ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01907217EFFECT-DepUpdated Nov 14, 2018Results posted

Enhancing the Effectiveness of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Severe Depression

A Phase 4 interventional study of ECT Mecta 5000M and Methohexitone in Depression, sponsored by St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland. Completed at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-14.

Sponsored by St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most powerful antidepressant treatment available and is often life-saving. There are concerns, however, that standard bitemporal ECT (the most commonly used form of ECT worldwide) causes persisting retrograde amnesia. However, clinical trials have indicated that high-dose unilateral ECT may be as effective as bitemporal ECT but have much less cognitive side-effects.

The trial aims to test the primary experimental hypothesis: High-dose (6 x ST) right unilateral ECT is as effective as (i.e. not inferior to) standard (1.5 x ST) bitemporal ECT for severe depression in terms of Hamilton Depression Rating Score (HDRS) at the end of the treatment course.

Read the detailed description

The study is a two-group parallel design randomised controlled non-inferiority trial and has been registered (ISRCTN23577151). Consented patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) will be randomly allocated to a course of bitemporal (BT) ECT (1.5 x ST) or high-dose right unilateral (RUL) ECT (6.0 x ST). To facilitate generalizability of results, the trial takes place under "real world" conditions and so both groups continue usual care and medications during the treatment phase and thereafter. Patients are followed-up for 12 months after completing their allocated course of ECT. Completion of the primary outcome depression-rating measure (i.e. HDRS) and the secondary outcome of most interest (autobiographical memory, using the AMI-SF) will be prioritised in the data collection.

Patients, their treating clinicians and raters are blind to treatment; clinicians administering ECT are not involved in post randomisation assessments or formal data analysis. Success of blinding for patients and raters will be assessed after the second and final treatments. The trial statistician is also blinded to allocation status.

Sample size: In a large series (n = 253) of depressed patients, Petrides et al. (2001) found a mean (SD) reduction in 24-item HDRS of 25.6 (9.4) after treatment with bitemporalT ECT (1.5 x ST). We therefore estimate that 69 patients will be required per treatment group to have 80% power to demonstrate, using a one-sided equivalence t-test at 5% level, that mean reduction in 24-item HDRS achieved using high-dose RUL ECT is no more than 4 points (i.e. equivalent to 3 points on 17-item HDRS) less than that achieved using standard BT ECT, assuming a common within-group SD of change scores of 9.4 and equal expected group mean change scores.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Electroconvulsive therapy
  • ECT
  • electrode placement
  • effectiveness
  • cognition
  • autobiographical memory
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 138 is above the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥18 years diagnosed with major depressive episode () and referred for ECT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition rendering patients medically unfit for general anaesthesia or ECT; treatment with ECT in previous six months; dementia or other Axis 1 diagnosis; alcohol/other substance abuse in previous six months; inability/refusal to consent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
138 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M

    Modified bilateral ECT (bitemporal electrode positions) twice weekly at 1.5 times the seizure threshold. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0mg/kg) for muscle relaxation.

    Device: ECT Mecta 5000M · Drug: Methohexitone · Drug: Suxamethonium

  • Experimental
    High-dose unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M

    High-dose right modified unilateral ECT twice weekly at 6 times the seizure threshold. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0mg/kg) for muscle relaxation.

    Device: ECT Mecta 5000M · Drug: Methohexitone · Drug: Suxamethonium

Interventions

  • DeviceECT Mecta 5000M

    ECT is administered twice weekly with hand-held electrodes using the Mecta 5000M device following a standard stimulus dosing protocol. Seizure duration is measured by EEG monitoring. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) as muscle relaxant. Seizure threshold (ST) is established by a method of limits at the first session and subsequent treatments will be given at 1.5 x ST for BT ECT and 6.0 x ST for RUL ECT. To reflect routine clinical practice, number of ECT treatments is determined by referring physicians who will be blind to randomisation. The treatment period varies between patients to allow up to 12 administrations of ECT, i.e. up to 6 weeks.

    Also known as: electroconvulsive therapy Mecta 500M device

  • Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia along with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)for muscle relaxation. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.

    Also known as: methohexital, Brevimytal (Hikma, Germany)

  • Suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)is used for muscle relaxation along with Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) for anaesthesia. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.

