation represents stiffer artery.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin

07

Results

Posted Jan 29, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Limitations of our study may include the relatively short duration of 12 week Saxagliptin therapy, which may have been inadequate to see significant changes in certain clinical and cellular parameters.

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited from clinic of the Principle Investigator and Sub-Investigators involved in the trial. First patient was recruited on 26 Nov 2013, last patient was recruited on 24 May 2016.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboSaxagliptin
Started2121
Completed2121
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryCD34+ Endothelial Progenitor Cells Number

We will use patient's peripheral blood derived CD34+ cells looking at number of CD34+ Endothelial Progenitor Cell as % of the total Mononuclear cell population. Post saxagliptin will be compared to pre saxagliptin measurement

Time frame:
Up to 12 weeks post saxagliptin
Reported as:
Mean · % of Mononuclear Cells
CD34+ Endothelial Progenitor Cells Number
% of Mononuclear CellsPlaceboSaxagliptin
CD34+ Endothelial Progenitor Cells Number2.0 ± 0.32.8 ± 0.5
PrimaryCD 34+ Cell Function

function of EPC cell as migration of CD34+ cells in response to SDF-1a ( 100 ng/mL). Results are expressed in fluorescence ratio between cells exposed to the chemotactic factor and cells exposed to chemo attractant-free media ( control) followed by lysis in presence of CyQuant GR dye.

Time frame:
Up to 12 weeks post saxagliptin Up to 12 weeks post saxagliptin: Visit 1 at Baseline, Visit 2 at 6 weeks, and Visit 3 at 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
CD 34+ Cell Function
RatioPlaceboSaxagliptin
Visit 1 - Week 01.2 ± 0.11.05 ± 0.06
Visit 2 - Week 61.05 ± 0.151.55 ± 0.2
Visit 3 - Week 121.0 ± 0.061.2 ± 0.05
SecondarySerum Endothelial Inflammatory Marker hsCRP
Time frame:
Baseline 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Serum Endothelial Inflammatory Marker hsCRP
mg/LPlaceboSaxagliptin
Visit 1 - Baseline2.4 ± 0.62.8 ± 0.5
Visit 2 - Week 62.9 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.4
Visit 3 - Week 122.9 ± 0.72.4 ± 0.4
SecondaryFasting Lipid Profile LDL/HDL

ratio of LDL over HDL

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin
Reported as:
Mean · ratio of LDL over HDL
Fasting Lipid Profile LDL/HDL
ratio of LDL over HDLPlaceboSaxagliptin
Visit 1 - Baseline2.3 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.1
Visit 2 - Week 62.1 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.1
Visit 3 - Week 122.1 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.2
SecondaryGlycemic Control

measuring HbA1c levels

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin
Reported as:
Mean · % of Glycosylated Hemoglobin
Glycemic Control
% of Glycosylated HemoglobinPlaceboSaxagliptin
Visit 1 - Baseline6.6 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.2
Visit 2 - Week 66.6 ± 0.16.8 ± 0.2
Visit 3 - Week 126.5 ± 0.16.7 ± 0.2
SecondaryAdiposity

measured using a Tanita Body Composition Fat Analyzer scale, measured as percentage body fat

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin
Reported as:
Mean · % of Body fat
Adiposity
% of Body fatPlaceboSaxagliptin
Visit 1 - Baseline34 ± 237 ± 2
Visit 2 - Week 634 ± 236.5 ± 2
Visit 3 - Week 1235 ± 236 ± 2
SecondaryArterial Stiffness

Arterial stiffness assessed using Vascular Flow and wave measurement equipment, SphygmoCor CP system from ATCOR. Reported as Augmentation Index adjusted for a heart rate of 75. Augmentation index (AIx) is a measure of systemic arterial stiffness derived from the ascending aortic pressure waveform. Lower the value, better correlated outcome as positive augmentation represents stiffer artery.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post saxagliptin
Reported as:
Mean · Augmentation Index
Arterial Stiffness
Augmentation IndexPlaceboSaxagliptin
Visit 1: Baseline18.4 ± 2.424.1 ± 2.1
Visit 2: Week 626 ± 3.922.5 ± 2.0
Visit 3: Week 1223.3 ± 2.323.1 ± 2.1

Adverse events

Collected over 20 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/21 (0%)1/21 (4.8%)0/21 (0%)
Saxagliptin0/21 (0%)1/21 (4.8%)0/21 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboSaxagliptin
Hypertensive UrgencyCardiac disorders1/210/21
Chest PainCardiac disorders0/211/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
Mean56.4 ± 8.558.3 ± 5.757.3 ± 7.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
Female71118
Male141024
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
African American131528
White6511
Other213
Weight
Weight(Kg)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
Mean202.3 ± 38.7202.7 ± 24.5202.5 ± 31.6
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
Mean31.5 ± 4.832.3 ± 4.231.9 ± 4.5
Duration of Diabetes Mellitus II
Duration of Diabetes Mellitus II(Years)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
Mean3.5 ± 1.83.7 ± 2.43.6 ± 2.1
HBA1c
HBA1c(mmol/mol)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
Mean6.6 ± 0.57.0 ± 0.86.8 ± 0.65
Fasting Glucose
Fasting Glucose(mg/Dl)PlaceboSaxagliptinTotal
Mean114.8 ± 25127.4 ± 35.9121.1 ± 30.45

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical Faculty Associates Inc
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dore FJ, Domingues CC, Ahmadi N, Kundu N, Kropotova Y, Houston S, Rouphael C, Mammadova A, Witkin L, Khiyami A, Amdur RL, Sen S. The synergistic effects of saxagliptin and metformin on CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells in early type 2 diabetes patients: a randomized clinical trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 May 3;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0709-9. PubMed 29724198 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 21, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no current plan for sharing IPD with other researchers.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2013, a primary completion of Sep 2017 and a completion of Dec 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2019, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 13, 2013
First posted
Dec 31, 2013
Start
Nov 2013
Primary completionActual
Sep 2017
CompletionActual
Dec 2017
Results first posted
Jan 29, 2019
Last update
Feb 15, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02024477
Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sabyasachi Sen (Associate Professor of Medicine, George Washington University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 31, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Sep 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Results posted
Jan 29, 2019
Last update
Feb 15, 2019

Study contacts

Sabyaschi Sen, PhD, MD
principal investigator · George Washington University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Saxagliptin

Start the discussion