A Phase 2 interventional study of Introductory Educational Workshop and Standard Dietary Change (ON/OFF) in Ultra-Processed Food Intake and Obesity & Overweight, sponsored by Oregon Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.
Sponsored by Oregon Research Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The DISRUPT clinical trial will test two different 2-month programs to help adults with overweight/obesity (N=60) reduce their intake of ultra-processed foods (UPFs). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive standard dietary change strategies, cognitive dissonance strategies that engage them in activism against the UPF industry, or both. All participants will attend an introductory educational workshop about UPFs. If they are assigned to receive one or more of these strategies, they will attend weekly group sessions with the relevant intervention content for 7 more weeks. Groups will be held virtually.
The DISRUPT clinical trial will test 2-month interventions for reducing ultra processed food (UPF) intake among 60 adults with overweight or obesity (ages 18-70) who frequently consume UPFs. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive a standard dietary change (SDC) intervention (ON/OFF), in which they will receive the typical toolbox of evidence-based methods for changing diet (e.g., meal planning, problem solving, reflecting on the benefits of change) to help them reduce their ultra-processed food intake. Participants will be also randomly assigned to receive a cognitive dissonance intervention (ON/OFF). In this intervention, participants will learn about the harms of the food industry and be engaged in activism against this industry to elicit cognitive dissonance for consuming UPFs. Participants will be randomly assigned to each condition separately (through a 2x2 factorial design, resulting in four possible experimental conditions: 1) Control (both OFF), 2) Standard Dietary Change Condition (SDC ON, Dissonance OFF), 3) Dissonance Condition (SDC OFF, Dissonance ON), and 4) SDC + Dissonance Condition (SDC ON, Dissonance ON).
All participants will receive an introductory educational workshop on UPFs, how to identify them, and their harmful health effects. Participants assigned to receive at least one of the interventions (i.e., SDC, dissonance, or both) will attend weekly group sessions for weeks 2-8.
Aim 1 is to test the isolated and interactive effects of standard behavior change strategies and dissonance-based strategies on treatment outcomes. Participants randomly assigned to the SDC condition and the Dissonance condition, respectively, are expected to have larger reductions in UPF intake, greater improvements in indicators of dietary quality (e.g., added sugar, sodium intake), and more weight loss, compared to those in the control condition. The effect of the SDC + Dissonance condition (vs. the control condition) on treatment outcomes is expected to be synergistic, greater than the additive effect either condition alone.
Aim 2 is to test the hypothesis that having the dissonance intervention ON will attenuate the disparity in treatment outcomes for individuals with socio-structural barriers to healthy eating (i.e., low perceived socioeconomic status, low income, limited access to healthy food, and unhealthy neighborhood food environment).
11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 59 is below the median of 67 across 9,006 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.
Browse Obesity studies →Oregon Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 70 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants in this condition (Standard Dietary Change OFF, Dissonance OFF) will receive an educational workshop on UPFs and their harmful health effects.
Behavioral: Introductory Educational Workshop
Participants in this condition (Standard Dietary Change ON, Dissonance OFF) will attend an introductory educational workshop about UPFs, then attend weekly group sessions that teach standard dietary change strategies for the next 7 weeks.
Behavioral: Introductory Educational Workshop · Behavioral: Standard Dietary Change (ON/OFF)
Participants in this condition (Standard Dietary Change OFF, Dissonance ON) will attend an introductory educational session about UPFs, then attend weekly group sessions in which they will be engaged in cognitive dissonance-inducing activities for the next 7 weeks.
Behavioral: Introductory Educational Workshop · Behavioral: Cognitive Dissonance Strategies (ON/OFF)
Participants in this condition (Standard Dietary Change ON, Dissonance ON) will attend an introductory educational session about UPFs, then attend weekly group sessions in which they will 1) learn standard dietary change strategies and 2) be engaged in cognitive-dissonance inducing strategies for the next 7 weeks. Groups will be slightly longer to accommodate both intervention strategies.
Behavioral: Introductory Educational Workshop · Behavioral: Standard Dietary Change (ON/OFF) · Behavioral: Cognitive Dissonance Strategies (ON/OFF)
Participants will attend an introductory educational workshop held through videoconferencing software in week 1 of the program. The workshop will teach participants about ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and their negative health effects.
Participants randomly assigned to have Standard Dietary Change Strategies ON will attend group sessions with a study coach, during which they will learn standard dietary change strategies such as meal planning, problem solving, and goal setting. Sessions will involve didactics, discussion, and interactive elements to promote greater participant engagement.
Participants assigned to have the dissonance condition ON will attend weekly virtual group sessions with a coach, during which they will learn about the nefarious efforts of the food industry, including its creation of UPFs to be hyperpalatable and addictive, its predatory and deceptive marketing techniques, and its role in blocking policy change. Special emphasis will be placed on the food industry's exploitation of vulnerable, low-income communities by inundating these neighborhoods with cheap, ultra-rewarding products. Participants will be asked to engage in activities designed to elicit cognitive dissonance for consuming UPFs. Examples include writing letters to Congress urging policy change and creating "elevator pitches" for family and friends.
Ultra-Processed Food Intake
Dietary intake will be assessed using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Recall (ASA24), in which participants report all of the food and beverages consumed during the past 24 hours. At each assessment, participants will complete three recalls (two weekdays, one weekend day). To calculate UPF intake, each food entry on the ASA24 will be coded into a NOVA category based on a classification system developed through a collaboration between The University de São Paulo and the National Cancer Institute. UPF intake will be operationalized as the average daily calories that come from UPFs.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Treatment (2 months)
Weight
Participants will be asked to provide their current weight by weighing themselves on three consecutive mornings on a digital scale following proper weighing procedures (e.g., in the morning, in a fasted state). The average of the three days of weights will be used.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Treatment (2 months)
Added Sugar Intake
Average daily added sugar intake (in grams) will be generated from participants' ASA24 recalls.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Treatment (2 months)
Saturated Fat Intake
Average daily saturated fat intake (in grams) will be generated from participants' ASA24 recalls.
Time frame: Baseline; Post-Treatment (2 months)
Sodium Intake
Average daily sodium intake (in milligrams) will be generated from participants' ASA24 recalls.
Time frame: Baseline; Post-Treatment (2 months)
Fruit Intake
Average daily fruit intake (in cups) will be generated from participants' ASA24 recalls.
Time frame: Baseline; Post-Treatment (2 months)
Vegetable Intake
Average daily vegetable intake (in cups) will be generated from participants' ASA24 recalls.
Time frame: Baseline; Post-Treatment (2 months)
Total Calorie Intake
Average daily calorie intake will be generated from participants' ASA24 recalls.
Time frame: Baseline; Post-Treatment (2 months)
Plan to share: Yes — Identifiable data will be de-identified prior to submission in the public repository to protect research participant privacy and confidentiality. All individual-participant level data will be preserved and shared, as all variables collected are pertinent to scientific questions.
Supporting information: Analytic code
Time frame: IDP and supporting information will be shared within 12 months of the trial's completion, and will be stored indefinitely.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Oregon Research Institute