ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01895361SUSTAINUpdated Jan 31, 2020Results posted

Study to Assess Safety and Impact of SelG1 With or Without Hydroxyurea Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease Patients With Pain Crises

A Phase 2 interventional study of SelG1 and Placebo in Sickle Cell Disease, sponsored by Reprixys Pharmaceutical Corporation. Completed at 56 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-31.

Sponsored by Reprixys Pharmaceutical Corporation · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
198
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the investigational drug SelG1 when given to sickle cell disease patients either taking or not taking hydroxyurea was effective in preventing or reducing the occurrence of pain crises. SelG1 prevents various cells in the bloodstream from sticking together. By stopping these cell-cell interactions, SelG1 may prevent small blood vessels from becoming blocked and therefore reduce the occurrence and severity of pain crises. Other effects of SelG1 was evaluated, as well as the safety of the drug and how long it stayed in the blood stream.

Funding Source - FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD)

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • SelG1
  • P-selectin
  • monoclonal antibody
  • sickle cell disease
  • sickle cell anemia
  • sickle cell
  • pain crisis
  • pain crises
  • vasoocclusion
  • vaso-occlusion
  • priapism
  • hepatic sequestration
  • splenic sequestration
  • chest syndrome
  • SCD
03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,134 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 198 is above the median of 40 across 769 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Reprixys Pharmaceutical Corporation as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sickle Cell Disease (HbSS, HbSC, HbSβ⁰-thalassemia, or HbSβ⁺-thalassemia)
  • If receiving hydroxyurea or erythropoietin, treatment must have been prescribed for at least 6 months, with the dose stable for at least 3 months
  • Between 2 and 10 sickle cell-related pain crises in the past 12 months

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • On a chronic transfusion program or planning on exchange transfusion during the study
  • \<4.0 g/dL
  • Planned initiation, termination, or dose alteration of hydroxyurea during the study
  • Receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g. warfarin, heparin) other than aspirin
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
198 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)

    IV Infusion, once every 4 weeks through Week 50

    Drug: SelG1

  • Experimental
    Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)

    IV Infusion, once every 4 weeks through Week 50

    Drug: SelG1

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    IV Infusion, once every 4 weeks through Week 50

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Annual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

    An SCPC is defined as an acute episode of pain with no other medically determined cause than a vasoocclusive event that requires a medical facility visit and treatment with oral or parenteral narcotics, or parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The annual rate of SCPC is defined as the total number of pain crises for a patient occurring from the date of randomization to the end date multiplied by 365 divided by the number of days during that same time period. End date is defined as the last dose date plus 14 days. For participants never dosed, the end date was the end of study date. This calculation accounts for early dropouts or lost to follow-up by extrapolating the SCPC rate of every participant to one year.

    Time frame: One year

  2. Annual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) - Per Standard Median

    An SCPC is defined as an acute episode of pain with no other medically determined cause than a vasoocclusive event that requires a medical facility visit and treatment with oral or parenteral narcotics, or parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The annual rate of SCPC is defined as the total number of pain crises for a patient occurring from the date of randomization to the end date multiplied by 365 divided by the number of days during that same time period. End date is defined as the last dose date plus 14 days. For participants never dosed, the end date was the end of study date. This calculation accounts for early dropouts or lost to follow-up by extrapolating the SCPC rate of every participant to one year.

    Time frame: One year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Annual Rate of Days Hospitalized (Key Secondary Endpoint) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

    The annual rate of days hospitalized was calculated as the number of days hospitalized multiplied by 365 divided by the end date minus the date of randomization plus one where the end date is defined as the last dose date plus 14 days (for subjects never dosed, the end date equaled the end of study date, which was the last site contact for these patients).

    Time frame: One year

  2. Time to First Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis

    Time to first SCPC is defined as months from randomization to first SCPC. A participant without SCPC before withdrawal or completion of the study is considered censored at the time of the end date. End date is defined as the last dose plus 14 days. For participants never dosed, the end date is the end of study date.

    Time frame: Up to one year

  3. Time to Second Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis

    Time to second SCPC is defined as months from randomization to second SCPC. A patient with less than two SCPC before withdrawal or completion of the study is considered censored at the time of the end date. End date is defined as the last dose plus 14 days. For patients never dosed, the end date is the end of study date.

    Time frame: Up to one year

  4. Annual Rate of Uncomplicated Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

    Uncomplicated SCPC is defined as an acute episode of pain with no known cause for pain other than a vasoocclusive event; requiring a visit to a medical facility; and requiring treatment with a parenteral or oral narcotic (including opiates), or parenteral NSAIDs; but is NOT classified as an acute chest syndrome, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration or priapism.

    Time frame: Up to one year

  5. Annual Rate of Acute Chest Syndrome Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

    Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) is defined on the basis of the finding of a new pulmonary infiltrate involving at least one complete lung segment that was consistent with alveolar consolidation, but excluding atelectasis (as indicated by chest X-ray). At least one of the following additional signs or symptoms needs to be present as well: a participant had to have reported chest pain, a temperature of more than 38.5oC, tachypnea, wheezing or cough.

    Time frame: One year

  6. Patient Reported Outcome: Change From Baseline in Pain Severity/Pain Interference Domain From Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire

    The BPI instrument was completed by the patients at pre-specified study visits prior to \& during the Treatment \& Follow-Up Evaluation Phases. Patients completed the brief pain inventory long-form, 1-week recall at the indicated pre-specified study visits. The BPI is a standardized self-reported questionnaire developed to provide information on the intensity of pain (the sensory dimension) as well as the degree to which pain interferes with function (the reactive dimension). The BPI also asks questions about pain relief, pain quality, \& the patient's perception of the cause of pain. Since pain can be quite variable over a day, the BPI asks patients to rate their pain at the time of responding to the questionnaire (pain now), \& also at its worst, least, \& average over the previous week. The scorings for pain \& interference have a range from 0 (no pain/no interference) to 10 (worst pain/complete interference). The BPI scoring manual was used to calculate scores for each domain.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, Week 14, Week 26, Week 38, Week 52, and Week 58, up to 58 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jan 31, 2020
Limitations and caveats
The Safety population includes all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Although the safety is now coded with MedDRA 21.1, the CSR, when first published 1in 2016, used MedDRA 16.1 CFB = Change from Baseline

Participant flow

Approx. 174 patients were planned. A total of 198 patients were randomized. 192 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug \& were analyzed for safety; 198 patients were analyzed for efficacy, 125 patients contributed data to the analysis of SelG1 PK data, \& 176 patients contributed data to the analysis of PD data (% P-selectin inhibition).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Started676665
Completed434541
Not completed242124
Withdrew: Adverse event113
Withdrew: Death212
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up446
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study131
Withdrew: Physician decision222
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject766
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy010
Withdrew: Reasons different from categories above734

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnnual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

An SCPC is defined as an acute episode of pain with no other medically determined cause than a vasoocclusive event that requires a medical facility visit and treatment with oral or parenteral narcotics, or parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The annual rate of SCPC is defined as the total number of pain crises for a patient occurring from the date of randomization to the end date multiplied by 365 divided by the number of days during that same time period. End date is defined as the last dose date plus 14 days. For participants never dosed, the end date was the end of study date. This calculation accounts for early dropouts or lost to follow-up by extrapolating the SCPC rate of every participant to one year.

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Median · SCPC per year
Annual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median
SCPC per yearHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Annual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median1.63 (0.0 to 24.3)2.01 (0.0 to 24.3)2.98 (0.0 to 24.3)
Statistical analysis
  • High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test · p = = 0.010 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: -1.01 · 95% CI -2.00 to 0.00with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crisis history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata.
  • Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test · p = = 0.180 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: -0.69 · 95% CI -1.84 to 0.02with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata.
PrimaryAnnual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) - Per Standard Median

An SCPC is defined as an acute episode of pain with no other medically determined cause than a vasoocclusive event that requires a medical facility visit and treatment with oral or parenteral narcotics, or parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The annual rate of SCPC is defined as the total number of pain crises for a patient occurring from the date of randomization to the end date multiplied by 365 divided by the number of days during that same time period. End date is defined as the last dose date plus 14 days. For participants never dosed, the end date was the end of study date. This calculation accounts for early dropouts or lost to follow-up by extrapolating the SCPC rate of every participant to one year.

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Median · SCPC per year
Annual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) - Per Standard Median
SCPC per yearHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Annual Rate of Sickle Cell-related Pain Crises (SCPC) - Per Standard Median1.63 (0.0 to 24.3)2.01 (0.0 to 24.3)2.98 (0.0 to 24.3)
Statistical analysis
  • High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Change vs placebo (%): -45.3
  • Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Change vs placebo (%): -32.6
SecondaryAnnual Rate of Days Hospitalized (Key Secondary Endpoint) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

The annual rate of days hospitalized was calculated as the number of days hospitalized multiplied by 365 divided by the end date minus the date of randomization plus one where the end date is defined as the last dose date plus 14 days (for subjects never dosed, the end date equaled the end of study date, which was the last site contact for these patients).

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Median · Days hospitalized per year
Annual Rate of Days Hospitalized (Key Secondary Endpoint) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median
Days hospitalized per yearHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Annual Rate of Days Hospitalized (Key Secondary Endpoint) Per Hodges-Lehmann Median4.00 (0.0 to 130.7)6.87 (0.0 to 151.0)6.87 (0.0 to 307.4)
Statistical analysis
  • High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test · p = = 0.450 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: 0.00 · 95% CI -4.36 to 0.00with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata.
  • Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test · p = = 0.837 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: 0.00 · 95% CI -3.90 to 2.61with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata.
SecondaryTime to First Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis

Time to first SCPC is defined as months from randomization to first SCPC. A participant without SCPC before withdrawal or completion of the study is considered censored at the time of the end date. End date is defined as the last dose plus 14 days. For participants never dosed, the end date is the end of study date.

Time frame:
Up to one year
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to First Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis
monthsHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Time to First Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis4.07 (1.31 to NA)2.20 (0.95 to 6.60)1.38 (0.39 to 4.90)
Statistical analysis
  • High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = = 0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.495 · 95% CI 0.331 to 0.741Calculated based on Cox regression analysis with HU therapy (yes, no), categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10), and treatment as covariates
  • Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = = 0.136 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.752 · 95% CI 0.515 to 1.097Calculated based on Cox regression analysis with HU therapy (yes, no), categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10), and treatment as covariates
SecondaryTime to Second Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis

Time to second SCPC is defined as months from randomization to second SCPC. A patient with less than two SCPC before withdrawal or completion of the study is considered censored at the time of the end date. End date is defined as the last dose plus 14 days. For patients never dosed, the end date is the end of study date.

Time frame:
Up to one year
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Second Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis
monthsHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Time to Second Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis10.32 (4.47 to NA)9.20 (3.94 to 12.16)5.09 (2.96 to 11.01)
Statistical analysis
  • High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = = 0.022 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.534 · 95% CI 0.329 to 0.866Calculated based on Cox regression analysis with HU therapy (yes, no), categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10), and treatment as covariates
  • Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = = 0.100 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.693 · 95% CI 0.440 to 1.092Calculated based on Cox regression analysis with HU therapy (yes, no), categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10), and treatment as covariates
SecondaryAnnual Rate of Uncomplicated Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

Uncomplicated SCPC is defined as an acute episode of pain with no known cause for pain other than a vasoocclusive event; requiring a visit to a medical facility; and requiring treatment with a parenteral or oral narcotic (including opiates), or parenteral NSAIDs; but is NOT classified as an acute chest syndrome, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration or priapism.

Time frame:
Up to one year
Reported as:
Median · Uncomplicated SCPC per year
Annual Rate of Uncomplicated Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis Per Hodges-Lehmann Median
Uncomplicated SCPC per yearHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Annual Rate of Uncomplicated Sickle Cell-related Pain Crisis Per Hodges-Lehmann Median1.08 (0.0 to 24.3)2.00 (0.0 to 24.3)2.91 (0.0 to 19.2)
Statistical analysis
  • High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test · p = = 0.015 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: -1.00 · 95% CI -1.98 to 0.00with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata
  • Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test · p = = 0.120 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: -0.87 · 95% CI -1.77 to 0.00with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata
SecondaryAnnual Rate of Acute Chest Syndrome Per Hodges-Lehmann Median

Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) is defined on the basis of the finding of a new pulmonary infiltrate involving at least one complete lung segment that was consistent with alveolar consolidation, but excluding atelectasis (as indicated by chest X-ray). At least one of the following additional signs or symptoms needs to be present as well: a participant had to have reported chest pain, a temperature of more than 38.5oC, tachypnea, wheezing or cough.

Time frame:
One year
Reported as:
Median · accute chest syndrome per year
Annual Rate of Acute Chest Syndrome Per Hodges-Lehmann Median
accute chest syndrome per yearHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Annual Rate of Acute Chest Syndrome Per Hodges-Lehmann Median0.00 (0.0 to 3.7)0.00 (0.0 to 3.9)0.00 (0.0 to 24.3)
Statistical analysis
  • High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum test · p = = 0.780 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: 0.00 · 95% CI 0.00 to 0.00with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata
  • Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg) vs Placebo · Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum test · p = = 0.868 · Hodges-lehmann median absolute diff.: 0.00 · 95% CI 0.00 to 0.00with HU therapy (yes, no) and categorized crises history (2 to 4, 5 to 10) as recorded in the IXRS system as the strata.
SecondaryPatient Reported Outcome: Change From Baseline in Pain Severity/Pain Interference Domain From Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire

The BPI instrument was completed by the patients at pre-specified study visits prior to \& during the Treatment \& Follow-Up Evaluation Phases. Patients completed the brief pain inventory long-form, 1-week recall at the indicated pre-specified study visits. The BPI is a standardized self-reported questionnaire developed to provide information on the intensity of pain (the sensory dimension) as well as the degree to which pain interferes with function (the reactive dimension). The BPI also asks questions about pain relief, pain quality, \& the patient's perception of the cause of pain. Since pain can be quite variable over a day, the BPI asks patients to rate their pain at the time of responding to the questionnaire (pain now), \& also at its worst, least, \& average over the previous week. The scorings for pain \& interference have a range from 0 (no pain/no interference) to 10 (worst pain/complete interference). The BPI scoring manual was used to calculate scores for each domain.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 15, Week 14, Week 26, Week 38, Week 52, and Week 58, up to 58 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Reported Outcome: Change From Baseline in Pain Severity/Pain Interference Domain From Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire
score on a scaleHigh-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)Placebo
Pain Severity: Baseline (BL) (n=48,49,55)4.363 ± 2.11764.531 ± 2.00894.129 ± 2.0076
Pain Severity: CFB to Day 15 (n=38,42,47)-0.123 ± 1.34190.073 ± 1.50970.355 ± 1.7289
Pain Severity: CFB to Week (Wk) 14 (n=32,33,33)-0.146 ± 1.1520-0.068 ± 1.4608-0.152 ± 2.0918
Pain Severity: CFB to Week 26 (n=27,31,32)-0.377 ± 1.2460-0.290 ± 1.9865-0.563 ± 2.3751
Pain Severity: CFB to Week 38 (n=25,29,29)-0.267 ± 1.40790.026 ± 1.38930.333 ± 1.8430
Pain Severity: CFB to Week 52 (n=18,23,22)-0.634 ± 1.85010.130 ± 1.5899-0.310 ± 1.9508
Pain Severity: CFB to Wk 58 follow up (n=27,33,30)-0.145 ± 1.23090.091 ± 1.3790-0.444 ± 1.8626
Pain Interference: BL (n=48,49,55)4.643 ± 2.57264.656 ± 2.60994.995 ± 2.9470
Pain Interence: CFB to Day 15 (n=38,42,47)-0.674 ± 2.2868-0.099 ± 2.0435-0.816 ± 2.3556
Pain Interence: CFB to Wk 14 (n=32,33,33)-0.213 ± 2.3988-0.534 ± 2.7769-0.039 ± 3.0412
Pain Interference: CFB to Wk 26 (n=27,32,32)-0.583 ± 2.2844-0.728 ± 2.4220-0.821 ± 3.1561
Pain Interference: CFB to Wk 38 (n=25,29,29)-0.866 ± 2.7720-0.119 ± 1.6473-0.221 ± 3.1076
Pain Interference: CFB to Wk 52 (n=18,23,22)-1.014 ± 2.0989-0.174 ± 2.2510-0.819 ± 2.8490
Pain Interference: CFB to Wk 58 f/up (n=27,33,30)-0.476 ± 2.3473-0.386 ± 2.2249-0.802 ± 2.5785

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Event (AE) timeframe: Adverse events were collected from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment, up to a maximum duration of 58 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
High-dose SelG1 (5.0 mg/kg SelG1)2/66 (3%)17/66 (25.8%)46/66 (69.7%)
Low-dose SelG1 (2.5 mg/kg SelG101/64 (1.6%)21/64 (32.8%)47/64 (73.4%)
Placebo2/62 (3.2%)17/62 (27.4%)42/62 (67.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 66
Most frequent serious events
EventHigh-dose SelG1 (5.0 mg/kg SelG1)Low-dose SelG1 (2.5 mg/kg SelG10Placebo
PNEUMONIAInfections and infestations3/662/643/62
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations1/661/643/62
INFLUENZAInfections and infestations0/663/640/62
SICKLE CELL ANAEMIA WITH CRISISCongenital, familial and genetic disorders1/660/642/62
PYREXIAGeneral disorders2/660/641/62
LEUKOCYTOSISBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/660/641/62
RIGHT VENTRICULAR FAILURECardiac disorders0/660/641/62
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders0/660/641/62
NAUSEAGastrointestinal disorders0/660/641/62
VOMITINGGastrointestinal disorders0/660/641/62
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent other events
EventHigh-dose SelG1 (5.0 mg/kg SelG1)Low-dose SelG1 (2.5 mg/kg SelG10Placebo
HEADACHENervous system disorders11/6614/6410/62
BACK PAINMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders10/6612/647/62
NAUSEAGastrointestinal disorders12/6611/647/62
ARTHRALGIAMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders12/669/645/62
PAIN IN EXTREMITYMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders11/668/6410/62
URINARY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations8/666/646/62
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAINMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/664/646/62
COUGHRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/664/647/62
VOMITINGGastrointestinal disorders5/667/643/62
CHEST PAINGeneral disorders1/667/641/62

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-Treat (ITT): The ITT population includes all randomized patients.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)PlaceboTotal
Mean30.9 ± 10.8930.1 ± 9.7929.3 ± 10.3630.1 ± 10.33
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)PlaceboTotal
Female353638109
Male32302789
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino20121143
Not Hispanic or Latino455253150
Unknown or Not Reported2215
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)High-dose SelG1 (Selg1 5.0 mg/kg)Low-dose SelG1 (Selg1 2.5 mg/kg)PlaceboTotal
Black or African American606260182
White4239
Other3227
08

Study locations

56 sites
  • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Mobile, Alabama, United States
  • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
  • Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Oakland, California, United States
  • Orange, California, United States
  • Sacramento, California, United States
  • Aurora, Colorado, United States
  • New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
  • Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
  • Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  • Miami, Florida, United States
  • Orlando, Florida, United States
  • Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Augusta, Georgia, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Peoria, Illinois, United States
  • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
  • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
  • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Bethesda, Maryland, United States
  • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Jackson, Mississippi, United States
  • Kansas City, Missouri, United States
  • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
  • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Bronx, New York, United States
  • Brooklyn, New York, United States
  • New Hyde Park, New York, United States
  • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Greenville, North Carolina, United States
  • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Sumter, South Carolina, United States
  • Fort Worth, Texas, United States
  • Houston, Texas, United States
  • Norfolk, Virginia, United States
  • Richmond, Virginia, United States
  • Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
  • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
  • Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
  • São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • São Paulo, Brazil
  • Kingston, Jamaica
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ataga KI, Kutlar A, Kanter J, Liles D, Cancado R, Friedrisch J, Guthrie TH, Knight-Madden J, Alvarez OA, Gordeuk VR, Gualandro S, Colella MP, Smith WR, Rollins SA, Stocker JW, Rother RP. Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):429-439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611770. Epub 2016 Dec 3. PubMed 27959701 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01895361
Lead sponsor
Reprixys Pharmaceutical Corporation
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2013
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
Mar 2016
Results posted
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
Jan 31, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Crizanlizumab

Start the discussion