CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02006069MORE CRT MPPUpdated May 17, 2023Results posted

MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With MultiPoint Pacing

An interventional study of MPP in Heart Failure, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Terminated at 206 sites in 30 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-17.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The steering committee had decided to discontinue enrollment because the interim analysis showed a low probability that the study would meet the primary endpoint. The interim analysis did not demonstrate any safety concerns with activating MPP.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,850
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this Clinical investigation is to assess the impact of the Multi Point Pacing (MPP) feature at 12 months in the treatment of patients not responding to standard Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) after 6 months.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, multi-center trial. Data will be collected at enrollment, baseline, implant procedure, patient classification, 6 months and 12 months of follow-up. During the 6-month visit, the patient's response to CRT will be evaluated according to LVESV reduction. Patients with an LVESV reduction of at least 15% will be classified as responders. These patients will terminate their participation in the study and return to the center's standard practice. Patients with an LVESV reduction less than 15% will be classified as non-responders and the MPP feature will be activated according to randomization result and they will be followed until the 12-month visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CRT, non responders, MultiPoint Pacing (MPP)
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meets the current ESC Guidelines or ACCF/AHA/HRS Class I or Class IIa indications for CRT implant (including upgrades from single or dual chamber ICDs)
  • Must be willing and able to comply with study requirements
  • Must indicate their understanding of the study and willingness to participate by signing an appropriate informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already had a CRT device implanted
  • Myocardial Infarction, unstable angina within 40 days prior the enrollment
  • Recent cardiac revascularization (PTCA, Stent or CABG) in the 4 weeks prior to enrollment or planned for the 3 months following
  • Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the 3 months prior the enrollment
  • Primary valvular disease
  • Atrial Fibrillation:

    • Persistent AF at the time of enrollment
    • Permanent AF not treated with AV node ablation within 2 weeks from the CRT implant
    • History or incidence of Paroxysmal or Persistent AF within 30 days prior the enrollment
  • Unable to comply with the follow up schedule
  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Pregnant or are planning to become pregnant during the duration of the investigation
  • Classification of Status 1 for cardiac transplantation or consideration for transplantation over the next 12 months
  • Undergone a cardiac transplantation
  • Life expectancy \< 12 months
  • Currently participating in any other clinical investigation
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
5,850 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MPP ON

    MPP ON: feature is enabled

    Device: MPP

  • No intervention
    MPP OFF

    MPP OFF: feature not enabled

Interventions

  • DeviceMPP

    All patients enrolled in the study will be implanted (according to current Guidelines) with an MPP compatible CRT device. The MPP feature will be evaluated in two study phases. Patients randomized to MPP in Phase I will have MPP programmed per the physician's discretion ("no mandated MPP programming") and patients randomized to MPP in Phase II will have MPP programmed per protocol requirements ("mandated MPP programming").

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Non-responder Patients Who Converted to Responders

    The primary endpoint of this study is evaluated at 12 months after enrollment and it is defined as the percentage of non-responder patients converted to responders after 6 months of MPP feature turned ON compared to baseline, as measured by Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) reduction of at least 15%.

    Time frame: Non-responder to responder conversion rate between randomization at 6 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction of Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) in Acute Phase

    Reduction of LVESV between baseline and 6 Months visit

    Time frame: Baseline vs 6 Months

  2. Clinical Composite Score Evaluation

    Packer's Clinical Composite Score evaluation between baseline and 12 months as defined below, * Worsened: the patient died because of cardiovascular reasons OR experienced a HF event OR demonstrated worsening in NYHA functional class, or had worsening of patient global assessment (PGA) score compared with the last observation * Improved: the patient survived without an HF event AND demonstrated either improvement in NYHA functional class or improvement in PGA score or both compared with the last observation * Unchanged: the patient was neither improved nor worsened

    Time frame: Baseline vs 12 Months

  3. Reverse Left Ventricular (LV) Remodeling

    Evaluation of Reverse LV remodeling, measured as changed in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline to 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline vs 12 Months

  4. NYHA Class Changes

    Evaluation of NYHA Class changes between baseline and 12 months. Increasing functional class is associated with greater risk of death or hospitalization.

    Time frame: Baseline vs 12 Months

  5. 6MWT Changes

    Evaluation of the patient's activity status using 6 Minutes Walking Test changes from baseline to 12 months FU

    Time frame: Baseline vs 12 Months

  6. Patient's QoL Score Changes (MLWHF)

    Evaluation of patient's Quality of Life score using Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaires. The MLWHF Questionnaire consists of 21 questions with a range in overall scores of 0 to 105 points (lower scores indicate better quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline vs 12 Months

06

Results

Posted May 17, 2023

Participant flow

The study enrolled eligible patients with a standard CRT indication after obtaining written informed consent. The implanting physician programmed biventricular pacing (BiVP) at implant in those patients who had the quadripolar CRT system successfully implanted The implanting physician programmed the LV pacing vector, A-V delay, and V-V delay settings at their discretion until the patient's randomization at 6 months.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMPP ONBiVP
Started510558
Completed271555
Not completed2393
Withdrew: Mpp other programming2390
Withdrew: Rv only pacing03

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Non-responder Patients Who Converted to Responders

The primary endpoint of this study is evaluated at 12 months after enrollment and it is defined as the percentage of non-responder patients converted to responders after 6 months of MPP feature turned ON compared to baseline, as measured by Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) reduction of at least 15%.

Time frame:
Non-responder to responder conversion rate between randomization at 6 months and 12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Non-responder Patients Who Converted to Responders
ParticipantsMPP ONBiVP
Percentage of Non-responder Patients Who Converted to Responders84170
SecondaryReduction of Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) in Acute Phase

Reduction of LVESV between baseline and 6 Months visit

Time frame:
Baseline vs 6 Months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of LVESV change
Reduction of Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) in Acute Phase
percentage of LVESV changeMPP ONBiVP
Reduction of Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) in Acute Phase2.1 ± 11.20.1 ± 3.3
SecondaryClinical Composite Score Evaluation

Packer's Clinical Composite Score evaluation between baseline and 12 months as defined below, * Worsened: the patient died because of cardiovascular reasons OR experienced a HF event OR demonstrated worsening in NYHA functional class, or had worsening of patient global assessment (PGA) score compared with the last observation * Improved: the patient survived without an HF event AND demonstrated either improvement in NYHA functional class or improvement in PGA score or both compared with the last observation * Unchanged: the patient was neither improved nor worsened

Time frame:
Baseline vs 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Composite Score Evaluation
ParticipantsMPP ONBiVP
Improved161312
Unchanged56124
Worsensed54119
SecondaryReverse Left Ventricular (LV) Remodeling

Evaluation of Reverse LV remodeling, measured as changed in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline to 12 months

Time frame:
Baseline vs 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Reverse Left Ventricular (LV) Remodeling
mLMPP ONBiVP
Reverse Left Ventricular (LV) Remodeling3.0 ± 243.8 ± 23.1
SecondaryNYHA Class Changes

Evaluation of NYHA Class changes between baseline and 12 months. Increasing functional class is associated with greater risk of death or hospitalization.

Time frame:
Baseline vs 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
NYHA Class Changes
ParticipantsMPP ONBiVP
Improved125287
Unchanged129225
Worsened1220
Secondary6MWT Changes

Evaluation of the patient's activity status using 6 Minutes Walking Test changes from baseline to 12 months FU

Time frame:
Baseline vs 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · meters
6MWT Changes
metersMPP ONBiVP
6MWT Changes41.1 ± 113.646 ± 121.1
SecondaryPatient's QoL Score Changes (MLWHF)

Evaluation of patient's Quality of Life score using Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaires. The MLWHF Questionnaire consists of 21 questions with a range in overall scores of 0 to 105 points (lower scores indicate better quality of life).

Time frame:
Baseline vs 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient's QoL Score Changes (MLWHF)
score on a scaleMPP ONBiVP
Patient's QoL Score Changes (MLWHF)-11.6 ± 20.0-12.2 ± 21.7

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months to 12 months after randomization. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MPP ON4/271 (1.5%)82/271 (30.3%)67/271 (24.7%)
BIVP18/555 (3.2%)190/555 (34.2%)118/555 (21.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 116
Most frequent serious events
EventMPP ONBIVP
Exacerbation of Heart FailureCardiac disorders30/27153/555
Atrial or Ventricular ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders23/27142/555
Lead Dislodgement or MigrationProduct Issues8/27136/555
InfectionInfections and infestations7/27116/555
Bleeding/Hematoma/SeromaVascular disorders6/2719/555
Kidney DiseaseRenal and urinary disorders4/27111/555
Pulmonary EdemaCardiac disorders4/2717/555
StrokeNervous system disorders3/2711/555
PneumothoraxInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2716/555
Malignant TumorNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2716/555
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 38
Most frequent other events
EventMPP ONBIVP
Atrial or Ventricular ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders24/27141/555
Extracardiac Stimulation (Phrenic Nerve, Diaphragm, Chest Wall)Product Issues13/27126/555
Exacerbation of Heart FailureCardiac disorders5/27113/555
Elevated Pacing Thresholds/Loss of CaptureProduct Issues5/2718/555
Bleeding/Hematoma/SeromaVascular disorders1/27110/555
InfectionInfections and infestations3/2714/555
Coronary Sinus DissectionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/2713/555
Lead Dislodgement or MigrationProduct Issues3/2712/555
OversensingProduct Issues3/2715/555
HypotensionVascular disorders3/2713/555

Baseline characteristics

A race/ethnicity baseline was not collected in the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MPP ONBiVPTotal
Mean68.4 ± 10.368.1 ± 10.668.2 ± 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MPP ONBiVPTotal
Female45123168
Male226432658
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)MPP ONBiVPTotal
Count of participants——0
Type of Cardiomyopathy
Type of Cardiomyopathy(Participants)MPP ONBiVPTotal
Ischemic147278425
Non-ischemic124277401
NYHA Class
NYHA Class(Participants)MPP ONBiVPTotal
II129272401
III137268405
IV41317
Not done123
07

Study locations

206 sites
  • Heart Center Research, LLC.
    Huntsville, Alabama 35801, United States
  • Cardiovascular Associates of Mesa
    Mesa, Arizona 85206, United States
  • Phoenix Cardiovascular Research Group
    Phoenix, Arizona 85018, United States
  • Comprehensive Cardiovascular
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • Glendale Adventist Medical Center
    Glendale, California 91206, United States
  • Scripps Health
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Eisenhower Medical Center
    Rancho Mirage, California 92270, United States
  • Cardiac Rhythm Specialists, Inc.
    Reseda, California 91335, United States
  • San Diego Cardiac Center
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Colorado Heart & Vascular, P.C.
    Lakewood, Colorado 80228, United States
  • Sarasota Memorial Hospital
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • Coliseum Medical Centers
    Macon, Georgia 31217, United States
  • Redmond Regional Medical Center
    Rome, Georgia 30165, United States
  • St. Elizabeth Medical Center - South Unit
    Edgewood, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Baptist Health Lexington
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • McLaren Health Care Corporation
    Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326, United States
  • MidMichigan Medical Center-Midland
    Midland, Michigan 48670, United States
  • Munson Medical Center
    Traverse City, Michigan 49684, United States
  • CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center-Bergan Mercy
    Omaha, Nebraska 68124, United States
  • Deborah Heart and Lung Center
    Browns Mills, New Jersey 08015, United States
  • Cardiology Associates of Fairfield County, PC
    Haddon Heights, New Jersey 08035, United States
  • Samaritan Heart & Vascular Institute - Cardiology Dept.
    Corvallis, Oregon 97330, United States
  • Lancaster General Hospital
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17602, United States
  • St. Francis Hospital
    Greenville, South Carolina 29601, United States
  • Erlanger Medical Center
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37403, United States
  • Methodist University Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38104, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75390-9016, United States
  • Baylor All Saints Medical Center at Fort Worth
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Memorial Katy Cardiology Associates
    Houston, Texas 77094, United States
  • Vivek Mangla, MD
    Lufkin, Texas 75904, United States
  • EP Heart
    The Woodlands, Texas 77384, United States
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    Adelaide, Australia
  • Flinders Medical Centre
    Bedford Park, 5042, Australia
  • St. Andrews War Memorial Hospital
    Brisbane, Australia
  • The Alfred Hospital
    Melbourne, Australia
  • Westmead Hospital
    Westmead, Australia
  • Krankenhaus der Stadt St. Poelten
    St. Poelten, Austria
  • Krankenhaus Hietzing
    Vienna, 1130, Austria
  • Wilhelminenspital
    Vienna, Austria
  • Hopital Erasme
    Brussels, Belgium
  • St. Joseph Gilly
    Gilly, Belgium
  • Foothills Medical Centre
    Calgary, Canada
  • Royal Alexandra Hospital
    Edmonton, Canada
  • QEII Health Sciences
    Halifax, Canada
  • Kingston General Hospital
    Kingston, Canada
  • Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal
    Montreal, Canada
  • Hôtel Dieu de CHUM
    Montréal, Canada
  • McGill University Health Centre General Hospital
    Montréal, Canada
  • Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec
    Sainte-Foy, Canada
  • CHUS Fleurimont
    Sherbrooke, J1H 5N4, Canada
  • HSC, Eastern Health
    St. Johns, Canada
  • Rouge Valley Centenary
    Toronto, Canada
  • St. Paul's Hospital
    Vancouver, Canada
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, China
  • Angiografia Clinica de Occidente
    Cali, Colombia
  • Clínica Cardio VID
    Medellín, Colombia
  • Odense University Hospital
    Odense, Fyn 5000, Denmark
  • Aalborg Sygehus Syd
    Aalborg, Nordjylland DK-9000, Denmark
  • Skejby University Hospital
    Aarhus, Denmark
  • Keski-Suomi Central Hospital
    Jyvaskyla, Finland
  • Turku University Hospital
    Turku, Finland
  • Hôpital Clairval
    Marseille, Alpes 13009, France
  • CHU Cavale Blanche
    Brest, France
  • CHU Trousseau
    Chambray-lès-Tours, France
  • CHU François Mitterrand Dijon Bourgogne
    Dijon, France
  • CHRU Albert Michallon
    Grenoble, France
  • CHRU Lille
    Lille, France
  • Hopital Saint Philibert
    Lomme, France
  • Hôpital Saint Joseph
    Marseille, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Belfort-Montbeliard
    Montbéliard, France
  • CHU Montpellier
    Montpellier, France
  • CHU de Nancy - Hopital de Brabois
    Nancy, France
  • CHU Hopital G. & R. Laënnec
    Nantes, 44093, France
  • Nouvelles cliniques Nantaises
    Nantes, France
  • Centre Cardiologique Du Nord
    Paris, France
  • Hopital Pitiè Salpetrière
    Paris, France
  • Institute Cardio. Paris-Sud - Institut Jacques Cartier
    Paris, France
  • CHRU Hôpital de Pontchaillou
    Rennes, 35033, France
  • CHRU Rouen Hospital Charles Nicolle
    Rouen, France
  • CHR de La Reunion - Site du CHFG
    Saint-Denis Cedex, 97405, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Valence
    Valence, France
  • Clinique du Tonkin
    Villeurbanne, France
  • Hegau-Bodensee-Hochrhein-Kliniken GmbH
    Singen, Baden-Wurttemberg 78224, Germany
  • Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg - Bad Krozingen
    Bad Krozingen, Baden-Württemberg 79189, Germany
  • Kerckhoff-Klinik gGmbH
    Bad Nauheim, Hessen 61231, Germany
  • Herz- und Gefäßzentrum am Krankenhaus Neu-Bethlehem
    Göttingen, Niedersachsen 37073, Germany
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
    Hannover, Niedersachsen 30625, Germany
  • Medizinische Einrichtungen der Universität zu Köln
    Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen 50931, Germany
  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk gGmbH
    Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen 51103, Germany
  • Herz-und Diabetes Zentrum NRW
    Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
  • Schuchtermann-Schillersche Kliniken
    Bad Rothenfelde, Germany
  • Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum
    Berlin, Germany
  • Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF)
    Berlin, Germany
  • Klinikum Bielefeld
    Bielefeld, Germany
  • Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannsheil
    Bochum, Germany
  • Klinikum Coburg
    Coburg, Germany
  • Helios-Klinikum Erfurt GmbH
    Erfurt, Germany
  • Kliniken der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
    Erlangen, Germany
  • Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen GmbH
    Essen, Germany

Showing the first 100 of 206 sites across 30 countries.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Leclercq C, Burri H, Curnis A, Delnoy PP, Rinaldi CA, Sperzel J, Lee K, Calo L, Vicentini A, Concha JF, Thibault B. Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I. Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 14;40(35):2979-2987. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz109. PubMed 30859220 ↗
  • Leclercq C, Burri H, Curnis A, Delnoy PP, Rinaldi CA, Sperzel J, Lee K, Cohorn C, Thibault B; MORE-CRT MPP Investigators. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II). Am Heart J. 2019 Mar;209:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 8. PubMed 30616009 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 9, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02006069
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 9, 2013
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
May 30, 2021
Completion
May 30, 2021
Results posted
May 17, 2023
Last update
May 17, 2023

Study contacts

Christophe Leclercq
study chair · Centre Cardio-Pneumologique, CHU Pontchaillou

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion