CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01992419OCARUpdated Dec 9, 2013

Evaluation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Recognition by Non-physicians Dispatchers in a French Emergency Dispatch Call Center

An observational study in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by Fire Brigade Of Paris Emergency Medicine Dept. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-09.

Sponsored by Fire Brigade Of Paris Emergency Medicine Dept · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to measure an improvement in the detection rate of cardiac arrest (CA) in the Dispatch Center as a result of debriefings and repeated trainings for non-medical operators who receive emergency calls.

Read the detailed description
  1. . Justification

    The performance of phone-guided chest compressions is recommended to minimize the No Flow risk (1). Pre-arrival instructions and dispatch-assisted chest compressions are the first link in the chain of survival, determining the effectiveness of subsequent links. This first link is only possible if a prior detection of cardiac arrest was made.

    The Dispatch Center of the Fire Brigade of Paris receives more than 7,000 calls per day, including 8-10 calls for cardiac arrest. The establishment of specific training and experience feedback with emergency dispatchers should improve the detection of cardiac arrest (CA) by the same dispatchers.

  2. . Objectives

    The main objective is to measure an improvement in the detection rate of CA in the Dispatch Center as a result of debriefings and repeated trainings for non-medical operators who receive emergency calls.

    The secondary objective is to identify risk factors for CA non-detection by those emergency dispatchers.

  3. . Materials and Methods

    Experimental design:

    Observational prospective non-randomized controlled study. Type "before and after" study. Three observation periods are defined over a total period of 20 months.

    Different actions before and during each period:

    Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Algorithm available to emergency dispatchers + + + New algorithm - - + Basic training for new operators - + + Daily briefing +/- +/- + Systematic Debreafing - - + Specific course before period - - + Table leaders training - - + Heads of room training - - +

    Period 1 is preceded and accompanied by the diffusion of a decision algorithm available to emergency dispatchers

    Period 2 is accompanied by:

    • Short briefings, twice daily, in the presence of operators on duty that day
    • Debriefing immediately after the call with some operators (but not systematically, depending on their availability).

    Period 3 is preceded by information to the Dispatch Center managers (heads of room and table leaders) and a short course about detection of CA (1 hour) for all operators. During this same period, a daily briefing for operators is established.

    The study is based on the three CA call periods' audio recordings

    For each period, all calls related to CA on the field were listened to and evaluated.

    Each call had a double audition:

    • one audition by an instructor, responsible for managing calls in the Dispatch Center, and
    • one audition by two emergency physicians experienced in the management of emergency calls.

    The second listening physician helped to verify, correct, and complete the variables collected during the first listening

    The variables collected during listening were:

    • "detectability of the CA"
    • detection or not of the CA
    • the causes of non-detection
    • the occurrence of dispatch-assisted chest compression
    • the time between the start of the call and the time the operator pronounces the words "cardiopulmonary Resuscitation" or "CPR" or "chest compressions"
    • the time between the start of the call and the first real chest compression
    • causes for non-realization of chest compressions
    • the presence or absence of a public defibrillator

    Other variables collected - Variables corresponding to the Utstein style:

    • Epidemiological variables (age, sex, location, background)
    • Specific backup system variables: time alert - use of an AED
    • Specific first aid and medical management variables:

      • type of rhythm detected by AED on the arrival of rescuers
      • Success of first AED's shock (loss of ventricular fibrillaton (VF)5 seconds after shock)
      • Number of shocks administered by the AED in the first 10 minutes of support by rescuers
      • Recovery of a palpable pulse in the presence of rescuers, before the arrival of the medical team
      • Resuscitation undertaken by the medical team YES/NO
      • Injection of adrenaline: YES/NO
      • Transport to the hospital with beating heart: YES/NO
      • Released resuscitation YES/NO
      • Survival to one year after the CA
      • Quality of survival (CPC score) at 6 months, 1 year

    Main judgment criteria:

    • Detection of CA by the emergency dispatcher:

      • Detection is considered positive if the dispatcher formalized the presence of a CA , either on the software, or orally with the words "CPR" or "chest compression" at any time during the recorded call.
      • It is considered negative if the dispatcher never suggested, neither orally nor in writing, the possibility of the presence of a CA.
    • Secondary endpoints:

      • Median time between the start of the emergency call and the pronunciation of the words "chest compressions," by the dispatcher
      • Median time elapsed between the start of the emergency call and the actual start of chest compressions by caller
      • Evaluation of the ventilation mode (hand on abdomen YES/NO, count the interval between two ventilatory movements YES/NO)
  4. . Statistics

Sample size We need 100 patients in each period group to observe an absolute 20% difference in the rate of CA detection, compared with the detection rate of the control group (period 1) estimated at 60%, with an alpha risk = 0.05 and an 80% power in bilateral situations.

For each period:

  • Description of patient characteristics and outcome

Comparison of these periods:

  • Comparison of detection rate between the reference period (P1) and each of the other periods
  • The number of subjects included in each period allows the realization of a χ² test with an alpha risk retained at 5%
  • Adjust the detection rate on the significantly different variables between the groups (age, sex, no flow, time of rescuer arrival)
  • The period 1 and 2 will be grouped and compared with period 3.

In all periods:

  • Search variables associated with successful detection
  • Multivariate logistic regression analysis type
  • Survival analysis.
  • Description of the evolution of the detection rate over time
02

Conditions studied

  • Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

  • Out-of-hospital Cardiac arrest
  • telephone dispatch assisted resuscitation
  • cardiac arrest phone detection
03

In context

Heart Arrest

966 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 200 across 383 observational studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Fire Brigade Of Paris Emergency Medicine Dept is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

residents of Paris urban and suburban area

Inclusion criteria

Patient over 15 years old (adult morphology) suffering Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest before or during the call to the Dispatch Center

  • Patient who benefited from the installation of a automated external defibrillator (AED) before or at the time of arrival of the rescuers on the scene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient conscious at the time of the call

  • OHCA between the end of the phone call and the arrival of rescuers on site
  • OHCA after the rescuers' arrival on site
  • Dispatch Center alerted on "second line" from another institution (Police, SAMU), without the possibility of joining the first caller.
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ratio of CA Detected by the emergency dispatcher

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. o Median time between the start of the emergency call and the pronunciation of the words "chest compressions," by the dispatcher

    Time frame: one year

Other outcomes

  1. Median time elapsed between the start of the emergency call and the actual start of chest compressions by caller

    Time frame: one year

  2. Evaluation of the ventilation mode (hand on abdomen YES/NO, count the interval between two ventilatory movements YES/NO)

    , all calls related to Out -of-hospital Cardiac Arrest were registered , and in the days after, listened to and evaluated.

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Paris Fire Brigade Emergency Dept
    Paris, 75017, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 9, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01992419
Lead sponsor
Fire Brigade Of Paris Emergency Medicine Dept
Responsible party
Dr Jost D. (Medical Doctor, responsible for clinical research at Paris Fire Brigade, Fire Brigade Of Paris Emergency Medicine Dept) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 25, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Last update
Dec 9, 2013

Study contacts

Jean-Pierre TOURTIER, MDPhD Prof
study chair · Paris Fire Brigade - Emergency Medical Dept

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion