ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07265505IMERRUpdated Feb 5, 2026

Study of Endometrial Immune and Microbiological Modifications in Cases of Recurrent Implantation Failure and/or Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

An interventional study of Endometrial Biopsy and Vaginal Swab in Recurrent Implantation Failure, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Infertility, Female, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-05.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The IMERR study aims to improve understanding of certain causes of infertility related to recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and/or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), conditions that affect many women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite medical advances, some patients repeatedly fail to achieve pregnancy, or experience repeated miscarriages. These situations may be linked to subtle immune or microbial disturbances in the uterus. This study seeks to identify immune and microbiological profiles in the endometrium during the implantation window-a crucial period when the embryo attaches to the uterine wall. We will compare women who have experienced RIF and/or RPL with women who have had no such history. Blood and uterine samples will be analyzed to investigate whether certain immune or microbial features are associated with these reproductive failures. The ultimate goal is to uncover predictive factors that may explain why some women experience implantation failure or pregnancy loss, and to lay the foundation for future personalized treatments to improve reproductive outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The IMERR study is a prospective, monocentric, controlled interventional study aiming to identify immune and microbiological signatures in the eutopic endometrium of women undergoing ART (IVF/ICSI), with and without a history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and/or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). RIF is defined as the absence of clinical pregnancy after at least three embryo transfers of good-quality blastocysts, and RPL as two or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 24 weeks of gestation.

Participants will be divided into two groups: a study group (with RIF and/or RPL) and a control group (without RIF or RPL). Endometrial biopsies will be collected during the implantation window, alongside peripheral blood and vaginal samples. These samples will undergo immunological and microbiological analyses, including histology, immunophenotyping, and microbiota profiling.

The study aims to (i) Characterize immune cell populations in the endometrium and blood, (ii) Investigate the endometrial microbiome and its potential dysbiosis, (iii) Explore associations between these biological profiles and clinical features such as endometriosis, adenomyosis, chronic endometritis, or uterine contractility disorders.

The study includes 100 participants and spans a total duration of 60 months (36 months for inclusion and 24 months of follow-up). A subgroup analysis will assess the association between immuno-microbiological profiles and clinical outcomes after embryo transfer within the 24-month post-inclusion period.

By identifying predictive markers of RIF and RPL, this study may help establish new diagnostic tools and personalized treatment strategies in reproductive medicine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Recurrent Implantation Failure
  • Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
  • Infertility, Female
  • Endometrial Diseases
  • Endometritis
  • Endometriosis
  • Adenomyosis

Keywords

  • Uterine Immune Profile
  • Endometrial Receptivity
  • Infertility
  • Recurrent Miscarriage
  • IVF Failure
  • Implantation Window
  • Reproductive Immunology
  • Endometrial Microbiome
  • Chronic Endometritis
  • Adenomyosis
  • Endometriosis
03

In context

Infertility, Female

552 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility, Female; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 378 interventional studies indexed under Infertility, Female.

Browse Infertility, Female studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female aged ≥18 and \<36 years
  • Undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) in a fertility center
  • Covered by the French national health insurance system
  • Belonging to one of two groups:

    • Study group: history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and/or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)
    • Control group: no history of RIF or RPL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant at inclusion
  • Refusal to provide written
  • Antibiotic use within one month prior to endometrial Positive serology for , or
  • Uterine anatomical abnormalities (e.g., polyps, cavity-distorting fibroids, untreated hydrosalpinx)
  • Known chromosomal abnormality in either partner
  • Known disease, thrombophilia, or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
  • Persons under legal protection (e.g., guardianship, curatorship)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    RIF/RPL group

    Women undergoing ART with a history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and/or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

    Diagnostic Test: Endometrial Biopsy · Diagnostic Test: Vaginal Swab · Diagnostic Test: Blood sample · Diagnostic Test: Pelvic ultrasound (±pelvic MRI)

  • Other
    Control group

    Women undergoing ART without a history of RIF or RPL.

    Diagnostic Test: Endometrial Biopsy · Diagnostic Test: Vaginal Swab · Diagnostic Test: Blood sample · Diagnostic Test: Pelvic ultrasound (±pelvic MRI)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testEndometrial Biopsy

    Endometrial biopsy with Cornier Pipelle (part of the treatment in the RIF/RPL group and some patients of the control group / added for the research for the other patients of the control group)

  • Diagnostic testVaginal Swab

    Vaginal sample collection using a cotton swab. Part of the treatment

  • Diagnostic testBlood sample

    Peripheral blood draw. Part of the treatment + 10 mL additional for research

  • Diagnostic testPelvic ultrasound (±pelvic MRI)

    Pelvic ultrasound (±pelvic MRI). Part of the treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Profiling of endometrial immune cell populations

    Profiling of endometrial immune cell populations (proportion of subpopulation) during the implantation window using single-cell transcriptomics and/or flow cytometry. Endometrial biopsies will be collected during the implantation window. Immune cell populations will be characterized using either single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and /or multiparametric flow cytometry, depending on technical feasibility and sample quality. For scRNA-seq, transcriptomic analysis will be performed (e.g., using the 10x Genomics platform), and immune cell types will be identified via clustering and annotation algorithms. For flow cytometry, immune subsets will be identified and quantified based on surface marker expression. Comparisons of immune profiles will be made between women with and without a history of RIF and/or RPL.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Microbiological profiling of endometrial tissue

    Microbiological profiling of endometrial tissue during the implantation window using next-generation sequencing (NGS) Endometrial microbiota will be characterized by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA extracted from endometrial biopsy samples collected during the implantation window. Diversity metrics (alpha and beta diversity) and relative abundances of microbial taxa will be compared between women with and without a history of RIF and/or RPL.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Characterization of peripheral blood immune cell populations

    Characterization of peripheral blood immune cell populations during the implantation window using single-cell transcriptomics and/or flow cytometry Peripheral blood samples will be collected at inclusion. Immune profiling will be performed to characterize circulating immune cell subpopulations. Depending on feasibility and sample quality, either single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and / or multiparametric flow cytometry may be used. Immune profiles will be compared between women with and without a history of RIF and/or RPL.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Exploratory analysis of associations between immune and microbiological profiles and clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics

    This outcome consists of exploratory analyses assessing the associations between previously measured immune and microbiological profiles (from endometrial tissue) and (i) clinical outcomes (e.g., pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth), (ii) radiological findings (e.g., adenomyosis, uterine contractility), and (iii) histological/bacteriological findings (e.g., chronic endometritis with CD138+ cells or vaginal cultures). No new biological measurements will be performed. Each association will be reported as a separate statistical outcome (e.g., odds ratios, p-values)

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Exploratory analysis of associations between immune and microbiological profiles and clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics

    This outcome consists of exploratory analyses assessing the associations between previously measured immune and microbiological profiles (from endometrial tissue) and (i) clinical outcomes (e.g., pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth), (ii) radiological findings (e.g., adenomyosis, uterine contractility), and (iii) histological/bacteriological findings (e.g., chronic endometritis with CD138+ cells or vaginal cultures). No new biological measurements will be performed. Each association will be reported as a separate statistical outcome (e.g., odds ratios, p-values)

    Time frame: Through 24 months of follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique II et Médecine de la Reproduction - Cochin Hospital
    Paris, IDF 75014, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Benner M, Ferwerda G, Joosten I, van der Molen RG. How uterine microbiota might be responsible for a receptive, fertile endometrium. Hum Reprod Update. 2018 Jul 1;24(4):393-415. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy012. PubMed 29668899 ↗
  • Bourdon M, Santulli P, Jeljeli M, Vannuccini S, Marcellin L, Doridot L, Petraglia F, Batteux F, Chapron C. Immunological changes associated with adenomyosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Jan 4;27(1):108-129. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa038. PubMed 33099635 ↗
  • Campo S, Campo V, Benagiano G. Infertility and adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:786132. doi: 10.1155/2012/786132. Epub 2011 Dec 26. PubMed 22242025 ↗
  • Chen P, Chen P, Guo Y, Fang C, Li T. Interaction Between Chronic Endometritis Caused Endometrial Microbiota Disorder and Endometrial Immune Environment Change in Recurrent Implantation Failure. Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 4;12:748447. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.748447. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34671363 ↗
  • Duffy JMN, Adamson GD, Benson E, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S, Bofill M, Brian K, Collura B, Curtis C, Evers JLH, Farquharson RG, Fincham A, Franik S, Giudice LC, Glanville E, Hickey M, Horne AW, Hull ML, Johnson NP, Jordan V, Khalaf Y, Knijnenburg JML, Legro RS, Lensen S, MacKenzie J, Mavrelos D, Mol BW, Morbeck DE, Nagels H, Ng EHY, Niederberger C, Otter AS, Puscasiu L, Rautakallio-Hokkanen S, Sadler L, Sarris I, Showell M, Stewart J, Strandell A, Strawbridge C, Vail A, van Wely M, Vercoe M, Vuong NL, Wang AY, Wang R, Wilkinson J, Wong K, Wong TY, Farquhar CM; Priority Setting Partnership for Infertility. Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study. Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 30. PubMed 33272617 ↗
  • ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL; Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, Middeldorp S, Mcheik S, Peramo B, Quenby S, Nielsen HS, van der Hoorn ML, Vermeulen N, Goddijn M. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022. Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Mar 2;2023(1):hoad002. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad002. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36873081 ↗
  • ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure; Cimadomo D, de Los Santos MJ, Griesinger G, Lainas G, Le Clef N, McLernon DJ, Montjean D, Toth B, Vermeulen N, Macklon N. ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Jun 15;2023(3):hoad023. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad023. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37332387 ↗
  • Giuliani E, Parkin KL, Lessey BA, Young SL, Fazleabas AT. Characterization of uterine NK cells in women with infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss and associated endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014 Sep;72(3):262-9. doi: 10.1111/aji.12259. Epub 2014 May 8. PubMed 24807109 ↗
  • Kunz G, Leyendecker G. Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4 Suppl 3:5-9. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(12)60108-4. PubMed 12470555 ↗
  • Ledee N, Petitbarat M, Prat-Ellenberg L, Dray G, Cassuto GN, Chevrier L, Kazhalawi A, Vezmar K, Chaouat G. The uterine immune profile: A method for individualizing the management of women who have failed to implant an embryo after IVF/ICSI. J Reprod Immunol. 2020 Nov;142:103207. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2020.103207. Epub 2020 Sep 14. PubMed 32971456 ↗
  • Marron K, Harrity C. Endometrial lymphocyte concentrations in adverse reproductive outcome populations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 May;36(5):837-846. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01427-8. Epub 2019 Mar 7. PubMed 30847699 ↗
  • McQueen DB, Bernardi LA, Stephenson MD. Chronic endometritis in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss and/or fetal demise. Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):1026-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.031. Epub 2014 Jan 23. PubMed 24462055 ↗
  • Ota H, Tanaka T. Stromal vascularization in the endometrium during adenomyosis. Microsc Res Tech. 2003 Mar 1;60(4):445-9. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10282. PubMed 12567401 ↗
  • Pirtea P, Cicinelli E, De Nola R, de Ziegler D, Ayoubi JM. Endometrial causes of recurrent pregnancy losses: endometriosis, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis. Fertil Steril. 2021 Mar;115(3):546-560. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Feb 11. PubMed 33581856 ↗
  • Rimmer MP, Fishwick K, Henderson I, Chinn D, Al Wattar BH, Quenby S. Quantifying CD138+ cells in the endometrium to assess chronic endometritis in women at risk of recurrent pregnancy loss: A prospective cohort study and rapid review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Feb;47(2):689-697. doi: 10.1111/jog.14585. Epub 2020 Dec 3. PubMed 33274569 ↗
  • Romero R, Espinoza J, Mazor M. Can endometrial infection/inflammation explain implantation failure, spontaneous abortion, and preterm birth after in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2004 Oct;82(4):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.076. PubMed 15482749 ↗
  • Vernon M, Stern JE, Ball GD, Wininger D, Mayer J, Racowsky C. Utility of the national embryo morphology data collection by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART): correlation between day-3 morphology grade and live-birth outcome. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2761-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 15. PubMed 21406305 ↗
  • Von Woon E, Greer O, Shah N, Nikolaou D, Johnson M, Male V. Number and function of uterine natural killer cells in recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2022 Jun 30;28(4):548-582. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac006. PubMed 35265977 ↗
  • Zhao Y, Chen X, Zhang T, Chan LKY, Liu Y, Chung JP, Kwong J, Li TC. The use of multiplex staining to measure the density and clustering of four endometrial immune cells around the implantation period in women with recurrent miscarriage: comparison with fertile controls. J Mol Histol. 2020 Oct;51(5):593-603. doi: 10.1007/s10735-020-09908-2. Epub 2020 Aug 28. PubMed 32857228 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Apr 2029, 36 months later.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Infertility, Female, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 155 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 26, 2025
First posted
Dec 4, 2025
StartEst.
Apr 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2029
CompletionEst.
Apr 2031
Last update
Feb 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07265505
Collaborators
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, ADREGOF, URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 4, 2025
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 5, 2026

Study contacts

Mathilde Bourdon, MD, PhD
Contact
mathilde.bourdon@aphp.fr
00331 58 41 35 51
Marie Benhammani-Godard
Contact
marie.godard@aphp.fr
Mathilde Bourdon, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique II et Médecine de la Reproduction - Cochin Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion