CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01907672GhanaCommRDTUpdated Jul 25, 2013

The Role of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria for Targeting of ACTs at Community Level

A Phase 4 interventional study of Rapid Diagnostic Test in Malaria, sponsored by Ghana Health Services. Completed at 1 site in Ghana. Open to participants aged 6 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-25.

Sponsored by Ghana Health Services · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4,748
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to test directly by means of a cluster randomized controlled trial, the impact of the introduction of RDTs for malaria on dispensing behaviour of chemical sellers, the main non-formal outlet for drugs locally, at community level.

Read the detailed description

In many settings the majority of people with malaria particularly the poorest do not access formal care but access anti-malarials at the informal community level. ACTs were previously unaffordable to this group but this should change with the introduction of the AMFm. To avoid missing alternative causes of illness, reduce costs and delay the spread of resistance to ACTs, they need to be targeted at those who really need them. Studies in formal healthcare settings in Ghana have shown that where microscopy is not available, the impact of Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) can be substantial. RDTs are relatively simple to use, requiring fairly minimal training to master the mechanics of test preparation and interpretation Whether to deploy RDTs as part of AMFm is unclear at this time.Even in the absence of AMFm the question about how best to target antimalarials in the community is an important one, and will get more so as malaria incidence in many countries decreases, making presumptive treatment of all febrile illness as malaria increasingly ineffective. Locally chemical sellers are the closest equivalent as they provide the majority of treatments, especially for the poorest.

It is difficult to predict whether RDTs would make chemical sellers more commonly accessed (because patients prefer a diagnosis) , or less accessed (patients do not like having choice restricted/do not want a blood test etc). Studies in other settings suggest interventions to improve diagnosis by shop-keepers can be effective and cost-effective .

02

Conditions studied

  • Malaria

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria
  • Chemical Shops
  • Drug Shops
  • Diagnostics
  • Testing for Malaria
03

In context

Malaria

1,299 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4,748 is above the median of 220 across 1,027 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.

Browse Malaria studies →

Lead sponsor

Ghana Health Services is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients reporting to chemical seller with complaint of fever or who request for an anti-malarial drug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clients providing a prescription from a health facility
  • Clients with signs of severe disease who will be referred onward
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4,748 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rapid Diagnostic Test

    Rapid Diagnostic Test for malaria to direct antimalarial dispensing decisions in Chemical Shops

    Procedure: Rapid Diagnostic Test

  • No intervention
    No RDT

    Chemical sellers dispense antimalarials as per their own decisions without the benefit of test results

Interventions

  • ProcedureRapid Diagnostic Test

    Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria carried out to direct antimalarial dispensing. No antimalarials for negative tests, antimalarials for positive tests

    Also known as: mRDT, RDT for malaria, RDT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of clients negative for malaria by double read research blood slide who received an anti-malarial in both arms

    Out of all clients who test negative when their blood slides are read by two independent expert microscopists, how many received an antimalarial treatment from the Licensed Chemical Seller

    Time frame: Until the estimated sample size is obtained or up to 2 yrs whichever comes first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of mRDT -ve clients who received an anti-malarial in the RDT arm

    Out of all clients who test negative by RDT, number who receive an antimalarial

    Time frame: Until the estimated sample size is obtained or up to 2 years, whichever comes first

  2. Proportion of clients tested using a Rapid Diagnostic Test

    The number of clients who agree to be tested with an RDT Out of all clients who meet inclusion criteria

    Time frame: Until the estimated sample size is obtained or up to 2 years, whichever comes first

  3. Proportion of clients in each arm receiving an antibiotic

    The number of clients in the intervention and control arms who receive an antibiotic out of the total number of clients recruited into each arm

    Time frame: Until the estimated sample size is obtained or up to 2 years, whichever comes first

  4. Proportion of clients receiving addittional or alternative treatments to antimalarial and which these are

    The number of clients who receive additional or alternative treatments in the intervention and control arms out of the total number recruited into both arms

    Time frame: Until the estimated sample size is obtained or up to 2 years, whichever comes first

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dodowa Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service
    Dodowa, Greater Accra Box DD1, Ghana
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ansah EK, Narh-Bana S, Affran-Bonful H, Bart-Plange C, Cundill B, Gyapong M, Whitty CJ. The impact of providing rapid diagnostic malaria tests on fever management in the private retail sector in Ghana: a cluster randomized trial. BMJ. 2015 Mar 4;350:h1019. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1019. PubMed 25739769 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 25, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01907672
Lead sponsor
Ghana Health Services
Collaborators
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Responsible party
Evelyn K. Ansah (Deputy Director (Research), Ghana Health Services) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 25, 2013
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Apr 2013
Last update
Jul 25, 2013

Study contacts

Evelyn K Ansah, MD,MPH,PhD
principal investigator · Ghana Health Services
Christopher C Whitty, BSc,MSc,PhD
principal investigator · London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Margaret Gyapong, BSc,MSc,PhD
principal investigator · Ghana Health Services

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion