A Phase 3 interventional study of LH alone and LH with opportunistic salpingectomy in Benign Uterine Disease, sponsored by CHA University. Completed at 3 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to female participants aged 19 Years to 52 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-28.
Sponsored by CHA University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Recently, many gynecologic oncologists proposed that surgeons should consider opportunistic salpingectomy to prevent ovarian cancer for all patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. However, the safety and the consequences regarding ovarian function after salpingectomy have not yet to be established. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is compare the ovarian reserve via anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) between laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) alone and LH combined with salpingectomy.
66 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Diseases; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 68 is below the median of 98 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Diseases.
Browse Uterine Diseases studies →CHA University is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
LH, laparoscopic hysterectomy
Procedure: LH alone
LH, laparoscopic hysterectomy
Procedure: LH with opportunistic salpingectomy
LH, laparoscopic hysterectomy
LH, laparoscopic hysterectomy
Change in ovarian reserve
The primary outcome measure was the change of ovarian reserve, determined by the rate of decline in AMH level from before surgery to 3-month post-surgery with the following formula : decline rate (%) = 100 × (preoperative AMH level - postoperative AMH level) ÷ preoperative AMH level.
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
CHA University