ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02010268CALPROPREMAUpdated Sep 8, 2025

Use of Faecal Calprotectin to Predict Enteropathy of the Preterm Neonates

An interventional study of Collection of stool samples in Enteropathy, Necrotizing Enterocolitis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged Up to 33 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-08.

Primary conditionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingRegistry: Intestinal DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Intestinal Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, a narrower term within Intestinal Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
122
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 33 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate a clinico-biological predictive score, associating the faecal calprotectin, for the diagnosis of enterocolitis and enteropathy of the preterm neonates.

Read the detailed description

Enteropathy and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are digestive emergencies in premature neonates which represent a major concern for the vital prognosis. It is therefore important to propose a tool for early diagnosis of these intestinal complications in order to avoid extended interruptions of enteral feeding at a period of life where growth (and digestive maturation) is in the foreground. Currently, the diagnosis of digestive impairment is based on classical clinical, biological (CRP, procalcitonin, fecal calprotectin, NFS) and radiological (abdomen without preparation) approaches, which induce on one hand a prolonged interruption of enteral feeding sometimes useless and even harmful for the intestinal maturation and, secondly, the establishment of a parenteral nutrition which is not risk-free. The study propose to dose the fecal calprotectin, a non-invasive marker of digestive inflammation, in order to validate the threshold decision proposed in a pilot study (350 µg/g of feces). Measurement of fecal calprotectin levels will be used as an integrated tool to build a powerful screening score combined to the usual parameters used in routine care for the diagnosis of and enteropathy and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature neonates. A cohort of preterm infants born at a gestational age of 33 weeks or less will be included from birth. A stool sample will be collected from the diaper once a week, from birth until discharge from the hospital, and every day during gastrointestinal events (interruption of enteral feeding over 48 hours). The study will evaluate the performance of the rapid assay of fecal calprotectin by quantitative immunochromatography compared to the reference method by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Enteropathy, Necrotizing Enterocolitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Faecal calprotectin
  • Feces
  • Preterm neonates
  • Enterocolitis
  • Enteropathy
  • Necrotizing
03

In context

Enterocolitis, Necrotizing Reclassified

228 studies on the registry are indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 122 is above the median of 103 across 127 interventional studies indexed under Enterocolitis, Necrotizing.

Browse Enterocolitis, Necrotizing studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Compared within Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Intestinal Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 33 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants prematurely born at a gestational age of 33 weeks or less (or before the 7th month of pregnancy).
  • Patient whose parents or holders of parental authority signed an .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a malformation.
  • Lack of signature of the consent by parents or holders of parental authority.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
122 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    preterm neonates

    Preterm neonates (birth before 33 weeks of gestation)

    Other: Collection of stool samples

Interventions

  • OtherCollection of stool samples

    A stool sample will be collected once a week from birth until discharge from the hospital, and every day during digestive episodes, that is to say during an interruption of enteral nutrition for more than 48 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. fecal calprotectin level

    Quantification of fecal calprotectin in stool samples collected every week and the first 3 days during an interruption over 48 hours of enteral feeding

    Time frame: From birth to hospital discharge (3 months maximum).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the performance of fecal calprotectin rapid assay.

    The measurement results of fecal calprotectin obtained by the rapid quantitative immunochromatography method, will be compared with those obtained by conventional reference method (ELISA).

    Time frame: from birth to hospital discharge (3 months maximum)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Necker Hospital
    Paris, 75015, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Campeotto F, Elie C, Rousseau C, Giuseppi A, Hachem T, Gobalakichenane P, Le Touzey M, de Stefano M, Butel MJ, Kapel N. Faecal calprotectin and gut microbiota do not predict enteropathy in very preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2021 Jan;110(1):109-116. doi: 10.1111/apa.15354. Epub 2020 Sep 1. PubMed 32418251 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02010268
Collaborators
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 12, 2013
Start date
Sep 30, 2013
Primary completion
Feb 22, 2015
Completion
Feb 22, 2015
Last update
Sep 8, 2025

Study contacts

Florence Campeotto, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Necker Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion