ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01972087STAT911Updated Nov 9, 2016

Simulation Training to Improve 911 Dispatcher Identification of Cardiac Arrest

An interventional study of Telephone simulation training in Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-09.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
157
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to test the use of simulation training to improve 9-1-1 telecommunicators' call processing and response. Training sessions will expose 9-1-1 telecommunicators to several realistic emergency situations through mock 9-1-1 calls with a trained actor playing the part of a reporting party, followed immediately by feedback on call handling provided by a trained call observer. Investigators hypothesize that simulation followed by trained observer-directed feedback will increase correct triage of medical emergency and delivery of pre-arrival instructions during simulated calls and in actual 9-1-1 calls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Arrest

984 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 157 is above the median of 100 across 563 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,431 studies on the registry; 226 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: 9-1-1 call-center call receivers. -

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
157 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants randomized to the control arm receive no telephone simulation training.

  • Experimental
    Simulation Training

    Participants randomized to the intervention arm receive telephone simulation training.

    Behavioral: Telephone simulation training

Interventions

  • BehavioralTelephone simulation training

    The intervention consists of four 20-minute telephone simulation training sessions over a 4 month period (one session each month). Each 20-minute training session will include 3 simulated 9-1-1 calls, performed by a standardized caller (trained actor) and feedback will be provided right away by a trained observer who takes notes during the simulation calls and discusses the teaching points after the session. In total, the 9-1-1 dispatchers will receive 12 different simulated calls.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in elapsed seconds from call answer to start of telephone-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) instructions in cardiac arrest calls in simulations and in actual calls.

    Time frame: Once monthly over 4 months (during simulations); at event (actual cardiac arrest 9-1-1 call) over 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in proportion of calls with querying behaviors compliant with the "all-callers" interviewing protocol.

    Time frame: Once monthly over 4 months (during simulations); at event (actual cardiac arrest 9-1-1 call) over 12 months.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stangenes SR, Painter IS, Rea TD, Meischke H. Delays in recognition of the need for telephone-assisted CPR due to caller descriptions of chief complaint. Resuscitation. 2020 Apr;149:82-86. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PubMed 32088255 ↗
  • Meischke H, Painter IS, Stangenes SR, Weaver MR, Fahrenbruch CE, Rea T, Turner AM. Simulation training to improve 9-1-1 dispatcher identification of cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2017 Oct;119:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Jul 29. PubMed 28760696 ↗
  • Meischke H, Painter I, Turner AM, Weaver MR, Fahrenbruch CE, Ike BR, Stangenes S. Protocol: simulation training to improve 9-1-1 dispatcher identification of cardiac arrest. BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Feb 1;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0073-6. PubMed 26830676 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2013, a primary completion of Jul 2016 and a completion of Jul 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2013
First posted
Oct 30, 2013
Start
Sep 2013
Primary completionActual
Jul 2016
CompletionActual
Jul 2016
Last update
Nov 9, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01972087
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Responsible party
Hendrika Meischke (Professor, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Last update
Nov 9, 2016

Study contacts

Hendrika Meischke, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion