CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01917188HF SIMUpdated Jan 16, 2019Results posted

Promoting Patient-Centered Care Through a Heart Failure Simulation Study

An interventional study of Full simulation and education and See simulation room, usual education in Heart Failure, sponsored by Intermountain Health Care, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-16.

Sponsored by Intermountain Health Care, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The initial aim of this study will be to assess current methods of heart failure (HF) patient education in terms of patient satisfaction, level of preparedness for home, and care provider satisfaction. The second aim will be to design and create a "living with HF at home" simulation session. The third aim will test the hypothesis that hospitalized HF patients who receive education in a simulation room in addition to usual HF education will have improved qualitative and quantitative outcomes as compared to those who do not receive the additional education support.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is close to the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Intermountain Health Care, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female > 18 years of age.
  2. Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of any study procedures.
  3. Documentation of HF of any etiology based on clinical assessment of the Primary Investigator, using standard-of-care criteria for diagnosis.
  4. Heart failure of either preserved or reduced ventricular function.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients requiring ICU monitoring
  2. LVAD candidate/recipient
  3. Cardiac transplant candidate/recipient
  4. Confusion
  5. Sepsis
  6. Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
  7. Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized clinical trial during this hospitalization
  8. Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  9. Active illicit drug use
  10. Participation in any other clinical trials involving investigational or marketed products within 30 days prior to entry in the study.
  11. Other conditions that in the opinion of the Primary Investigator may increase risk to the subject and/or compromise the quality of the clinical trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Full simulation and education

    Patients who will receive full simulation and education session prior to discharge.

    Behavioral: Full simulation and education

  • Other
    See simulation room, usual education

    Patients will be shown the simulation room prior to discharge but will only receive usual education.

    Behavioral: See simulation room, usual education

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Patients will receive usual care by bedside nurse.

Interventions

  • BehavioralFull simulation and education
  • BehavioralSee simulation room, usual education
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Differences in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Results

    The mean differences in heart failure knowledge (from study enrollment to the 30 day study follow up) in each of the arms as assessed by the MLHFQ. Lower scores indicate improvement and a better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The MLHFQ is a self-administered questionnaire for patients with HF, comprising 21 items rated on six-point Likert scales, representing different degrees of impact of HF on HRQoL, from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL), as well as scores for two dimensions, physical (8 items, range 0-40) and emotional (5 items, range 0-25). The other eight items (of the total of 21) are only considered for the calculation of the total score.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Results

Posted Jan 16, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFull Simulation and EducationSee Simulation Room, Usual EducationUsual Care
Started292320
Completed171711
Not completed1269

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Differences in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Results

The mean differences in heart failure knowledge (from study enrollment to the 30 day study follow up) in each of the arms as assessed by the MLHFQ. Lower scores indicate improvement and a better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The MLHFQ is a self-administered questionnaire for patients with HF, comprising 21 items rated on six-point Likert scales, representing different degrees of impact of HF on HRQoL, from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL), as well as scores for two dimensions, physical (8 items, range 0-40) and emotional (5 items, range 0-25). The other eight items (of the total of 21) are only considered for the calculation of the total score.

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Differences in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Results
score on a scaleFull Simulation and EducationSee Simulation Room, Usual EducationUsual Care
Total Score Difference-4.69 ± 35.06-26.59 ± 28.25-29.36 ± 35.69
Physical Score Difference-4.31 ± 15.25-13.24 ± 11.51-15.09 ± 14.58
Emotional Score Difference-0.88 ± 8.60-6.59 ± 8.28-5.27 ± 8.88

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Full Simulation and Education2/29 (6.9%)0/29 (0%)1/29 (3.4%)
See Simulation Room, Usual Education1/23 (4.3%)1/23 (4.3%)0/23 (0%)
Usual Care1/20 (5%)1/20 (5%)1/20 (5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventFull Simulation and EducationSee Simulation Room, Usual EducationUsual Care
Subarachnoid hemorrhage after a fallNervous system disorders0/290/231/20
Knee wound dehiscenceSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/291/230/20
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFull Simulation and EducationSee Simulation Room, Usual EducationUsual Care
hypertensionVascular disorders0/290/231/20
lightheadedCardiac disorders1/290/230/20

Baseline characteristics

Only included those who completed the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Full Simulation and EducationSee Simulation Room, Usual EducationUsual CareTotal
Mean66 ± 1367.9 ± 8.262.7 ± 11.665.3 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Full Simulation and EducationSee Simulation Room, Usual EducationUsual CareTotal
Female82111
Male9151034
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Intermountain Medical Center
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01917188
Lead sponsor
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Collaborators
Intermountain Research and Medical Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Jan 16, 2019
Last update
Jan 16, 2019

Study contacts

Kismet D Rasmusson, FNP-BC
principal investigator · Intermountain Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion