CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02023918PEGIRUpdated Apr 24, 2017Results posted

Role of Growth Hormone Antagonism in Modulating Insulin Sensitivity in Subjects With Pre-diabetes

A Phase 2 interventional study of pegvisomant in Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-24.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Growth hormone is well known to cause changes in glucose regulation. People with Laron syndrome are born without the growth hormone receptor and are protected from diabetes. Mice who are engineered without the growth hormone receptor are similarly protected from diabetes. Conversely, people who have excessive amounts of growth hormone, such as patients with acromegaly, have an increased risk for type 2 diabetes. In acromegaly patients, treatment with pegvisomant, a medication that reduces insulin like growth factor-1 by blocking the growth hormone receptor, significantly improves insulin resistance. Pegvisomant has not been explored as a possibility for the treatment of type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance in people without acromegaly. In this study, the investigators hope to study the metabolic effects of pegvisomant on people who have insulin resistance but not diabetes. Pegivosmant is expected to improve insulin resistance in the liver, fat and muscle as well as decrease serum free fatty acids.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes
  • Metabolic Syndrome
  • Insulin Resistance

Keywords

  • Growth hormone antagonism
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI between 18-35
  • Homeostatic model assessment - insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) >2.77
  • Able to administer daily subcutaneous injections of pegvisomant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding in the last 6 months
  • Liver function tests greater than 3x the upper limits of normal
  • unstable diet over the last 3 months
  • unstable weight over the last 6 months
  • unstable lipid lowering regimen
  • diabetes - type 1 or type 2
  • History of major gastrointestinal surgery
  • History of pancreatic, liver, biliary, or intestinal disease
  • Fasting blood glucose >126
  • Fasting triglycerides>500
  • A1c>6.5
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pegvisomant arm

    Pegvisomant 20 mg subcutaneously Qday x 28 days will be administered by the study subject.

    Drug: pegvisomant

Interventions

  • Drugpegvisomant

    Pegvisomant 20 mg subcutaneously Qday will be administered by the study subject for 28 days during this study.

    Also known as: Somavert

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Insulin Sensitivity

    Investigators will measure insulin sensitivity via hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp prior to the initiation of the study medication and then again at the end of the 28 days to evaluate the effect of pegvisomant on insulin sensitivity and reported as HOMA-IR. HOMA-IR was derived from fasting insulin and fasting glucose by the calculation: fasting insulin (microU/L) x fasting glucose (nmol/L)/22.5

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lipolysis

    Treatment with pegvisomant is expected to alter lipolysis. To assess this investigators will do fasting and steady state stable isotope measurements prior to treatment with pegvisomant and at day 28 after treatment with pegvisomant.

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Results

Posted Mar 13, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePegvisomant Arm
Started6
Completed6
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryInsulin Sensitivity

Investigators will measure insulin sensitivity via hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp prior to the initiation of the study medication and then again at the end of the 28 days to evaluate the effect of pegvisomant on insulin sensitivity and reported as HOMA-IR. HOMA-IR was derived from fasting insulin and fasting glucose by the calculation: fasting insulin (microU/L) x fasting glucose (nmol/L)/22.5

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Insulin Sensitivity
units on a scalePegvisomant Arm
Baseline HOMA-IR3.06 ± 1.46
HOMA-IR after 28 days of treatment3.33 ± 2.76
SecondaryLipolysis

Treatment with pegvisomant is expected to alter lipolysis. To assess this investigators will do fasting and steady state stable isotope measurements prior to treatment with pegvisomant and at day 28 after treatment with pegvisomant.

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg/min
Lipolysis
mg/kg/minPegvisomant Arm
Ra glycerol fasting state baseline0.20 ± 0.07
Ra glycerol fasting state after 28 days of peg0.21 ± 0.02
Ra glycerol steady state baseline-0.01 ± 0.2
Ra glycerol steady state treatment 28 days peg0.4 ± 0.2

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pegvisomant Arm—0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Pegvisomant Arm
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years6
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pegvisomant Arm
Mean56.5 ± 3.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pegvisomant Arm
Female0
Male6
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Pegvisomant Arm
United States6
08

Study locations

1 site
  • San Francisco General Hospital
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02023918
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
San Francisco General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 30, 2013
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Results posted
Mar 13, 2017
Last update
Apr 24, 2017

Study contacts

Ethan J Weiss, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Morris Schambelan, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Kathleen Mulligan, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion