A Phase 3 interventional study of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate and Dymista vehicle in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Meda Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 31 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-29.
Sponsored by Meda Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine if Dymista nasal spray is better and safer than placebo in treating children ages 4 to \<12 years old who have seasonal allergic rhinitis.
1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 348 is above the median of 89 across 906 interventional studies indexed under Rhinitis.
Browse Rhinitis studies →Meda Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
At Visit 2:
At Visit 2, to be eligible for entry into the double-blind treatment period, subjects must have the total of the seven lead-in symptom assessments during the past 3 days of the lead-in period including the Day of Randomization (Visit 2, Day 1):
Exclusion Criteria:
(azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate) Nasal Spray, 137mcg/50mcg: Mode of Administration: Topical/intranasal spray Dose: 548 mcg azelastine hydrochloride / 200 mcg fluticasone propionate, total daily dose Regimen: 1 spray per nostril twice daily
Drug: azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate
Dose: vehicle only Regimen: 1 spray per nostril twice daily
Drug: Dymista vehicle
Also known as: Dymista
Also known as: placebo
Primary Efficacy
change from baseline in AM+PM rTNSS (reflective total nasal symptoms score): ITT( intent to treat population)change from baseline in 12-hour reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) consisting of nasal congestion,runny nose, itchy nose and sneezing scored twice daily (AM and PM) in diary for the entire 14 day study period.The measurement scale is 0 to 24 so that the higher the number the worse the symptom.A reduction in symptom severity score is indicated by a negative value.A greater negative value suggests improvement.
Time frame: 15 days of treatment
Safety
* Subject-reported adverse experiences (incidence, type, and severity of adverse events) * Nasal Examinations * Vital signs assessments
Time frame: entire length of study (day 1 to day 22)
Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ)
Change from baseline to Visit 4 in the ITT ( intent to treat) Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) in subjects equal to or greater than 6 years old and less than12 years old compared to placebo.Scored on a 0 to 7 scale with 0 being not troubled at all and 7 being extremely troublesome. The higher the difference the better the result.
Time frame: day 1 to day 15 of treatment
| Milestone | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 173 | 175 |
| Completed | 171 | 173 |
| Not completed | 2 | 2 |
change from baseline in AM+PM rTNSS (reflective total nasal symptoms score): ITT( intent to treat population)change from baseline in 12-hour reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) consisting of nasal congestion,runny nose, itchy nose and sneezing scored twice daily (AM and PM) in diary for the entire 14 day study period.The measurement scale is 0 to 24 so that the higher the number the worse the symptom.A reduction in symptom severity score is indicated by a negative value.A greater negative value suggests improvement.
| units on a scale | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Efficacy | -3.83 ± 5.154 | -2.77 ± 4.731 |
* Subject-reported adverse experiences (incidence, type, and severity of adverse events) * Nasal Examinations * Vital signs assessments
| occurance | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | 28 | 23 |
Change from baseline to Visit 4 in the ITT ( intent to treat) Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) in subjects equal to or greater than 6 years old and less than12 years old compared to placebo.Scored on a 0 to 7 scale with 0 being not troubled at all and 7 being extremely troublesome. The higher the difference the better the result.
| units on a scale | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) | -.91 ± 1.22 | -.66 ± 1.22 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dymista | — | 0/173 (0%) | 13/173 (7.5%) |
| Dymista Vehicle | — | 0/175 (0%) | 6/175 (3.4%) |
| Event | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| dysgusiaNervous system disorders | 7/173 | 0/175 |
| epistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 6/173 | 6/175 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 173 | 175 | 348 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 8.5 ± 2.11 | 8.4 ± 2.06 | 8.4 ± 2.08 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 77 | 85 | 162 |
| Male | 96 | 90 | 186 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Dymista | Dymista Vehicle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 173 | 175 | 348 |
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Meda Pharmaceuticals