    Also known as: Succinylcholine, Anectine (GlaxoSmithKline, UK)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

    The HDRS was originally designed to assess severity of depressive symptoms in patients with a primary depressive illness and is now the most commonly used measure of depression severity. It was first published in a 17-item format with the optional addition of 4 items making up the 21-item version. In addition to the original 21 items, the 24-item HDRS includes items on helplessness, hopelessness and worthlessness; its score range is 0-77, with higher scores reflecting greater burden of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: HDRS scores were obtained at baseline, end of allocated ECT treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up timepoints.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

    The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

    Time frame: end of allocated ECT course

  2. Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

    The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

    Time frame: 3 months follow-up

  3. Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

    The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

    Time frame: 6 months follow-up

07

Results

Posted Nov 14, 2018
Limitations and caveats
We did not include involuntary patients who could not consent due to illness severity (7.4% of referrals), for whom bitemporal ECT may be better. The AMI-SF does not allow quantification of retrograde amnesia attributable directly to ECT.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
Started6969
Completed6967
Not completed02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject02

Outcome measures

PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

The HDRS was originally designed to assess severity of depressive symptoms in patients with a primary depressive illness and is now the most commonly used measure of depression severity. It was first published in a 17-item format with the optional addition of 4 items making up the 21-item version. In addition to the original 21 items, the 24-item HDRS includes items on helplessness, hopelessness and worthlessness; its score range is 0-77, with higher scores reflecting greater burden of depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
HDRS scores were obtained at baseline, end of allocated ECT treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up timepoints.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
units on a scaleBilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
Baseline29.5 ± 6.330.4 ± 6.1
End-of-treatment12.5 ± 9.211.1 ± 7.5
3 months follow-up15.0 ± 10.211.5 ± 9.1
6 months follow-up13.0 ± 8.612.6 ± 10.9
Statistical analysis
  • Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M vs High-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M · Regression, Linear · p = <0.05 (Primary statistical analysis was assessment of difference in HAM-D scores between arms at end-of-treatment, supplemented by 95% CIs and this interval compared with the pre-specified noninferiority threshold (-4 points). The p-value was calculated.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.08 · 95% CI -1.67 to 3.84The prespecified noninferiority margin was no more than a -4-point difference at the end of treatment between bitemporal and unilateral groups. The predicted difference at the end of treatment was 1.08 (95% confidence interval \[CI\]=-1.67 to 3.84).
SecondaryColumbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

Time frame:
end of allocated ECT course
Reported as:
Mean · % of baseline performance
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
% of baseline performanceBilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)56.8 ± 17.367.1 ± 16.3
Statistical analysis
  • Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M vs High-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M · generalized linear models with a binomia · p = 0.001 (As above) · Odds ratio (or): 0.66 · 95% CI 0.51 to 0.85
SecondaryColumbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

Time frame:
3 months follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · % of baseline performance
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
% of baseline performanceBilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)56.2 ± 18.167.3 ± 14.2
Statistical analysis
  • Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M vs High-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M · Regression, Linear · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 0.59 · 95% CI 0.45 to 0.78Analyzed using a generalized linear models with a binomial distribution and logit-link.
SecondaryColumbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

Time frame:
6 months follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · % of baseline performance
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
% of baseline performanceBilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)52.9 ± 16.463.4 ± 17.7
Statistical analysis
  • Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M vs High-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M · Regression, Linear · p = 0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 0.59 · 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79generalized linear models with a binomial distribution and logit-link

Adverse events

Collected over Participants were monitored for ECT-related adverse events during individual ECT sessions and throughout the ECT treatment course, an average of four weeks per participant. They were also monitored for any other adverse events (not directly related to treatment with ECT) throughout the six month follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M—9/69 (13%)33/69 (47.8%)
High-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M—7/69 (10.1%)37/69 (53.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
ECT-related hypertensionCardiac disorders2/694/69
interictal confusionNervous system disorders3/690/69
laryngospasmRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/691/69
tachyarrhythmiaCardiac disorders1/691/69
attempted suicidePsychiatric disorders0/691/69
BronchospasmRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/690/69
bradyarrhythmiaCardiac disorders1/690/69
pulmonary embolusRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/690/69
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
HeadacheNervous system disorders19/6918/69
nauseaGastrointestinal disorders8/6911/69
muscle painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/698/69

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000MTotal
Mean56.8 ± 14.456.6 ± 15.356.7 ± 14.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000MTotal
Female474087
Male222951
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000MTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino6969138
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000MHigh-dose Unilateral ECT Mecta 5000MTotal
Ireland6969138
08

Study locations

1 site
  • St Patrick's University Hospital
    Dublin, 8, Ireland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fenton C, McLoughlin DM. Usefulness of Hamilton rating scale for depression subset scales and full versions for electroconvulsive therapy. PLoS One. 2021 Nov 9;16(11):e0259861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259861. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34752484 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — We are continuing to analyze trial data for secondary analyses. Requests for IPD will be considered where appropriate.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01907217
Lead sponsor
St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland
Collaborators
Health Research Board, Ireland
Responsible party
Prof Declan McLoughlin (Professor, St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2013
Start date
May 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2013
Completion
Apr 2015
Results posted
Nov 14, 2018
Last update
Nov 14, 2018

Study contacts

Declan M McLoughlin, PhD
principal investigator · St Patrick's University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Methohexital · Succinylcholine

Start the discussion