An interventional study of Peer-Led Group Intervention and Internet-Based Intervention in Eating Disorder Prevention, sponsored by Oregon Research Institute. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 17 Years to 22 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-18.
Sponsored by Oregon Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Five percent of young women meet criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder, with another 5% meeting criteria for Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (ED-NOS), which includes subthreshold variants of these disorders. Over half of those presenting for eating disorder treatment meet criteria for ED-NOS and both threshold cases and ED-NOS are marked by chronicity, relapse, distress, functional impairment, and increased risk for future obesity, depression, suicide attempts, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, morbidity, and mortality. Anorexia and bulimia nervosa show stronger relations to suicide attempts, outpatient/inpatient treatment, and functional impairment than most other psychiatric disorders. Treatment of eating disorders is very expensive, similar to the cost for schizophrenia treatment, and is effective for only 40-60% of patients. Thus, a public health priority is to develop and disseminate effective eating disorder prevention programs.
Although dozens of eating disorder prevention programs have been evaluated, only a dissonance-based program (the Body Project) has significantly reduced future onset of threshold and subthreshold eating disorders through long-term follow-up. An effectiveness trial found that the Body Project produced significant reductions in risk factors, eating disorder symptoms, and functional impairment relative to educational brochure controls, with some effects persisting through 3-yr follow-up when high school clinicians recruited students and delivered the program. These trials confirm the efficacy and effectiveness of the Body Project, but revealed a key dissemination barrier; it can be difficult to identify and recruit clinicians at high schools and colleges with the time and expertise to competently deliver the program.
One solution to this key dissemination barrier is to train students in established peer leader programs at colleges to recruit high-risk students and deliver the program. Another solution to this dissemination barrier would be to deliver the Body Project via the Internet.
Because peer-led groups and Internet delivery of the Body Project could markedly extend the reach and sustainability of this evidence-based program, we propose to conduct the first large multi-site effectiveness trial that directly compares the effects and cost effectiveness of peer-led Body Project groups, the eBody Project intervention, and clinician-led Body Project groups to an educational video control condition.
740 studies on the registry are indexed under Feeding and Eating Disorders; 159 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 680 is above the median of 75 across 540 interventional studies indexed under Feeding and Eating Disorders.
Browse Feeding and Eating Disorders studies →Oregon Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 70 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
In the Peer-Led Group Intervention, participants voluntarily engage in verbal, written, and behavioral exercises in which they critique the thin-ideal ideal during 4 1-hr sessions and in homework activities which are led by peer leaders.
Behavioral: Peer-Led Group Intervention
In the Clinician-Led Group Intervention, participants voluntarily engage in verbal, written, and behavioral exercises in which they critique the thin-ideal ideal during 4 1-hr sessions and in homework activities which are led by University clinicians.
Behavioral: Clinician-Led Group Intervention
The Internet-Based Intervention consists of 6 40-min modules involving user-driven self-education activities and games (e.g., role-plays), writing/video contests, and off-line exercises designed to induce dissonance regarding pursuit of the thin-ideal, mirroring activities from the group Body Project.
Behavioral: Internet-Based Intervention
The Education Video describes eating disorders, their adverse effects, and the need for treatment, which is key information to provide to young women at elevated risk for eating disorders due to body dissatisfaction.
Behavioral: Education Video
Change over time: Eating disorder diagnostic interview
Participants will complete an interview assessing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) eating disorder symptoms.
Time frame: baseline obtained on intake, 1 month post intervention and at 6mo, 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-ups
Change over time: Thin-ideal internalization
Thin-ideal internalization will be assessed with the 8-item Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised. Participants respond using a 5-point response format.
Time frame: baseline obtained on intake, 1 month post intervention and 6mo-, 1-, 2-, & 3-year followups
Change over time: Body Dissatisfaction
Body dissatisfaction will be assessed with the Body Dissatisfaction Scale. Respondents rate their level of satisfaction with 9 body parts on 6-point scales.
Time frame: baseline obtained on intake, 1 month post intervention and at 6mo, 1-, 2- & 3-yr followups
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Oregon Research Institute