CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01953276ASAP CathUpdated Feb 17, 2022

Are Serial Electrocardiograms Additive to SeriAl Second-generations Troponins in Predicting Acute CoronAry Syndromes in PatienTs With Undifferentiated cHest Pain

An observational study in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Chest Pain, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-17.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
382
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our research will examine whether the presence or absence of serial electrocardiogram (ECG) changes aids in reclassifying participants' risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) over and above serial blood testing.

Read the detailed description

Chest pain is one of the most common symptoms evaluated in the Emergency Department (ED). One of the primary diagnostic concerns during the evaluation of this presentation is whether there is evidence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as ACS is a major risk factor for short- and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, defined as acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, or all-cause death). Two of the cornerstones of the guidelines-based evaluation of this patient group are serial electrocardiograms (ECG) and troponin measurements (a serological marker of myocardial ischemia), which have shown to be both independently and incrementally predictive of ACS. Recently, second-generation troponin assays have been adopted into clinical practice as they have higher sensitivity and specificity for ACS compared to older assays. Given the increased diagnostic accuracy of these novel second-generation assays, the proposed study's research question is to investigate whether serial ECG changes significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of serial second-generation troponin changes in predicting MACE in patients presenting with symptoms consistent with ACS. In order to investigate this question, we originally proposed an observational pilot study ancillary to the HEART Pathway trial (WFUHS IRB00021074), a funded randomized controlled trial investigating a recently developed decision aid tool (the HEART score) designed to identify patients being evaluated for chest pain that can safely forgo further objective testing. We proposed to add the collection of two additional 12-lead ECGs to the protocol in the HEART Pathway trial, which included serial second-generation troponin collection, in order to generate pilot data regarding the research question. As recruitment for the HEART Pathway trial ended in February 2014, we now propose to continue enrollment for the ASAP CATH study independently, as a prospective observational study evaluating the additional prognostic value of serial ECGs to standard care in patients with chest pain being evaluated for acute coronary syndromes in the Emergency Department.

Objective:

The goal of this project is to produce preliminary data to investigate whether the presence or absence of serial ECG changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia aids in reclassifying participants' risk for MACE and objective evidence of ACS over and above serial second-generation troponin testing.

Methods:

Adult patients, over 21 years old, presenting to WFBMC ED with chest pain or symptoms concerning for ACS, in which the provider orders cardiac biomarkers and an ECG will be eligible for enrollment. We aim to add serial ECG analysis (one at the time of study enrollment and a second at the time of the study blood draw) to the protocol in the proposed study. The primary outcomes are major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days and evidence of acute myocardial ischemia via objective cardiac testing performed during the index hospitalization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Chest Pain

Keywords

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Chest pain
  • Electrocardiograms
  • Risk Stratification
  • Emergency Department
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,461 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 267 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 382 is below the median of 500 across 561 observational studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients presenting to the Wake Forest Baptist Health Emergency Department with symptoms concerning for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are eligible for enrollment.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than or equal to 21 years of age at the time of enrollment
  • Chest discomfort or other symptoms consistent with possible ACS as indicated by the treating physician after obtaining an ECG and cardiac biomarkers for the patient's evaluation
  • The treating physician feels the patient could be discharged home if cardiac disease was excluded

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or left bundle branch block (LBBB) on initial ECG
  • Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (history of left ventricular ejection fraction \<40% or active symptoms of congestive heart failure)
  • New or uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias on initial ECG
  • Hemodynamic instability: heart rate > 120 bpm or \< 40 bpm and/or systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg
  • Hypoxemia (oxygen saturation \<90% on room air or normal home oxygen flow rate)
  • Terminal diagnosis with life expectancy less than 1 year
  • A non-cardiac medical, surgical, or psychiatric illness determined by the provider to require admission, increase risk of objective cardiac testing, or prevent immediate discharge following negative testing.
  • Prior enrollment
  • Incapacity or unwillingness to provide consent and comply with study procedures
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
382 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Serial Electrocardiogram Arm

    All study participants will receive serial electrocardiograms.

    Device: Serial Electrocardiograms

Interventions

  • DeviceSerial Electrocardiograms

    All participants will have serial electrocardiograms performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events at 30 days

    Determine whether serial electrocardiogram changes significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of serial second-generation troponin measurements in predicting MACE at 30 days in patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  2. Evidence of acute myocardial ischemia via objective cardiac testing performed during the index hospitalization

    Determine whether serial ECG changes significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of serial second-generation troponin measurements in predicting positive cardiac stress testing or coronary angiography findings indicative of acute myocardial ischemia in patients being evaluated for ACS.

    Time frame: Duration of initial hospitalization, usually 1 to 2 days

  3. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events at 30 days

    Determine whether serial ECG changes significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of serial second-generation troponin measurements in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days in patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS.

    Time frame: 30 Days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center - Emergency Department
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Owens PL, Barrett ML, Gibson TB, Andrews RM, Weinick RM, Mutter RL. Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;56(2):150-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 15. PubMed 20074834 ↗
  • Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff DC Jr, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD. Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011 Sep;10(3):128-33. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182315a85. PubMed 21989033 ↗
  • Hedges JR, Young GP, Henkel GF, Gibler WB, Green TR, Swanson JR. Serial ECGs are less accurate than serial CK-MB results for emergency department diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Dec;21(12):1445-50. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80057-5. PubMed 1443839 ↗
  • Fesmire FM, Percy RF, Bardoner JB, Wharton DR, Calhoun FB. Usefulness of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring during the initial emergency department evaluation of patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Jan;31(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70274-4. PubMed 9437335 ↗
  • Carmo P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, Ferreira A, Raposo L, Goncalves P, Brito J, Silva A. Does continuous ST-segment monitoring add prognostic information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores? Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011 Jul;16(3):239-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00438.x. PubMed 21762251 ↗
  • Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, Senaratne M, Fitchett DH, Langer A, Goodman SG; INTERACT Investigators. Long-term prognostic value and therapeutic implications of continuous ST-segment monitoring in acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2007 Apr;153(4):500-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.02.003. PubMed 17383285 ↗
  • Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Wallentin L. The combination of a continuous 12-lead ECG and troponin T; a valuable tool for risk stratification during the first 6 hours in patients with chest pain and a non-diagnostic ECG. Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(17):1464-72. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2178. PubMed 10952839 ↗
  • Norgaard BL, Andersen K, Dellborg M, Abrahamsson P, Ravkilde J, Thygesen K. Admission risk assessment by cardiac troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: additional prognostic information from continuous ST segment monitoring. TRIM study group. Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1519-27. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00080-7. PubMed 10334417 ↗
  • Fesmire FM, Decker WW, Diercks DB, Ghaemmaghami CA, Nazarian D, Brady WJ, Hahn S, Jagoda AS; American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;48(3):270-301. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.005. No abstract available. PubMed 16934648 ↗
  • Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, Chavey WE 2nd, Fesmire FM, Hochman JS, Levin TN, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Theroux P, Wenger NK, Wright RS, Smith SC Jr; 2011 WRITING GROUP MEMBERS; ACCF/AHA TASK FORCE MEMBERS. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011 May 10;123(18):e426-579. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318212bb8b. Epub 2011 Mar 28. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2011 Jun 7;123(22):e627. PubMed 21444888 ↗
  • Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, Schactman M, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, Fischer GA, Fung AY, Thompson C, Wybenga D, Braunwald E. Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 31;335(18):1342-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610313351802. PubMed 8857017 ↗
  • Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):959-69. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00804-4. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol 2001 Mar 1;37(3):973. PubMed 10987628 ↗
  • Luepker RV, Apple FS, Christenson RH, Crow RS, Fortmann SP, Goff D, Goldberg RJ, Hand MM, Jaffe AS, Julian DG, Levy D, Manolio T, Mendis S, Mensah G, Pajak A, Prineas RJ, Reddy KS, Roger VL, Rosamond WD, Shahar E, Sharrett AR, Sorlie P, Tunstall-Pedoe H; AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Epidemiology and Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies: a statement from the AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Epidemiology and Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation. 2003 Nov 18;108(20):2543-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000100560.46946.EA. Epub 2003 Nov 10. No abstract available. PubMed 14610011 ↗
  • Norgaard BL, Andersen K, Thygesen K, Ravkilde J, Abrahamsson P, Grip L, Dellborg M. Long term risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes: characteristics of troponin T testing and continuous ST segment monitoring. Heart. 2004 Jul;90(7):739-44. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.020479. PubMed 15201240 ↗
  • Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, Tzikas S, Roth A, Czyz E, Bickel C, Baldus S, Warnholtz A, Frohlich M, Sinning CR, Eleftheriadis MS, Wild PS, Schnabel RB, Lubos E, Jachmann N, Genth-Zotz S, Post F, Nicaud V, Tiret L, Lackner KJ, Munzel TF, Blankenberg S. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 27;361(9):868-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903515. PubMed 19710485 ↗
  • Katus HA, Remppis A, Neumann FJ, Scheffold T, Diederich KW, Vinar G, Noe A, Matern G, Kuebler W. Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1991 Mar;83(3):902-12. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.902. PubMed 1999039 ↗
  • Melanson SE, Morrow DA, Jarolim P. Earlier detection of myocardial injury in a preliminary evaluation using a new troponin I assay with improved sensitivity. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007 Aug;128(2):282-6. doi: 10.1309/Q9W5HJTT24GQCXXX. PubMed 17638663 ↗
  • Aldous SJ, Richards M, Cullen L, Troughton R, Than M. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of early measurement with high-sensitivity troponin T assay in patients presenting with chest pain. CMAJ. 2012 Mar 20;184(5):E260-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110773. Epub 2012 Jan 30. PubMed 22291171 ↗
  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction; Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Galvani M, Katus HA, Newby LK, Ravkilde J, Chaitman B, Clemmensen PM, Dellborg M, Hod H, Porela P, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Beller GA, Bonow R, Van der Wall EE, Bassand JP, Wijns W, Ferguson TB, Steg PG, Uretsky BF, Williams DO, Armstrong PW, Antman EM, Fox KA, Hamm CW, Ohman EM, Simoons ML, Poole-Wilson PA, Gurfinkel EP, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pais P, Mendis S, Zhu JR, Wallentin LC, Fernandez-Aviles F, Fox KM, Parkhomenko AN, Priori SG, Tendera M, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Vahanian A, Camm AJ, De Caterina R, Dean V, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Funck-Brentano C, Hellemans I, Kristensen SD, McGregor K, Sechtem U, Silber S, Tendera M, Widimsky P, Zamorano JL, Morais J, Brener S, Harrington R, Morrow D, Lim M, Martinez-Rios MA, Steinhubl S, Levine GN, Gibler WB, Goff D, Tubaro M, Dudek D, Al-Attar N. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007 Nov 27;116(22):2634-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187397. Epub 2007 Oct 19. No abstract available. PubMed 17951284 ↗
  • Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Hendel RC, Carr JC, Gerstad NA, Gillam LD, Hodgson JM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM, Lesser JR, Martin ET, Messer JV, Redberg RF, Rubin GD, Rumsfeld JS, Taylor AJ, Weigold WG, Woodard PK, Brindis RG, Hendel RC, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, Patel MR; American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 3;48(7):1475-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.003. No abstract available. PubMed 17010819 ↗
  • Hollander JE, Blomkalns AL, Brogan GX, Diercks DB, Field JM, Garvey JL, Gibler WB, Henry TD, Hoekstra JW, Holroyd BR, Hong Y, Kirk JD, O'Neil BJ, Jackson RE; Multidisciplinary Standardized Reporting Criteria Task Force. Standardized reporting guidelines for studies evaluating risk stratification of ED patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1331-40. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.033. No abstract available. PubMed 15576525 ↗
  • Bonaca M, Scirica B, Sabatine M, Dalby A, Spinar J, Murphy SA, Jarolim P, Braunwald E, Morrow DA. Prospective evaluation of the prognostic implications of improved assay performance with a sensitive assay for cardiac troponin I. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 11;55(19):2118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.044. PubMed 20447535 ↗
  • Ronald J. Prineas RSC, Zhu-Ming Zhang. The minnesota code manual of electrocardiographic findings. London: Springer-Verlag; 2010.
  • Rautaharju PM, MacInnis PJ, Warren JW, Wolf HK, Rykers PM, Calhoun HP. Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Dalhousie program; NOVACODE ECG classification procedures for clinical trials and population health surveys. Methods Inf Med. 1990 Sep;29(4):362-74. PubMed 2233384 ↗
  • Miller CD, Hoekstra JW, Lefebvre C, Blumstein H, Hamilton CA, Harper EN, Mahler S, Diercks DB, Neiberg R, Hundley WG. Provider-directed imaging stress testing reduces health care expenditures in lower-risk chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):111-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.965293. Epub 2011 Nov 29. PubMed 22128195 ↗
  • Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(18):1502-13. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2305. PubMed 10973764 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01953276
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Collaborators
American Heart Association
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 30, 2013
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
Jan 15, 2018
Last update
Feb 17, 2022

Study contacts

Simon Mahler, MD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion