CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01982994Updated Feb 22, 2019

Intervention to Motivate Standing &Walking in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgical Patients

An interventional study of Education/Daily Planning in Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-22.

Sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Observational research has linked physical activity with faster recovery, improved quality of life, and greater survival; however, little is known about the effects of physical activity in pre-operative, peri-operative, or post-operative treatment contexts and there is a need for interventions to improve patient outcomes across the cancer treatment continuum. Three propositions derived from basic research, epidemiological evidence, and clinical practice informed our intervention development efforts: (1) Patient outcomes will be enhanced by interventions that increase physical activity (i.e., standing, walking) across the cancer treatment continuum (i.e., pre-operative, peri-operative, post-operative). (2) Reducing sedentary behavior (i.e., seated or reclined activities involving minimal energy expenditure) will enhance patient outcomes both by increasing physical activity and by stimulating additional adaptive physiological responses to reduced sedentary time (responses which are independent of physical activity-induced responses). (3) Patients with gastrointestinal cancers often suffer functional limitations that limit their independence and their health behaviors are strongly influenced by the family environment so interventions that engage caregivers (e.g., spouses) will be more effective than those that target patients/survivors alone.

Read the detailed description

Phase 1 Screening and Baseline Assessment in Clinic Patients will be recruited by their physician upon diagnosis and immediately after the Penn State Surgical Oncology team presents then with the surgical treatment option. The patient must be able to identify an adult caregiver. The caregiver must be someone who is willing to participate in the study for the intervention period.

Once enrolled by the research assistant, the participant will complete an intake questionnaire to capture demographic information. The participant will then be given a tablet computer, training on how to use it to complete the questionnaires at the beginning and end of each day, an activity monitor with materials for securing it, and training on how/where to affix it on the leg.

In this study, we will use educational materials delivered at the initial enrollment session and in daily "facts of the day" presented electronically to heighten awareness of (1) the risks of insufficient physical activity and excessive sedentary behavior, and (2) the expected beneficial outcomes of increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behavior. These messages should are designed to increase intentions to engage in physical activity and to limit sedentary behavior (motivational phase). Although intentions are necessary for behavior change, a recent review of experimental evidence indicates that they are not sufficient. In the volitional phase, people translate those intentions into action by developing actions plans that specify when/where/how they will act (e.g., after lunch I will go on a 30 min walk around my neighborhood) and coping plans that specify how they will overcome anticipated barriers to desired behavior (e.g., if it rains after lunch, I will go to the mall to walk for 30 min). Repeated planning of this nature is the basis for breaking existing behavioral habits and forming newer (and hopefully more adaptive) ones. We have already developed an electronic daily planning tool that can be used at the beginning of each day to form action and coping plans for the target behaviors in this intervention. In the first two months of this project, we will tailor this existing planning tool for the target population by drawing from existing and emerging research on strategies for and barriers to health behaviors among cancer patients.

The control group will not receive the educational or daily planning components of the motivational intervention. They will, however, engage in self-monitoring by virtue of wearing activity monitors and using tablet computers to provide self-report data on their physical activity and sedentary behavior.

After the patient's surgery while staying at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center, the study coordinator will provide the caregiver with behavioral goals to help the patient recover from his/her surgery, and additional information about how the caregiver can support the patient's behavior change efforts.

Phase 2: Intervention Period

For the duration of the study, participant will:

  • Complete beginning-and end -of-day questionnaires on the tablet computer. The beginning of day questionnaire will evaluate the patient's intentions and plans for daily physical activity. The end of day questionnaire will evaluate actual physical activity completed daily as well as the patient's physical, emotional, and social well-being.
  • Wear and activity monitor

For participants in the experimental group the research assistant will also:

  • Deliver the educational intervention for patients and caregivers during their first visit after they have signed the consent forms.
  • Train patients how to use the daily planning tool prior to the beginning -of- day prior to the beginning-of-day questionnaires.

The theoretical basis for our intervention draws from both social-cognitive theory (i.e., Health Action Process Approach [HAPA]) and self-determination theory. The Health Action Process Approach differentiates between motivational and volitional phases of action control. In the motivational phase, people form intentions or goals for their behavior based on factors such as risk awareness and outcome expectations. In this study, we will use educational materials delivered at the initial enrollment session and in daily "facts of the day" presented electronically to heighten awareness of (1) the risks of insufficient physical activity and excessive sedentary behavior, and (2) the expected beneficial outcomes of increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behavior. These messages should are designed to increase intentions to engage in physical activity and to limit sedentary behavior (motivational phase). Although intentions are necessary for behavior change, a recent review of experimental evidence indicates that they are not sufficient. In the volitional phase, people translate those intentions into action by developing actions plans that specify when/where/how they will act (e.g., after lunch I will go on a 30 min walk around my neighborhood) and coping plans that specify how they will overcome anticipated barriers to desired behavior (e.g., if it rains after lunch, I will go to the mall to walk for 30 min). Repeated planning of this nature is the basis for breaking existing behavioral habits and forming newer (and hopefully more adaptive) ones. We have already developed an electronic daily planning tool that can be used at the beginning of each day to form action and coping plans for the target behaviors in this intervention. In the first two months of this project, we will tailor this existing planning tool for the target population by drawing from existing and emerging research on strategies for and barriers to health behaviors among cancer patients.

Self-determination theory posits that social factors, such as family relationships, can also influence motivation. Our recent work using experience sampling methodology and accelerometry has shown that spouses' autonomy support for patient physical activity and the spouse's level of physical activity were associated with patients' greater daily moderate physical activity and steps taken Individuals whose family members or health care providers show autonomy support for increasing physical activity and decreasing sedentary behavior are more likely to make those changes for reasons that come from within themselves and are freely chosen. Because close family members influence the emotional and physical well-being of patients, their inclusion in behavioral interventions is logical and has the potential to boost the effects of those interventions. In this study, caregivers will be educated about the importance of autonomy support in behavior change and strategies for supporting their partner's autonomy around physical activity and sedentary behavior change across the stages of treatment. This education will be delivered by the nurse coordinator at the initial education session following enrollment.

Collectively, these three components of patient education, daily planning, and caregiver education were assembled to strengthen intentions for desired health behaviors (motivational phase of behavior change), to increase the likelihood that such intentions will translate into action (volitional phase of behavior change), and to provide social resources that support behavior change in both of those phases.

The control group will not receive the educational or daily planning components of the motivational intervention. They will, however, engage in self-monitoring by virtue of wearing activity monitors and using tablet computers to provide self-report data on their physical activity and sedentary behavior.

During the intervention period the study coordinator will also contact the patient via phone weekly to ask questions related to the patients safety including questions about frequency of falls mild/moderate/severe, chest pain, dizziness, musculoskeletal soreness or pain, and changes in swelling.

Phase 3: Follow-Up Telephone Call

The research assistant will call the participant 30, 60, and 90 days after surgery to assess the frequency of hospital readmission or emergency room visits since being discharged.

Phase 4: Follow- Up Questionnaire

21 days after discharge form the hospital, participants and caregivers will complete a brief questionnaire that we will mail to them with a self-addressed stamped envelope.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Physical Activity Education
  • Caregivers
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

779 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; 231 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 60 across 569 interventional studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.

Browse Gastrointestinal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 480 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract cancer (hepatobiliary) requiring surgical resection. for treatment
  • Failing to meet the aerobic component of national physical activity guidelines over past week (e.g., \< 150 min moderate-intensity physical activity or \< 75 min vigorous-intensity physical activity).
  • Excessive sedentary behavior over the past week (> 8 hrs/day sitting).
  • Minimum age 18 years.
  • A spouse or adult child serving as a caregiver who is also willing to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Functional limitations that preclude normal physical activity.
  • Patients who will be scheduled for surgery \< 10 days after their clinic visit.
  • Medical contraindications to physical activity.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Education/Daily Planning

    Physical Activity Education and Daily Planning Tool

    Behavioral: Education/Daily Planning

  • No intervention
    No Education/Daily Planning

    No Physical Activity Education/ Daily Planning Tool

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducation/Daily Planning

    In this study, we will use educational materials delivered at the initial enrollment session and in daily "facts of the day" presented electronically to heighten awareness of (1) the risks of insufficient physical activity and excessive sedentary behavior, and (2) the expected beneficial outcomes of increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behavior. These messages should are designed to increase intentions to engage in physical activity and to limit sedentary behavior (motivational phase)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer who showed daily compliance using activity monitors and tablet computers to measure physical activity.

    To demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of using activity monitors and tablet computers to measure physical activity (standing, walking)/sedentary behavior (sitting) and deliver daily interventions in this patient population, we will evaluate daily compliance using activity monitors and tablet computers.

    Time frame: up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer that benefit from an intervention of physical activity daily planning and education.

    To evaluate the efficacy of this intervention, we will conduct a pilot study of a two-arm randomized controlled trial of the intervention against a self-monitoring control group.

    Time frame: up to 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Penn State Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jun 6;104(11):815-40. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs207. Epub 2012 May 8. PubMed 22570317 ↗
  • Lynch BM. Sedentary behavior and cancer: a systematic review of the literature and proposed biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov;19(11):2691-709. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0815. Epub 2010 Sep 10. PubMed 20833969 ↗
  • Santos DA, Silva AM, Baptista F, Santos R, Vale S, Mota J, Sardinha LB. Sedentary behavior and physical activity are independently related to functional fitness in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2012 Dec;47(12):908-12. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.07.011. Epub 2012 Aug 1. PubMed 22884978 ↗
  • Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Schoenborn CA, Loustalot F. Trend and prevalence estimates based on the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):305-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.06.006. PubMed 20837280 ↗
  • Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano RP. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr 1;167(7):875-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm390. Epub 2008 Feb 25. PubMed 18303006 ↗
  • Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Aug;56(3):161-70. doi: 10.1037/a0024509. PubMed 21767036 ↗
  • Gonzalez M, Guillaume JE, Laloux P, Mahieu P, Installe E. Strychnine poisoning, hypoxic damage, severe acidosis: a case report. Acta Clin Belg Suppl. 1990;13:94-5. No abstract available. PubMed 2239073 ↗
  • Martire LM, Stephens MA, Mogle J, Schulz R, Brach J, Keefe FJ. Daily spousal influence on physical activity in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Apr;45(2):213-23. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9442-x. PubMed 23161472 ↗
  • Martire LM, Schulz R, Helgeson VS, Small BJ, Saghafi EM. Review and meta-analysis of couple-oriented interventions for chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Dec;40(3):325-42. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9216-2. PubMed 20697859 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01982994
Lead sponsor
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Collaborators
Penn State University
Responsible party
Niraj J. Gusani MD (Professor of Surgery and Public Health Sciences, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2013
Start date
Oct 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Dec 2018
Last update
Feb 22, 2019

Study contacts

Niraj J Gusani, M.D., M.S.
principal investigator · Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
David E Conroy, Ph.D
study director · Penn State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion