CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01981629Updated Oct 24, 2014

The Use of the USCOM Device in Addition to Cardiac Ultrasound in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Undifferentiated Shock

An observational study in Shock, sponsored by Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-24.

Sponsored by Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Currently, bedside ultrasound (US) is performed routinely in emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated shock to help guide resuscitation. Previously, it has never been possible to measure cardiac output on patients in the ED. Our clinical question looks at whether the USCOM device gives clinically relevant information in addition to ED cardiac US in patients with shock.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shock

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Shock
  • USCOM
  • Cardiac Ultrasound
  • Emergency Department
03

In context

Shock

916 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock; 176 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is below the median of 91 across 346 observational studies indexed under Shock.

Browse Shock studies →

Lead sponsor

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients presenting to the emergency department at an urban county hospital.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients in shock, as defined by systolic blood pressure less than 95 mmHg or shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) greater than 0.9

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • less than 18 years old
  • Pregnant
  • Patients in shock due to trauma
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Shock

    Defined by systolic blood pressure less than 95 mmHg or shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) greater than 0.9

    Device: USCOM

Interventions

  • DeviceUSCOM

    The USCOM device will be used in addition to cardiac ultrasound in patients with shock.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cardiac Output

    Cardiac ultrasound findings will be compared to cardiac index and output from the USCOM device

    Time frame: Twice during ED visit, averaging one hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient outcomes

    Data will be collected on outcomes of patients including death, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and diagnosis.

    Time frame: After emergency department visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hennepin County Medical Center
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01981629
Lead sponsor
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 11, 2013
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Aug 2013
Last update
Oct 24, 2014

Study contacts

Johanna C Moore, MD
principal investigator · Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion